michael/lean2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
lean2/tests/lean/interactive/elab6.lean.expected.out

4 lines
62 B
Text
Raw Normal View History

feat(library/elaborator): only expand definitions that are not marked as hidden The elaborator produces better proof terms. This is particularly important when we have to prove the remaining holes using tactics. For example, in one of the tests, the elaborator was producing the sub-expression (λ x : N, if ((λ x::1 : N, if (P a x x::1) ⊥ ⊤) == (λ x : N, ⊤)) ⊥ ⊤) After, this commit it produces (λ x : N, ¬ ∀ x::1 : N, ¬ P a x x::1) The expressions above are definitionally equal, but the second is easier to work with. Question: do we really need hidden definitions? Perhaps, we can use only the opaque flag. Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-20 10:16:41 +00:00
# Set: pp::colors
fix(library/elaborator): bug in simple_ho_match Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-16 05:48:55 +00:00
Set: pp::unicode
Proved: ForallIntro2
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink