lean2/hott/homotopy/connectedness.hlean

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Ulrik Buchholtz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ulrik Buchholtz, Floris van Doorn
-/
import types.trunc types.arrow_2 types.fiber

open eq is_trunc is_equiv nat equiv trunc function fiber funext pi

namespace is_conn

  definition is_conn [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) : Type :=
  is_contr (trunc n A)

  definition is_conn_equiv_closed (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type}
    : A ≃ B → is_conn n A → is_conn n B :=
  begin
    intros H C,
    fapply @is_contr_equiv_closed (trunc n A) _,
    apply trunc_equiv_trunc,
    assumption
  end

  definition is_conn_fun [reducible] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type :=
  Πb : B, is_conn n (fiber f b)

  theorem is_conn_of_le (A : Type) {n k : ℕ₋₂} (H : n ≤ k) [is_conn k A] : is_conn n A :=
  begin
    apply is_contr_equiv_closed,
    apply trunc_trunc_equiv_left _ H
  end

  theorem is_conn_fun_of_le {A B : Type} (f : A → B) {n k : ℕ₋₂} (H : n ≤ k)
    [is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun n f :=
  λb, is_conn_of_le _ H

  namespace is_conn_fun
  section
    parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {h : A → B}
               (H : is_conn_fun n h) (P : B → Type) [Πb, is_trunc n (P b)]

    private definition rec.helper : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → Πb : B, trunc n (fiber h b) → P b :=
    λt b, trunc.rec (λx, point_eq x ▸ t (point x))

    private definition rec.g : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → (Πb : B, P b) :=
    λt b, rec.helper t b (@center (trunc n (fiber h b)) (H b))

    -- induction principle for n-connected maps (Lemma 7.5.7)
    protected definition rec : is_equiv (λs : Πb : B, P b, λa : A, s (h a)) :=
    adjointify (λs a, s (h a)) rec.g
    begin
      intro t, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, unfold rec.g, unfold rec.helper,
      rewrite [@center_eq _ (H (h a)) (tr (fiber.mk a idp))],
    end
    begin
      intro k, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b, unfold rec.g,
      generalize (@center _ (H b)), apply trunc.rec, apply fiber.rec,
      intros a p, induction p, reflexivity
    end

    protected definition elim : (Πa : A, P (h a)) → (Πb : B, P b) :=
    @is_equiv.inv _ _ (λs a, s (h a)) rec

    protected definition elim_β : Πf : (Πa : A, P (h a)), Πa : A, elim f (h a) = f a :=
    λf, apd10 (@is_equiv.right_inv _ _ (λs a, s (h a)) rec f)

  end

  section
    parameters (n k : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {f : A → B}
               (H : is_conn_fun n f) (P : B → Type) [HP : Πb, is_trunc (n +2+ k) (P b)]

    include H HP
    -- Lemma 8.6.1
    proposition elim_general : is_trunc_fun k (pi_functor_left f P) :=
    begin
      revert P HP,
      induction k with k IH: intro P HP t,
      { apply is_contr_fiber_of_is_equiv, apply is_conn_fun.rec, exact H, exact HP},
      { apply is_trunc_succ_intro,
        intros x y, cases x with g p, cases y with h q,
        have e : fiber (λr : g ~ h, (λa, r (f a))) (apd10 (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
                 ≃ (fiber.mk g p = fiber.mk h q
                     :> fiber (λs : (Πb, P b), (λa, s (f a))) t),
        begin
          apply equiv.trans !fiber.sigma_char,
          have e' : Πr : g ~ h,
                 ((λa, r (f a)) = apd10 (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
               ≃ (ap (λv, (λa, v (f a))) (eq_of_homotopy r) ⬝ q = p),
          begin
            intro r,
            refine equiv.trans _ (eq_con_inv_equiv_con_eq q p
                                   (ap (λv a, v (f a)) (eq_of_homotopy r))),
            rewrite [-(ap (λv a, v (f a)) (apd10_eq_of_homotopy r))],
            rewrite [-(apd10_ap_precompose_dependent f (eq_of_homotopy r))],
            apply equiv.symm,
            apply eq_equiv_fn_eq (@apd10 A (λa, P (f a)) (λa, g (f a)) (λa, h (f a)))
          end,
          apply equiv.trans (sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right e'), clear e',
          apply equiv.trans (equiv.symm (sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_left
                                           eq_equiv_homotopy)),
          apply equiv.symm, apply equiv.trans !fiber_eq_equiv,
          apply sigma.sigma_equiv_sigma_right, intro r,
          apply eq_equiv_eq_symm
        end,
        apply @is_trunc_equiv_closed _ _ k e, clear e,
        apply IH (λb : B, (g b = h b)) (λb, @is_trunc_eq (P b) (n +2+ k) (HP b) (g b) (h b))}
    end

  end

  section
    universe variables u v
    parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type.{u}} {B : Type.{v}} {h : A → B}
    parameter sec : ΠP : B → trunctype.{max u v} n,
                    is_retraction (λs : (Πb : B, P b), λ a, s (h a))

    private definition s := sec (λb, trunctype.mk' n (trunc n (fiber h b)))

    include sec

    -- the other half of Lemma 7.5.7
    definition intro : is_conn_fun n h :=
    begin
      intro b,
      apply is_contr.mk (@is_retraction.sect _ _ _ s (λa, tr (fiber.mk a idp)) b),
      esimp, apply trunc.rec, apply fiber.rec, intros a p,
      apply transport
               (λz : (Σy, h a = y), @sect _ _ _ s (λa, tr (mk a idp)) (sigma.pr1 z) =
                                    tr (fiber.mk a (sigma.pr2 z)))
               (@center_eq _ (is_contr_sigma_eq (h a)) (sigma.mk b p)),
      exact apd10 (@right_inverse _ _ _ s (λa, tr (fiber.mk a idp))) a
    end
  end
  end is_conn_fun

  -- Connectedness is related to maps to and from the unit type, first to
  section
    parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type)

    definition is_conn_of_map_to_unit
      : is_conn_fun n (const A unit.star) → is_conn n A :=
    begin
      intro H, unfold is_conn_fun at H,
      rewrite [-(ua (fiber.fiber_star_equiv A))],
      exact (H unit.star)
    end

    -- now maps from unit
    definition is_conn_of_map_from_unit (a₀ : A) (H : is_conn_fun n (const unit a₀))
      : is_conn n .+1 A :=
    is_contr.mk (tr a₀)
    begin
      apply trunc.rec, intro a,
      exact trunc.elim (λz : fiber (const unit a₀) a, ap tr (point_eq z))
                            (@center _ (H a))
    end

    definition is_conn_fun_from_unit (a₀ : A) [H : is_conn n .+1 A]
      : is_conn_fun n (const unit a₀) :=
    begin
      intro a,
      apply is_conn_equiv_closed n (equiv.symm (fiber_const_equiv A a₀ a)),
      apply @is_contr_equiv_closed _ _ (tr_eq_tr_equiv n a₀ a),
    end

  end

  -- as special case we get elimination principles for pointed connected types
  namespace is_conn
    open pointed unit
    section
      parameters (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type*}
                 [H : is_conn n .+1 A] (P : A → Type) [Πa, is_trunc n (P a)]

      include H
      protected definition rec : is_equiv (λs : Πa : A, P a, s (Point A)) :=
      @is_equiv_compose
        (Πa : A, P a) (unit → P (Point A)) (P (Point A))
        (λs x, s (Point A)) (λf, f unit.star)
        (is_conn_fun.rec n (is_conn_fun_from_unit n A (Point A)) P)
        (to_is_equiv (arrow_unit_left (P (Point A))))

      protected definition elim : P (Point A) → (Πa : A, P a) :=
      @is_equiv.inv _ _ (λs, s (Point A)) rec

      protected definition elim_β (p : P (Point A)) : elim p (Point A) = p :=
      @is_equiv.right_inv _ _ (λs, s (Point A)) rec p
    end

    section
      parameters (n k : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type*}
                 [H : is_conn n .+1 A] (P : A → Type) [Πa, is_trunc (n +2+ k) (P a)]

      include H
      proposition elim_general (p : P (Point A))
        : is_trunc k (fiber (λs : (Πa : A, P a), s (Point A)) p) :=
      @is_trunc_equiv_closed
        (fiber (λs x, s (Point A)) (λx, p))
        (fiber (λs, s (Point A)) p)
        k
        (equiv.symm (fiber.equiv_postcompose (to_fun (arrow_unit_left (P (Point A))))))
        (is_conn_fun.elim_general n k (is_conn_fun_from_unit n A (Point A)) P (λx, p))
    end
  end is_conn

  -- Lemma 7.5.2
  definition minus_one_conn_of_surjective {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
    : is_surjective f → is_conn_fun -1 f :=
  begin
    intro H, intro b,
    exact @is_contr_of_inhabited_prop (∥fiber f b∥) (is_trunc_trunc -1 (fiber f b)) (H b),
  end

  definition is_surjection_of_minus_one_conn {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
    : is_conn_fun -1 f → is_surjective f :=
  begin
    intro H, intro b,
    exact @center (∥fiber f b∥) (H b),
  end

  definition merely_of_minus_one_conn {A : Type} : is_conn -1 A → ∥A∥ :=
  λH, @center (∥A∥) H

  definition minus_one_conn_of_merely {A : Type} : ∥A∥ → is_conn -1 A :=
  @is_contr_of_inhabited_prop (∥A∥) (is_trunc_trunc -1 A)

  section
    open arrow

    variables {f g : arrow}

    -- Lemma 7.5.4
    definition retract_of_conn_is_conn [instance] (r : arrow_hom f g) [H : is_retraction r]
      (n : ℕ₋₂) [K : is_conn_fun n f] : is_conn_fun n g :=
    begin
      intro b, unfold is_conn,
      apply is_contr_retract (trunc_functor n (retraction_on_fiber r b)),
      exact K (on_cod (arrow.is_retraction.sect r) b)
    end

  end

  -- Corollary 7.5.5
  definition is_conn_homotopy (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} {f g : A → B}
    (p : f ~ g) (H : is_conn_fun n f) : is_conn_fun n g :=
  @retract_of_conn_is_conn _ _
    (arrow.arrow_hom_of_homotopy p) (arrow.is_retraction_arrow_hom_of_homotopy p) n H

  -- all types are -2-connected
  definition is_conn_minus_two (A : Type) : is_conn -2 A :=
  _

  -- the following trivial cases are solved by type class inference
  definition is_conn_of_is_contr (k : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) [is_contr A] : is_conn k A := _
  definition is_conn_fun_of_is_equiv (k : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) [is_equiv f] :
    is_conn_fun k f :=
  _

  -- Lemma 7.5.14
  theorem is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun [instance] {A B : Type} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A → B)
    [H : is_conn_fun n f] : is_equiv (trunc_functor n f) :=
  begin
    fapply adjointify,
    { intro b, induction b with b, exact trunc_functor n point (center (trunc n (fiber f b)))},
    { intro b, induction b with b, esimp, generalize center (trunc n (fiber f b)), intro v,
      induction v with v, induction v with a p, esimp, exact ap tr p},
    { intro a, induction a with a, esimp, rewrite [center_eq (tr (fiber.mk a idp))]}
  end

  theorem trunc_equiv_trunc_of_is_conn_fun {A B : Type} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A → B)
    [H : is_conn_fun n f] : trunc n A ≃ trunc n B :=
  equiv.mk (trunc_functor n f) (is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_is_conn_fun n f)

  definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_le {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (H : k ≤ n)
    [H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
  begin
    apply is_conn_fun.intro,
    intro P, have Πb, is_trunc n (P b), from (λb, is_trunc_of_le _ H),
    fconstructor,
    { intro f' b,
      induction b with b,
      refine is_conn_fun.elim k H2 _ _ b, intro a, exact f' (tr a)},
    { intro f', apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a,
      induction a with a, esimp, rewrite [is_conn_fun.elim_β]}
  end

  definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_ge {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (H : n ≤ k)
    [H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
  begin
    apply is_conn_fun_of_is_equiv,
    apply is_equiv_trunc_functor_of_le f H
  end

  -- Exercise 7.18
  definition is_conn_fun_trunc_functor {n k : ℕ₋₂} {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
    [H2 : is_conn_fun k f] : is_conn_fun k (trunc_functor n f) :=
  begin
    eapply algebra.le_by_cases k n: intro H,
    { exact is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_le f H},
    { exact is_conn_fun_trunc_functor_of_ge f H}
  end

end is_conn