-- definitions, theorems and attributes which should be moved to files in the HoTT library import homotopy.sphere2 homotopy.cofiber homotopy.wedge hit.prop_trunc open eq nat int susp pointed pmap sigma is_equiv equiv fiber algebra trunc trunc_index pi group is_trunc function sphere unit sum prod bool attribute is_prop.elim_set [unfold 6] definition add_comm_right {A : Type} [add_comm_semigroup A] (n m k : A) : n + m + k = n + k + m := !add.assoc ⬝ ap (add n) !add.comm ⬝ !add.assoc⁻¹ structure is_exact_t {A B : Type} {C : Type*} (f : A → B) (g : B → C) := ( im_in_ker : Π(a:A), g (f a) = pt) ( ker_in_im : Π(b:B), (g b = pt) → fiber f b) structure is_exact {A B : Type} {C : Type*} (f : A → B) (g : B → C) := ( im_in_ker : Π(a:A), g (f a) = pt) ( ker_in_im : Π(b:B), (g b = pt) → image f b) definition is_exact_g {A B C : Group} (f : A →g B) (g : B →g C) := is_exact f g definition is_exact_ag {A B C : AbGroup} (f : A →g B) (g : B →g C) := is_exact f g definition is_exact_g.mk {A B C : Group} {f : A →g B} {g : B →g C} (H₁ : Πa, g (f a) = 1) (H₂ : Πb, g b = 1 → image f b) : is_exact_g f g := is_exact.mk H₁ H₂ namespace algebra definition inf_group_loopn (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) [H : is_succ n] : inf_group (Ω[n] A) := by induction H; exact _ definition one_unique {A : Type} [group A] {a : A} (H : Πb, a * b = b) : a = 1 := !mul_one⁻¹ ⬝ H 1 definition pSet_of_AddGroup [constructor] [reducible] [coercion] (G : AddGroup) : Set* := pSet_of_Group G attribute algebra._trans_of_pSet_of_AddGroup [unfold 1] attribute algebra._trans_of_pSet_of_AddGroup_1 algebra._trans_of_pSet_of_AddGroup_2 [constructor] definition pType_of_AddGroup [reducible] [constructor] : AddGroup → Type* := algebra._trans_of_pSet_of_AddGroup_1 definition Set_of_AddGroup [reducible] [constructor] : AddGroup → Set := algebra._trans_of_pSet_of_AddGroup_2 -- -- -- definition Group_of_AddAbGroup [coercion] [constructor] (G : AddAbGroup) : Group := -- AddGroup.mk G _ -- -- definition AddGroup_of_AddAbGroup [coercion] [constructor] (G : AddAbGroup) : AddGroup := AddGroup.mk G _ attribute algebra._trans_of_AddGroup_of_AddAbGroup_1 algebra._trans_of_AddGroup_of_AddAbGroup algebra._trans_of_AddGroup_of_AddAbGroup_3 [constructor] attribute algebra._trans_of_AddGroup_of_AddAbGroup_2 [unfold 1] definition add_ab_group_AddAbGroup2 [instance] (G : AddAbGroup) : add_ab_group G := AddAbGroup.struct G end algebra namespace eq section -- squares variables {A B : Type} {a a' a'' a₀₀ a₂₀ a₄₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ a₂₄ a₀₄ a₄₂ a₄₄ a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : A} /-a₀₀-/ {p₁₀ p₁₀' : a₀₀ = a₂₀} /-a₂₀-/ {p₃₀ : a₂₀ = a₄₀} /-a₄₀-/ {p₀₁ p₀₁' : a₀₀ = a₀₂} /-s₁₁-/ {p₂₁ p₂₁' : a₂₀ = a₂₂} /-s₃₁-/ {p₄₁ : a₄₀ = a₄₂} /-a₀₂-/ {p₁₂ p₁₂' : a₀₂ = a₂₂} /-a₂₂-/ {p₃₂ : a₂₂ = a₄₂} /-a₄₂-/ {p₀₃ : a₀₂ = a₀₄} /-s₁₃-/ {p₂₃ : a₂₂ = a₂₄} /-s₃₃-/ {p₄₃ : a₄₂ = a₄₄} /-a₀₄-/ {p₁₄ : a₀₄ = a₂₄} /-a₂₄-/ {p₃₄ : a₂₄ = a₄₄} /-a₄₄-/ variables {s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁} {s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁} {s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃} {s₃₃ : square p₃₂ p₃₄ p₂₃ p₄₃} definition natural_square_eq {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') : natural_square p q = square_of_pathover (apd p q) := idp definition eq_of_square_hrfl_hconcat_eq {A : Type} {a a' : A} {p p' : a = a'} (q : p = p') : eq_of_square (hrfl ⬝hp q⁻¹) = !idp_con ⬝ q := by induction q; induction p; reflexivity definition aps_vrfl {A B : Type} {a a' : A} (f : A → B) (p : a = a') : aps f (vrefl p) = vrefl (ap f p) := by induction p; reflexivity definition aps_hrfl {A B : Type} {a a' : A} (f : A → B) (p : a = a') : aps f (hrefl p) = hrefl (ap f p) := by induction p; reflexivity -- should the following two equalities be cubes? definition natural_square_ap_fn {A B C : Type} {a a' : A} {g h : A → B} (f : B → C) (p : g ~ h) (q : a = a') : natural_square (λa, ap f (p a)) q = ap_compose f g q ⬝ph (aps f (natural_square p q) ⬝hp (ap_compose f h q)⁻¹) := begin induction q, exact !aps_vrfl⁻¹ end definition natural_square_compose {A B C : Type} {a a' : A} {g g' : B → C} (p : g ~ g') (f : A → B) (q : a = a') : natural_square (λa, p (f a)) q = ap_compose g f q ⬝ph (natural_square p (ap f q) ⬝hp (ap_compose g' f q)⁻¹) := by induction q; reflexivity definition natural_square_eq2 {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {f f' : A → B} (p : f ~ f') {q q' : a = a'} (r : q = q') : natural_square p q = ap02 f r ⬝ph (natural_square p q' ⬝hp (ap02 f' r)⁻¹) := by induction r; reflexivity definition natural_square_refl {A B : Type} {a a' : A} (f : A → B) (q : a = a') : natural_square (homotopy.refl f) q = hrfl := by induction q; reflexivity definition aps_eq_hconcat {p₀₁'} (f : A → B) (q : p₀₁' = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : aps f (q ⬝ph s₁₁) = ap02 f q ⬝ph aps f s₁₁ := by induction q; reflexivity definition aps_hconcat_eq {p₂₁'} (f : A → B) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁' = p₂₁) : aps f (s₁₁ ⬝hp r⁻¹) = aps f s₁₁ ⬝hp (ap02 f r)⁻¹ := by induction r; reflexivity definition aps_hconcat_eq' {p₂₁'} (f : A → B) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p₂₁') : aps f (s₁₁ ⬝hp r) = aps f s₁₁ ⬝hp ap02 f r := by induction r; reflexivity definition aps_square_of_eq (f : A → B) (s : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂) : aps f (square_of_eq s) = square_of_eq ((ap_con f p₁₀ p₂₁)⁻¹ ⬝ ap02 f s ⬝ ap_con f p₀₁ p₁₂) := by induction p₁₂; esimp at *; induction s; induction p₂₁; induction p₁₀; reflexivity definition aps_eq_hconcat_eq {p₀₁' p₂₁'} (f : A → B) (q : p₀₁' = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁' = p₂₁) : aps f (q ⬝ph s₁₁ ⬝hp r⁻¹) = ap02 f q ⬝ph aps f s₁₁ ⬝hp (ap02 f r)⁻¹ := by induction q; induction r; reflexivity end section -- cubes variables {A B : Type} {a₀₀₀ a₂₀₀ a₀₂₀ a₂₂₀ a₀₀₂ a₂₀₂ a₀₂₂ a₂₂₂ a a' : A} {p₁₀₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₂₀₀} {p₀₁₀ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₂₀} {p₀₀₁ : a₀₀₀ = a₀₀₂} {p₁₂₀ : a₀₂₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₁₀ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₂₀} {p₂₀₁ : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂} {p₁₀₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₂₀₂} {p₀₁₂ : a₀₀₂ = a₀₂₂} {p₀₂₁ : a₀₂₀ = a₀₂₂} {p₁₂₂ : a₀₂₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₁₂ : a₂₀₂ = a₂₂₂} {p₂₂₁ : a₂₂₀ = a₂₂₂} {s₀₁₁ : square p₀₁₀ p₀₁₂ p₀₀₁ p₀₂₁} {s₂₁₁ : square p₂₁₀ p₂₁₂ p₂₀₁ p₂₂₁} {s₁₀₁ : square p₁₀₀ p₁₀₂ p₀₀₁ p₂₀₁} {s₁₂₁ : square p₁₂₀ p₁₂₂ p₀₂₁ p₂₂₁} {s₁₁₀ : square p₀₁₀ p₂₁₀ p₁₀₀ p₁₂₀} {s₁₁₂ : square p₀₁₂ p₂₁₂ p₁₀₂ p₁₂₂} {b₁ b₂ b₃ b₄ : B} (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) definition whisker001 {p₀₀₁' : a₀₀₀ = a₀₀₂} (q : p₀₀₁' = p₀₀₁) (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube (q ⬝ph s₀₁₁) s₂₁₁ (q ⬝ph s₁₀₁) s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition whisker021 {p₀₂₁' : a₀₂₀ = a₀₂₂} (q : p₀₂₁' = p₀₂₁) (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube (s₀₁₁ ⬝hp q⁻¹) s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ (q ⬝ph s₁₂₁) s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition whisker021' {p₀₂₁' : a₀₂₀ = a₀₂₂} (q : p₀₂₁ = p₀₂₁') (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube (s₀₁₁ ⬝hp q) s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ (q⁻¹ ⬝ph s₁₂₁) s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition whisker201 {p₂₀₁' : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂} (q : p₂₀₁' = p₂₀₁) (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube s₀₁₁ (q ⬝ph s₂₁₁) (s₁₀₁ ⬝hp q⁻¹) s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition whisker201' {p₂₀₁' : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂} (q : p₂₀₁ = p₂₀₁') (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube s₀₁₁ (q⁻¹ ⬝ph s₂₁₁) (s₁₀₁ ⬝hp q) s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition whisker221 {p₂₂₁' : a₂₂₀ = a₂₂₂} (q : p₂₂₁ = p₂₂₁') (c : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube s₀₁₁ (s₂₁₁ ⬝hp q) s₁₀₁ (s₁₂₁ ⬝hp q) s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition move221 {p₂₂₁' : a₂₂₀ = a₂₂₂} {s₁₂₁ : square p₁₂₀ p₁₂₂ p₀₂₁ p₂₂₁'} (q : p₂₂₁ = p₂₂₁') (c : cube s₀₁₁ (s₂₁₁ ⬝hp q) s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ s₁₀₁ (s₁₂₁ ⬝hp q⁻¹) s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c definition move201 {p₂₀₁' : a₂₀₀ = a₂₀₂} {s₁₀₁ : square p₁₀₀ p₁₀₂ p₀₀₁ p₂₀₁'} (q : p₂₀₁' = p₂₀₁) (c : cube s₀₁₁ (q ⬝ph s₂₁₁) s₁₀₁ s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂) : cube s₀₁₁ s₂₁₁ (s₁₀₁ ⬝hp q) s₁₂₁ s₁₁₀ s₁₁₂ := by induction q; exact c end definition ap_eq_ap010 {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : B) : ap (λa, f a b) p = ap010 f p b := by reflexivity definition ap011_idp {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (b : B) : ap011 f p idp = ap010 f p b := by reflexivity definition ap011_flip {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) {a a' : A} {b b' : B} (p : a = a') (q : b = b') : ap011 f p q = ap011 (λb a, f a b) q p := by induction q; induction p; reflexivity theorem apd_constant' {A A' : Type} {B : A' → Type} {a₁ a₂ : A} {a' : A'} (b : B a') (p : a₁ = a₂) : apd (λx, b) p = pathover_of_eq p idp := by induction p; reflexivity definition apo011 {A : Type} {B C D : A → Type} {a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {c : C a} {c' : C a'} (f : Π⦃a⦄, B a → C a → D a) (q : b =[p] b') (r : c =[p] c') : f b c =[p] f b' c' := begin induction q, induction r using idp_rec_on, exact idpo end definition ap011_ap_square_right {A B C : Type} (f : A → B → C) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') {b₁ b₂ b₃ : B} {q₁₂ : b₁ = b₂} {q₂₃ : b₂ = b₃} {q₁₃ : b₁ = b₃} (r : q₁₂ ⬝ q₂₃ = q₁₃) : square (ap011 f p q₁₂) (ap (λx, f x b₃) p) (ap (f a) q₁₃) (ap (f a') q₂₃) := by induction r; induction q₂₃; induction q₁₂; induction p; exact ids definition ap011_ap_square_left {A B C : Type} (f : B → A → C) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') {b₁ b₂ b₃ : B} {q₁₂ : b₁ = b₂} {q₂₃ : b₂ = b₃} {q₁₃ : b₁ = b₃} (r : q₁₂ ⬝ q₂₃ = q₁₃) : square (ap011 f q₁₂ p) (ap (f b₃) p) (ap (λx, f x a) q₁₃) (ap (λx, f x a') q₂₃) := by induction r; induction q₂₃; induction q₁₂; induction p; exact ids definition ap_ap011 {A B C D : Type} (g : C → D) (f : A → B → C) {a a' : A} {b b' : B} (p : a = a') (q : b = b') : ap g (ap011 f p q) = ap011 (λa b, g (f a b)) p q := begin induction p, exact (ap_compose g (f a) q)⁻¹ end definition con2_assoc {A : Type} {x y z t : A} {p p' : x = y} {q q' : y = z} {r r' : z = t} (h : p = p') (h' : q = q') (h'' : r = r') : square ((h ◾ h') ◾ h'') (h ◾ (h' ◾ h'')) (con.assoc p q r) (con.assoc p' q' r') := by induction h; induction h'; induction h''; exact hrfl definition con_left_inv_idp {A : Type} {x : A} {p : x = x} (q : p = idp) : con.left_inv p = q⁻² ◾ q := by cases q; reflexivity definition eckmann_hilton_con2 {A : Type} {x : A} {p p' q q': idp = idp :> x = x} (h : p = p') (h' : q = q') : square (h ◾ h') (h' ◾ h) (eckmann_hilton p q) (eckmann_hilton p' q') := by induction h; induction h'; exact hrfl definition ap_con_fn {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {b : B} (g h : A → b = b) (p : a = a') : ap (λa, g a ⬝ h a) p = ap g p ◾ ap h p := by induction p; reflexivity protected definition homotopy.rfl [reducible] [unfold_full] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} : f ~ f := homotopy.refl f definition compose_id {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : f ∘ id ~ f := by reflexivity definition id_compose {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : id ∘ f ~ f := by reflexivity -- move to eq2 definition ap_eq_ap011 {A B C X : Type} (f : A → B → C) (g : X → A) (h : X → B) {x x' : X} (p : x = x') : ap (λx, f (g x) (h x)) p = ap011 f (ap g p) (ap h p) := by induction p; reflexivity definition ap_is_weakly_constant {A B : Type} {f : A → B} (h : is_weakly_constant f) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') : ap f p = (h a a)⁻¹ ⬝ h a a' := by induction p; exact !con.left_inv⁻¹ definition ap_is_constant_idp {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b : B} (p : Πa, f a = b) {a : A} (q : a = a) (r : q = idp) : ap_is_constant p q = ap02 f r ⬝ (con.right_inv (p a))⁻¹ := by cases r; exact !idp_con⁻¹ definition con_right_inv_natural {A : Type} {a a' : A} {p p' : a = a'} (q : p = p') : con.right_inv p = q ◾ q⁻² ⬝ con.right_inv p' := by induction q; induction p; reflexivity definition whisker_right_ap {A B : Type} {a a' : A}{b₁ b₂ b₃ : B} (q : b₂ = b₃) (f : A → b₁ = b₂) (p : a = a') : whisker_right q (ap f p) = ap (λa, f a ⬝ q) p := by induction p; reflexivity infix ` ⬝hty `:75 := homotopy.trans postfix `⁻¹ʰᵗʸ`:(max+1) := homotopy.symm definition hassoc {A B C D : Type} (h : C → D) (g : B → C) (f : A → B) : (h ∘ g) ∘ f ~ h ∘ (g ∘ f) := λa, idp -- to algebra.homotopy_group definition homotopy_group_homomorphism_pcompose (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) (f : A →* B) : π→g[n] (g ∘* f) ~ π→g[n] g ∘ π→g[n] f := begin induction H with n, exact to_homotopy (homotopy_group_functor_compose (succ n) g f) end definition apn_pinv (n : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A ≃* B) : Ω→[n] f⁻¹ᵉ* ~* (loopn_pequiv_loopn n f)⁻¹ᵉ* := begin refine !to_pinv_pequiv_MK2⁻¹* end -- definition homotopy_group_homomorphism_pinv (n : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A ≃* B) : -- π→g[n+1] f⁻¹ᵉ* ~ (homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv n f)⁻¹ᵍ := -- begin -- -- refine ptrunc_functor_phomotopy 0 !apn_pinv ⬝hty _, -- -- intro x, esimp, -- end -- definition natural_square_tr_eq {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {f g : A → B} -- (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') : natural_square p q = square_of_pathover (apd p q) := -- idp section hsquare variables {A₀₀ A₂₀ A₄₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ A₄₂ A₀₄ A₂₄ A₄₄ : Type} {f₁₀ : A₀₀ → A₂₀} {f₃₀ : A₂₀ → A₄₀} {f₀₁ : A₀₀ → A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ → A₂₂} {f₄₁ : A₄₀ → A₄₂} {f₁₂ : A₀₂ → A₂₂} {f₃₂ : A₂₂ → A₄₂} {f₀₃ : A₀₂ → A₀₄} {f₂₃ : A₂₂ → A₂₄} {f₄₃ : A₄₂ → A₄₄} {f₁₄ : A₀₄ → A₂₄} {f₃₄ : A₂₄ → A₄₄} definition hsquare [reducible] (f₁₀ : A₀₀ → A₂₀) (f₁₂ : A₀₂ → A₂₂) (f₀₁ : A₀₀ → A₀₂) (f₂₁ : A₂₀ → A₂₂) : Type := f₂₁ ∘ f₁₀ ~ f₁₂ ∘ f₀₁ definition hsquare_of_homotopy (p : f₂₁ ∘ f₁₀ ~ f₁₂ ∘ f₀₁) : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁ := p definition homotopy_of_hsquare (p : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : f₂₁ ∘ f₁₀ ~ f₁₂ ∘ f₀₁ := p definition hhconcat (p : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) (q : hsquare f₃₀ f₃₂ f₂₁ f₄₁) : hsquare (f₃₀ ∘ f₁₀) (f₃₂ ∘ f₁₂) f₀₁ f₄₁ := hwhisker_right f₁₀ q ⬝hty hwhisker_left f₃₂ p definition hvconcat (p : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) (q : hsquare f₁₂ f₁₄ f₀₃ f₂₃) : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₄ (f₀₃ ∘ f₀₁) (f₂₃ ∘ f₂₁) := (hhconcat p⁻¹ʰᵗʸ q⁻¹ʰᵗʸ)⁻¹ʰᵗʸ definition hhinverse {f₁₀ : A₀₀ ≃ A₂₀} {f₁₂ : A₀₂ ≃ A₂₂} (p : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : hsquare f₁₀⁻¹ᵉ f₁₂⁻¹ᵉ f₂₁ f₀₁ := λb, eq_inv_of_eq ((p (f₁₀⁻¹ᵉ b))⁻¹ ⬝ ap f₂₁ (to_right_inv f₁₀ b)) definition hvinverse {f₀₁ : A₀₀ ≃ A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ ≃ A₂₂} (p : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : hsquare f₁₂ f₁₀ f₀₁⁻¹ᵉ f₂₁⁻¹ᵉ := (hhinverse p⁻¹ʰᵗʸ)⁻¹ʰᵗʸ infix ` ⬝htyh `:73 := hhconcat infix ` ⬝htyv `:73 := hvconcat postfix `⁻¹ʰᵗʸʰ`:(max+1) := hhinverse postfix `⁻¹ʰᵗʸᵛ`:(max+1) := hvinverse end hsquare -- move to init.funext protected definition homotopy.rec_on_idp_left [recursor] {A : Type} {P : A → Type} {g : Πa, P a} {Q : Πf, (f ~ g) → Type} {f : Π x, P x} (p : f ~ g) (H : Q g (homotopy.refl g)) : Q f p := begin induction p using homotopy.rec_on, induction q, exact H end --eq2 (duplicate of ap_compose_ap02_constant) definition ap02_ap_constant {A B C : Type} {a a' : A} (f : B → C) (b : B) (p : a = a') : square (ap_constant p (f b)) (ap02 f (ap_constant p b)) (ap_compose f (λx, b) p) idp := by induction p; exact ids definition ap_constant_compose {A B C : Type} {a a' : A} (c : C) (f : A → B) (p : a = a') : square (ap_constant p c) (ap_constant (ap f p) c) (ap_compose (λx, c) f p) idp := by induction p; exact ids definition ap02_constant {A B : Type} {a a' : A} (b : B) {p p' : a = a'} (q : p = p') : square (ap_constant p b) (ap_constant p' b) (ap02 (λx, b) q) idp := by induction q; exact vrfl end eq open eq namespace wedge open pushout unit protected definition glue (A B : Type*) : inl pt = inr pt :> wedge A B := pushout.glue ⋆ end wedge namespace pi definition is_contr_pi_of_neg {A : Type} (B : A → Type) (H : ¬ A) : is_contr (Πa, B a) := begin apply is_contr.mk (λa, empty.elim (H a)), intro f, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, contradiction end end pi namespace trunc -- TODO: redefine loopn_ptrunc_pequiv definition apn_ptrunc_functor (n : ℕ₋₂) (k : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : Ω→[k] (ptrunc_functor (n+k) f) ∘* (loopn_ptrunc_pequiv n k A)⁻¹ᵉ* ~* (loopn_ptrunc_pequiv n k B)⁻¹ᵉ* ∘* ptrunc_functor n (Ω→[k] f) := begin revert n, induction k with k IH: intro n, { reflexivity }, { exact sorry } end definition ptrunc_pequiv_natural [constructor] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_trunc n A] [is_trunc n B] : f ∘* ptrunc_pequiv n A ~* ptrunc_pequiv n B ∘* ptrunc_functor n f := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro a, induction a with a, reflexivity }, { refine !idp_con ⬝ _ ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹, refine !ap_compose'⁻¹ ⬝ _, apply ap_id } end definition ptr_natural [constructor] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : ptrunc_functor n f ∘* ptr n A ~* ptr n B ∘* f := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro a, reflexivity }, { reflexivity } end definition ptrunc_elim_pcompose (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) (f : A →* B) [is_trunc n B] [is_trunc n C] : ptrunc.elim n (g ∘* f) ~* g ∘* ptrunc.elim n f := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro a, induction a with a, reflexivity }, { apply idp_con } end end trunc namespace is_equiv definition inv_homotopy_inv {A B : Type} {f g : A → B} [is_equiv f] [is_equiv g] (p : f ~ g) : f⁻¹ ~ g⁻¹ := λb, (left_inv g (f⁻¹ b))⁻¹ ⬝ ap g⁻¹ ((p (f⁻¹ b))⁻¹ ⬝ right_inv f b) definition to_inv_homotopy_to_inv {A B : Type} {f g : A ≃ B} (p : f ~ g) : f⁻¹ᵉ ~ g⁻¹ᵉ := inv_homotopy_inv p end is_equiv namespace prod definition pprod_functor [constructor] {A B C D : Type*} (f : A →* C) (g : B →* D) : A ×* B →* C ×* D := pmap.mk (prod_functor f g) (prod_eq (respect_pt f) (respect_pt g)) open prod.ops definition prod_pathover_equiv {A : Type} {B C : A → Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (x : B a × C a) (x' : B a' × C a') : x =[p] x' ≃ x.1 =[p] x'.1 × x.2 =[p] x'.2 := begin fapply equiv.MK, { intro q, induction q, constructor: constructor }, { intro v, induction v with q r, exact prod_pathover _ _ _ q r }, { intro v, induction v with q r, induction x with b c, induction x' with b' c', esimp at *, induction q, refine idp_rec_on r _, reflexivity }, { intro q, induction q, induction x with b c, reflexivity } end end prod open prod namespace sigma -- set_option pp.notation false -- set_option pp.binder_types true open sigma.ops definition pathover_pr1 [unfold 9] {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type} {a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {x : Σb, C a b} {x' : Σb', C a' b'} (q : x =[p] x') : x.1 =[p] x'.1 := begin induction q, constructor end definition is_prop_elimo_self {A : Type} (B : A → Type) {a : A} (b : B a) {H : is_prop (B a)} : @is_prop.elimo A B a a idp b b H = idpo := !is_prop.elim definition sigma_pathover_equiv_of_is_prop {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (C : Πa, B a → Type) {a a' : A} (p : a = a') (x : Σb, C a b) (x' : Σb', C a' b') [Πa b, is_prop (C a b)] : x =[p] x' ≃ x.1 =[p] x'.1 := begin fapply equiv.MK, { exact pathover_pr1 }, { intro q, induction x with b c, induction x' with b' c', esimp at q, induction q, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, exact sigma_eq idp !is_prop.elimo }, { intro q, induction x with b c, induction x' with b' c', esimp at q, induction q, have c = c', from !is_prop.elim, induction this, rewrite [▸*, is_prop_elimo_self (C a) c] }, { intro q, induction q, induction x with b c, rewrite [▸*, is_prop_elimo_self (C a) c] } end definition sigma_ua {A B : Type} (C : A ≃ B → Type) : (Σ(p : A = B), C (equiv_of_eq p)) ≃ Σ(e : A ≃ B), C e := sigma_equiv_sigma_left' !eq_equiv_equiv -- definition sigma_pathover_equiv_of_is_prop {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type} -- {a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {c : C a b} {c' : C a' b'} -- [Πa b, is_prop (C a b)] : ⟨b, c⟩ =[p] ⟨b', c'⟩ ≃ b =[p] b' := -- begin -- fapply equiv.MK, -- { exact pathover_pr1 }, -- { intro q, induction q, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, exact sigma_eq idp !is_prop.elimo }, -- { intro q, induction q, -- have c = c', from !is_prop.elim, induction this, -- rewrite [▸*, is_prop_elimo_self (C a) c] }, -- { esimp, generalize ⟨b, c⟩, intro x q, } -- end --rexact @(ap pathover_pr1) _ idpo _, end sigma open sigma namespace pointed definition phomotopy_of_homotopy {X Y : Type*} {f g : X →* Y} (h : f ~ g) [is_set Y] : f ~* g := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { exact h }, { apply is_set.elim } end end pointed open pointed namespace group open is_trunc algebra definition to_fun_isomorphism_trans {G H K : Group} (φ : G ≃g H) (ψ : H ≃g K) : φ ⬝g ψ ~ ψ ∘ φ := by reflexivity definition add_homomorphism (G H : AddGroup) : Type := homomorphism G H infix ` →a `:55 := add_homomorphism definition agroup_fun [coercion] [unfold 3] [reducible] {G H : AddGroup} (φ : G →a H) : G → H := φ definition add_homomorphism.struct [instance] {G H : AddGroup} (φ : G →a H) : is_add_hom φ := homomorphism.addstruct φ definition add_homomorphism.mk [constructor] {G H : AddGroup} (φ : G → H) (h : is_add_hom φ) : G →g H := homomorphism.mk φ h definition add_homomorphism_compose [constructor] [trans] {G₁ G₂ G₃ : AddGroup} (ψ : G₂ →a G₃) (φ : G₁ →a G₂) : G₁ →a G₃ := add_homomorphism.mk (ψ ∘ φ) (is_add_hom_compose _ _) definition add_homomorphism_id [constructor] [refl] (G : AddGroup) : G →a G := add_homomorphism.mk (@id G) (is_add_hom_id G) abbreviation aid [constructor] := @add_homomorphism_id infixr ` ∘a `:75 := add_homomorphism_compose definition to_respect_add' {H₁ H₂ : AddGroup} (χ : H₁ →a H₂) (g h : H₁) : χ (g + h) = χ g + χ h := respect_add χ g h theorem to_respect_zero' {H₁ H₂ : AddGroup} (χ : H₁ →a H₂) : χ 0 = 0 := respect_zero χ theorem to_respect_neg' {H₁ H₂ : AddGroup} (χ : H₁ →a H₂) (g : H₁) : χ (-g) = -(χ g) := respect_neg χ g definition homomorphism_add [constructor] {G H : AddAbGroup} (φ ψ : G →a H) : G →a H := add_homomorphism.mk (λg, φ g + ψ g) abstract begin intro g g', refine ap011 add !to_respect_add' !to_respect_add' ⬝ _, refine !add.assoc ⬝ ap (add _) (!add.assoc⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, x + _) !add.comm ⬝ !add.assoc) ⬝ !add.assoc⁻¹ end end definition homomorphism_mul [constructor] {G H : AbGroup} (φ ψ : G →g H) : G →g H := homomorphism.mk (λg, φ g * ψ g) (to_respect_add (homomorphism_add φ ψ)) definition pmap_of_homomorphism_gid (G : Group) : pmap_of_homomorphism (gid G) ~* pid G := begin fapply phomotopy_of_homotopy, reflexivity end definition pmap_of_homomorphism_gcompose {G H K : Group} (ψ : H →g K) (φ : G →g H) : pmap_of_homomorphism (ψ ∘g φ) ~* pmap_of_homomorphism ψ ∘* pmap_of_homomorphism φ := begin fapply phomotopy_of_homotopy, reflexivity end definition pmap_of_homomorphism_phomotopy {G H : Group} {φ ψ : G →g H} (H : φ ~ ψ) : pmap_of_homomorphism φ ~* pmap_of_homomorphism ψ := begin fapply phomotopy_of_homotopy, exact H end definition pequiv_of_isomorphism_trans {G₁ G₂ G₃ : Group} (φ : G₁ ≃g G₂) (ψ : G₂ ≃g G₂) : pequiv_of_isomorphism (φ ⬝g ψ) ~* pequiv_of_isomorphism ψ ∘* pequiv_of_isomorphism φ := begin apply phomotopy_of_homotopy, reflexivity end definition isomorphism_eq {G H : Group} {φ ψ : G ≃g H} (p : φ ~ ψ) : φ = ψ := begin induction φ with φ φe, induction ψ with ψ ψe, exact apd011 isomorphism.mk (homomorphism_eq p) !is_prop.elimo end definition is_set_isomorphism [instance] (G H : Group) : is_set (G ≃g H) := begin have H : G ≃g H ≃ Σ(f : G →g H), is_equiv f, begin fapply equiv.MK, { intro φ, induction φ, constructor, assumption }, { intro v, induction v, constructor, assumption }, { intro v, induction v, reflexivity }, { intro φ, induction φ, reflexivity } end, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, exact H end -- definition is_equiv_isomorphism -- some extra instances for type class inference -- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G') -- : @is_mul_hom G G' (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G)) -- (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G')) φ := -- homomorphism.struct φ -- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism1 [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G') -- : @is_mul_hom G G' _ -- (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G')) φ := -- homomorphism.struct φ -- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism2 [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G') -- : @is_mul_hom G G' (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G)) _ φ := -- homomorphism.struct φ end group open group namespace fiber definition pcompose_ppoint {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : f ∘* ppoint f ~* pconst (pfiber f) B := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { exact point_eq }, { exact !idp_con⁻¹ } end definition ap1_ppoint_phomotopy {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : Ω→ (ppoint f) ∘* pfiber_loop_space f ~* ppoint (Ω→ f) := begin exact sorry end definition pfiber_equiv_of_square_ppoint {A B C D : Type*} {f : A →* B} {g : C →* D} (h : A ≃* C) (k : B ≃* D) (s : k ∘* f ~* g ∘* h) : ppoint g ∘* pfiber_equiv_of_square h k s ~* h ∘* ppoint f := sorry end fiber namespace is_trunc definition center' {A : Type} (H : is_contr A) : A := center A definition pequiv_punit_of_is_contr [constructor] (A : Type*) (H : is_contr A) : A ≃* punit := pequiv_of_equiv (equiv_unit_of_is_contr A) (@is_prop.elim unit _ _ _) definition pequiv_punit_of_is_contr' [constructor] (A : Type) (H : is_contr A) : pointed.MK A (center A) ≃* punit := pequiv_punit_of_is_contr (pointed.MK A (center A)) H definition is_trunc_is_contr_fiber [instance] [priority 900] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (b : B) [is_trunc n A] [is_trunc n B] : is_trunc n (is_contr (fiber f b)) := begin cases n, { apply is_contr_of_inhabited_prop, apply is_contr_fun_of_is_equiv, apply is_equiv_of_is_contr }, { apply is_trunc_succ_of_is_prop } end end is_trunc namespace is_conn open unit trunc_index nat is_trunc pointed.ops definition is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy' (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn -1 A] (H : Πk a, is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_contr A := begin assert aa : trunc -1 A, { apply center }, assert H3 : is_conn 0 A, { induction aa with a, exact H 0 a }, exact is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy n A H end -- don't make is_prop_is_trunc an instance definition is_trunc_succ_is_trunc [instance] (n m : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) : is_trunc (n.+1) (is_trunc m A) := is_trunc_of_le _ !minus_one_le_succ definition is_conn_of_trivial_homotopy (n : ℕ₋₂) (m : ℕ) (A : Type) [is_trunc n A] [is_conn 0 A] (H : Π(k : ℕ) a, k ≤ m → is_contr (π[k] (pointed.MK A a))) : is_conn m A := begin apply is_contr_of_trivial_homotopy_nat m (trunc m A), intro k a H2, induction a with a, apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev, exact equiv_of_pequiv (homotopy_group_trunc_of_le (pointed.MK A a) _ _ H2), exact H k a H2 end definition is_conn_of_trivial_homotopy_pointed (n : ℕ₋₂) (m : ℕ) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A] (H : Π(k : ℕ), k ≤ m → is_contr (π[k] A)) : is_conn m A := begin have is_conn 0 A, proof H 0 !zero_le qed, apply is_conn_of_trivial_homotopy n m A, intro k a H2, revert a, apply is_conn.elim -1, cases A with A a, exact H k H2 end end is_conn namespace circle /- Suppose for `f, g : A -> B` I prove a homotopy `H : f ~ g` by induction on the element in `A`. And suppose `p : a = a'` is a path constructor in `A`. Then `natural_square_tr H p` has type `square (H a) (H a') (ap f p) (ap g p)` and is equal to the square which defined H on the path constructor -/ definition natural_square_elim_loop {A : Type} {f g : S¹ → A} (p : f base = g base) (q : square p p (ap f loop) (ap g loop)) : natural_square (circle.rec p (eq_pathover q)) loop = q := begin -- refine !natural_square_eq ⬝ _, refine ap square_of_pathover !rec_loop ⬝ _, exact to_right_inv !eq_pathover_equiv_square q end definition circle_elim_constant [unfold 5] {A : Type} {a : A} {p : a = a} (r : p = idp) (x : S¹) : circle.elim a p x = a := begin induction x, { reflexivity }, { apply eq_pathover_constant_right, apply hdeg_square, exact !elim_loop ⬝ r } end end circle namespace susp definition loop_psusp_intro_natural {X Y Z : Type*} (g : psusp Y →* Z) (f : X →* Y) : loop_psusp_intro (g ∘* psusp_functor f) ~* loop_psusp_intro g ∘* f := pwhisker_right _ !ap1_pcompose ⬝* !passoc ⬝* pwhisker_left _ !loop_psusp_unit_natural⁻¹* ⬝* !passoc⁻¹* definition psusp_functor_phomotopy {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (p : f ~* g) : psusp_functor f ~* psusp_functor g := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro x, induction x, { reflexivity }, { reflexivity }, { apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square, esimp, refine !elim_merid ⬝ _ ⬝ !elim_merid⁻¹ᵖ, exact ap merid (p a), }}, { reflexivity }, end definition psusp_functor_pid (A : Type*) : psusp_functor (pid A) ~* pid (psusp A) := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro x, induction x, { reflexivity }, { reflexivity }, { apply eq_pathover_id_right, apply hdeg_square, apply elim_merid }}, { reflexivity }, end definition psusp_functor_pcompose {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) (f : A →* B) : psusp_functor (g ∘* f) ~* psusp_functor g ∘* psusp_functor f := begin fapply phomotopy.mk, { intro x, induction x, { reflexivity }, { reflexivity }, { apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square, esimp, refine !elim_merid ⬝ _ ⬝ (ap_compose (psusp_functor g) _ _)⁻¹ᵖ, refine _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_merid⁻¹, exact !elim_merid⁻¹ }}, { reflexivity }, end definition psusp_elim_psusp_functor {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* Ω C) (f : A →* B) : psusp.elim g ∘* psusp_functor f ~* psusp.elim (g ∘* f) := begin refine !passoc ⬝* _, exact pwhisker_left _ !psusp_functor_pcompose⁻¹* end definition psusp_elim_phomotopy {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* Ω B} (p : f ~* g) : psusp.elim f ~* psusp.elim g := pwhisker_left _ (psusp_functor_phomotopy p) definition psusp_elim_natural {X Y Z : Type*} (g : Y →* Z) (f : X →* Ω Y) : g ∘* psusp.elim f ~* psusp.elim (Ω→ g ∘* f) := begin refine _ ⬝* pwhisker_left _ !psusp_functor_pcompose⁻¹*, refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _ ⬝* !passoc, exact pwhisker_right _ !loop_psusp_counit_natural end end susp namespace category -- replace precategory_group with precategory_Group (the former has a universe error) definition precategory_Group.{u} [instance] [constructor] : precategory.{u+1 u} Group := begin fapply precategory.mk, { exact λG H, G →g H }, { exact _ }, { exact λG H K ψ φ, ψ ∘g φ }, { exact λG, gid G }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp } end definition precategory_AbGroup.{u} [instance] [constructor] : precategory.{u+1 u} AbGroup := begin fapply precategory.mk, { exact λG H, G →g H }, { exact _ }, { exact λG H K ψ φ, ψ ∘g φ }, { exact λG, gid G }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }, { intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp } end open iso definition Group_is_iso_of_is_equiv {G H : Group} (φ : G →g H) (H : is_equiv (group_fun φ)) : is_iso φ := begin fconstructor, { exact (isomorphism.mk φ H)⁻¹ᵍ }, { apply homomorphism_eq, rexact left_inv φ }, { apply homomorphism_eq, rexact right_inv φ } end definition Group_is_equiv_of_is_iso {G H : Group} (φ : G ⟶ H) (Hφ : is_iso φ) : is_equiv (group_fun φ) := begin fapply adjointify, { exact group_fun φ⁻¹ʰ }, { note p := right_inverse φ, exact ap010 group_fun p }, { note p := left_inverse φ, exact ap010 group_fun p } end definition Group_iso_equiv (G H : Group) : (G ≅ H) ≃ (G ≃g H) := begin fapply equiv.MK, { intro φ, induction φ with φ φi, constructor, exact Group_is_equiv_of_is_iso φ _ }, { intro v, induction v with φ φe, constructor, exact Group_is_iso_of_is_equiv φ _ }, { intro v, induction v with φ φe, apply isomorphism_eq, reflexivity }, { intro φ, induction φ with φ φi, apply iso_eq, reflexivity } end definition Group_props.{u} {A : Type.{u}} (v : (A → A → A) × (A → A) × A) : Prop.{u} := begin induction v with m v, induction v with i o, fapply trunctype.mk, { exact is_set A × (Πa, m a o = a) × (Πa, m o a = a) × (Πa b c, m (m a b) c = m a (m b c)) × (Πa, m (i a) a = o) }, { apply is_trunc_of_imp_is_trunc, intro v, induction v with H v, have is_prop (Πa, m a o = a), from _, have is_prop (Πa, m o a = a), from _, have is_prop (Πa b c, m (m a b) c = m a (m b c)), from _, have is_prop (Πa, m (i a) a = o), from _, apply is_trunc_prod } end definition Group.sigma_char2.{u} : Group.{u} ≃ Σ(A : Type.{u}) (v : (A → A → A) × (A → A) × A), Group_props v := begin fapply equiv.MK, { intro G, refine ⟨G, _⟩, induction G with G g, induction g with m s ma o om mo i mi, repeat (fconstructor; do 2 try assumption), }, { intro v, induction v with x v, induction v with y v, repeat induction y with x y, repeat induction v with x v, constructor, fconstructor, repeat assumption }, { intro v, induction v with x v, induction v with y v, repeat induction y with x y, repeat induction v with x v, reflexivity }, { intro v, repeat induction v with x v, reflexivity }, end open is_trunc section local attribute group.to_has_mul group.to_has_inv [coercion] theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq {A : Type} (G H : group A) (p : @mul A G ~2 @mul A H) : @inv A G ~ @inv A H := begin have foo : Π(g : A), @inv A G g = (@inv A G g * g) * @inv A H g, from λg, !mul_inv_cancel_right⁻¹, cases G with Gs Gm Gh1 G1 Gh2 Gh3 Gi Gh4, cases H with Hs Hm Hh1 H1 Hh2 Hh3 Hi Hh4, change Gi ~ Hi, intro g, have p' : Gm ~2 Hm, from p, calc Gi g = Hm (Hm (Gi g) g) (Hi g) : foo ... = Hm (Gm (Gi g) g) (Hi g) : by rewrite p' ... = Hm G1 (Hi g) : by rewrite Gh4 ... = Gm G1 (Hi g) : by rewrite p' ... = Hi g : Gh2 end theorem one_eq_of_mul_eq {A : Type} (G H : group A) (p : @mul A (group.to_has_mul G) ~2 @mul A (group.to_has_mul H)) : @one A (group.to_has_one G) = @one A (group.to_has_one H) := begin cases G with Gm Gs Gh1 G1 Gh2 Gh3 Gi Gh4, cases H with Hm Hs Hh1 H1 Hh2 Hh3 Hi Hh4, exact (Hh2 G1)⁻¹ ⬝ (p H1 G1)⁻¹ ⬝ Gh3 H1, end end open prod.ops definition group_of_Group_props.{u} {A : Type.{u}} {m : A → A → A} {i : A → A} {o : A} (H : Group_props (m, (i, o))) : group A := ⦃group, mul := m, inv := i, one := o, is_set_carrier := H.1, mul_one := H.2.1, one_mul := H.2.2.1, mul_assoc := H.2.2.2.1, mul_left_inv := H.2.2.2.2⦄ theorem Group_eq_equiv_lemma2 {A : Type} {m m' : A → A → A} {i i' : A → A} {o o' : A} (H : Group_props (m, (i, o))) (H' : Group_props (m', (i', o'))) : (m, (i, o)) = (m', (i', o')) ≃ (m ~2 m') := begin have is_set A, from pr1 H, apply equiv_of_is_prop, { intro p, exact apd100 (eq_pr1 p)}, { intro p, apply prod_eq (eq_of_homotopy2 p), apply prod_eq: esimp [Group_props] at *; esimp, { apply eq_of_homotopy, exact inv_eq_of_mul_eq (group_of_Group_props H) (group_of_Group_props H') p }, { exact one_eq_of_mul_eq (group_of_Group_props H) (group_of_Group_props H') p }} end open sigma.ops theorem Group_eq_equiv_lemma {G H : Group} (p : (Group.sigma_char2 G).1 = (Group.sigma_char2 H).1) : ((Group.sigma_char2 G).2 =[p] (Group.sigma_char2 H).2) ≃ (is_mul_hom (equiv_of_eq (proof p qed : Group.carrier G = Group.carrier H))) := begin refine !sigma_pathover_equiv_of_is_prop ⬝e _, induction G with G g, induction H with H h, esimp [Group.sigma_char2] at p, induction p, refine !pathover_idp ⬝e _, induction g with s m ma o om mo i mi, induction h with σ μ μa ε εμ με ι μι, exact Group_eq_equiv_lemma2 (Group.sigma_char2 (Group.mk G (group.mk s m ma o om mo i mi))).2.2 (Group.sigma_char2 (Group.mk G (group.mk σ μ μa ε εμ με ι μι))).2.2 end definition isomorphism.sigma_char (G H : Group) : (G ≃g H) ≃ Σ(e : G ≃ H), is_mul_hom e := begin fapply equiv.MK, { intro φ, exact ⟨equiv_of_isomorphism φ, to_respect_mul φ⟩ }, { intro v, induction v with e p, exact isomorphism_of_equiv e p }, { intro v, induction v with e p, induction e, reflexivity }, { intro φ, induction φ with φ H, induction φ, reflexivity }, end definition Group_eq_equiv (G H : Group) : G = H ≃ (G ≃g H) := begin refine (eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv Group.sigma_char2 G H) ⬝e _, refine !sigma_eq_equiv ⬝e _, refine sigma_equiv_sigma_right Group_eq_equiv_lemma ⬝e _, transitivity (Σ(e : (Group.sigma_char2 G).1 ≃ (Group.sigma_char2 H).1), @is_mul_hom _ _ _ _ (to_fun e)), apply sigma_ua, exact !isomorphism.sigma_char⁻¹ᵉ end definition to_fun_Group_eq_equiv {G H : Group} (p : G = H) : Group_eq_equiv G H p ~ isomorphism_of_eq p := begin induction p, reflexivity end definition Group_eq2 {G H : Group} {p q : G = H} (r : isomorphism_of_eq p ~ isomorphism_of_eq q) : p = q := begin apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn (Group_eq_equiv G H), apply isomorphism_eq, intro g, refine to_fun_Group_eq_equiv p g ⬝ r g ⬝ (to_fun_Group_eq_equiv q g)⁻¹, end definition Group_eq_equiv_Group_iso (G₁ G₂ : Group) : G₁ = G₂ ≃ G₁ ≅ G₂ := Group_eq_equiv G₁ G₂ ⬝e (Group_iso_equiv G₁ G₂)⁻¹ᵉ definition category_Group.{u} : category Group.{u} := category.mk precategory_Group begin intro G H, apply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy (Group_eq_equiv_Group_iso G H), intro p, induction p, fapply iso_eq, apply homomorphism_eq, reflexivity end definition category_AbGroup : category AbGroup := category.mk precategory_AbGroup sorry definition Grp.{u} [constructor] : Category := category.Mk Group.{u} category_Group definition AbGrp [constructor] : Category := category.Mk AbGroup category_AbGroup end category namespace sphere definition psphere_pequiv_iterate_psusp (n : ℕ) : psphere n ≃* iterate_psusp n pbool := begin induction n with n e, { exact psphere_pequiv_pbool }, { exact psusp_pequiv e } end -- definition constant_sphere_map_sphere {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) (f : S* n →* S* m) : -- f ~* pconst (S* n) (S* m) := -- begin -- assert H : is_contr (Ω[n] (S* m)), -- { apply homotopy_group_sphere_le, }, -- apply phomotopy_of_eq, -- apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn !psphere_pmap_pequiv, -- apply @is_prop.elim -- end end sphere definition image_pathover {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {x y : B} (p : x = y) (u : image f x) (v : image f y) : u =[p] v := begin apply is_prop.elimo end section injective_surjective open trunc fiber image variables {A B C : Type} [is_set A] [is_set B] [is_set C] (f : A → B) (g : B → C) (h : A → C) (H : g ∘ f ~ h) include H definition is_embedding_factor : is_embedding h → is_embedding f := begin induction H using homotopy.rec_on_idp, intro E, fapply is_embedding_of_is_injective, intro x y p, fapply @is_injective_of_is_embedding _ _ _ E _ _ (ap g p) end definition is_surjective_factor : is_surjective h → is_surjective g := begin induction H using homotopy.rec_on_idp, intro S, intro c, note p := S c, induction p, apply tr, fapply fiber.mk, exact f a, exact p end end injective_surjective definition AbGroup_of_Group.{u} (G : Group.{u}) (H : Π x y : G, x * y = y * x) : AbGroup.{u} := begin induction G, fapply AbGroup.mk, assumption, exact ⦃ab_group, struct, mul_comm := H⦄ end definition trivial_ab_group : AbGroup.{0} := begin fapply AbGroup_of_Group Trivial_group, intro x y, reflexivity end definition trivial_homomorphism (A B : AbGroup) : A →g B := begin fapply homomorphism.mk, exact λ a, 1, intros, symmetry, exact one_mul 1, end definition from_trivial_ab_group (A : AbGroup) : trivial_ab_group →g A := trivial_homomorphism trivial_ab_group A definition is_embedding_from_trivial_ab_group (A : AbGroup) : is_embedding (from_trivial_ab_group A) := begin fapply is_embedding_of_is_injective, intro x y p, induction x, induction y, reflexivity end definition to_trivial_ab_group (A : AbGroup) : A →g trivial_ab_group := trivial_homomorphism A trivial_ab_group /- Stuff added by Jeremy -/ definition exists.elim {A : Type} {p : A → Type} {B : Type} [is_prop B] (H : Exists p) (H' : ∀ (a : A), p a → B) : B := trunc.elim (sigma.rec H') H definition image.elim {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {C : Type} [is_prop C] {b : B} (H : image f b) (H' : ∀ (a : A), f a = b → C) : C := begin refine (trunc.elim _ H), intro H'', cases H'' with a Ha, exact H' a Ha end definition image.intro {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {a : A} {b : B} (h : f a = b) : image f b := begin apply trunc.merely.intro, apply fiber.mk, exact h end definition total_image {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type := sigma (image f) local attribute is_prop.elim_set [recursor 6] definition total_image.elim_set [unfold 8] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {C : Type} [is_set C] (g : A → C) (h : Πa a', f a = f a' → g a = g a') (x : total_image f) : C := begin induction x with b v, induction v using is_prop.elim_set with x x x', { induction x with a p, exact g a }, { induction x with a p, induction x' with a' p', induction p', exact h _ _ p } end definition total_image.rec [unfold 7] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {C : total_image f → Type} [H : Πx, is_prop (C x)] (g : Πa, C ⟨f a, image.mk a idp⟩) (x : total_image f) : C x := begin induction x with b v, refine @image.rec _ _ _ _ _ (λv, H ⟨b, v⟩) _ v, intro a p, induction p, exact g a end definition image.equiv_exists {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b : B} : image f b ≃ ∃ a, f a = b := trunc_equiv_trunc _ (fiber.sigma_char _ _) -- move to homomorphism.hlean section theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero_of_is_embedding {A B : Type} [add_group A] [add_group B] {f : A → B} [is_add_hom f] [is_embedding f] {a : A} (h : f a = 0) : a = 0 := have f a = f 0, by rewrite [h, respect_zero], show a = 0, from is_injective_of_is_embedding this end /- put somewhere in algebra -/ structure Ring := (carrier : Type) (struct : ring carrier) attribute Ring.carrier [coercion] attribute Ring.struct [instance]