feat(library/tactic): add apply_tactic
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b4ea75dee
commit
029ef57abd
8 changed files with 211 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -10,9 +10,7 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||||||
#include "kernel/metavar.h"
|
#include "kernel/metavar.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace lean {
|
namespace lean {
|
||||||
expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & a, unsigned n, expr const * s) {
|
expr instantiate_with_closed_relaxed(expr const & a, unsigned n, expr const * s) {
|
||||||
lean_assert(std::all_of(s, s+n, closed));
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
auto f = [=](expr const & m, unsigned offset) -> expr {
|
auto f = [=](expr const & m, unsigned offset) -> expr {
|
||||||
if (is_var(m)) {
|
if (is_var(m)) {
|
||||||
unsigned vidx = var_idx(m);
|
unsigned vidx = var_idx(m);
|
||||||
|
@ -35,6 +33,12 @@ expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & a, unsigned n, expr const * s) {
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
return replace_fn<decltype(f)>(f)(a);
|
return replace_fn<decltype(f)>(f)(a);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & a, unsigned n, expr const * s) {
|
||||||
|
lean_assert(std::all_of(s, s+n, closed));
|
||||||
|
return instantiate_with_closed_relaxed(a, n, s);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
expr instantiate(expr const & a, unsigned s, unsigned n, expr const * subst) {
|
expr instantiate(expr const & a, unsigned s, unsigned n, expr const * subst) {
|
||||||
auto f = [=](expr const & m, unsigned offset) -> expr {
|
auto f = [=](expr const & m, unsigned offset) -> expr {
|
||||||
if (is_var(m)) {
|
if (is_var(m)) {
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ inline expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & e, std::initializer_list<expr>
|
||||||
return instantiate_with_closed(e, l.size(), l.begin());
|
return instantiate_with_closed(e, l.size(), l.begin());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
inline expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & e, expr const & s) { return instantiate_with_closed(e, 1, &s); }
|
inline expr instantiate_with_closed(expr const & e, expr const & s) { return instantiate_with_closed(e, 1, &s); }
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
\brief Similar to instantiate_with_closed, but does not use an assertion for
|
||||||
|
testing whether arguments are close or not.
|
||||||
|
This version is useful, for example, when we want to treat metavariables as closed terms.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
expr instantiate_with_closed_relaxed(expr const & a, unsigned n, expr const * s);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
\brief Replace the free variables with indices 0, ..., n-1 with s[n-1], ..., s[0] in e.
|
\brief Replace the free variables with indices 0, ..., n-1 with s[n-1], ..., s[0] in e.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
add_library(tactic goal.cpp proof_builder.cpp cex_builder.cpp
|
add_library(tactic goal.cpp proof_builder.cpp cex_builder.cpp
|
||||||
proof_state.cpp tactic.cpp boolean.cpp)
|
proof_state.cpp tactic.cpp boolean.cpp apply_tactic.cpp)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
target_link_libraries(tactic ${LEAN_LIBS})
|
target_link_libraries(tactic ${LEAN_LIBS})
|
||||||
|
|
154
src/library/tactic/apply_tactic.cpp
Normal file
154
src/library/tactic/apply_tactic.cpp
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
Copyright (c) 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||||||
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
#include <utility>
|
||||||
|
#include <algorithm>
|
||||||
|
#include "kernel/environment.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "kernel/instantiate.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/fo_unify.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/kernel_bindings.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/type_inferer.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/goal.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/proof_builder.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/proof_state.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/tactic.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/apply_tactic.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
namespace lean {
|
||||||
|
static name g_tmp_mvar_name = name::mk_internal_unique_name();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static optional<proof_state> apply_tactic(environment const & env, proof_state const & s,
|
||||||
|
expr const & th, expr const & th_type, bool all) {
|
||||||
|
precision prec = s.get_precision();
|
||||||
|
if (prec != precision::Precise && prec != precision::Over) {
|
||||||
|
// it is pointless to apply this tactic, since it will produce UnderOver
|
||||||
|
return none_proof_state();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
unsigned num = 0;
|
||||||
|
expr th_type_c = th_type;
|
||||||
|
while (is_pi(th_type_c)) {
|
||||||
|
num++;
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = abst_body(th_type_c);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
buffer<expr> mvars;
|
||||||
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < num; i++)
|
||||||
|
mvars.push_back(mk_metavar(name(g_tmp_mvar_name, i)));
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = instantiate_with_closed_relaxed(th_type_c, mvars.size(), mvars.data());
|
||||||
|
bool found = false;
|
||||||
|
buffer<std::pair<name, goal>> new_goals_buf;
|
||||||
|
// The proof is based on an application of th.
