lean2/library/logic/identities.lean

/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura

Useful logical identities. Since we are not using propositional extensionality, some of the
calculations use the type class support provided by logic.instances.
-/
import logic.connectives logic.quantifiers logic.cast
open decidable

theorem or.right_comm (a b c : Prop) : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∨ b :=
calc
  (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ a ∨ (b ∨ c) : or.assoc
    ... ↔ a ∨ (c ∨ b)       : {or.comm}
     ... ↔ (a ∨ c) ∨ b      : iff.symm or.assoc

theorem and.right_comm (a b c : Prop) : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b :=
calc
  (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ a ∧ (b ∧ c) : and.assoc
    ... ↔ a ∧ (c ∧ b)       : {and.comm}
     ... ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b      : iff.symm and.assoc

theorem or_not_self_iff {a : Prop} [D : decidable a] : a ∨ ¬ a ↔ true :=
iff.intro (assume H, trivial) (assume H, em a)

theorem not_or_self_iff {a : Prop} [D : decidable a] : ¬ a ∨ a ↔ true :=
iff.intro (λ H, trivial) (λ H, or.swap (em a))

theorem and_not_self_iff {a : Prop} : a ∧ ¬ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume H, (and.right H) (and.left H)) (assume H, false.elim H)

theorem not_and_self_iff {a : Prop} : ¬ a ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (λ H, and.elim H (by contradiction)) (λ H, false.elim H)

theorem not_not_iff {a : Prop} [D : decidable a] : (¬¬a) ↔ a :=
iff.intro by_contradiction not_not_intro

theorem not_not_elim {a : Prop} [D : decidable a] : ¬¬a → a :=
by_contradiction

theorem not_or_iff_not_and_not {a b : Prop} : ¬(a ∨ b) ↔ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
or.imp_distrib

theorem not_and_iff_not_or_not {a b : Prop} [Da : decidable a] :
  ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
iff.intro
  (λH, by_cases (λa, or.inr (not.mto (and.intro a) H)) or.inl)
  (or.rec (not.mto and.left) (not.mto and.right))

theorem or_iff_not_and_not {a b : Prop} [Da : decidable a] [Db : decidable b] :
  a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
by rewrite [-not_or_iff_not_and_not, not_not_iff]

theorem and_iff_not_or_not {a b : Prop} [Da : decidable a] [Db : decidable b] :
  a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) :=
by rewrite [-not_and_iff_not_or_not, not_not_iff]

theorem imp_iff_not_or {a b : Prop} [Da : decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ ¬a ∨ b :=
iff.intro
  (by_cases (λHa H, or.inr (H Ha)) (λHa H, or.inl Ha))
  (or.rec not.elim imp.intro)

theorem not_implies_iff_and_not {a b : Prop} [Da : decidable a] :
  ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b :=
calc
  ¬(a → b) ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ b) : {imp_iff_not_or}
       ... ↔ ¬¬a ∧ ¬b  : not_or_iff_not_and_not
       ... ↔ a ∧ ¬b    : {not_not_iff}

theorem peirce {a b : Prop} [D : decidable a] : ((a → b) → a) → a :=
by_cases imp.intro (imp.syl imp.mp not.elim)

theorem forall_not_of_not_exists {A : Type} {p : A → Prop} [D : ∀x, decidable (p x)]
  (H : ¬∃x, p x) : ∀x, ¬p x :=
take x, by_cases
  (assume Hp : p x, absurd (exists.intro x Hp) H)
  imp.id

theorem forall_of_not_exists_not {A : Type} {p : A → Prop} [D : decidable_pred p] :
  ¬(∃ x, ¬p x) → ∀ x, p x :=
imp.syl (forall_imp_forall (λa, not_not_elim)) forall_not_of_not_exists

theorem exists_not_of_not_forall {A : Type} {p : A → Prop} [D : ∀x, decidable (p x)]
    [D' : decidable (∃x, ¬p x)] (H : ¬∀x, p x) :
  ∃x, ¬p x :=
by_contradiction (λH1, absurd (λx, not_not_elim (forall_not_of_not_exists H1 x)) H)

theorem exists_of_not_forall_not {A : Type} {p : A → Prop} [D : ∀x, decidable (p x)]
    [D' : decidable (∃x, p x)] (H : ¬∀x, ¬ p x) :
  ∃x, p x :=
by_contradiction (imp.syl H forall_not_of_not_exists)