move results to HoTT library, and start on uniqueness of K(G, n) for n>1

This commit is contained in:
Floris van Doorn 2016-06-24 09:49:45 +01:00
parent 21c6e8f7e5
commit dc2a26745e

View file

@ -7,234 +7,160 @@ Authors: Floris van Doorn
Eilenberg MacLane spaces
-/
import homotopy.EM
import homotopy.EM .spectrum
open eq is_equiv equiv is_conn is_trunc unit function pointed nat group algebra trunc trunc_index
fiber prod fin pointed
namespace chain_complex
open succ_str
definition is_contr_of_is_embedding_of_is_surjective {N : succ_str} (X : chain_complex N) {n : N}
(H : is_exact_at X (S n)) [is_embedding (cc_to_fn X n)]
[H2 : is_surjective (cc_to_fn X (S (S (S n))))] : is_contr (X (S (S n))) :=
begin
apply is_contr.mk pt, intro x,
have p : cc_to_fn X n (cc_to_fn X (S n) x) = cc_to_fn X n pt,
from !cc_is_chain_complex ⬝ !respect_pt⁻¹,
have q : cc_to_fn X (S n) x = pt, from is_injective_of_is_embedding p,
induction H x q with y r,
induction H2 y with z s,
exact (cc_is_chain_complex X _ z)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (cc_to_fn X _) s ⬝ r
end
end chain_complex open chain_complex
fiber prod fin pointed susp EM.ops
namespace EM
-- MOVE to connectedness
definition is_conn_fun_to_unit_of_is_conn (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [H : is_conn n A]
: is_conn_fun n (const A unit.star) :=
begin
intro u, induction u,
exact is_conn_equiv_closed n (fiber.fiber_star_equiv A)⁻¹ᵉ _,
end
/- Higher EM-spaces -/
/- Whitehead Corollaries -/
-- to pointed
definition pointed_eta_pequiv [constructor] (A : Type*) : A ≃* pointed.MK A pt :=
pequiv.mk id !is_equiv_id idp
/- every pointed map is homotopic to one of the form `pmap_of_map _ _`, up to some
pointed equivalences -/
definition phomotopy_pmap_of_map {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) :
(pointed_eta_pequiv B ⬝e* (pequiv_of_eq_pt (respect_pt f))⁻¹ᵉ*) ∘* f ∘*
(pointed_eta_pequiv A)⁻¹ᵉ* ~* pmap_of_map f pt :=
/- K(G, 2) is unique (see below for general case) -/
definition loopn_EMadd1 (G : CommGroup) (n : ) : Ω[succ n] (EMadd1 G n) ≃* pType_of_Group G :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ reflexivity},
{ esimp [pequiv.trans, pequiv.symm],
exact !con.right_inv⁻¹ ⬝ ((!idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ !ap_id⁻¹) ◾ (!ap_id⁻¹⁻² ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹)), }
refine _ ⬝e* loop_pEM1 G,
cases n with n,
{ refine !loop_ptrunc_pequiv ⬝e* _, refine ptrunc_pequiv _ _ _,
apply is_trunc_eq, apply is_trunc_EM1},
induction n with n IH,
{ exact loop_pequiv_loop (loop_EM2 G)},
refine _ ⬝e* IH,
refine !phomotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc⁻¹ᵉ* ⬝e* _ ⬝e* !phomotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc,
apply iterate_psusp_stability_pequiv,
rexact add_mul_le_mul_add n 1 1
end
-- reorder arguments of is_equiv_compose
-- rename whiteheads_principle to whitehead_principle
definition whitehead_principle_pointed (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*}
[HA : is_trunc n A] [HB : is_trunc n B] [is_conn 0 A] (f : A →* B)
(H : Πk, is_equiv (π→*[k] f)) : is_equiv f :=
definition EM2_map [unfold 7] {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} (e : Ω[2] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[2] X), e (@concat (Ω X) idp idp idp p q) = e p * e q)
[is_conn 1 X] [is_trunc 2 X] : EMadd1 G 1 → X :=
begin
apply whiteheads_principle n, rexact H 0,
intro a k, revert a, apply is_conn.elim -1,
have is_equiv (π→*[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv B ⬝e* (pequiv_of_eq_pt (respect_pt f))⁻¹ᵉ*)
∘* π→*[k + 1] f ∘* π→*[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv A)⁻¹ᵉ*),
begin
apply is_equiv_compose (π→*[k + 1] f ∘* π→*[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv A)⁻¹ᵉ*),
apply is_equiv_compose (π→*[k + 1] (pointed_eta_pequiv A)⁻¹ᵉ*),
all_goals apply is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor,
end,
refine @(is_equiv.homotopy_closed _) _ this _,
apply to_homotopy,
refine pwhisker_left _ !phomotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
refine !phomotopy_group_functor_compose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
apply phomotopy_group_functor_phomotopy, apply phomotopy_pmap_of_map
change trunc 2 (susp (EM1 G)) → X, intro x,
induction x with x, induction x with x,
{ exact pt},
{ exact pt},
{ change carrier (Ω X), refine EM1_map e r x}
end
-- replace in homotopy_group?
theorem trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc' (A : Type*) {n k : } [is_trunc n A] (H : n < k)
: is_contr (π[k] A) :=
definition pEM2_pmap [constructor] {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} (e : Ω[2] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[2] X), e (@concat (Ω X) idp idp idp p q) = e p * e q)
[is_conn 1 X] [is_trunc 2 X] : EMadd1 G 1 →* X :=
pmap.mk (EM2_map e r) idp
definition loop_pEM2_pmap {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} (e : Ω[2] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[2] X), e (@concat (Ω X) idp idp idp p q) = e p * e q)
[is_conn 1 X] [is_trunc 2 X] :
Ω→[2](pEM2_pmap e r) ~ e⁻¹ᵉ ∘ loopn_EMadd1 G 1 :=
begin
apply is_trunc_trunc_of_is_trunc,
apply is_contr_loop_of_is_trunc,
apply @is_trunc_of_le A n _,
apply trunc_index.le_of_succ_le_succ,
rewrite [succ_sub_two_succ k],
exact of_nat_le_of_nat H,
exact sorry
end
definition is_trunc_pointed_MK [instance] [priority 1100] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type} (a : A)
[H : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc n (pointed.MK A a) :=
H
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn 0 A]
(H : Πk a, is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_contr A :=
-- TODO: make arguments in trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc implicit
attribute is_conn_EMadd1 is_trunc_EMadd1 [instance]
definition pEM2_pequiv' {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} (e : Ω[2] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[2] X), e (@concat (Ω X) idp idp idp p q) = e p * e q)
[is_conn 1 X] [is_trunc 2 X] : EMadd1 G 1 ≃* X :=
begin
fapply is_trunc_is_equiv_closed_rev, { exact λa, ⋆},
apply whiteheads_principle n,
{ apply is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun, apply is_conn_fun_to_unit_of_is_conn},
intro a k,
apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
refine trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc' _ !one_le_succ,
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat (n : ) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn 0 A]
(H : Πk a, k ≤ n → is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_contr A :=
begin
