160 lines
5.7 KiB
Text
160 lines
5.7 KiB
Text
|
/-
|
||
|
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
|
Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||
|
-/
|
||
|
prelude
|
||
|
import init.relation init.tactic
|
||
|
|
||
|
inductive acc.{l₁ l₂} {A : Type.{l₁}} (R : A → A → Type.{l₂}) : A → Type.{max l₁ l₂} :=
|
||
|
intro : ∀x, (∀ y, R y x → acc R y) → acc R x
|
||
|
|
||
|
namespace acc
|
||
|
variables {A : Type} {R : A → A → Type}
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition inv {x y : A} (H₁ : acc R x) (H₂ : R y x) : acc R y :=
|
||
|
rec_on H₁ (λ x₁ ac₁ iH H₂, ac₁ y H₂) H₂
|
||
|
end acc
|
||
|
|
||
|
inductive well_founded [class] {A : Type} (R : A → A → Type) : Type :=
|
||
|
intro : (∀ a, acc R a) → well_founded R
|
||
|
|
||
|
namespace well_founded
|
||
|
definition apply [coercion] {A : Type} {R : A → A → Type} (wf : well_founded R) : ∀a, acc R a :=
|
||
|
take a, well_founded.rec_on wf (λp, p) a
|
||
|
|
||
|
context
|
||
|
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Type}
|
||
|
infix `≺`:50 := R
|
||
|
|
||
|
hypothesis [Hwf : well_founded R]
|
||
|
|
||
|
theorem recursion {C : A → Type} (a : A) (H : Πx, (Πy, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on (Hwf a) (λ x₁ ac₁ iH, H x₁ iH)
|
||
|
|
||
|
theorem induction {C : A → Type} (a : A) (H : ∀x, (∀y, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
|
||
|
recursion a H
|
||
|
|
||
|
parameter {C : A → Type}
|
||
|
parameter F : Πx, (Πy, y ≺ x → C y) → C x
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition fix_F (x : A) (a : acc R x) : C x :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on a (λ x₁ ac₁ iH, F x₁ iH)
|
||
|
|
||
|
theorem fix_F_eq (x : A) (r : acc R x) :
|
||
|
fix_F x r = F x (λ (y : A) (p : y ≺ x), fix_F y (acc.inv r p)) :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on r (λ x H ih, rfl)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- Remark: after we prove function extensionality from univalence, we can drop this hypothesis
|
||
|
hypothesis F_ext : Π (x : A) (f g : Π y, y ≺ x → C y),
|
||
|
(Π (y : A) (p : y ≺ x), f y p = g y p) → F x f = F x g
|
||
|
|
||
|
lemma fix_F_inv (x : A) (r : acc R x) : Π (s : acc R x), fix_F x r = fix_F x s :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on r (λ
|
||
|
(x₁ : A)
|
||
|
(h₁ : Π y, y ≺ x₁ → acc R y)
|
||
|
(ih₁ : Π y (hlt : y ≺ x₁) (s : acc R y), fix_F y (h₁ y hlt) = fix_F y s)
|
||
|
(s : acc R x₁),
|
||
|
have aux₁ : Π (s : acc R x₁) (h₁ : Π y, y ≺ x₁ → acc R y) (ih₁ : Π y (hlt : y ≺ x₁) (s : acc R y),
|
||
|
fix_F y (h₁ y hlt) = fix_F y s), fix_F x₁ (acc.intro x₁ h₁) = fix_F x₁ s, from
|
||
|
λ s, acc.rec_on s (λ
|
||
|
(x₂ : A)
|
||
|
(h₂ : Π y, y ≺ x₂ → acc R y)
|
||
|
(ih₂ : _)
|
||
|
(h₁ : Π y, y ≺ x₂ → acc R y)
|
||
|
(ih₁ : Π y (hlt : y ≺ x₂) (s : acc R y), fix_F y (h₁ y hlt) = fix_F y s),
|
||
|
calc fix_F x₂ (acc.intro x₂ h₁)
|
||
|
= F x₂ (λ (y : A) (p : y ≺ x₂), fix_F y (h₁ y p)) : rfl
|
||
|
... = F x₂ (λ (y : A) (p : y ≺ x₂), fix_F y (h₂ y p)) : F_ext x₂ _ _ (λ (y : A) (p : y ≺ x₂), ih₁ y p (h₂ y p))
|
||
|
... = fix_F x₂ (acc.intro x₂ h₂) : rfl),
|
||
|
show fix_F x₁ (acc.intro x₁ h₁) = fix_F x₁ s, from
|
||
|
aux₁ s h₁ ih₁)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- Well-founded fixpoint
|
||
|
definition fix (x : A) : C x :=
|
||
|
fix_F x (Hwf x)
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- Well-founded fixpoint satisfies fixpoint equation
|
||
|
theorem fix_eq (x : A) : fix x = F x (λy h, fix y) :=
|
||
|
calc
|
||
|
fix x
|
||
|
= fix_F x (Hwf x) : rfl
|
||
|
... = F x (λy h, fix_F y (acc.inv (Hwf x) h)) : fix_F_eq x (Hwf x)
|
||
|
... = F x (λy h, fix_F y (Hwf y)) : F_ext x _ _ (λ y h, fix_F_inv y _ _)
|
||
|
... = F x (λy h, fix y) : rfl
|
||
|
|
||
|
end
|
||
|
end well_founded
|
||
|
|
||
|
open well_founded
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- Empty relation is well-founded
|
||
|
definition empty.wf {A : Type} : well_founded empty_relation :=
|
||
|
well_founded.intro (λ (a : A),
|
||
|
acc.intro a (λ (b : A) (lt : empty), empty.rec _ lt))
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- Subrelation of a well-founded relation is well-founded
|
||
|
namespace subrelation
|
||
|
context
|
||
|
parameters {A : Type} {R Q : A → A → Type}
|
||
|
parameters (H₁ : subrelation Q R)
|
||
|
parameters (H₂ : well_founded R)
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition accessible {a : A} (ac : acc R a) : acc Q a :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on ac
|
||
|
(λ (x : A) (ax : _) (iH : ∀ (y : A), R y x → acc Q y),
|
||
|
acc.intro x (λ (y : A) (lt : Q y x), iH y (H₁ lt)))
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition wf : well_founded Q :=
|
||
|
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H₂ a))
|
||
|
end
|
||
|
end subrelation
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- The inverse image of a well-founded relation is well-founded
|
||
|
namespace inv_image
|
||
|
context
|
||
|
parameters {A B : Type} {R : B → B → Type}
|
||
|
parameters (f : A → B)
|
||
|
parameters (H : well_founded R)
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition accessible {a : A} (ac : acc R (f a)) : acc (inv_image R f) a :=
|
||
|
have gen : ∀x, f x = f a → acc (inv_image R f) x, from
|
||
|
acc.rec_on ac
|
||
|
(λx acx (iH : ∀y, R y x → (∀z, f z = y → acc (inv_image R f) z))
|
||
|
(z : A) (eq₁ : f z = x),
|
||
|
acc.intro z (λ (y : A) (lt : R (f y) (f z)),
|
||
|
iH (f y) (eq.rec_on eq₁ lt) y rfl)),
|
||
|
gen a rfl
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition wf : well_founded (inv_image R f) :=
|
||
|
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H (f a)))
|
||
|
end
|
||
|
end inv_image
|
||
|
|
||
|
-- The transitive closure of a well-founded relation is well-founded
|
||
|
namespace tc
|
||
|
context
|
||
|
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Type}
|
||
|
notation `R⁺` := tc R
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition accessible {z} (ac: acc R z) : acc R⁺ z :=
|
||
|
acc.rec_on ac
|
||
|
(λ x acx (iH : ∀y, R y x → acc R⁺ y),
|
||
|
acc.intro x (λ (y : A) (lt : R⁺ y x),
|
||
|
have gen : x = x → acc R⁺ y, from
|
||
|
tc.rec_on lt
|
||
|
(λa b (H : R a b) (Heq : b = x),
|
||
|
iH a (eq.rec_on Heq H))
|
||
|
(λa b c (H₁ : R⁺ a b) (H₂ : R⁺ b c)
|
||
|
(iH₁ : b = x → acc R⁺ a)
|
||
|
(iH₂ : c = x → acc R⁺ b)
|
||
|
(Heq : c = x),
|
||
|
acc.inv (iH₂ Heq) H₁),
|
||
|
gen rfl))
|
||
|
|
||
|
definition wf (H : well_founded R) : well_founded R⁺ :=
|
||
|
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H a))
|
||
|
|
||
|
end
|
||
|
end tc
|