diff --git a/library/data/fintype/function.lean b/library/data/fintype/function.lean
index 61a91bbc0..0e1195aee 100644
--- a/library/data/fintype/function.lean
+++ b/library/data/fintype/function.lean
@@ -1,364 +1,364 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-
-Author : Haitao Zhang
--/
-import data
-
-open nat function eq.ops
-
-namespace list
--- this is in preparation for counting the number of finite functions
-section list_of_lists
-open prod
-variable {A : Type}
-
-definition cons_pair (pr : A × list A) := (pr1 pr) :: (pr2 pr)
-
-definition cons_all_of (elts : list A) (ls : list (list A)) : list (list A) :=
-           map cons_pair (product elts ls)
-
-lemma pair_of_cons {a} {l} {pr : A × list A} : cons_pair pr = a::l → pr = (a, l) :=
-      prod.destruct pr (λ p1 p2, assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (by intros; substvars))
-
-lemma cons_pair_inj : injective (@cons_pair A) :=
-      take p1 p2, assume Pl,
-      prod.eq (list.no_confusion Pl (λ P1 P2, P1)) (list.no_confusion Pl (λ P1 P2, P2))
-
-lemma nodup_of_cons_all {elts : list A} {ls : list (list A)}
-      : nodup elts → nodup ls → nodup (cons_all_of elts ls) :=
-      assume Pelts Pls,
-      nodup_map cons_pair_inj (nodup_product Pelts Pls)
-
-lemma length_cons_all {elts : list A} {ls : list (list A)} :
-      length (cons_all_of elts ls) = length elts * length ls := calc
-      length (cons_all_of elts ls) = length (product elts ls) : length_map
-                               ... = length elts * length ls : length_product
-
-variable [finA : fintype A]
-include finA
-
-definition all_lists_of_len : ∀ (n : nat), list (list A)
-| 0        := [[]]
-| (succ n) := cons_all_of (elements_of A) (all_lists_of_len n)
-
-lemma nodup_all_lists : ∀ (n : nat), nodup (@all_lists_of_len A _ n)
-| 0                   := nodup_singleton []
-| (succ n)            := nodup_of_cons_all (fintype.unique A) (nodup_all_lists n)
-
-lemma mem_all_lists : ∀ (n : nat) (l : list A), length l = n → l ∈ all_lists_of_len n
-| 0 []              := assume P, mem_cons [] []
-| 0 (a::l)          := assume Peq, by contradiction
-| (succ n) []       := assume Peq, by contradiction
-| (succ n) (a::l)   := assume Peq, begin
-                    apply mem_map, apply mem_product,
-                      exact fintype.complete a,
-                      exact mem_all_lists n l (succ_inj Peq)
-                    end
-
-lemma leq_of_mem_all_lists : ∀ {n : nat} ⦃l : list A⦄,
-                           l ∈ all_lists_of_len n → length l = n
-| 0 []             := assume P, rfl
-| 0 (a::l)         := assume Pin, assert Peq : (a::l) = [], from mem_singleton Pin,
-                   by contradiction
-| (succ n) []      := assume Pin, obtain pr Pprin Ppr, from exists_of_mem_map Pin,
-                   by contradiction
-| (succ n) (a::l)  := assume Pin, obtain pr Pprin Ppr, from exists_of_mem_map Pin,
-                   assert Pl : l ∈ all_lists_of_len n,
-                     from mem_of_mem_product_right ((pair_of_cons Ppr) ▸ Pprin),
-                   by rewrite [length_cons, leq_of_mem_all_lists Pl]
-
-open fintype
-lemma length_all_lists : ∀ {n : nat}, length (@all_lists_of_len A _ n) = (card A) ^ n
-| 0         := calc length [[]] = 1 : length_cons
-| (succ n)  := calc length _ = card A * length (all_lists_of_len n) : length_cons_all
-                         ... = card A * (card A ^ n) : length_all_lists
-                         ... = (card A ^ n) * card A : nat.mul.comm
-                         ... = (card A) ^ (succ n) : pow_succ
-
-end list_of_lists
-
-section kth
-
-variable {A : Type}
-
-definition kth : ∀ k (l : list A), k < length l → A
-| k []        := begin rewrite length_nil, intro Pltz, exact absurd Pltz !not_lt_zero end
-| 0 (a::l)    := λ P, a
-| (k+1) (a::l):= by rewrite length_cons; intro Plt; exact kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt)
-
-lemma kth_zero_of_cons {a} (l : list A) (P : 0 < length (a::l)) : kth 0 (a::l) P = a :=
-      rfl
-lemma kth_succ_of_cons {a} k (l : list A) (P : k+1 < length (a::l)) :
-      kth (succ k) (a::l) P = kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P) :=
-      rfl
-
-lemma kth_mem : ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, kth k l P ∈ l
-| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
-| 0 (a::l)        := assume P, by rewrite kth_zero_of_cons; apply mem_cons
-| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, by
-                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons]; apply mem_cons_of_mem a; apply kth_mem
-
--- Leo provided the following proof.