apply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy n,
intro k a, apply @lt_ge_by_cases _ _ n k,
{ intro H', exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc' _ H'},
{ intro H', exact H k a H'}
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_pointed (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A]
(H : Πk, is_contr (π[k] A)) : is_contr A :=
begin
have is_conn 0 A, proof H 0 qed,
fapply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy n A,
intro k, apply is_conn.elim -1,
cases A with A a, exact H k
end
definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat_pointed (n : ) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A]
(H : Πk, k ≤ n → is_contr (π[k] A)) : is_contr A :=
begin
have is_conn 0 A, proof H 0 !zero_le qed,
fapply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat n A,
intro k a H', revert a, apply is_conn.elim -1,
cases A with A a, exact H k H'
end
-- replace in homotopy_group
definition phomotopy_group_ptrunc_of_le [constructor] {k n : } (H : k ≤ n) (A : Type*) :
π*[k] (ptrunc n A) ≃* π*[k] A :=
calc
π*[k] (ptrunc n A) ≃* Ω[k] (ptrunc k (ptrunc n A))
: phomotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc k (ptrunc n A)
... ≃* Ω[k] (ptrunc k A)
: loopn_pequiv_loopn k (ptrunc_ptrunc_pequiv_left A (of_nat_le_of_nat H))
... ≃* π*[k] A : (phomotopy_group_pequiv_loop_ptrunc k A)⁻¹ᵉ*
definition is_conn_fun_of_equiv_on_homotopy_groups.{u} (n : ) {A B : Type.{u}} (f : A → B)
[is_equiv (trunc_functor 0 f)]
(H1 : Πa k, k ≤ n → is_equiv (homotopy_group_functor k (pmap_of_map f a)))
(H2 : Πa, is_surjective (homotopy_group_functor (succ n) (pmap_of_map f a))) : is_conn_fun n f :=
have H2' : Πa k, k ≤ n → is_surjective (homotopy_group_functor (succ k) (pmap_of_map f a)),
begin
intro a k H, cases H with n' H',
{ apply H2},
{ apply is_surjective_of_is_equiv, apply H1, exact succ_le_succ H'}
end,
have H3 : Πa, is_contr (ptrunc n (pfiber (pmap_of_map f a))),
begin
intro a, apply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat_pointed n,
{ intro k H, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, exact phomotopy_group_ptrunc_of_le H _,
rexact @is_contr_of_is_embedding_of_is_surjective +3
(LES_of_homotopy_groups (pmap_of_map f a)) (k, 0)
(is_exact_LES_of_homotopy_groups _ _)
proof @(is_embedding_of_is_equiv _) (H1 a k H) qed
proof (H2' a k H) qed}
end,
show Πb, is_contr (trunc n (fiber f b)),
begin
intro b,
note p := right_inv (trunc_functor 0 f) (tr b), revert p,
induction (trunc_functor 0 f)⁻¹ (tr b), esimp, intro p,
induction !tr_eq_tr_equiv p with q,
rewrite -q, exact H3 a
end
-- open sigma lift
-- definition flatten_univ.{u v} {A : Type.{u}} {B : Type.{v}} (f : A → B) :
-- Σ(A' B' : Type.{max u v}) (f' : A' → B') (g : A ≃ A') (h : B ≃ B'), h ∘ f ~ f' ∘ g :=
-- ⟨lift A, lift B, lift_functor f, proof equiv_lift A qed, proof equiv_lift B qed,
-- proof sorry qed⟩
definition is_conn_inf [reducible] (A : Type) : Type := Πn, is_conn n A
definition is_conn_fun_inf [reducible] {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type := Πn, is_conn_fun n f
/- applications to EM spaces -/
-- TODO
definition pEM1_pmap [constructor] {G : Group} {X : Type*} (e : Ω X ≃ G)
(r : Πp q, e (p ⬝ q) = e p * e q) [is_conn 0 X] [is_trunc 1 X] : pEM1 G →* X :=
begin
apply pmap.mk (EM1_map e r),
reflexivity,
end
definition loop_pEM1 [constructor] (G : Group) : Ω (pEM1 G) ≃* pType_of_Group G :=
pequiv_of_equiv (base_eq_base_equiv G) idp
attribute base_eq_base_equiv [constructor]
export [unfold] groupoid_quotient
definition loop_pEM1_pmap {G : Group} {X : Type*} (e : Ω X ≃ G)
(r : Πp q, e (p ⬝ q) = e p * e q) [is_conn 0 X] [is_trunc 1 X] :
Ω→(pEM1_pmap e r) ~ e⁻¹ᵉ ∘ base_eq_base_equiv G :=
begin
apply homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre (base_eq_base_equiv G),
esimp, intro g, exact !idp_con ⬝ !elim_pth
end
definition pEM1_pequiv'.{u} {G : Group.{u}} {X : pType.{u}} (e : Ω X ≃ G)
(r : Πp q, e (p ⬝ q) = e p * e q) [is_conn 0 X] [is_trunc 1 X] : pEM1 G ≃* X :=
begin
apply pequiv_of_pmap (pEM1_pmap e r),
apply whitehead_principle_pointed 1,
intro k, cases k with k,
apply pequiv_of_pmap (pEM2_pmap e r),
have is_conn 0 (EMadd1 G 1), from !is_conn_of_is_conn_succ,
have is_trunc 2 (EMadd1 G 1), from !is_trunc_EMadd1,
refine whitehead_principle_pointed 2 _ _,
intro k, apply @nat.lt_by_cases k 2: intro H,
{ apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
all_goals (esimp; exact _)},
{ cases k with k,
{ apply is_equiv_trunc_functor, esimp,
apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, rotate 1,
{ symmetry, exact loop_pEM1_pmap _ _},
apply is_equiv_compose, apply to_is_equiv},
{ apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
do 2 apply trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ _ _ !one_le_succ}}
do 2 exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_conn _ (le_of_lt_succ H)},
{ cases H, esimp, apply is_equiv_trunc_functor, esimp,
apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, rotate 1,
{ symmetry, exact loop_pEM2_pmap _ _},
apply is_equiv_compose, apply pequiv.to_is_equiv, apply to_is_equiv},
{ apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ H,
apply @trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc, rotate 1, exact H, exact _inst_2}
end
definition pEM1_pequiv.{u} {G : Group.{u}} {X : pType.{u}} (e : π₁ X ≃g G)
[is_conn 0 X] [is_trunc 1 X] : pEM1 G ≃* X :=
definition pEM2_pequiv {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} (e : πg[1+1] X ≃g G)
[is_conn 1 X] [is_trunc 2 X] : EMadd1 G 1 ≃* X :=
begin
apply pEM1_pequiv' (!trunc_equiv⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e equiv_of_isomorphism e),
intro p q, esimp, exact respect_mul e (tr p) (tr q)
have is_set (Ω[2] X), from !is_trunc_eq,
apply pEM2_pequiv' (!trunc_equiv⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e equiv_of_isomorphism e),
intro p q, esimp, exact to_respect_mul e (tr p) (tr q)
end
definition KG1_pequiv.{u} {X Y : pType.{u}} (e : π₁ X ≃g π₁ Y)
[is_conn 0 X] [is_trunc 1 X] [is_conn 0 Y] [is_trunc 1 Y] : X ≃* Y :=
(pEM1_pequiv e)⁻¹ᵉ* ⬝e* pEM1_pequiv !isomorphism.refl
-- general case
definition EMadd1_map [unfold 8] {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} {n : } (e : Ω[succ n] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[succ n] X), e (@concat (Ω[n] X) pt pt pt p q) = e p * e q)
[H1 : is_conn n X] [H2 : is_trunc (n.+1) X] : EMadd1 G n → X :=
begin
revert X e r H1 H2, induction n with n f: intro X e r H1 H2,
{ change trunc 1 (EM1 G) → X, intro x, induction x with x, exact EM1_map e r x},
change trunc (n.+2) (susp (iterate_psusp n (pEM1 G))) → X, intro x,
induction x with x, induction x with x,
{ exact pt},
{ exact pt},
{ change carrier (Ω X), refine f _ _ _ _ _ (tr x),
{ refine _⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e e, apply equiv_of_pequiv, apply pequiv_of_eq, apply loop_space_succ_eq_in},
exact abstract begin
intro p q, refine _ ⬝ !r, apply ap e, esimp,
apply inv_tr_eq_of_eq_tr, symmetry,
rewrite [- + ap_inv, - + tr_compose],
refine !loop_space_succ_eq_in_concat ⬝ _, exact !tr_inv_tr ◾ !tr_inv_tr
end end}
end
definition pEMadd1_pmap [constructor] {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} {n : } (e : Ω[succ n] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[succ n] X), e (@concat (Ω[n] X) pt pt pt p q) = e p * e q)
[H1 : is_conn n X] [H2 : is_trunc (n.+1) X] : EMadd1 G n →* X :=
pmap.mk (EMadd1_map e r) begin cases n with n: reflexivity end
definition loop_pEMadd1_pmap {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} {n : } (e : Ω[succ n] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[succ n] X), e (@concat (Ω[n] X) pt pt pt p q) = e p * e q)
[H1 : is_conn n X] [H2 : is_trunc (n.+1) X] :
Ω→[succ n](pEMadd1_pmap e r) ~ e⁻¹ᵉ ∘ loopn_EMadd1 G n :=
begin
apply homotopy_of_inv_homotopy_pre (loopn_EMadd1 G n),
intro g, esimp at *,
revert X e r H1 H2, induction n with n IH: intro X e r H1 H2,
{ refine !idp_con ⬝ _, refine !ap_compose'⁻¹ ⬝ _, esimp, apply elim_pth},
{ replace (succ (succ n)) with ((succ n) + 1), rewrite [apn_succ],
unfold [ap1], exact sorry}
--exact !idp_con ⬝ !elim_pth
end
-- definition is_conn_of_le (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_conn (n.+1) A] :
-- is_conn n A :=
-- is_trunc_trunc_of_le A -2 (trunc_index.self_le_succ n)
-- attribute is_conn_EMadd1 is_trunc_EMadd1 [instance]
definition pEMadd1_pequiv' {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} {n : } (e : Ω[succ n] X ≃ G)
(r : Π(p q : Ω[succ n] X), e (@concat (Ω[n] X) pt pt pt p q) = e p * e q)
[H1 : is_conn n X] [H2 : is_trunc (n.+1) X] : EMadd1 G n ≃* X :=
begin
apply pequiv_of_pmap (pEMadd1_pmap e r),
have is_conn 0 (EMadd1 G n), from is_conn_of_le _ (zero_le_of_nat n),
have is_trunc (n.+1) (EMadd1 G n), from !is_trunc_EMadd1,
refine whitehead_principle_pointed (n.+1) _ _,
intro k, apply @nat.lt_by_cases k (succ n): intro H,
{ apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
do 2 exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_conn _ (le_of_lt_succ H)},
{ cases H, esimp, apply is_equiv_trunc_functor, esimp,
apply is_equiv.homotopy_closed, rotate 1,
{ symmetry, exact loop_pEMadd1_pmap _ _},
apply is_equiv_compose, apply pequiv.to_is_equiv},
{ apply @is_equiv_of_is_contr,
do 2 exact trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ H}
end
definition pEMadd1_pequiv {G : CommGroup} {X : Type*} {n : } (e : πg[n+1] X ≃g G)
[H1 : is_conn n X] [H2 : is_trunc (n.+1) X] : EMadd1 G n ≃* X :=
begin
have is_set (Ω[succ n] X), from !is_set_loopn,
apply pEMadd1_pequiv' (!trunc_equiv⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e equiv_of_isomorphism e),
intro p q, esimp, exact to_respect_mul e (tr p) (tr q)
end
definition EM_spectrum /-[constructor]-/ (G : CommGroup) : spectrum :=
spectrum.Mk (K G) (λn, (loop_EM G n)⁻¹ᵉ*)
end EM
-- cohomology ∥ X → K(G,n) ∥
-- reduced cohomology ∥ X →* K(G,n) ∥
-- but we probably want to do this for any spectrum