fix(hott/algebra) fix some proofs for functor category

This commit is contained in:
Jakob von Raumer 2014-12-31 19:30:17 -05:00 committed by Leonardo de Moura
parent 31b3bbe5cb
commit 31d1076bd7
2 changed files with 143 additions and 82 deletions

View file

@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jakob von Raumer
import .basic
import .basic types.pi
open function precategory eq prod equiv is_equiv sigma sigma.ops
open function precategory eq prod equiv is_equiv sigma sigma.ops truncation
open pi
structure functor (C D : Precategory) : Type :=
(obF : C → D)
@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ namespace functor
-- "functor C D" is equivalent to a certain sigma type
set_option unifier.max_steps 38500
protected definition sigma_char :
(obF : C → D)
(Σ (obF : C → D)
(homF : Π ⦃a b : C⦄, hom a b → hom (obF a) (obF b)),
(Π (a : C), homF (ID a) = ID (obF a)) ×
(Π {a b c : C} (g : hom b c) (f : hom a b),
@ -36,20 +37,22 @@ namespace functor
exact (pr₁ S.2.2), exact (pr₂ S.2.2),
fapply adjointify,
intro F, apply (functor.rec_on F), intros (d1, d2, d3, d4),
exact (dpair d1 (dpair d2 (pair d3 (@d4)))),
exact (sigma.mk d1 (sigma.mk d2 (pair d3 (@d4)))),
intro F, apply (functor.rec_on F), intros (d1, d2, d3, d4), apply idp,
intro S, apply (sigma.rec_on S), intros (d1, S2),
apply (sigma.rec_on S2), intros (d2, P1),
apply (prod.rec_on P1), intros (d3, d4), apply idp,
end
-- The following lemmas will later be used to prove that the type of
-- precategories formes a precategory itself
protected definition compose (G : functor D E) (F : functor C D) : functor C E :=
functor.mk
(λx, G (F x))
x, G (F x))
(λ a b f, G (F f))
(λ a, calc
G (F (ID a)) = G id : {respect_id F a} --not giving the braces explicitly makes the elaborator compute a couple more seconds
... = id : respect_id G (F a))
G (F (ID a)) = G (ID (F a)) : {respect_id F a}
... = ID (G (F a)) : respect_id G (F a))
(λ a b c g f, calc
G (F (g ∘ f)) = G (F g ∘ F f) : respect_comp F g f
... = G (F g) ∘ G (F f) : respect_comp G (F g) (F f))
@ -57,38 +60,87 @@ namespace functor
infixr `∘f`:60 := compose
protected theorem congr
{C : Precategory} {D : Precategory}
(F : C → D)
(foo2 : Π ⦃a b : C⦄, hom a b → hom (F a) (F b))
(foo3a foo3b : Π (a : C), foo2 (ID a) = ID (F a))
(foo4a foo4b : Π {a b c : C} (g : @hom C C b c) (f : @hom C C a b),
foo2 (g ∘ f) = foo2 g ∘ foo2 f)
(p3 : foo3a = foo3b) (p4 : @foo4a = @foo4b)
: functor.mk F foo2 foo3a @foo4a = functor.mk F foo2 foo3b @foo4b
:=
begin
apply (eq.rec_on p3), intros,
apply (eq.rec_on p4), intros,
apply idp,
end
protected theorem assoc {A B C D : Precategory} (H : functor C D) (G : functor B C) (F : functor A B) :
H ∘f (G ∘f F) = (H ∘f G) ∘f F :=
sorry
begin
apply (functor.rec_on H), intros (H1, H2, H3, H4),
apply (functor.rec_on G), intros (G1, G2, G3, G4),
apply (functor.rec_on F), intros (F1, F2, F3, F4),
fapply functor.congr,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
repeat (apply funext.path_pi; intros),
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
/-protected definition id {C : Precategory} : functor C C :=
protected definition id {C : Precategory} : functor C C :=
mk (λa, a) (λ a b f, f) (λ a, idp) (λ a b c f g, idp)
protected definition ID (C : Precategory) : functor C C := id
protected theorem id_left (F : functor C D) : id ∘f F = F :=
functor.rec (λ obF homF idF compF, dcongr_arg4 mk idp idp !proof_irrel !proof_irrel) F
begin
apply (functor.rec_on F), intros (F1, F2, F3, F4),
fapply functor.congr,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
repeat (apply funext.path_pi; intros),
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
protected theorem id_right (F : functor C D) : F ∘f id = F :=
functor.rec (λ obF homF idF compF, dcongr_arg4 mk idp idp !proof_irrel !proof_irrel) F-/
begin
apply (functor.rec_on F), intros (F1, F2, F3, F4),
fapply functor.congr,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
repeat (apply funext.path_pi; intros),
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
end functor
/-
namespace category
open functor
definition category_of_categories [reducible] : category Category :=
definition precategory_of_precategories : precategory Precategory :=
mk (λ a b, functor a b)
sorry -- TODO: Show that functors form a set?
(λ a b c g f, functor.compose g f)
(λ a, functor.id)
(λ a b c d h g f, !functor.assoc)
(λ a b f, !functor.id_left)
(λ a b f, !functor.id_right)
definition Category_of_categories [reducible] := Mk category_of_categories
definition Precategory_of_categories := Mk precategory_of_precategories
namespace ops
notation `Cat`:max := Category_of_categories
instance [persistent] category_of_categories
notation `PreCat`:max := Precategory_of_categories
instance [persistent] precategory_of_precategories
end ops
end category-/
end category
namespace functor
-- open category.ops