|
||||||
|
// There are two kinds of arguments:
|
||||||
|
// 1) regular arguments computed using unification.
|
||||||
|
// 2) propostions that generate new subgoals.
|
||||||
|
// We use a pair to simulate this "union" type.
|
||||||
|
typedef list<std::pair<expr, name>> arg_list;
|
||||||
|
// We may solve more than one goal.
|
||||||
|
// We store the solved goals using a list of pairs
|
||||||
|
// name, args. Where the 'name' is the name of the solved goal.
|
||||||
|
type_inferer inferer(env);
|
||||||
|
metavar_env new_menv = s.get_menv();
|
||||||
|
list<std::pair<name, arg_list>> proof_info;
|
||||||
|
for (auto const & p : s.get_goals()) {
|
||||||
|
check_interrupted();
|
||||||
|
if (all || !found) {
|
||||||
|
name const & gname = p.first;
|
||||||
|
goal const & g = p.second;
|
||||||
|
expr const & c = g.get_conclusion();
|
||||||
|
optional<substitution> subst = fo_unify(th_type_c, c);
|
||||||
|
if (subst) {
|
||||||
|
found = true;
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = th_type;
|
||||||
|
arg_list l;
|
||||||
|
unsigned new_goal_idx = 1;
|
||||||
|
for (auto const & mvar : mvars) {
|
||||||
|
expr mvar_sol = apply(*subst, mvar);
|
||||||
|
if (mvar_sol != mvar) {
|
||||||
|
l.emplace_front(mvar_sol, name());
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = instantiate(abst_body(th_type_c), mvar_sol);
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
if (inferer.is_proposition(abst_domain(th_type_c))) {
|
||||||
|
name new_gname(gname, new_goal_idx);
|
||||||
|
new_goal_idx++;
|
||||||
|
l.emplace_front(expr(), new_gname);
|
||||||
|
new_goals_buf.emplace_back(new_gname, update(g, abst_domain(th_type_c)));
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = instantiate(abst_body(th_type_c), mk_constant(new_gname, abst_domain(th_type_c)));
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
// we have to create a new metavar in menv
|
||||||
|
// since we do not have a substitution for mvar, and
|
||||||
|
// it is not a proposition
|
||||||
|
expr new_m = new_menv.mk_metavar(context(), abst_domain(th_type_c));
|
||||||
|
l.emplace_front(new_m, name());
|
||||||
|
// we use instantiate_with_closed_relaxed because we do not want
|
||||||
|
// to introduce a lift operator in the new_m
|
||||||
|
th_type_c = instantiate_with_closed_relaxed(abst_body(th_type_c), 1, &new_m);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
proof_info.emplace_front(gname, l);
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
new_goals_buf.push_back(p);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
new_goals_buf.push_back(p);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if (found) {
|
||||||
|
proof_builder pb = s.get_proof_builder();
|
||||||
|
proof_builder new_pb = mk_proof_builder([=](proof_map const & m, assignment const & a) -> expr {
|
||||||
|
proof_map new_m(m);
|
||||||
|
for (auto const & p1 : proof_info) {
|
||||||
|
name const & gname = p1.first;
|
||||||
|
arg_list const & l = p1.second;
|
||||||
|
buffer<expr> args;
|
||||||
|
args.push_back(th);
|
||||||
|
for (auto const & p2 : l) {
|
||||||
|
expr const & arg = p2.first;
|
||||||
|
if (arg) {
|
||||||
|
// TODO(Leo): decide if we instantiate the metavars in the end or not.
