Work on the construction of exact couples

This commit is contained in:
Floris van Doorn 2017-05-11 17:17:50 -04:00
parent 7ee38d255c
commit cea1250ca6
8 changed files with 672 additions and 360 deletions

View file

@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ definition graded_hom.mk_out [constructor] (d : I ≃ I)
(fn : Πi, M₁ (d⁻¹ i) →lm M₂ i) : M₁ →gm M₂ :=
graded_hom.mk' d (λi j p, fn j ∘lm homomorphism_of_eq (ap M₁ (eq_inv_of_eq p)))
definition graded_hom.mk_out' [constructor] (d : I ≃ I)
(fn : Πi, M₁ (d i) →lm M₂ i) : M₁ →gm M₂ :=
graded_hom.mk' d⁻¹ᵉ (λi j p, fn j ∘lm homomorphism_of_eq (ap M₁ (eq_inv_of_eq p)))
definition graded_hom.mk_out_in [constructor] (d₁ : I ≃ I) (d₂ : I ≃ I)
(fn : Πi, M₁ (d₁ i) →lm M₂ (d₂ i)) : M₁ →gm M₂ :=
graded_hom.mk' (d₁⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e d₂) (λi j p, homomorphism_of_eq (ap M₂ p) ∘lm fn (d₁⁻¹ᵉ i) ∘lm
@ -115,6 +119,16 @@ definition graded_hom_mk_refl (d : I ≃ I)
(fn : Πi, M₁ i →lm M₂ (d i)) {i : I} (m : M₁ i) : graded_hom.mk d fn i m = fn i m :=
by reflexivity
definition graded_hom_mk_out'_left_inv (d : I ≃ I)
(fn : Πi, M₁ (d i) →lm M₂ i) {i : I} (m : M₁ (d i)) :
graded_hom.mk_out' d fn ↘ (left_inv d i) m = fn i m :=
begin
unfold [graded_hom.mk_out'],
apply ap (λx, fn i (cast x m)),
refine !ap_compose⁻¹ ⬝ ap02 _ _,
apply is_set.elim --we can also prove this in arbitrary types
end
definition graded_hom_eq_zero {f : M₁ →gm M₂} {i j k : I} {q : deg f i = j} {p : deg f i = k}
(m : M₁ i) (r : f ↘ q m = 0) : f ↘ p m = 0 :=
have f ↘ p m = transport M₂ (q⁻¹ ⬝ p) (f ↘ q m), begin induction p, induction q, reflexivity end,
@ -488,9 +502,6 @@ definition graded_homology_elim {g : M₂ →gm M₃} {f : M₁ →gm M₂} (h :
(H : compose_constant h f) : graded_homology g f →gm M :=
graded_hom.mk (deg h) (λi, homology_elim (h i) (H _ _))
/- exact couples -/
definition is_exact_gmod (f : M₁ →gm M₂) (f' : M₂ →gm M₃) : Type :=
Π⦃i j k⦄ (p : deg f i = j) (q : deg f' j = k), is_exact_mod (f ↘ p) (f' ↘ q)
@ -502,336 +513,11 @@ begin intro i j k p q; induction p; induction q; split, apply h₁, apply h₂ e
definition gmod_im_in_ker (h : is_exact_gmod f f') : compose_constant f' f :=
λi j k p q, is_exact.im_in_ker (h p q)
-- structure exact_couple (M₁ M₂ : graded_module R I) : Type :=
-- (i : M₁ →gm M₁) (j : M₁ →gm M₂) (k : M₂ →gm M₁)
-- (exact_ij : is_exact_gmod i j)
-- (exact_jk : is_exact_gmod j k)
-- (exact_ki : is_exact_gmod k i)
-- definition is_exact_gmod_mk_mk_out' {d₁ d₂ : I ≃ I} (fn₁ : Πi, M₁ i →lm M₂ (d₁ i))
-- (fn₂ : Πi, M₂ (d₂ i) →lm M₃ i) (H : Πi, is_exact_mod (fn₁ i) _) : is_exact_gmod (graded_hom.mk d₁ fn₁) (graded_hom.mk_out' d₂ fn₂) :=
-- begin
end left_module
namespace left_module
structure exact_couple (R : Ring) (I : Set) : Type :=
(D E : graded_module R I)
(i : D →gm D) (j : D →gm E) (k : E →gm D)
(ij : is_exact_gmod i j)
(jk : is_exact_gmod j k)
(ki : is_exact_gmod k i)
namespace derived_couple
section
open exact_couple
parameters {R : Ring} {I : Set} (X : exact_couple R I)
local abbreviation D := D X
local abbreviation E := E X
local abbreviation i := i X
local abbreviation j := j X
local abbreviation k := k X
local abbreviation ij := ij X
local abbreviation jk := jk X
local abbreviation ki := ki X
definition d : E →gm E := j ∘gm k
definition D' : graded_module R I := graded_image i
definition E' : graded_module R I := graded_homology d d
definition is_contr_E' {x : I} (H : is_contr (E x)) : is_contr (E' x) :=
!is_contr_homology
definition is_contr_D' {x : I} (H : is_contr (D x)) : is_contr (D' x) :=
!is_contr_image_module
definition i' : D' →gm D' :=
graded_image_lift i ∘gm graded_submodule_incl _
-- degree i + 0
lemma is_surjective_i' {x y : I} (p : deg i' x = y)
(H : Π⦃z⦄ (q : deg i z = x), is_surjective (i ↘ q)) : is_surjective (i' ↘ p) :=
begin
apply is_surjective_graded_hom_compose,
{ intro y q, apply is_surjective_graded_image_lift },
{ intro y q, apply is_surjective_of_is_equiv,
induction q,
exact to_is_equiv (equiv_of_isomorphism (image_module_isomorphism (i ← x) (H _)))
}
end
lemma j_lemma1 ⦃x : I⦄ (m : D x) : d ((deg j) x) (j x m) = 0 :=
begin
rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn,↑d,graded_hom_compose_fn],
refine ap (graded_hom_fn j (deg k (deg j x))) _ ⬝
!to_respect_zero,
exact compose_constant.elim (gmod_im_in_ker (jk)) x m
end
lemma j_lemma2 : Π⦃x : I⦄ ⦃m : D x⦄ (p : i x m = 0),
(graded_quotient_map _ ∘gm graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1) x m = 0 :> E' _ :=
begin
have Π⦃x y : I⦄ (q : deg k x = y) (r : deg d x = deg j y)
(s : ap (deg j) q = r) ⦃m : D y⦄ (p : i y m = 0), image (d ↘ r) (j y m),
begin
intros, induction s, induction q,
note m_in_im_k := is_exact.ker_in_im (ki idp _) _ p,
induction m_in_im_k with e q,
induction q,
apply image.mk e idp
end,
have Π⦃x : I⦄ ⦃m : D x⦄ (p : i x m = 0), image (d ← (deg j x)) (j x m),
begin
intros,
refine this _ _ _ p,
exact to_right_inv (deg k) _ ⬝ to_left_inv (deg j) x,
apply is_set.elim
-- rewrite [ap_con, -adj],
end,
intros,
rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn],
exact quotient_map_eq_zero _ (this p)
end
definition j' : D' →gm E' :=
graded_image_elim (graded_homology_intro d d ∘gm graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1) j_lemma2
-- degree deg j - deg i
theorem k_lemma1 ⦃x : I⦄ (m : E x) : image (i ← (deg k x)) (k x m) :=
begin
exact sorry
end
theorem k_lemma2 : compose_constant (graded_hom_lift k k_lemma1 : E →gm D') d :=
begin
-- apply compose_constant.mk, intro x m,
-- rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn],
-- refine ap (graded_hom_fn (graded_image_lift i) (deg k (deg d x))) _ ⬝ !to_respect_zero,
-- exact compose_constant.elim (gmod_im_in_ker jk) (deg k x) (k x m)
exact sorry
end
definition k' : E' →gm D' :=
graded_homology_elim (graded_hom_lift k k_lemma1) k_lemma2
definition deg_i' : deg i' ~ deg i := by reflexivity
definition deg_j' : deg j' ~ deg j ∘ (deg i)⁻¹ := by reflexivity
definition deg_k' : deg k' ~ deg k := by reflexivity
theorem i'j' : is_exact_gmod i' j' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ intro x, refine total_image.rec _, intro m, exact sorry
-- exact calc
-- j' (deg i' x) (i' x ⟨(i ← x) m, image.mk m idp⟩)
-- = j' (deg i' x) (graded_image_lift i x ((i ← x) m)) : idp
-- ... = graded_homology_intro d d (deg j ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x)))
-- (graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1 ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x))
-- (i ↘ (!to_right_inv ⬝ !to_left_inv⁻¹) m)) : _
-- ... = graded_homology_intro d d (deg j ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x)))
-- (graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1 ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x))
-- (i ↘ (!to_right_inv ⬝ !to_left_inv⁻¹) m)) : _
-- ... = 0 : _
},
{ exact sorry }
end
theorem j'k' : is_exact_gmod j' k' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
theorem k'i' : is_exact_gmod k' i' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ intro x m, exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
end
end derived_couple
section
open derived_couple exact_couple
definition derived_couple [constructor] {R : Ring} {I : Set}
(X : exact_couple R I) : exact_couple R I :=
⦃exact_couple, D := D' X, E := E' X, i := i' X, j := j' X, k := k' X,
ij := i'j' X, jk := j'k' X, ki := k'i' X⦄
parameters {R : Ring} {I : Set} (X : exact_couple R I) (B B' : I → )
(Dub : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, (deg (i X))^[s] x = y → B x ≤ s → is_contr (D X y))
(Eub : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, (deg (k X))⁻¹ (iterate (deg (i X)) s ((deg (j X))⁻¹ x)) = y →
B x ≤ s → is_contr (E X y))
(Dlb : Π⦃x y z⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄ (p : deg (i X) x = y),
iterate (deg (i X)) s y = z → B' z ≤ s → is_surjective (i X ↘ p))
(Elb : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, deg (j X) (iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ s (deg (k X) x)) = y → B x ≤ s →
is_contr (E X y))
(deg_ik_commute : deg (i X) ∘ deg (k X) ~ deg (k X) ∘ deg (i X))
definition deg_iterate_ik_commute (n : ) (x : I) :
(deg (i X))^[n] (deg (k X) x) = deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x) :=
iterate_commute _ deg_ik_commute x
-- we start counting pages at 0, not at 2.
definition page (r : ) : exact_couple R I :=
iterate derived_couple r X
definition is_contr_E (r : ) (x : I) (h : is_contr (E X x)) :
is_contr (E (page r) x) :=
by induction r with r IH; exact h; exact is_contr_E' (page r) IH
definition is_contr_D (r : ) (x : I) (h : is_contr (D X x)) :
is_contr (D (page r) x) :=
by induction r with r IH; exact h; exact is_contr_D' (page r) IH
definition deg_i (r : ) : deg (i (page r)) ~ deg (i X) :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact IH }
end
definition deg_k (r : ) : deg (k (page r)) ~ deg (k X) :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact IH }
end
definition deg_j (r : ) :
deg (j (page r)) ~ deg (j X) ∘ iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ r :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ refine hwhisker_left (deg (j (page r)))
(to_inv_homotopy_inv (deg_i r)) ⬝hty _,
refine hwhisker_right _ IH ⬝hty _,
apply hwhisker_left, symmetry, apply iterate_succ }
end
definition deg_j_inv (r : ) :
(deg (j (page r)))⁻¹ ~ iterate (deg (i X)) r ∘ (deg (j X))⁻¹ :=
have H : deg (j (page r)) ~ iterate_equiv (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ r ⬝e deg (j X), from deg_j r,
λx, to_inv_homotopy_to_inv H x ⬝ iterate_inv (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ r ((deg (j X))⁻¹ x)
definition deg_d (r : ) :
deg (d (page r)) ~ deg (j X) ∘ iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ r ∘ deg (k X) :=
compose2 (deg_j r) (deg_k r)
definition deg_d_inv (r : ) :
(deg (d (page r)))⁻¹ ~ (deg (k X))⁻¹ ∘ iterate (deg (i X)) r ∘ (deg (j X))⁻¹ :=
compose2 (to_inv_homotopy_to_inv (deg_k r)) (deg_j_inv r)
include Elb Eub
definition Estable {x : I} {r : } (H : B x ≤ r) :
E (page (r + 1)) x ≃lm E (page r) x :=
begin
change homology (d (page r) x) (d (page r) ← x) ≃lm E (page r) x,
apply homology_isomorphism: apply is_contr_E,
exact Eub (deg_d_inv r x)⁻¹ H, exact Elb (deg_d r x)⁻¹ H
end
include Dlb
definition is_surjective_i {x y z : I} {r s : } (H : B' z ≤ s + r)
(p : deg (i (page r)) x = y) (q : iterate (deg (i X)) s y = z) :
is_surjective (i (page r) ↘ p) :=
begin
revert x y z s H p q, induction r with r IH: intro x y z s H p q,
{ exact Dlb p q H },
{ change is_surjective (i' (page r) ↘ p),
apply is_surjective_i', intro z' q',
refine IH _ _ _ _ (le.trans H (le_of_eq (succ_add s r)⁻¹)) _ _,
refine !iterate_succ ⬝ ap ((deg (i X))^[s]) _ ⬝ q,
exact !deg_i⁻¹ ⬝ p }
end
definition Dstable {x : I} {r : } (H : B' x ≤ r) :
D (page (r + 1)) x ≃lm D (page r) x :=
begin
change image_module (i (page r) ← x) ≃lm D (page r) x,
refine image_module_isomorphism (i (page r) ← x)
(is_surjective_i (le.trans H (le_of_eq !zero_add⁻¹)) _ _),
reflexivity
end
definition Einf : graded_module R I :=
λx, E (page (B x)) x
definition Dinf : graded_module R I :=
λx, D (page (B' x)) x
definition Einfstable {x y : I} {r : } (Hr : B y ≤ r) (p : x = y) :
Einf y ≃lm E (page r) x :=
by symmetry; induction p; induction Hr with r Hr IH; reflexivity; exact Estable Hr ⬝lm IH
definition Dinfstable {x y : I} {r : } (Hr : B' y ≤ r) (p : x = y) :
Dinf y ≃lm D (page r) x :=
by symmetry; induction p; induction Hr with r Hr IH; reflexivity; exact Dstable Hr ⬝lm IH
parameters {x : I}
definition r (n : ) : :=
max (max (B x + n + 1) (B ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(max (B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(max (B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n+1] x))) (B ((deg (j X))⁻¹ ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))))
lemma rb0 (n : ) : r n ≥ n + 1 :=
ge.trans !le_max_left (ge.trans !le_max_left !le_add_left)
lemma rb1 (n : ) : B x ≤ r n - (n + 1) :=
le_sub_of_add_le (le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_left)
lemma rb2 (n : ) : B ((deg (i X))^[n] x) ≤ r n :=
le.trans !le_max_right !le_max_left
lemma rb3 (n : ) : B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_right
lemma rb4 (n : ) : B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n+1] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans (le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_right) !le_max_right
lemma rb5 (n : ) : B ((deg (j X))⁻¹ ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans (le.trans !le_max_right !le_max_right) !le_max_right
definition Einfdiag : graded_module R :=
λn, Einf ((deg (i X))^[n] x)
definition Dinfdiag : graded_module R :=
λn, Dinf (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x))
include deg_ik_commute Dub
definition short_exact_mod_page_r (n : ) : short_exact_mod
(E (page (r n)) ((deg (i X))^[n] x))
(D (page (r n)) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(D (page (r n)) (deg (i (page (r n))) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))) :=
begin
fapply short_exact_mod_of_is_exact,
{ exact j (page (r n)) ← ((deg (i X))^[n] x) },
{ exact k (page (r n)) ((deg (i X))^[n] x) },
{ exact i (page (r n)) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) },
{ exact j (page (r n)) _ },
{ apply is_contr_D, refine Dub !deg_j_inv⁻¹ (rb5 n) },
{ apply is_contr_E, refine Elb _ (rb1 n),
refine ap (deg (j X)) _ ⬝ !deg_j⁻¹,
refine iterate_sub _ !rb0 _ ⬝ _, apply ap (_^[r n]),
exact ap (deg (i X)) (!deg_iterate_ik_commute ⬝ !deg_k⁻¹) ⬝ !deg_i⁻¹ },
{ apply jk (page (r n)) },
{ apply ki (page (r n)) },
{ apply ij (page (r n)) }
end
definition short_exact_mod_infpage (n : ) :
short_exact_mod (Einfdiag n) (Dinfdiag n) (Dinfdiag (n+1)) :=
begin
refine short_exact_mod_isomorphism _ _ _ (short_exact_mod_page_r n),
{ exact Einfstable !rb2 idp },
{ exact Dinfstable !rb3 !deg_k },
{ exact Dinfstable !rb4 (!deg_i ⬝ ap (deg (i X)) !deg_k ⬝ !deg_ik_commute) }
end
definition Dinfdiag0 (bound_zero : B' (deg (k X) x) = 0) : Dinfdiag 0 ≃lm D X (deg (k X) x) :=
Dinfstable (le_of_eq bound_zero) idp
definition Dinfdiag_stable {s : } (h : B (deg (k X) x) ≤ s) : is_contr (Dinfdiag s) :=
is_contr_D _ _ (Dub !deg_iterate_ik_commute h)
end
-- end
end left_module

View file

@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
/- Exact couples of graded (left-) R-modules. -/
-- Author: Floris van Doorn
import .graded ..homotopy.spectrum .product_group
open algebra is_trunc left_module is_equiv equiv eq function nat
-- move
section
open group int chain_complex pointed succ_str
definition LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup [constructor] (A : AbGroup) : LeftModule r :=
LeftModule.mk A (left_module.mk sorry sorry sorry sorry 1 sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry)
definition lm_hom_int.mk [constructor] {A B : AbGroup} (φ : A →g B) :
LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup A →lm LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup B :=
homomorphism.mk φ sorry
definition is_exact_of_is_exact_at {N : succ_str} {A : chain_complex N} {n : N}
(H : is_exact_at A n) : is_exact (cc_to_fn A (S n)) (cc_to_fn A n) :=
is_exact.mk (cc_is_chain_complex A n) H
end
/- exact couples -/
namespace left_module
structure exact_couple (R : Ring) (I : Set) : Type :=
(D E : graded_module R I)
(i : D →gm D) (j : D →gm E) (k : E →gm D)
(ij : is_exact_gmod i j)
(jk : is_exact_gmod j k)
(ki : is_exact_gmod k i)
namespace derived_couple
section
open exact_couple
parameters {R : Ring} {I : Set} (X : exact_couple R I)
local abbreviation D := D X
local abbreviation E := E X
local abbreviation i := i X
local abbreviation j := j X
local abbreviation k := k X
local abbreviation ij := ij X
local abbreviation jk := jk X
local abbreviation ki := ki X
definition d : E →gm E := j ∘gm k
definition D' : graded_module R I := graded_image i
definition E' : graded_module R I := graded_homology d d
definition is_contr_E' {x : I} (H : is_contr (E x)) : is_contr (E' x) :=
!is_contr_homology
definition is_contr_D' {x : I} (H : is_contr (D x)) : is_contr (D' x) :=
!is_contr_image_module
definition i' : D' →gm D' :=
graded_image_lift i ∘gm graded_submodule_incl _
-- degree i + 0
lemma is_surjective_i' {x y : I} (p : deg i' x = y)
(H : Π⦃z⦄ (q : deg i z = x), is_surjective (i ↘ q)) : is_surjective (i' ↘ p) :=
begin
apply is_surjective_graded_hom_compose,
{ intro y q, apply is_surjective_graded_image_lift },
{ intro y q, apply is_surjective_of_is_equiv,
induction q,
exact to_is_equiv (equiv_of_isomorphism (image_module_isomorphism (i ← x) (H _)))
}
end
lemma j_lemma1 ⦃x : I⦄ (m : D x) : d ((deg j) x) (j x m) = 0 :=
begin
rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn,↑d,graded_hom_compose_fn],
refine ap (graded_hom_fn j (deg k (deg j x))) _ ⬝
!to_respect_zero,
exact compose_constant.elim (gmod_im_in_ker (jk)) x m
end
lemma j_lemma2 : Π⦃x : I⦄ ⦃m : D x⦄ (p : i x m = 0),
(graded_quotient_map _ ∘gm graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1) x m = 0 :> E' _ :=
begin
have Π⦃x y : I⦄ (q : deg k x = y) (r : deg d x = deg j y)
(s : ap (deg j) q = r) ⦃m : D y⦄ (p : i y m = 0), image (d ↘ r) (j y m),
begin
intros, induction s, induction q,
note m_in_im_k := is_exact.ker_in_im (ki idp _) _ p,
induction m_in_im_k with e q,
induction q,
apply image.mk e idp
end,
have Π⦃x : I⦄ ⦃m : D x⦄ (p : i x m = 0), image (d ← (deg j x)) (j x m),
begin
intros,
refine this _ _ _ p,
exact to_right_inv (deg k) _ ⬝ to_left_inv (deg j) x,
apply is_set.elim
-- rewrite [ap_con, -adj],
end,
intros,
rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn],
exact quotient_map_eq_zero _ (this p)
end
definition j' : D' →gm E' :=
graded_image_elim (graded_homology_intro d d ∘gm graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1) j_lemma2
-- degree deg j - deg i
lemma k_lemma1 ⦃x : I⦄ (m : E x) : image (i ← (deg k x)) (k x m) :=
begin
exact sorry
end
lemma k_lemma2 : compose_constant (graded_hom_lift k k_lemma1 : E →gm D') d :=
begin
-- apply compose_constant.mk, intro x m,
-- rewrite [graded_hom_compose_fn],
-- refine ap (graded_hom_fn (graded_image_lift i) (deg k (deg d x))) _ ⬝ !to_respect_zero,
-- exact compose_constant.elim (gmod_im_in_ker jk) (deg k x) (k x m)
exact sorry
end
definition k' : E' →gm D' :=
graded_homology_elim (graded_hom_lift k k_lemma1) k_lemma2
definition deg_i' : deg i' ~ deg i := by reflexivity
definition deg_j' : deg j' ~ deg j ∘ (deg i)⁻¹ := by reflexivity
definition deg_k' : deg k' ~ deg k := by reflexivity
lemma i'j' : is_exact_gmod i' j' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ intro x, refine total_image.rec _, intro m, exact sorry
-- exact calc
-- j' (deg i' x) (i' x ⟨(i ← x) m, image.mk m idp⟩)
-- = j' (deg i' x) (graded_image_lift i x ((i ← x) m)) : idp
-- ... = graded_homology_intro d d (deg j ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x)))
-- (graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1 ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x))
-- (i ↘ (!to_right_inv ⬝ !to_left_inv⁻¹) m)) : _
-- ... = graded_homology_intro d d (deg j ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x)))
-- (graded_hom_lift j j_lemma1 ((deg i)⁻¹ᵉ (deg i x))
-- (i ↘ (!to_right_inv ⬝ !to_left_inv⁻¹) m)) : _
-- ... = 0 : _
},
{ exact sorry }
end
lemma j'k' : is_exact_gmod j' k' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
lemma k'i' : is_exact_gmod k' i' :=
begin
apply is_exact_gmod.mk,
{ intro x m, exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
end
end derived_couple
section
open derived_couple exact_couple
definition derived_couple [constructor] {R : Ring} {I : Set}
(X : exact_couple R I) : exact_couple R I :=
⦃exact_couple, D := D' X, E := E' X, i := i' X, j := j' X, k := k' X,
ij := i'j' X, jk := j'k' X, ki := k'i' X⦄
parameters {R : Ring} {I : Set} (X : exact_couple R I) (B B' : I → )
(Dub : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, (deg (i X))^[s] x = y → B x ≤ s → is_contr (D X y))
(Eub : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, (deg (k X))⁻¹ (iterate (deg (i X)) s ((deg (j X))⁻¹ x)) = y →
B x ≤ s → is_contr (E X y))
(Dlb : Π⦃x y z⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄ (p : deg (i X) x = y),
iterate (deg (i X)) s y = z → B' z ≤ s → is_surjective (i X ↘ p))
(Elb : Π⦃x y⦄ ⦃s : ℕ⦄, deg (j X) (iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ s (deg (k X) x)) = y → B x ≤ s →
is_contr (E X y))
(deg_ik_commute : deg (i X) ∘ deg (k X) ~ deg (k X) ∘ deg (i X))
definition deg_iterate_ik_commute (n : ) (x : I) :
(deg (i X))^[n] (deg (k X) x) = deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x) :=
iterate_commute _ deg_ik_commute x
-- we start counting pages at 0, not at 2.
definition page (r : ) : exact_couple R I :=
iterate derived_couple r X
definition is_contr_E (r : ) (x : I) (h : is_contr (E X x)) :
is_contr (E (page r) x) :=
by induction r with r IH; exact h; exact is_contr_E' (page r) IH
definition is_contr_D (r : ) (x : I) (h : is_contr (D X x)) :
is_contr (D (page r) x) :=
by induction r with r IH; exact h; exact is_contr_D' (page r) IH
definition deg_i (r : ) : deg (i (page r)) ~ deg (i X) :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact IH }
end
definition deg_k (r : ) : deg (k (page r)) ~ deg (k X) :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact IH }
end
definition deg_j (r : ) :
deg (j (page r)) ~ deg (j X) ∘ iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ r :=
begin
induction r with r IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ refine hwhisker_left (deg (j (page r)))
(to_inv_homotopy_inv (deg_i r)) ⬝hty _,
refine hwhisker_right _ IH ⬝hty _,
apply hwhisker_left, symmetry, apply iterate_succ }
end
definition deg_j_inv (r : ) :
(deg (j (page r)))⁻¹ ~ iterate (deg (i X)) r ∘ (deg (j X))⁻¹ :=
have H : deg (j (page r)) ~ iterate_equiv (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ r ⬝e deg (j X), from deg_j r,
λx, to_inv_homotopy_to_inv H x ⬝ iterate_inv (deg (i X))⁻¹ᵉ r ((deg (j X))⁻¹ x)
definition deg_d (r : ) :
deg (d (page r)) ~ deg (j X) ∘ iterate (deg (i X))⁻¹ r ∘ deg (k X) :=
compose2 (deg_j r) (deg_k r)
definition deg_d_inv (r : ) :
(deg (d (page r)))⁻¹ ~ (deg (k X))⁻¹ ∘ iterate (deg (i X)) r ∘ (deg (j X))⁻¹ :=
compose2 (to_inv_homotopy_to_inv (deg_k r)) (deg_j_inv r)
include Elb Eub
definition Estable {x : I} {r : } (H : B x ≤ r) :
E (page (r + 1)) x ≃lm E (page r) x :=
begin
change homology (d (page r) x) (d (page r) ← x) ≃lm E (page r) x,
apply homology_isomorphism: apply is_contr_E,
exact Eub (deg_d_inv r x)⁻¹ H, exact Elb (deg_d r x)⁻¹ H
end
include Dlb
definition is_surjective_i {x y z : I} {r s : } (H : B' z ≤ s + r)
(p : deg (i (page r)) x = y) (q : iterate (deg (i X)) s y = z) :
is_surjective (i (page r) ↘ p) :=
begin
revert x y z s H p q, induction r with r IH: intro x y z s H p q,
{ exact Dlb p q H },
{ change is_surjective (i' (page r) ↘ p),
apply is_surjective_i', intro z' q',
refine IH _ _ _ _ (le.trans H (le_of_eq (succ_add s r)⁻¹)) _ _,
refine !iterate_succ ⬝ ap ((deg (i X))^[s]) _ ⬝ q,
exact !deg_i⁻¹ ⬝ p }
end
definition Dstable {x : I} {r : } (H : B' x ≤ r) :
D (page (r + 1)) x ≃lm D (page r) x :=
begin
change image_module (i (page r) ← x) ≃lm D (page r) x,
refine image_module_isomorphism (i (page r) ← x)
(is_surjective_i (le.trans H (le_of_eq !zero_add⁻¹)) _ _),
reflexivity
end
definition Einf : graded_module R I :=
λx, E (page (B x)) x
definition Dinf : graded_module R I :=
λx, D (page (B' x)) x
definition Einfstable {x y : I} {r : } (Hr : B y ≤ r) (p : x = y) :
Einf y ≃lm E (page r) x :=
by symmetry; induction p; induction Hr with r Hr IH; reflexivity; exact Estable Hr ⬝lm IH
definition Dinfstable {x y : I} {r : } (Hr : B' y ≤ r) (p : x = y) :
Dinf y ≃lm D (page r) x :=
by symmetry; induction p; induction Hr with r Hr IH; reflexivity; exact Dstable Hr ⬝lm IH
parameters {x : I}
definition r (n : ) : :=
max (max (B x + n + 1) (B ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(max (B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(max (B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n+1] x))) (B ((deg (j X))⁻¹ ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))))
lemma rb0 (n : ) : r n ≥ n + 1 :=
ge.trans !le_max_left (ge.trans !le_max_left !le_add_left)
lemma rb1 (n : ) : B x ≤ r n - (n + 1) :=
le_sub_of_add_le (le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_left)
lemma rb2 (n : ) : B ((deg (i X))^[n] x) ≤ r n :=
le.trans !le_max_right !le_max_left
lemma rb3 (n : ) : B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_right
lemma rb4 (n : ) : B' (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n+1] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans (le.trans !le_max_left !le_max_right) !le_max_right
lemma rb5 (n : ) : B ((deg (j X))⁻¹ ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) ≤ r n :=
le.trans (le.trans !le_max_right !le_max_right) !le_max_right
definition Einfdiag : graded_module R :=
λn, Einf ((deg (i X))^[n] x)
definition Dinfdiag : graded_module R :=
λn, Dinf (deg (k X) ((deg (i X))^[n] x))
include deg_ik_commute Dub
definition short_exact_mod_page_r (n : ) : short_exact_mod
(E (page (r n)) ((deg (i X))^[n] x))
(D (page (r n)) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))
(D (page (r n)) (deg (i (page (r n))) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)))) :=
begin
fapply short_exact_mod_of_is_exact,
{ exact j (page (r n)) ← ((deg (i X))^[n] x) },
{ exact k (page (r n)) ((deg (i X))^[n] x) },
{ exact i (page (r n)) (deg (k (page (r n))) ((deg (i X))^[n] x)) },
{ exact j (page (r n)) _ },
{ apply is_contr_D, refine Dub !deg_j_inv⁻¹ (rb5 n) },
{ apply is_contr_E, refine Elb _ (rb1 n),
refine ap (deg (j X)) _ ⬝ !deg_j⁻¹,
refine iterate_sub _ !rb0 _ ⬝ _, apply ap (_^[r n]),
exact ap (deg (i X)) (!deg_iterate_ik_commute ⬝ !deg_k⁻¹) ⬝ !deg_i⁻¹ },
{ apply jk (page (r n)) },
{ apply ki (page (r n)) },
{ apply ij (page (r n)) }
end
definition short_exact_mod_infpage (n : ) :
short_exact_mod (Einfdiag n) (Dinfdiag n) (Dinfdiag (n+1)) :=
begin
refine short_exact_mod_isomorphism _ _ _ (short_exact_mod_page_r n),
{ exact Einfstable !rb2 idp },
{ exact Dinfstable !rb3 !deg_k },
{ exact Dinfstable !rb4 (!deg_i ⬝ ap (deg (i X)) !deg_k ⬝ !deg_ik_commute) }
end
definition Dinfdiag0 (bound_zero : B' (deg (k X) x) = 0) : Dinfdiag 0 ≃lm D X (deg (k X) x) :=
Dinfstable (le_of_eq bound_zero) idp
definition Dinfdiag_stable {s : } (h : B (deg (k X) x) ≤ s) : is_contr (Dinfdiag s) :=
is_contr_D _ _ (Dub !deg_iterate_ik_commute h)
end
end left_module
open left_module
namespace pointed
-- move
open pointed int group is_trunc trunc is_conn
section
variables {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B) [ab_group A]
-- to group
definition group_equiv_mul_comm (b b' : B) : group_equiv_mul f b b' = group_equiv_mul f b' b :=
by rewrite [↑group_equiv_mul, mul.comm]
definition ab_group_equiv_closed : ab_group B :=
⦃ab_group, group_equiv_closed f,
mul_comm := group_equiv_mul_comm f⦄
end
definition ab_group_of_is_contr (A : Type) [is_contr A] : ab_group A :=
have ab_group unit, from ab_group_unit,
ab_group_equiv_closed (equiv_unit_of_is_contr A)⁻¹ᵉ
definition group_of_is_contr (A : Type) [is_contr A] : group A :=
have ab_group A, from ab_group_of_is_contr A, by apply _
definition ab_group_lift_unit : ab_group (lift unit) :=
ab_group_of_is_contr (lift unit)
definition trivial_ab_group_lift : AbGroup :=
AbGroup.mk _ ab_group_lift_unit
definition homomorphism_of_is_contr_right (A : Group) {B : Type} (H : is_contr B) :
A →g Group.mk B (group_of_is_contr B) :=
group.homomorphism.mk (λa, center _) (λa a', !is_prop.elim)
definition ab_group_homotopy_group_of_is_conn (n : ) (A : Type*) [H : is_conn 1 A] : ab_group (π[n] A) :=
begin
have is_conn 0 A, from !is_conn_of_is_conn_succ,
cases n with n,
{ unfold [homotopy_group, ptrunc], apply ab_group_of_is_contr },
cases n with n,
{ unfold [homotopy_group, ptrunc], apply ab_group_of_is_contr },
exact ab_group_homotopy_group n A
end
definition homotopy_group_conn_nat (n : ) (A : Type*[1]) : AbGroup :=
AbGroup.mk (π[n] A) (ab_group_homotopy_group_of_is_conn n A)
definition homotopy_group_conn : Π(n : ) (A : Type*[1]), AbGroup
| (of_nat n) A := homotopy_group_conn_nat n A
| (-[1+ n]) A := trivial_ab_group_lift
notation `πag'[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := homotopy_group_conn n
definition homotopy_group_conn_nat_functor (n : ) {A B : Type*[1]} (f : A →* B) :
homotopy_group_conn_nat n A →g homotopy_group_conn_nat n B :=
begin
cases n with n, { apply homomorphism_of_is_contr_right },
cases n with n, { apply homomorphism_of_is_contr_right },
exact π→g[n+2] f
end
definition homotopy_group_conn_functor : Π(n : ) {A B : Type*[1]} (f : A →* B), πag'[n] A →g πag'[n] B
| (of_nat n) A B f := homotopy_group_conn_nat_functor n f
| (-[1+ n]) A B f := homomorphism_of_is_contr_right _ _
notation `π→ag'[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := homotopy_group_conn_functor n
section
open prod prod.ops fiber
parameters {A : → Type*[1]} (f : Π(n : ), A n →* A (n - 1)) [Hf : Πn, is_conn_fun 1 (f n)]
include Hf
definition I [constructor] : Set := trunctype.mk ( × ) !is_trunc_prod
definition D_sequence : graded_module r I :=
λv, LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup (πag'[v.2] (A (v.1)))
definition E_sequence : graded_module r I :=
λv, LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup (πag'[v.2] (pconntype.mk (pfiber (f (v.1))) !Hf pt))
definition exact_couple_sequence : exact_couple r I :=
exact_couple.mk D_sequence E_sequence sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry sorry
end
end pointed
namespace spectrum
open pointed int group is_trunc trunc is_conn prod prod.ops group fin chain_complex
section
-- notation `πₛ→[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := shomotopy_group_fun n
definition is_equiv_mul_right [constructor] {A : Group} (a : A) : is_equiv (λb, b * a) :=
adjointify _ (λb : A, b * a⁻¹) (λb, !inv_mul_cancel_right) (λb, !mul_inv_cancel_right)
definition right_action [constructor] {A : Group} (a : A) : A ≃ A :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_mul_right a)
definition is_equiv_add_right [constructor] {A : AddGroup} (a : A) : is_equiv (λb, b + a) :=
adjointify _ (λb : A, b - a) (λb, !neg_add_cancel_right) (λb, !add_neg_cancel_right)
definition add_right_action [constructor] {A : AddGroup} (a : A) : A ≃ A :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_add_right a)
parameters {A : → spectrum} (f : Π(s : ), A s →ₛ A (s - 1))
definition I [constructor] : Set := trunctype.mk (g ×g g) !is_trunc_prod
definition D_sequence : graded_module r I :=
λv, LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup (πₛ[v.1] (A (v.2)))
definition E_sequence : graded_module r I :=
λv, LeftModule_int_of_AbGroup (πₛ[v.1] (sfiber (f (v.2))))
include f
definition i_sequence : D_sequence →gm D_sequence :=
begin
fapply graded_hom.mk, exact (prod_equiv_prod erfl (add_right_action (- 1))),
intro v, induction v with n s,
apply lm_hom_int.mk, esimp,
-- exact homomorphism.mk _ (is_mul_hom_LES_of_shomotopy_groups (f s) (n, 0)),
-- exact shomotopy_groups_fun (f s) (n, 0)
exact πₛ→[n] (f s)
end
definition j_sequence : D_sequence →gm E_sequence :=
begin
fapply graded_hom.mk_out',
exact (prod_equiv_prod (add_right_action 1) (add_right_action (- 1))),
intro v, induction v with n s,
apply lm_hom_int.mk, esimp,
rexact shomotopy_groups_fun (f s) (n, 2)
end
definition k_sequence : E_sequence →gm D_sequence :=
begin
fapply graded_hom.mk erfl,
intro v, induction v with n s,
apply lm_hom_int.mk, esimp,
-- exact homomorphism.mk _ (is_mul_hom_LES_of_shomotopy_groups (f s) (n, 1)),
-- exact shomotopy_groups_fun (f s) (n, 1)
exact πₛ→[n] (spoint (f s))
end
lemma ij_sequence : is_exact_gmod i_sequence j_sequence :=
begin
intro i, induction i with n s,
revert n, refine equiv_rect (add_right_action 1) _ _, intro n,
esimp, intro j k p, unfold [i_sequence] at p,
-- induction p,
intro q, unfold [j_sequence] at q,
note qq := left_inv (deg j_sequence) (n, s),
unfold [j_sequence] at qq,
revert k q,
--refine eq.rec_to2 qq _ _
--intro i j k p q,
-- revert k q,
end
lemma jk_sequence : is_exact_gmod j_sequence k_sequence :=
sorry
local attribute i_sequence [reducible]
lemma ki_sequence : is_exact_gmod k_sequence i_sequence :=
begin
-- unfold [is_exact_gmod, is_exact_mod],
intro i j k p q, induction p, induction q, induction i with n s,
rexact is_exact_of_is_exact_at (is_exact_LES_of_shomotopy_groups (f s) (n, 0)),
end
definition exact_couple_sequence : exact_couple r I :=
exact_couple.mk D_sequence E_sequence i_sequence j_sequence k_sequence ij_sequence jk_sequence ki_sequence
end
end spectrum

View file

@ -58,7 +58,19 @@ namespace group
definition ab_product [constructor] (G G' : AbGroup) : AbGroup :=
AbGroup.mk _ (ab_group_prod G G')
infix ` ×g `:30 := group.product
infix ` ×ag `:30 := group.ab_product
infix ` ×g `:60 := group.product
infix ` ×ag `:60 := group.ab_product
definition product_functor [constructor] {G G' H H' : Group} (φ : G →g H) (ψ : G' →g H') :
G ×g G' →g H ×g H' :=
homomorphism.mk (λx, (φ x.1, ψ x.2)) (λx y, prod_eq !to_respect_mul !to_respect_mul)
infix ` ×→g `:60 := group.product_functor
definition product_isomorphism [constructor] {G G' H H' : Group} (φ : G ≃g H) (ψ : G' ≃g H') :
G ×g G' ≃g H ×g H' :=
isomorphism.mk (φ ×→g ψ) !is_equiv_prod_functor
infix ` ×≃g `:60 := group.product_isomorphism
end group

View file

@ -269,17 +269,6 @@ namespace group
definition image {G H : Group} (f : G →g H) : Group :=
subgroup (image_subgroup f)
definition AbGroup_of_Group.{u} (G : Group.{u}) (H : Π (g h : G), mul g h = mul h g) : AbGroup.{u} :=
begin
induction G,
induction struct,
fapply AbGroup.mk,
exact carrier,
fapply ab_group.mk,
repeat assumption,
exact H
end
definition ab_image {G : AbGroup} {H : AbGroup} (f : G →g H) : AbGroup :=
ab_subgroup (image_subgroup f)

View file

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
/- submodules and quotient modules -/
-- Authors: Floris van Doorn
import .left_module .quotient_group

64
heq.hlean Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
open eq is_trunc
variables {I : Set} {P : I → Type} {i j k : I} {x x₁ x₂ : P i} {y y₁ y₂ : P j} {z : P k}
{Q : Π⦃i⦄, P i → Type}
structure heq (x : P i) (y : P j) : Type :=
(p : i = j)
(q : x =[p] y)
namespace eq
notation x ` ==[`:50 P:0 `] `:0 y:50 := @heq _ P _ _ x y
infix ` == `:50 := heq -- mostly for printing, since it will be almost always ambiguous what P is
definition pathover_of_heq {p : i = j} (q : x ==[P] y) : x =[p] y :=
change_path !is_set.elim (heq.q q)
definition eq_of_heq (p : x₁ ==[P] x₂) : x₁ = x₂ :=
eq_of_pathover_idp (pathover_of_heq p)
definition heq.elim (p : x ==[P] y) (q : Q x) : Q y :=
begin
induction p with p r, induction r, exact q
end
definition heq.refl [refl] (x : P i) : x ==[P] x :=
heq.mk idp idpo
definition heq.rfl : x ==[P] x :=
heq.refl x
definition heq.symm [symm] (p : x ==[P] y) : y ==[P] x :=
begin
induction p with p q, constructor, exact q⁻¹ᵒ
end
definition heq_of_eq (p : x₁ = x₂) : x₁ ==[P] x₂ :=
heq.mk idp (pathover_idp_of_eq p)
definition heq.trans [trans] (p : x ==[P] y) (p₂ : y ==[P] z) : x ==[P] z :=
begin
induction p with p q, induction p₂ with p₂ q₂, constructor, exact q ⬝o q₂
end
infix ` ⬝he `:72 := heq.trans
postfix `⁻¹ʰᵉ`:(max+10) := heq.symm
definition heq_of_heq_of_eq (p : x ==[P] y) (p₂ : y = y₂) : x ==[P] y₂ :=
p ⬝he heq_of_eq p₂
definition heq_of_eq_of_heq (p : x = x₂) (p₂ : x₂ ==[P] y) : x ==[P] y :=
heq_of_eq p ⬝he p₂
infix ` ⬝hep `:73 := concato_eq
infix ` ⬝phe `:74 := eq_concato
definition heq_tr (p : i = j) (x : P i) : x ==[P] transport P p x :=
heq.mk p !pathover_tr
definition tr_heq (p : i = j) (x : P i) : transport P p x ==[P] x :=
(heq_tr p x)⁻¹ʰᵉ
end eq

View file

@ -208,11 +208,11 @@ namespace spectrum
-- read off the homotopy groups without any tedious case-analysis of
-- n. We increment by 2 in order to ensure that they are all
-- automatically abelian groups.
definition shomotopy_group [constructor] (n : ) (E : spectrum) : AbGroup := πag[2] (E (2 - n))
definition shomotopy_group (n : ) (E : spectrum) : AbGroup := πag[2] (E (2 - n))
notation `πₛ[`:95 n:0 `]`:0 := shomotopy_group n
definition shomotopy_group_fun [constructor] (n : ) {E F : spectrum} (f : E →ₛ F) :
definition shomotopy_group_fun (n : ) {E F : spectrum} (f : E →ₛ F) :
πₛ[n] E →g πₛ[n] F :=
π→g[2] (f (2 - n))
@ -318,23 +318,26 @@ namespace spectrum
(homomorphism_LES_of_homotopy_groups_fun (f (2 - n)) (1, 2) ∘g πg_glue Y n) qed
| (n, fin.mk (k+3) H) := begin exfalso, apply lt_le_antisymm H, apply le_add_left end
definition is_exact_LES_of_shomotopy_groups : is_exact LES_of_shomotopy_groups :=
begin
apply is_exact_splice, intro n, apply is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups,
end
-- In the comments below is a start on an explicit description of the LES for spectra
-- Maybe it's slightly nicer to work with than the above version
-- definition shomotopy_groups [reducible] : -3 → AbGroup
-- | (n, fin.mk 0 H) := πₛ[n] Y
-- | (n, fin.mk 1 H) := πₛ[n] X
-- | (n, fin.mk k H) := πₛ[n] (sfiber f)
-- definition shomotopy_groups_fun : Π(n : -3), shomotopy_groups (S n) →g shomotopy_groups n
-- | (n, fin.mk 0 H) := proof π→g[1+1] (f (n + 2)) qed --π→[2] f (n+2)
-- --pmap_of_homomorphism (πₛ→[n] f)
-- | (n, fin.mk 1 H) := proof π→g[1+1] (ppoint (f (n + 2))) qed
-- | (n, fin.mk 2 H) :=
-- proof _ ∘g π→g[1+1] equiv_glue Y (pred n + 2) qed
-- --π→[n] boundary_map ∘* pcast (ap (ptrunc 0) (loop_space_succ_eq_in Y n))
-- | (n, fin.mk (k+3) H) := begin exfalso, apply lt_le_antisymm H, apply le_add_left end
definition shomotopy_groups [reducible] : +3 → AbGroup
| (n, fin.mk 0 H) := πₛ[n] Y
| (n, fin.mk 1 H) := πₛ[n] X
| (n, fin.mk k H) := πₛ[n] (sfiber f)
definition shomotopy_groups_fun : Π(v : +3), shomotopy_groups (S v) →g shomotopy_groups v
| (n, fin.mk 0 H) := proof πₛ→[n] f qed
| (n, fin.mk 1 H) := proof πₛ→[n] (spoint f) qed
| (n, fin.mk 2 H) := proof homomorphism_LES_of_homotopy_groups_fun (f (2 - n)) (nat.succ nat.zero, 2) ∘g
πg_glue Y n ∘g (by reflexivity) qed
| (n, fin.mk (k+3) H) := begin exfalso, apply lt_le_antisymm H, apply le_add_left end
--(homomorphism_LES_of_homotopy_groups_fun (f (2 - n)) (1, 2) ∘g πg_glue Y n)
end
structure sp_chain_complex (N : succ_str) : Type :=

View file

@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ definition is_exact_g.mk {A B C : Group} {f : A →g B} {g : B →g C}
is_exact.mk H₁ H₂
namespace algebra
definition ab_group_unit [constructor] : ab_group unit :=
⦃ab_group, trivial_group, mul_comm := λx y, idp⦄
definition inf_group_loopn (n : ) (A : Type*) [H : is_succ n] : inf_group (Ω[n] A) :=
by induction H; exact _
@ -65,6 +68,18 @@ end algebra
namespace eq
definition eq.rec_to {A : Type} {a₀ : A} {P : Π⦃a₁⦄, a₀ = a₁ → Type}
{a₁ : A} (p₀ : a₀ = a₁) (H : P p₀) {a₂ : A} (p : a₀ = a₂) : P p :=
begin
induction p₀, induction p, exact H
end
definition eq.rec_to2 {A : Type} {P : Π⦃a₀ a₁⦄, a₀ = a₁ → Type}
{a₀ a₀' a₁' : A} (p' : a₀' = a₁') (p₀ : a₀ = a₀') (H : P p') ⦃a₁ : A⦄ (p : a₀ = a₁) : P p :=
begin
induction p₀, induction p', induction p, exact H
end
section -- squares
variables {A B : Type} {a a' a'' a₀₀ a₂₀ a₄₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ a₂₄ a₀₄ a₄₂ a₄₄ a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : A}
/-a₀₀-/ {p₁₀ p₁₀' : a₀₀ = a₂₀} /-a₂₀-/ {p₃₀ : a₂₀ = a₄₀} /-a₄₀-/
@ -1165,6 +1180,15 @@ structure Ring :=
attribute Ring.carrier [coercion]
attribute Ring.struct [instance]
namespace int
definition ring_int : Ring :=
Ring.mk _
notation `r` := ring_int
end int
namespace set_quotient
definition is_prop_set_quotient {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) [is_prop A] : is_prop (set_quotient R) :=
begin