View file

@ -15,33 +15,12 @@ infixl `⟹`:25 := natural_transformation -- \==>
namespace natural_transformation
variables {C D : Precategory} {F G H I : functor C D}
definition natural_map [coercion] (η : F ⟹ G) : Π(a : C), F a ⟶ G a :=
definition natural_map [coercion] (η : F ⟹ G) : Π (a : C), F a ⟶ G a :=
rec (λ x y, x) η
theorem naturality (η : F ⟹ G) : Π⦃a b : C⦄ (f : a ⟶ b), G f ∘ η a = η b ∘ F f :=
rec (λ x y, y) η
protected definition sigma_char :
(Σ (η : Π (a : C), hom (F a) (G a)), Π (a b : C) (f : hom a b), G f ∘ η a = η b ∘ F f) ≃ (F ⟹ G) :=
/-equiv.mk (λ S, natural_transformation.mk S.1 S.2)
(adjointify (λ S, natural_transformation.mk S.1 S.2)
(λ H, natural_transformation.rec_on H (λ η nat, dpair η nat))
(λ H, natural_transformation.rec_on H (λ η nat, idpath (natural_transformation.mk η nat)))
(λ S, sigma.rec_on S (λ η nat, idpath (dpair η nat))))-/
/- THE FOLLLOWING CAUSES LEAN TO SEGFAULT?
begin
fapply equiv.mk,
intro S, apply natural_transformation.mk, exact (S.2),
fapply adjointify,
intro H, apply (natural_transformation.rec_on H), intros (η, natu),
exact (dpair η @natu),
intro H, apply (natural_transformation.rec_on _ _ _),
intros,
end
check sigma_char-/
sorry
protected definition compose (η : G ⟹ H) (θ : F ⟹ G) : F ⟹ H :=
natural_transformation.mk
(λ a, η a ∘ θ a)
@ -52,64 +31,94 @@ namespace natural_transformation
... = η b ∘ (G f ∘ θ a) : assoc
... = η b ∘ (θ b ∘ F f) : naturality θ f
... = (η b ∘ θ b) ∘ F f : assoc)
--congr_arg (λx, η b ∘ x) (naturality θ f) -- this needed to be explicit for some reason (on Oct 24)
infixr `∘n`:60 := compose
protected definition assoc (η₃ : H ⟹ I) (η₂ : G ⟹ H) (η₁ : F ⟹ G) [fext fext2 fext3 : funext] :
protected theorem congr
{C : Precategory} {D : Precategory}
(F G : C ⇒ D)
(η₁ η₂ : Π (a : C), hom (F a) (G a))
(nat₁ : Π (a b : C) (f : hom a b), G f ∘ η₁ a = η₁ b ∘ F f)
(nat₂ : Π (a b : C) (f : hom a b), G f ∘ η₂ a = η₂ b ∘ F f)
(p₁ : η₁ = η₂) (p₂ : p₁ ▹ nat₁ = nat₂)
: @natural_transformation.mk C D F G η₁ nat₁ = @natural_transformation.mk C D F G η₂ nat₂
:=
begin
apply (dcongr_arg2 (@natural_transformation.mk C D F G) p₁ p₂),
end
protected definition assoc (η₃ : H ⟹ I) (η₂ : G ⟹ H) (η₁ : F ⟹ G) :
η₃ ∘n (η₂ ∘n η₁) = (η₃ ∘n η₂) ∘n η₁ :=
-- Proof broken, universe issues?
/-have aux [visible] : is_hprop (Π (a b : C) (f : hom a b), I f ∘ (η₃ ∘n η₂) a ∘ η₁ a = ((η₃ ∘n η₂) b ∘ η₁ b) ∘ F f),
begin
repeat (apply trunc_pi; intros),
apply (succ_is_trunc -1 (I a_2 ∘ (η₃ ∘n η₂) a ∘ η₁ a)),
end,
dcongr_arg2 mk (funext.path_forall _ _ (λ x, !assoc)) !is_hprop.elim-/
sorry
begin
apply (rec_on η₃), intros (η₃1, η₃2),
apply (rec_on η₂), intros (η₂1, η₂2),
apply (rec_on η₁), intros (η₁1, η₁2),
fapply natural_transformation.congr,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply assoc,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply funext.path_pi, intro b,
apply funext.path_pi, intro f,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
protected definition id {C D : Precategory} {F : functor C D} : natural_transformation F F :=
mk (λa, id) (λa b f, !id_right ⬝ (!id_left⁻¹))
protected definition ID {C D : Precategory} (F : functor C D) : natural_transformation F F := id
protected definition id_left (η : F ⟹ G) [fext : funext.{l_1 l_4}] :
id ∘n η = η :=
--Proof broken like all trunc_pi proofs
protected definition ID {C D : Precategory} (F : functor C D) : natural_transformation F F :=
id
protected definition id_left (η : F ⟹ G) : id ∘n η = η :=
begin
apply (rec_on η), intros (η₁, nat₁),
fapply (natural_transformation.congr F G),
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply id_left,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply funext.path_pi, intro b,
apply funext.path_pi, intro f,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
protected definition id_right (η : F ⟹ G) : η ∘n id = η :=
begin
apply (rec_on η), intros (η₁, nat₁),
fapply (natural_transformation.congr F G),
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply id_right,
apply funext.path_pi, intro a,
apply funext.path_pi, intro b,
apply funext.path_pi, intro f,
apply (@is_hset.elim), apply !homH,
end
protected definition sigma_char :
(Σ (η : Π (a : C), hom (F a) (G a)), Π (a b : C) (f : hom a b), G f ∘ η a = η b ∘ F f) ≃ (F ⟹ G) :=
/-begin
apply (rec_on η), intros (f, H),
fapply (path.dcongr_arg2 mk),
apply (funext.path_forall _ f (λa, !id_left)),
assert (H1 : is_hprop (Π {a b : C} (g : hom a b), G g ∘ f a = f b ∘ F g)),
--repeat (apply trunc_pi; intros),
apply (@trunc_pi _ _ _ (-2 .+1) _),
/- apply (succ_is_trunc -1 (G a_2 ∘ f a) (f a_1 ∘ F a_2)),
apply (!is_hprop.elim),-/
intro what,
fapply equiv.mk,
intro S, apply natural_transformation.mk, exact (S.2),
fapply adjointify,
intro H, apply (natural_transformation.rec_on H), intros (η, natu),
exact (sigma.mk η @natu),
intro H, apply (natural_transformation.rec_on _ _ _),
intro S2,
end-/
/-(λ x, equiv.mk (λ S, natural_transformation.mk S.1 S.2)
(adjointify (λ S, natural_transformation.mk S.1 S.2)
(λ H, natural_transformation.rec_on H (λ η nat, sigma.mk η nat))
(λ H, natural_transformation.rec_on H (λ η nat, refl (natural_transformation.mk η nat)))
(λ S, sigma.rec_on S (λ η nat, refl (sigma.mk η nat)))))-/
sorry
protected definition id_right (η : F ⟹ G) [fext : funext.{l_1 l_4}] :
η ∘n id = η :=
--Proof broken like all trunc_pi proofs
/-begin
apply (rec_on η), intros (f, H),
fapply (path.dcongr_arg2 mk),
apply (funext.path_forall _ f (λa, !id_right)),
assert (H1 : is_hprop (Π {a b : C} (g : hom a b), G g ∘ f a = f b ∘ F g)),
repeat (apply trunc_pi; intros),
apply (succ_is_trunc -1 (G a_2 ∘ f a) (f a_1 ∘ F a_2)),
apply (!is_hprop.elim),
end-/
sorry
protected definition to_hset [fx : funext] : is_hset (F ⟹ G) :=
--Proof broken like all trunc_pi proofs
/-begin
protected definition to_hset : is_hset (F ⟹ G) :=
begin
apply trunc_equiv, apply (equiv.to_is_equiv sigma_char),
apply trunc_sigma,
apply trunc_pi, intro a, exact (@homH (objects D) _ (F a) (G a)),
intro η, apply trunc_pi, intro a,
apply trunc_pi, intro b, apply trunc_pi, intro f,
apply succ_is_trunc, apply trunc_succ, exact (@homH (objects D) _ (F a) (G b)),
end-/
sorry
apply trunc_pi, intro b, apply trunc_pi, intro f,
apply succ_is_trunc, apply trunc_succ, exact (@homH (objects D) _ (F a) (G b)),
end
end natural_transformation