-lemma eq_of_kth_eq [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
-      : ∀ {l1 l2 : list A} (Pleq : length l1 = length l2),
-          (∀ (k : nat) (Plt1 : k < length l1) (Plt2 : k < length l2), kth k l1 Plt1 = kth k l2 Plt2) → l1 = l2
-| []       []       h₁ h₂ := rfl
-| (a₁::l₁) []       h₁ h₂ := by contradiction
-| []       (a₂::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by contradiction
-| (a₁::l₁) (a₂::l₂) h₁ h₂ :=
-  have ih₁ : length l₁ = length l₂, by injection h₁; eassumption,
-  have ih₂ : ∀ (k : nat) (plt₁ : k < length l₁) (plt₂ : k < length l₂), kth k l₁ plt₁ = kth k l₂ plt₂,
-    begin
-      intro k plt₁ plt₂,
-      have splt₁ : succ k < length l₁ + 1, from succ_le_succ plt₁,
-      have splt₂ : succ k < length l₂ + 1, from succ_le_succ plt₂,
-      have keq   : kth (succ k) (a₁::l₁) splt₁ = kth (succ k) (a₂::l₂) splt₂, from h₂ (succ k) splt₁ splt₂,
-      rewrite *kth_succ_of_cons at keq,
-      exact keq
-    end,
-  assert ih  : l₁ = l₂, from eq_of_kth_eq ih₁ ih₂,
-  assert k₁  : a₁ = a₂,
-    begin
-      have lt₁ : 0 < length (a₁::l₁), from !zero_lt_succ,
-      have lt₂ : 0 < length (a₂::l₂), from !zero_lt_succ,
-      have e₁  : kth 0 (a₁::l₁) lt₁ = kth 0 (a₂::l₂) lt₂, from h₂ 0 lt₁ lt₂,
-      rewrite *kth_zero_of_cons at e₁,
-      assumption
-    end,
-  by subst l₁; subst a₁
-
-lemma kth_of_map {B : Type} {f : A → B} :
-      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} Plt Pmlt, kth k (map f l) Pmlt = f (kth k l Plt)
-| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
-| 0 (a::l)        := assume Plt, by
-                  rewrite [map_cons]; intro Pmlt; rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons]
-| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, begin
-                  rewrite [map_cons], intro Pmlt, rewrite [*kth_succ_of_cons],
-                  apply kth_of_map
-                  end
-
-lemma kth_find [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
-      ∀ {l : list A} {a} P, kth (find a l) l P = a
-| []            := take a, assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
-| (x::l)        := take a, begin
-                assert Pd : decidable (a = x), {apply deceqA},
-                cases Pd with Pe Pne,
-                  rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Pe], intro P, rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, Pe],
-                  rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], intro P, rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
-                  apply kth_find
-                end
-
-lemma find_kth [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
-      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, find (kth k l P) l < length l
-| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
-| 0 (a::l)        := assume P, begin
-                  rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, find_cons_of_eq l rfl, length_cons],
-                  exact !zero_lt_succ
-                  end
-| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, begin
-                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
-                  assert Pd : decidable ((kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P)) = a),
-                    {apply deceqA},
-                  cases Pd with Pe Pne,
-                    rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Pe], apply zero_lt_succ,
-                    rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], apply succ_lt_succ, apply find_kth
-                  end
-
-lemma find_kth_of_nodup [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
-      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, nodup l → find (kth k l P) l = k
-| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
-| 0 (a::l)        := assume Plt Pnodup,
-                  by rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, find_cons_of_eq l rfl]
-| (succ k) (a::l) := assume Plt Pnodup, begin
-                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
-                  assert Pd : decidable ((kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt)) = a),
-                    {apply deceqA},
-                  cases Pd with Pe Pne,
-                    assert Pin : a ∈ l, {rewrite -Pe, apply kth_mem},
-                    exact absurd Pin (not_mem_of_nodup_cons Pnodup),
-                    rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], apply congr (eq.refl succ),
-                    apply find_kth_of_nodup (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt) (nodup_of_nodup_cons Pnodup)
-                  end
-
-end kth
-
-end list
-
-
-namespace fintype
-open list
-
-section found
-
-variables {A B : Type}
-variable [finA : fintype A]
-include finA
-
-lemma find_in_range [deceqB : decidable_eq B] {f : A → B} (b : B) :
-    ∀ (l : list A) (P : find b (map f l) < length l), f (kth (find b (map f l)) l P) = b
-| []       := assume P, begin exact absurd P !not_lt_zero end
-| (a::l)   := decidable.rec_on (deceqB b (f a))
-              (assume Peq, begin
-              rewrite [map_cons f a l, find_cons_of_eq _ Peq],
-              intro P, rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons], exact (Peq⁻¹)
-              end)
-              (assume Pne, begin
-              rewrite [map_cons f a l, find_cons_of_ne _ Pne],
-              intro P,
-              rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons (find b (map f l)) l P],
-              exact find_in_range l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P)
-              end)
-
-end found
-
-section list_to_fun
-variables {A B : Type}
-variable [finA : fintype A]
-include finA
-
-definition fun_to_list (f : A → B) : list B := map f (elems A)
-
-lemma length_map_of_fintype (f : A → B) : length (map f (elems A)) = card A :=
-      by apply length_map
-
-variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
-include deceqA
-
-lemma fintype_find (a : A) : find a (elems A) < card A :=
-      find_lt_length (complete a)
-
-definition list_to_fun (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) : A → B :=
-           take x,
-           kth _ _ (leq⁻¹ ▸ fintype_find x)
-
-definition all_funs [finB : fintype B] : list (A → B) :=
-           dmap (λ l, length l = card A) list_to_fun (all_lists_of_len (card A))
-
-lemma list_to_fun_apply (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) (a : A) :
-      ∀ P, list_to_fun l leq a = kth (find a (elems A)) l P :=
-      assume P, rfl
-
-variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
-include deceqB
-
-lemma fun_eq_list_to_fun_map (f : A → B) : ∀ P, f = list_to_fun (map f (elems A)) P :=
-      assume Pleq, funext (take a,
-      assert Plt : _, from Pleq⁻¹ ▸ find_lt_length (complete a), begin
-      rewrite [list_to_fun_apply _ Pleq a (Pleq⁻¹ ▸ find_lt_length (complete a))],
-      assert Pmlt : find a (elems A) < length (map f (elems A)),
-        {rewrite length_map, exact Plt},
-      rewrite [@kth_of_map A B f (find a (elems A)) (elems A) Plt _, kth_find]
-      end)
-
-lemma list_eq_map_list_to_fun  (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A)
-                    : l = map (list_to_fun l leq) (elems A) :=
-      begin
-      apply eq_of_kth_eq, rewrite length_map, apply leq,
-        intro k Plt Plt2,
-        assert Plt1 : k < length (elems A), {apply leq ▸ Plt},
-        assert Plt3 : find (kth k (elems A) Plt1) (elems A) < length l,
-          {rewrite leq, apply find_kth},
-        rewrite [kth_of_map Plt1 Plt2, list_to_fun_apply l leq _ Plt3],
-        congruence,
-        rewrite [find_kth_of_nodup Plt1 (unique A)],
-      end
-
-lemma fun_to_list_to_fun (f : A → B) : ∀ P, list_to_fun (fun_to_list f) P = f :=
-      assume P, (fun_eq_list_to_fun_map f P)⁻¹
-
-lemma list_to_fun_to_list (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) :
-      fun_to_list (list_to_fun l leq) = l
-      := (list_eq_map_list_to_fun l leq)⁻¹
-
-lemma dinj_list_to_fun : dinj (λ (l : list B), length l = card A) list_to_fun :=
-      take l1 l2 Pl1 Pl2 Peq,
-      by rewrite [list_eq_map_list_to_fun l1 Pl1, list_eq_map_list_to_fun l2 Pl2, Peq]
-
-variable [finB : fintype B]
-include finB
-
-lemma nodup_all_funs : nodup (@all_funs A B _ _ _) :=
-      dmap_nodup_of_dinj dinj_list_to_fun (nodup_all_lists _)
-
-lemma all_funs_complete (f : A → B) : f ∈ all_funs :=
-      assert Plin : map f (elems A) ∈ all_lists_of_len (card A),
-        from mem_all_lists (card A) _ (by rewrite length_map),
-      assert Plfin : list_to_fun (map f (elems A)) (length_map_of_fintype f) ∈ all_funs,
-        from mem_of_dmap _ Plin,
-      begin rewrite [fun_eq_list_to_fun_map f (length_map_of_fintype f)], apply Plfin end
-
-lemma all_funs_to_all_lists : map fun_to_list (@all_funs A B _ _ _) = all_lists_of_len (card A) :=
-      map_of_dmap_inv_pos list_to_fun_to_list leq_of_mem_all_lists
-
-lemma length_all_funs : length (@all_funs A B _ _ _) = (card B) ^ (card A) := calc
-      length _ = length (map fun_to_list all_funs) : length_map
-           ... = length (all_lists_of_len (card A)) : all_funs_to_all_lists
-           ... = (card B) ^ (card A) : length_all_lists
-
-definition fun_is_fintype [instance] : fintype (A → B) :=
-           fintype.mk all_funs nodup_all_funs all_funs_complete
-
-lemma card_funs : card (A → B) = (card B) ^ (card A) := length_all_funs
-
-end list_to_fun
-
-section surj_inv
-variables {A B : Type}
-variable [finA : fintype A]
-include finA
-
--- surj from fintype domain implies fintype range
-lemma mem_map_of_surj {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : ∀ b, b ∈ map f (elems A) :=
-      take b, obtain a Peq, from surj b,
-      Peq ▸ mem_map f (complete a)
-
-variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
-include deceqB
-
-lemma found_of_surj {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) :
-      ∀ b, let elts := elems A, k := find b (map f elts) in k < length elts :=
-      λ b, let elts := elems A, img := map f elts, k := find b img in
-           have Pin : b ∈ img, from mem_map_of_surj surj b,
-           assert Pfound : k < length img, from find_lt_length (mem_map_of_surj surj b),
-           length_map f elts ▸ Pfound
-
-definition right_inv {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : B → A :=
-           λ b, let elts := elems A, k := find b (map f elts) in
-           kth k elts (found_of_surj surj b)
-
-lemma id_of_right_inv {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : f ∘ (right_inv surj) = id :=
-      funext (λ b, find_in_range b (elems A) (found_of_surj surj b))
-end surj_inv
-
--- inj functions for equal card types are also surj and therefore bij
--- the right inv (since it is surj) is also the left inv
-section inj
-variables {A B : Type}
-variable [finA : fintype A]
-include finA
-variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
-include deceqA
-variable [finB : fintype B]
-include finB
-variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
-include deceqB
-open finset
-
-lemma surj_of_inj_eq_card : card A = card B → ∀ {f : A → B}, injective f → surjective f :=
-      assume Peqcard, take f, assume Pinj,
-      decidable.rec_on decidable_forall_finite
-      (assume P : surjective f, P)
-      (assume Pnsurj : ¬surjective f, obtain b Pne, from exists_not_of_not_forall Pnsurj,
-      assert Pall : ∀ a, f a ≠ b, from forall_not_of_not_exists Pne,
-      assert Pbnin : b ∉ image f univ, from λ Pin,
-        obtain a Pa, from exists_of_mem_image Pin, absurd (and.right Pa) (Pall a),
-      assert Puniv : finset.card (image f univ) = card A,
-        from card_eq_card_image_of_inj Pinj,
-      assert Punivb : finset.card (image f univ) = card B, from eq.trans Puniv Peqcard,
-      assert P : image f univ = univ, from univ_of_card_eq_univ Punivb,
-      absurd (P⁻¹▸ mem_univ b) Pbnin)
-
-end inj
-end fintype
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+
+Author : Haitao Zhang
+-/
+import data
+
+open nat function eq.ops
+
+namespace list
+-- this is in preparation for counting the number of finite functions
+section list_of_lists
+open prod
+variable {A : Type}
+
