From 011f5504db0c32e0ba7f386242a6f189b2e9e6e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Phillips Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:53:55 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify the L2 voting process (#1079) * Clarify the L2 voting process * Clarify that L2 and L3 via temp channel * Update GOVERNANCE.md Co-authored-by: Nate Moore Co-authored-by: Nate Moore --- GOVERNANCE.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/GOVERNANCE.md b/GOVERNANCE.md index 5609d3935..8796938ec 100644 --- a/GOVERNANCE.md +++ b/GOVERNANCE.md @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Anyone who has made several significant (non-trivial) contributions to Astro can - Nominees are expected to be respectful of every community member and to work collaboratively in the spirit of inclusion. - Have submitted a minimum of 10 qualifying significant contributions (see list above). - You can be nominated by any existing Contributor (L2 or above). -- Once nominated, there will be a vote by existing Contributors (L3 or above). +- Once nominated, there will be a vote by existing Contributors (L3 or above) (see [voting rules](#voting)). It is important to recognize that this role is a privilege, not a right. That privilege must be earned and once earned it can be removed (in a vote by project Stewards). However, under normal circumstances this role exists for as long as the Contributor wishes to continue engaging with the project. @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Steward is an additional privilege bestowed to 1 (or more) Contributors. The rol Certain project decisions require a vote. These include: - Governance changes: simple majority (over 50%) conducted via GitHub PR approval. -- Core contributor membership: overwhelming majority (over 70%) conducted by privately messaging a steward. Funneling both assenting and dissenting votes directly through stewards allows for anonymity when discussing the merits of a potential contributor. +- Contributor membership (L2 and L3): discussion conducted via a temporary Discord channel open to qualified contributors for up to 3 days. Acceptance requires an overwhelming majority (over 70%) vote conducted by privately messaging a steward. Funneling both assenting and dissenting votes directly through stewards allows for anonymity when discussing the merits of a potential contributor. A steward may initiate a vote for any unlisted project decision. Core contributors can request a vote by contacting a steward.