more fixes to Preface
This commit is contained in:
parent
715cfb7fcc
commit
ede0c7cc1b
2 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ Do we also have the following?
|
|||
|
||||
If so, prove; if not, explain why.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Standard Library
|
||||
|
||||
Definitions similar to those in this chapter can be found in the standard library.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ an excellent time to comment on the first part.
|
|||
Since 2013, I have taught a course on Types and Semantics for
|
||||
Programming Languages to fourth-year undergraduates and masters
|
||||
students at the University of Edinburgh. That course is not based on
|
||||
TAPL, but on Pierce's subsequent textbook, [Software Foundations][sf],
|
||||
the excellent [Types and Programming Languages][tapl] by Benjamin
|
||||
Pierce, but on Pierce's subsequent textbook, [Software Foundations][sf],
|
||||
written in collaboration with others and based on Coq. I am convinced
|
||||
of Pierce's claim that basing a course around a proof assistant aids
|
||||
learning, as summarised in his ICFP Keynote, [Lambda, The Ultimate
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue