fixed match me, updated flag formatting

match-me/couple_list.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+There's really no need for this but whatever, this is the string that needs to be md5'd to get the flag
+(Alejandro,Kerri)(Angel,Corina)(Austen,Baylee)(Caden,Patrice)(Camron,Lourdes)(Carter,Kalyn)(Clyde,Krista)(Cortez,Lucia)(Cullen,Justine)(Daquan,Sandra)(Drake,Tianna)(Edwin,Virginia)(Elvin,Tierra)(Galen,Lacey)(Gary,Shirley)(Gerald,Valeria)(Greg,Norma)(Harold,Eunice)(Jerrod,Kathryn)(Jerry,Katrina)(Joseph,Alyssa)(Kenny,Jenifer)(Ladarius,Tatiana)(Leonard,Beth)(Luciano,Nikita)(Marc,Madison)(Mario,Keri)(Mathew,Alicia)(Maxwell,Devin)(Mickey,Crystal)(Mike,Ivette)(Myron,Robin)(Nathanial,Jacquelyn)(Nathaniel,Infant)(Quinten,Shelly)(Quinton,Lorena)(Rashad,Jessika)(Scott,Janae)(Shaun,Micah)(Tristan,Sherry)(Tyron,Darian)(Zachery,Dara)

match-me/description.md

@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ We received two files, one listing men and the other women. Each line contains a
 
 For example, the entry "Joe 4, 5, 3, 1, 2" means that Joe would most prefer the 4th entry on the opposite list, and least prefer the 2nd.
 
-We have heard that there is one pairing which will be together in all possible stable matchings, please discover who this couple is and provide their names as "<male_name>,<female_name>"
+We have heard that there are some pairings that will be together in all possible stable matchings, please find them. However, because there are quite a bit of them, please submit your solution as the following:
+
+MD5 hash of `(male_1,female_1)(male_2,female_2)...(male_n,female_n)`, where the pairings are sorted alphabetically by male names. For example, `(Bob,Susie)(Jim,Carol)(Tom,Emma)` would be submitted as `b0d75104ce4b3a7d892f745fd515fea4`.
 
 Here are the lists of preferences:[male preferences](${male_prefs_txt}), [female preferences](${female_prefs_txt}).

match-me/grader.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 def grade(autogen, key):
-    if key.find("Paris,Blair") != -1:
+    if key.find("fe18ebaf381a63b3bf6a76cadcaaeb6e") != -1:
         return True, "Correct!"
     return False, "Nope!"