Changed missed inherent occurrences to intrinsic
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ef66e5dbe
commit
63fcbbe25e
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
2
beta.md
2
beta.md
|
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Pull requests are encouraged.
|
|||
|
||||
- [Lambda]({{ site.baseurl }}/Lambda/): Introduction to Lambda Calculus
|
||||
- [Properties]({{ site.baseurl }}/Properties/): Progress and Preservation
|
||||
- [DeBruijn]({{ site.baseurl }}/DeBruijn/): Inherently typed de Bruijn representation
|
||||
- [DeBruijn]({{ site.baseurl }}/DeBruijn/): Intrinsically-typed de Bruijn representation
|
||||
- [More]({{ site.baseurl }}/More/): Additional constructs of simply-typed lambda calculus
|
||||
- [Bisimulation]({{ site.baseurl }}/Bisimulation/): Relating reductions systems
|
||||
- [Inference]({{ site.baseurl }}/Inference/): Bidirectional type inference
|
||||
|
|
2
index.md
2
index.md
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Pull requests are encouraged.
|
|||
|
||||
- [Lambda]({{ site.baseurl }}/Lambda/): Introduction to Lambda Calculus
|
||||
- [Properties]({{ site.baseurl }}/Properties/): Progress and Preservation
|
||||
- [DeBruijn]({{ site.baseurl }}/DeBruijn/): Inherently typed de Bruijn representation
|
||||
- [DeBruijn]({{ site.baseurl }}/DeBruijn/): Intrinsically-typed de Bruijn representation
|
||||
- [More]({{ site.baseurl }}/More/): Additional constructs of simply-typed lambda calculus
|
||||
- [Bisimulation]({{ site.baseurl }}/Bisimulation/): Relating reductions systems
|
||||
- [Inference]({{ site.baseurl }}/Inference/): Bidirectional type inference
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ open import plfa.part3.Compositional using (lambda-inversion; var-inv)
|
|||
The proof of preservation in this section mixes techniques from
|
||||
previous chapters. Like the proof of preservation for the STLC, we are
|
||||
preserving a relation defined separately from the syntax, in contrast
|
||||
to the inherently typed terms. On the other hand, we are using de
|
||||
to the intrinsically-typed terms. On the other hand, we are using de
|
||||
Bruijn indices for variables.
|
||||
|
||||
The outline of the proof remains the same in that we must prove lemmas
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue