Merge pull request #568 from Altariarite/substitution
fixed indentation for proper code displays in Substitution.lagda.md
This commit is contained in:
commit
e54f752b6f
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -733,13 +733,13 @@ The proof is by induction on the term `M`.
|
|||
|
||||
* If `x = S y`, we obtain the goal by the following equational reasoning.
|
||||
|
||||
exts (exts σ) (ext ρ (S y))
|
||||
≡ rename S_ (exts σ (ρ y))
|
||||
≡ rename S_ (rename S_ (σ (ρ y) (by the premise)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (exts σ (S y)) (by compose-rename)
|
||||
≡ rename ((ext ρ) ∘ S_) (σ y)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (rename S_ (σ y)) (by compose-rename)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (exts σ (S y))
|
||||
exts (exts σ) (ext ρ (S y))
|
||||
≡ rename S_ (exts σ (ρ y))
|
||||
≡ rename S_ (rename S_ (σ (ρ y) (by the premise)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (exts σ (S y)) (by compose-rename)
|
||||
≡ rename ((ext ρ) ∘ S_) (σ y)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (rename S_ (σ y)) (by compose-rename)
|
||||
≡ rename (ext ρ) (exts σ (S y))
|
||||
|
||||
* If `M` is an application, we obtain the goal using the induction
|
||||
hypothesis for each subterm.
|
||||
|
@ -807,11 +807,11 @@ We proceed by induction on the term `M`.
|
|||
|
||||
* If `M = ƛ N`, we first use the induction hypothesis to show that
|
||||
|
||||
ƛ ⟪ exts σ₂ ⟫ (⟪ exts σ₁ ⟫ N) ≡ ƛ ⟪ exts σ₁ ⨟ exts σ₂ ⟫ N
|
||||
ƛ ⟪ exts σ₂ ⟫ (⟪ exts σ₁ ⟫ N) ≡ ƛ ⟪ exts σ₁ ⨟ exts σ₂ ⟫ N
|
||||
|
||||
and then use the lemma `exts-seq` to show
|
||||
|
||||
ƛ ⟪ exts σ₁ ⨟ exts σ₂ ⟫ N ≡ ƛ ⟪ exts ( σ₁ ⨟ σ₂) ⟫ N
|
||||
ƛ ⟪ exts σ₁ ⨟ exts σ₂ ⟫ N ≡ ƛ ⟪ exts ( σ₁ ⨟ σ₂) ⟫ N
|
||||
|
||||
* If `M` is an application, we use the induction hypothesis
|
||||
for both subterms.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue