feat(library/algebra/order): begin theory of orders

feat(library/algebra/order): begin theory of orders
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Avigad 2014-11-07 14:38:09 -05:00 committed by Leonardo de Moura
parent b97d437011
commit 4a955c0f92
2 changed files with 210 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ calc
... = 1 * b : mul_left_inv
... = b : mul_left_id
theorem group.to_left_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : group A] : left_cancel_semigroup A :=
definition group.to_left_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : group A] : left_cancel_semigroup A :=
left_cancel_semigroup.mk (@group.mul A s) (@group.mul_assoc A s)
(take a b c,
assume H : a * b = a * c,
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ left_cancel_semigroup.mk (@group.mul A s) (@group.mul_assoc A s)
... = a⁻¹ * (a * c) : H
... = c : mul_cancel_inv_left)
theorem group.to_right_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : group A] : right_cancel_semigroup A :=
definition group.to_right_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : group A] : right_cancel_semigroup A :=
right_cancel_semigroup.mk (@group.mul A s) (@group.mul_assoc A s)
(take a b c,
assume H : a * b = c * b,
@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ calc
... = 0 + b : add_left_inv
... = b : add_left_id
theorem add_group.to_left_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : add_group A] :
definition add_group.to_left_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : add_group A] :
add_left_cancel_semigroup A :=
add_left_cancel_semigroup.mk (@add_group.add A s) (@add_group.add_assoc A s)
(take a b c,
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ add_left_cancel_semigroup.mk (@add_group.add A s) (@add_group.add_assoc A s)
... = -a + (a + c) : H
... = c : add_cancel_inv_left)
theorem add_group.to_add_right_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : add_group A] :
definition add_group.to_add_right_cancel_semigroup [instance] [s : add_group A] :
add_right_cancel_semigroup A :=
add_right_cancel_semigroup.mk (@add_group.add A s) (@add_group.add_assoc A s)
(take a b c,

206
library/algebra/order.lean Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: algebra.order
Author: Jeremy Avigad
Various types of orders. We develop weak orders (<=) and strict orders (<) separately. We also
consider structures with both, where the two are related by
x < y ↔ (x ≤ y ∧ x ≠ y) (order_pair)
x ≤ y ↔ (x < y x = y) (strong_order_pair)
These might not hold constructively in some applications, but we can define additional structures
with both < and ≤ as needed.
-/
import logic.eq logic.connectives
import data.unit data.sigma data.prod
import algebra.function algebra.binary
open eq eq.ops
namespace algebra
variable {A : Type}
/- overloaded symbols -/
structure has_le [class] (A : Type) :=
(le : A → A → Prop)
structure has_lt [class] (A : Type) :=
(lt : A → A → Prop)
infixl `<=` := has_le.le
infixl `≤` := has_le.le
infixl `<` := has_lt.lt
definition has_le.ge {A : Type} [s : has_le A] (a b : A) := b ≤ a
notation a ≥ b := has_le.ge a b
notation a >= b := has_le.ge a b
definition has_lt.gt {A : Type} [s : has_lt A] (a b : A) := b < a
notation a > b := has_lt.gt a b
/- weak orders -/
structure weak_order [class] (A : Type) extends has_le A :=
(le_refl : ∀a, le a a)
(le_trans : ∀a b c, le a b → le b c → le a c)
(le_antisym : ∀a b, le a b → le b a → a = b)
theorem le_refl [s : weak_order A] (a : A) : a ≤ a := !weak_order.le_refl
theorem le_trans [s : weak_order A] {a b c : A} : a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c := !weak_order.le_trans
theorem le_antisym [s : weak_order A] {a b : A} : a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b := !weak_order.le_antisym
structure linear_weak_order [class] (A : Type) extends weak_order A :=
(le_total : ∀a b, le a b le b a)
theorem le_total [s : linear_weak_order A] {a b : A} : a ≤ b b ≤ a :=
!linear_weak_order.le_total
/- strict orders -/
structure strict_order [class] (A : Type) extends has_lt A :=
(lt_irrefl : ∀a, ¬ lt a a)
(lt_trans : ∀a b c, lt a b → lt b c → lt a c)
theorem lt_irrefl [s : strict_order A] (a : A) : ¬ a < a := !strict_order.lt_irrefl
theorem lt_trans [s : strict_order A] {a b c : A} : a < b → b < c → a < c := !strict_order.lt_trans
theorem lt_imp_ne [s : strict_order A] {a b : A} : a < b → a ≠ b :=
assume lt_ab : a < b, assume eq_ab : a = b, lt_irrefl a (eq_ab⁻¹ ▸ lt_ab)
structure wf_strict_order [class] (A : Type) extends strict_order A :=
(wf_rec : ∀P : A → Type, (∀x, (∀y, lt y x → P y) → P x) → ∀x, P x)
-- TODO: is there a way to make this type check without specifying universe parameters?
-- The good news is that the error message was very helpful.
theorem wf_rec_on.{u v} {A : Type.{u}} [s : wf_strict_order.{u v} A] {P : A → Type.{v}}
(x : A) (H : ∀x, (∀y, wf_strict_order.lt y x → P y) → P x) : P x :=
wf_strict_order.wf_rec P H x
theorem wf_ind_on.{u v} {A : Type.{u}} [s : wf_strict_order.{u 0} A] {P : A → Prop}
(x : A) (H : ∀x, (∀y, wf_strict_order.lt y x → P y) → P x) : P x :=
wf_rec_on x H
/- structures with a weak and a strict order -/
structure order_pair [class] (A : Type) extends weak_order A, has_lt A :=
(lt_iff_le_ne : ∀a b, lt a b ↔ (le a b ∧ a ≠ b))
theorem lt_iff_le_ne [s : order_pair A] {a b : A} : a < b ↔ (a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b) :=
!order_pair.lt_iff_le_ne
theorem lt_imp_le [s : order_pair A] {a b : A} (H : a < b) : a ≤ b :=
and.elim_left (iff.mp lt_iff_le_ne H)
theorem le_ne_imp_lt [s : order_pair A] {a b : A} (H1 : a ≤ b) (H2 : a ≠ b) : a < b :=
iff.mp (iff.symm lt_iff_le_ne) (and.intro H1 H2)
definition order_pair.to_strict_order [instance] [s : order_pair A] : strict_order A :=
strict_order.mk
order_pair.lt
(show ∀a, ¬ a < a, from
take a,
assume H : a < a,
have H1 : a ≠ a, from and.elim_right (iff.mp !lt_iff_le_ne H),
H1 rfl)
(show ∀a b c, a < b → b < c → a < c, from
take a b c,
assume lt_ab : a < b,
have le_ab : a ≤ b, from lt_imp_le lt_ab,
assume lt_bc : b < c,
have le_bc : b ≤ c, from lt_imp_le lt_bc,
have le_ac : a ≤ c, from le_trans le_ab le_bc,
have ne_ac : a ≠ c, from
assume eq_ac : a = c,
have le_ba : b ≤ a, from eq_ac⁻¹ ▸ le_bc,
have eq_ab : a = b, from le_antisym le_ab le_ba,
have ne_ab : a ≠ b, from and.elim_right (iff.mp lt_iff_le_ne lt_ab),
ne_ab eq_ab,
show a < c, from le_ne_imp_lt le_ac ne_ac)
theorem lt_le_trans [s : order_pair A] {a b c : A} : a < b → b ≤ c → a < c :=
assume lt_ab : a < b,
assume le_bc : b ≤ c,
have le_ac : a ≤ c, from le_trans (lt_imp_le lt_ab) le_bc,
have ne_ac : a ≠ c, from
assume eq_ac : a = c,
have le_ba : b ≤ a, from eq_ac⁻¹ ▸ le_bc,
have eq_ab : a = b, from le_antisym (lt_imp_le lt_ab) le_ba,
show false, from lt_imp_ne lt_ab eq_ab,
show a < c, from le_ne_imp_lt le_ac ne_ac
theorem le_lt_trans [s : order_pair A] {a b c : A} : a ≤ b → b < c → a < c :=
assume le_ab : a ≤ b,
assume lt_bc : b < c,
have le_ac : a ≤ c, from le_trans le_ab (lt_imp_le lt_bc),
have ne_ac : a ≠ c, from
assume eq_ac : a = c,
have le_cb : c ≤ b, from eq_ac ▸ le_ab,
have eq_bc : b = c, from le_antisym (lt_imp_le lt_bc) le_cb,
show false, from lt_imp_ne lt_bc eq_bc,
show a < c, from le_ne_imp_lt le_ac ne_ac
structure strong_order_pair [class] (A : Type) extends strict_order A, has_le A :=
(le_iff_lt_or_eq : ∀a b, le a b ↔ lt a b a = b)
theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq [s : strong_order_pair A] {a b : A} : a ≤ b ↔ a < b a = b :=
!strong_order_pair.le_iff_lt_or_eq
theorem le_imp_lt_or_eq [s : strong_order_pair A] {a b : A} (le_ab : a ≤ b) : a < b a = b :=
iff.mp le_iff_lt_or_eq le_ab
theorem strong_order_pair.to_order_pair [instance] [s : strong_order_pair A] : order_pair A :=
order_pair.mk
strong_order_pair.le
(take a, show a ≤ a, from iff.mp (iff.symm le_iff_lt_or_eq) (or.intro_right _ rfl))
(take a b c,
assume le_ab : a ≤ b,
assume le_bc : b ≤ c,
show a ≤ c, from
or.elim (le_imp_lt_or_eq le_ab)
(assume lt_ab : a < b,
or.elim (le_imp_lt_or_eq le_bc)
(assume lt_bc : b < c,
iff.elim_right le_iff_lt_or_eq (or.intro_left _ (lt_trans lt_ab lt_bc)))
(assume eq_bc : b = c, eq_bc ▸ le_ab))
(assume eq_ab : a = b,
eq_ab⁻¹ ▸ le_bc))
(take a b,
assume le_ab : a ≤ b,
assume le_ba : b ≤ a,
show a = b, from
or.elim (le_imp_lt_or_eq le_ab)
(assume lt_ab : a < b,
or.elim (le_imp_lt_or_eq le_ba)
(assume lt_ba : b < a, absurd (lt_trans lt_ab lt_ba) (lt_irrefl a))
(assume eq_ba : b = a, eq_ba⁻¹))
(assume eq_ab : a = b, eq_ab))
strong_order_pair.lt
(take a b,
iff.intro
(assume lt_ab : a < b,
have le_ab : a ≤ b, from iff.elim_right le_iff_lt_or_eq (or.intro_left _ lt_ab),
show a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b, from and.intro le_ab (lt_imp_ne lt_ab))
(assume H : a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b,
have H1 : a < b a = b, from le_imp_lt_or_eq (and.elim_left H),
show a < b, from or.resolve_left H1 (and.elim_right H)))
structure linear_order_pair (A : Type) extends order_pair A, linear_weak_order A
structure linear_strong_order_pair (A : Type) extends strong_order_pair A :=
(trichotomy : ∀a b, lt a b a = b lt b a)
end algebra