|
||||||
|
args.push_back(arg);
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
name const & subgoal_name = p2.second;
|
||||||
|
args.push_back(find(m, subgoal_name));
|
||||||
|
new_m.erase(subgoal_name);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
std::reverse(args.begin() + 1, args.end());
|
||||||
|
new_m.insert(gname, mk_app(args));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
return pb(new_m, a);
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
goals new_gs = to_list(new_goals_buf.begin(), new_goals_buf.end());
|
||||||
|
return some(proof_state(precision::Over, new_gs, new_menv, new_pb, s.get_cex_builder()));
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
return none_proof_state();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
tactic apply_tactic(expr const & th, expr const & th_type, bool all) {
|
||||||
|
return mk_tactic01([=](environment const & env, io_state const &, proof_state const & s) -> optional<proof_state> {
|
||||||
|
return apply_tactic(env, s, th, th_type, all);
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
tactic apply_tactic(name const & th_name, bool all) {
|
||||||
|
return mk_tactic01([=](environment const & env, io_state const &, proof_state const & s) -> optional<proof_state> {
|
||||||
|
object const & obj = env.find_object(th_name);
|
||||||
|
if (obj && (obj.is_theorem() || obj.is_axiom()))
|
||||||
|
return apply_tactic(env, s, mk_constant(th_name), obj.get_type(), all);
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
return none_proof_state();
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
int mk_apply_tactic(lua_State * L) {
|
||||||
|
int nargs = lua_gettop(L);
|
||||||
|
return push_tactic(L, apply_tactic(to_name_ext(L, 1), nargs >= 2 ? lua_toboolean(L, 2) : true));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
void open_apply_tactic(lua_State * L) {
|
||||||
|
SET_GLOBAL_FUN(mk_apply_tactic, "apply_tactic");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
13
src/library/tactic/apply_tactic.h
Normal file
13
src/library/tactic/apply_tactic.h
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
Copyright (c) 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||||||
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
#pragma once
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/tactic.h"
|
||||||
|
namespace lean {
|
||||||
|
tactic apply_tactic(expr const & th, expr const & th_type, bool all = true);
|
||||||
|
tactic apply_tactic(name const & th_name, bool all = true);
|
||||||
|
void open_apply_tactic(lua_State * L);
|
||||||
|
}
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||||||
#include "library/tactic/proof_state.h"
|
#include "library/tactic/proof_state.h"
|
||||||
#include "library/tactic/tactic.h"
|
#include "library/tactic/tactic.h"
|
||||||
#include "library/tactic/boolean.h"
|
#include "library/tactic/boolean.h"
|
||||||
|
#include "library/tactic/apply_tactic.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace lean {
|
namespace lean {
|
||||||
inline void open_tactic_module(lua_State * L) {
|
inline void open_tactic_module(lua_State * L) {
|
||||||
|
@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ inline void open_tactic_module(lua_State * L) {
|
||||||
open_proof_state(L);
|
open_proof_state(L);
|
||||||
open_tactic(L);
|
open_tactic(L);
|
||||||
open_boolean(L);
|
open_boolean(L);
|
||||||
|
open_apply_tactic(L);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
inline void register_tactic_module() {
|
inline void register_tactic_module() {
|
||||||
script_state::register_module(open_tactic_module);
|
script_state::register_module(open_tactic_module);
|
||||||
|
|
18
tests/lean/apply_tac1.lean
Normal file
18
tests/lean/apply_tac1.lean
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||||
|
Variable f : Int -> Int -> Bool
|
||||||
|
Variable P : Int -> Int -> Bool
|
||||||
|
Axiom Ax1 (x y : Int) (H : P x y) : (f x y)
|
||||||
|
Theorem T1 (a : Int) : (P a a) => (f a a).
|
||||||
|
apply imp_tactic
|
||||||
|
apply (** apply_tactic("Ax1") **)
|
||||||
|
apply assumption_tactic
|
||||||
|
done
|
||||||
|
Variable b : Int
|
||||||
|
Axiom Ax2 (x : Int) : (f x b)
|
||||||
|
(**
|
||||||
|
simple_tac = REPEAT(ORELSE(imp_tactic, assumption_tactic, apply_tactic("Ax2"), apply_tactic("Ax1")))
|
||||||
|
**)
|
||||||
|
Theorem T2 (a : Int) : (P a a) => (f a a).
|
||||||
|
apply simple_tac
|
||||||
|
done
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Show Environment 1.
|
10
tests/lean/apply_tac1.lean.expected.out
Normal file
10
tests/lean/apply_tac1.lean.expected.out
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||||
|
Set: pp::colors
|
||||||
|
Set: pp::unicode
|
||||||
|
Assumed: f
|
||||||
|
Assumed: P
|
||||||
|
Assumed: Ax1
|
||||||
|
Proved: T1
|
||||||
|
Assumed: b
|
||||||
|
Assumed: Ax2
|
||||||
|
Proved: T2
|
||||||
|
Theorem T2 (a : ℤ) : (P a a) ⇒ (f a a) := Discharge (λ H : P a a, Ax1 a a H)
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue