* Pass the `mode` through to snowpack
This allows the production packages to be prepared.
* Use snowpack 3.3.1
* Update path to prism loadComponents external ref
* Upgrade to snowpack 3.3.2
* chore(examples): add kitchen-sink
* feat: support children in rendered components
* feat: add support for rendering children in Svelte
* fix: cleanup p/react fragment children
* chore: add @ts-nocheck to svelte files
* chore: update lockfiles
* fix: types
* feat: memoize frontend/renderer/utils
* fix: disable eslint for compiled SvelteWrapper
* fix: add missing dep
Co-authored-by: Nate Moore <nate@skypack.dev>
* Change to import.meta.glob()
Change of plans—maintain parity with Snowpack and Vite because our Collections API will use a different interface
* Get basic pagination working
* Get params working
* Rename to import.meta.fetchContent
* Upgrade to fdir
* add dep domhandler imported in in src/build/static
* lint and jsDoc error
* move domhandler to devDep
* chore: add package lock
* escape string jsDoc
* chore: add astro dep in until prism import is refactored
* chore: add snowpack example package lock
Removing the dependency breaks the site as using Markdown creates an import to a builtin Astro component. So we need astro as a dep. Not sure why it was changed anyways.
* Add example blog
* Add author data
* Improve navigation
* Style nav
* Add friendly error message
* Throw error if import glob used for non-Markdown files
* Use import.meta.collection() API instead
* README fixes
This adds astro/components/ and moves the Prism.astro component into there. So to use in a project you can do:
```html
---
import Prism from 'astro/components/Prism.astro';
---
<Prism lang="html" code={`<html> ... </html>`}
```
* Fix complex MDX parsing
This allows fully MDX support using the micromark MDX extension. One caveat is that if you do something like use the less than sign, you need to escape it because the parser expects these to be tags otherwise.
* Move micromark definition
* Implement fallback capability
This makes it possible for a dynamic component to render fallback content on the server.
The mechanism is a special `static` prop passed to the component. If `static` is true then the component knows it can render static content.
Putting aside the word `static`, is this the right approach? I think giving components the flexibility to make the decision themselves *is* the right approach.
However in this case we have a special property that is passed in non-explicitly. I think we have to do it this way because if the caller passes in a prop it will get serialized and appear on the client. By making this something we *add* during rendering, it only happens on the server (and only when using `:load`).
Assuming this is the right approach, is `static` the right name for this prop? Other candidates:
* `server`
That's all I have!
* Use `import.meta.env.astro` to tell if running in SSR mode.
* Run formatter
* Add support for React components.
This adds support for react components via a new `extensions` config in astro.config.mjs. In the future we can extend this to do things like look at the import statements, as Snowpack does.
* Fix the tests
* Begin debugging
* Initial tests set up
This adds tests using uvu (we can switch if people want) and restructures things a bit so that it's easier to test.
Like in snowpack you set up a little project. In our tests you can say:
```js
const result = await runtime.load('/blog/hello-world')
```
And analyze the result. I included a `test-helpers.js` which has a function that will turn HTML into a cheerio instance, for inspecting the result HTML.
* Add CI
* Remove extra console logs
* Formatting