+definition cons_pair (pr : A × list A) := (pr1 pr) :: (pr2 pr)
+
+definition cons_all_of (elts : list A) (ls : list (list A)) : list (list A) :=
+           map cons_pair (product elts ls)
+
+lemma pair_of_cons {a} {l} {pr : A × list A} : cons_pair pr = a::l → pr = (a, l) :=
+      prod.destruct pr (λ p1 p2, assume Peq, list.no_confusion Peq (by intros; substvars))
+
+lemma cons_pair_inj : injective (@cons_pair A) :=
+      take p1 p2, assume Pl,
+      prod.eq (list.no_confusion Pl (λ P1 P2, P1)) (list.no_confusion Pl (λ P1 P2, P2))
+
+lemma nodup_of_cons_all {elts : list A} {ls : list (list A)}
+      : nodup elts → nodup ls → nodup (cons_all_of elts ls) :=
+      assume Pelts Pls,
+      nodup_map cons_pair_inj (nodup_product Pelts Pls)
+
+lemma length_cons_all {elts : list A} {ls : list (list A)} :
+      length (cons_all_of elts ls) = length elts * length ls := calc
+      length (cons_all_of elts ls) = length (product elts ls) : length_map
+                               ... = length elts * length ls : length_product
+
+variable [finA : fintype A]
+include finA
+
+definition all_lists_of_len : ∀ (n : nat), list (list A)
+| 0        := [[]]
+| (succ n) := cons_all_of (elements_of A) (all_lists_of_len n)
+
+lemma nodup_all_lists : ∀ (n : nat), nodup (@all_lists_of_len A _ n)
+| 0                   := nodup_singleton []
+| (succ n)            := nodup_of_cons_all (fintype.unique A) (nodup_all_lists n)
+
+lemma mem_all_lists : ∀ (n : nat) (l : list A), length l = n → l ∈ all_lists_of_len n
+| 0 []              := assume P, mem_cons [] []
+| 0 (a::l)          := assume Peq, by contradiction
+| (succ n) []       := assume Peq, by contradiction
+| (succ n) (a::l)   := assume Peq, begin
+                    apply mem_map, apply mem_product,
+                      exact fintype.complete a,
+                      exact mem_all_lists n l (succ_inj Peq)
+                    end
+
+lemma leq_of_mem_all_lists : ∀ {n : nat} ⦃l : list A⦄,
+                           l ∈ all_lists_of_len n → length l = n
+| 0 []             := assume P, rfl
+| 0 (a::l)         := assume Pin, assert Peq : (a::l) = [], from mem_singleton Pin,
+                   by contradiction
+| (succ n) []      := assume Pin, obtain pr Pprin Ppr, from exists_of_mem_map Pin,
+                   by contradiction
+| (succ n) (a::l)  := assume Pin, obtain pr Pprin Ppr, from exists_of_mem_map Pin,
+                   assert Pl : l ∈ all_lists_of_len n,
+                     from mem_of_mem_product_right ((pair_of_cons Ppr) ▸ Pprin),
+                   by rewrite [length_cons, leq_of_mem_all_lists Pl]
+
+open fintype
+lemma length_all_lists : ∀ {n : nat}, length (@all_lists_of_len A _ n) = (card A) ^ n
+| 0         := calc length [[]] = 1 : length_cons
+| (succ n)  := calc length _ = card A * length (all_lists_of_len n) : length_cons_all
+                         ... = card A * (card A ^ n) : length_all_lists
+                         ... = (card A ^ n) * card A : nat.mul.comm
+                         ... = (card A) ^ (succ n) : pow_succ
+
+end list_of_lists
+
+section kth
+
+variable {A : Type}
+
+definition kth : ∀ k (l : list A), k < length l → A
+| k []        := begin rewrite length_nil, intro Pltz, exact absurd Pltz !not_lt_zero end
+| 0 (a::l)    := λ P, a
+| (k+1) (a::l):= by rewrite length_cons; intro Plt; exact kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt)
+
+lemma kth_zero_of_cons {a} (l : list A) (P : 0 < length (a::l)) : kth 0 (a::l) P = a :=
+      rfl
+lemma kth_succ_of_cons {a} k (l : list A) (P : k+1 < length (a::l)) :
+      kth (succ k) (a::l) P = kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P) :=
+      rfl
+
+lemma kth_mem : ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, kth k l P ∈ l
+| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
+| 0 (a::l)        := assume P, by rewrite kth_zero_of_cons; apply mem_cons
+| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, by
+                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons]; apply mem_cons_of_mem a; apply kth_mem
+
+-- Leo provided the following proof.
+lemma eq_of_kth_eq [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
+      : ∀ {l1 l2 : list A} (Pleq : length l1 = length l2),
+          (∀ (k : nat) (Plt1 : k < length l1) (Plt2 : k < length l2), kth k l1 Plt1 = kth k l2 Plt2) → l1 = l2
+| []       []       h₁ h₂ := rfl
+| (a₁::l₁) []       h₁ h₂ := by contradiction
+| []       (a₂::l₂) h₁ h₂ := by contradiction
+| (a₁::l₁) (a₂::l₂) h₁ h₂ :=
+  have ih₁ : length l₁ = length l₂, by injection h₁; eassumption,
+  have ih₂ : ∀ (k : nat) (plt₁ : k < length l₁) (plt₂ : k < length l₂), kth k l₁ plt₁ = kth k l₂ plt₂,
+    begin
+      intro k plt₁ plt₂,
+      have splt₁ : succ k < length l₁ + 1, from succ_le_succ plt₁,
+      have splt₂ : succ k < length l₂ + 1, from succ_le_succ plt₂,
+      have keq   : kth (succ k) (a₁::l₁) splt₁ = kth (succ k) (a₂::l₂) splt₂, from h₂ (succ k) splt₁ splt₂,
+      rewrite *kth_succ_of_cons at keq,
+      exact keq
+    end,
+  assert ih  : l₁ = l₂, from eq_of_kth_eq ih₁ ih₂,
+  assert k₁  : a₁ = a₂,
+    begin
+      have lt₁ : 0 < length (a₁::l₁), from !zero_lt_succ,
+      have lt₂ : 0 < length (a₂::l₂), from !zero_lt_succ,
+      have e₁  : kth 0 (a₁::l₁) lt₁ = kth 0 (a₂::l₂) lt₂, from h₂ 0 lt₁ lt₂,
+      rewrite *kth_zero_of_cons at e₁,
+      assumption
+    end,
+  by subst l₁; subst a₁
+
+lemma kth_of_map {B : Type} {f : A → B} :
+      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} Plt Pmlt, kth k (map f l) Pmlt = f (kth k l Plt)
+| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
+| 0 (a::l)        := assume Plt, by
+                  rewrite [map_cons]; intro Pmlt; rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons]
+| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, begin
+                  rewrite [map_cons], intro Pmlt, rewrite [*kth_succ_of_cons],
+                  apply kth_of_map
+                  end
+
+lemma kth_find [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
+      ∀ {l : list A} {a} P, kth (find a l) l P = a
+| []            := take a, assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
+| (x::l)        := take a, begin
+                assert Pd : decidable (a = x), {apply deceqA},
+                cases Pd with Pe Pne,
+                  rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Pe], intro P, rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, Pe],
+                  rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], intro P, rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
+                  apply kth_find
+                end
+
+lemma find_kth [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
+      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, find (kth k l P) l < length l
+| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
+| 0 (a::l)        := assume P, begin
+                  rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, find_cons_of_eq l rfl, length_cons],
+                  exact !zero_lt_succ
+                  end
+| (succ k) (a::l) := assume P, begin
+                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
+                  assert Pd : decidable ((kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P)) = a),
+                    {apply deceqA},
+                  cases Pd with Pe Pne,
+                    rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Pe], apply zero_lt_succ,
+                    rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], apply succ_lt_succ, apply find_kth
+                  end
+
+lemma find_kth_of_nodup [deceqA : decidable_eq A] :
+      ∀ {k : nat} {l : list A} P, nodup l → find (kth k l P) l = k
+| k []            := assume P, absurd P !not_lt_zero
+| 0 (a::l)        := assume Plt Pnodup,
+                  by rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons, find_cons_of_eq l rfl]
+| (succ k) (a::l) := assume Plt Pnodup, begin
+                  rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons],
+                  assert Pd : decidable ((kth k l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt)) = a),
+                    {apply deceqA},
+                  cases Pd with Pe Pne,
+                    assert Pin : a ∈ l, {rewrite -Pe, apply kth_mem},
+                    exact absurd Pin (not_mem_of_nodup_cons Pnodup),
+                    rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne], apply congr (eq.refl succ),
+                    apply find_kth_of_nodup (lt_of_succ_lt_succ Plt) (nodup_of_nodup_cons Pnodup)
+                  end
+
+end kth
+
+end list
+
+
+namespace fintype
+open list
+
+section found
+
+variables {A B : Type}
+variable [finA : fintype A]
+include finA
+
+lemma find_in_range [deceqB : decidable_eq B] {f : A → B} (b : B) :
+    ∀ (l : list A) (P : find b (map f l) < length l), f (kth (find b (map f l)) l P) = b
+| []       := assume P, begin exact absurd P !not_lt_zero end
+| (a::l)   := decidable.rec_on (deceqB b (f a))
+              (assume Peq, begin
+              rewrite [map_cons f a l, find_cons_of_eq _ Peq],
+              intro P, rewrite [kth_zero_of_cons], exact (Peq⁻¹)
+              end)
+              (assume Pne, begin
+              rewrite [map_cons f a l, find_cons_of_ne _ Pne],
+              intro P,
+              rewrite [kth_succ_of_cons (find b (map f l)) l P],
+              exact find_in_range l (lt_of_succ_lt_succ P)
+              end)
+
+end found
+
+section list_to_fun
+variables {A B : Type}
+variable [finA : fintype A]
+include finA
+
+definition fun_to_list (f : A → B) : list B := map f (elems A)
+
+lemma length_map_of_fintype (f : A → B) : length (map f (elems A)) = card A :=
+      by apply length_map
+
+variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
+include deceqA
+
+lemma fintype_find (a : A) : find a (elems A) < card A :=
+      find_lt_length (complete a)
+
+definition list_to_fun (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) : A → B :=
+           take x,
+           kth _ _ (leq⁻¹ ▸ fintype_find x)
+
+definition all_funs [finB : fintype B] : list (A → B) :=
+           dmap (λ l, length l = card A) list_to_fun (all_lists_of_len (card A))
+
+lemma list_to_fun_apply (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) (a : A) :
+      ∀ P, list_to_fun l leq a = kth (find a (elems A)) l P :=
+      assume P, rfl
+
+variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
+include deceqB
+
+lemma fun_eq_list_to_fun_map (f : A → B) : ∀ P, f = list_to_fun (map f (elems A)) P :=
+      assume Pleq, funext (take a,
+      assert Plt : _, from Pleq⁻¹ ▸ find_lt_length (complete a), begin
+      rewrite [list_to_fun_apply _ Pleq a (Pleq⁻¹ ▸ find_lt_length (complete a))],
+      assert Pmlt : find a (elems A) < length (map f (elems A)),
+        {rewrite length_map, exact Plt},
+      rewrite [@kth_of_map A B f (find a (elems A)) (elems A) Plt _, kth_find]
+      end)
+
+lemma list_eq_map_list_to_fun  (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A)
+                    : l = map (list_to_fun l leq) (elems A) :=
+      begin
+      apply eq_of_kth_eq, rewrite length_map, apply leq,
+        intro k Plt Plt2,
+        assert Plt1 : k < length (elems A), {apply leq ▸ Plt},
+        assert Plt3 : find (kth k (elems A) Plt1) (elems A) < length l,
+          {rewrite leq, apply find_kth},
+        rewrite [kth_of_map Plt1 Plt2, list_to_fun_apply l leq _ Plt3],
+        congruence,
+        rewrite [find_kth_of_nodup Plt1 (unique A)],
+      end
+
+lemma fun_to_list_to_fun (f : A → B) : ∀ P, list_to_fun (fun_to_list f) P = f :=
+      assume P, (fun_eq_list_to_fun_map f P)⁻¹
+
+lemma list_to_fun_to_list (l : list B) (leq : length l = card A) :
+      fun_to_list (list_to_fun l leq) = l
+      := (list_eq_map_list_to_fun l leq)⁻¹
+
+lemma dinj_list_to_fun : dinj (λ (l : list B), length l = card A) list_to_fun :=
+      take l1 l2 Pl1 Pl2 Peq,
+      by rewrite [list_eq_map_list_to_fun l1 Pl1, list_eq_map_list_to_fun l2 Pl2, Peq]
+
+variable [finB : fintype B]
+include finB
+
+lemma nodup_all_funs : nodup (@all_funs A B _ _ _) :=
+      dmap_nodup_of_dinj dinj_list_to_fun (nodup_all_lists _)
+
+lemma all_funs_complete (f : A → B) : f ∈ all_funs :=
+      assert Plin : map f (elems A) ∈ all_lists_of_len (card A),
+        from mem_all_lists (card A) _ (by rewrite length_map),
+      assert Plfin : list_to_fun (map f (elems A)) (length_map_of_fintype f) ∈ all_funs,
+        from mem_of_dmap _ Plin,
+      begin rewrite [fun_eq_list_to_fun_map f (length_map_of_fintype f)], apply Plfin end
+
+lemma all_funs_to_all_lists : map fun_to_list (@all_funs A B _ _ _) = all_lists_of_len (card A) :=
+      map_of_dmap_inv_pos list_to_fun_to_list leq_of_mem_all_lists
+
+lemma length_all_funs : length (@all_funs A B _ _ _) = (card B) ^ (card A) := calc
+      length _ = length (map fun_to_list all_funs) : length_map
+           ... = length (all_lists_of_len (card A)) : all_funs_to_all_lists
+           ... = (card B) ^ (card A) : length_all_lists
+
+definition fun_is_fintype [instance] : fintype (A → B) :=
+           fintype.mk all_funs nodup_all_funs all_funs_complete
+
+lemma card_funs : card (A → B) = (card B) ^ (card A) := length_all_funs
+
+end list_to_fun
+
+section surj_inv
+variables {A B : Type}
+variable [finA : fintype A]
+include finA
+
+-- surj from fintype domain implies fintype range
+lemma mem_map_of_surj {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : ∀ b, b ∈ map f (elems A) :=
+      take b, obtain a Peq, from surj b,
+      Peq ▸ mem_map f (complete a)
+
+variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
+include deceqB
+
+lemma found_of_surj {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) :
+      ∀ b, let elts := elems A, k := find b (map f elts) in k < length elts :=
+      λ b, let elts := elems A, img := map f elts, k := find b img in
+           have Pin : b ∈ img, from mem_map_of_surj surj b,
+           assert Pfound : k < length img, from find_lt_length (mem_map_of_surj surj b),
+           length_map f elts ▸ Pfound
+
+definition right_inv {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : B → A :=
+           λ b, let elts := elems A, k := find b (map f elts) in
+           kth k elts (found_of_surj surj b)
+
+lemma id_of_right_inv {f : A → B} (surj : surjective f) : f ∘ (right_inv surj) = id :=
+      funext (λ b, find_in_range b (elems A) (found_of_surj surj b))
+end surj_inv
+
+-- inj functions for equal card types are also surj and therefore bij
+-- the right inv (since it is surj) is also the left inv
+section inj
+variables {A B : Type}
+variable [finA : fintype A]
+include finA
+variable [deceqA : decidable_eq A]
+include deceqA
+variable [finB : fintype B]
+include finB
+variable [deceqB : decidable_eq B]
+include deceqB
+open finset
+
+lemma surj_of_inj_eq_card : card A = card B → ∀ {f : A → B}, injective f → surjective f :=
+      assume Peqcard, take f, assume Pinj,
+      decidable.rec_on decidable_forall_finite
+      (assume P : surjective f, P)
+      (assume Pnsurj : ¬surjective f, obtain b Pne, from exists_not_of_not_forall Pnsurj,
+      assert Pall : ∀ a, f a ≠ b, from forall_not_of_not_exists Pne,
+      assert Pbnin : b ∉ image f univ, from λ Pin,
+        obtain a Pa, from exists_of_mem_image Pin, absurd (and.right Pa) (Pall a),
+      assert Puniv : finset.card (image f univ) = card A,
+        from card_eq_card_image_of_inj Pinj,
+      assert Punivb : finset.card (image f univ) = card B, from eq.trans Puniv Peqcard,
+      assert P : image f univ = univ, from univ_of_card_eq_univ Punivb,
+      absurd (P⁻¹▸ mem_univ b) Pbnin)
+
+end inj
+end fintype