refactor(library/data/list/perm): use anonymous 'suppose' and 'have' expressions
This commit is contained in:
parent
812ddf1ef5
commit
73f665dce3
1 changed files with 29 additions and 26 deletions
|
@ -689,38 +689,41 @@ theorem perm_ext : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → (∀a
|
|||
| (a₁::t₁) [] d₁ d₂ e := absurd (iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons) (not_mem_nil a₁)
|
||||
| (a₁::t₁) (a₂::t₂) d₁ d₂ e :=
|
||||
have a₁ ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a₁) !mem_cons,
|
||||
have ∃s₁ s₂, a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂), from mem_split this,
|
||||
have ∃ s₁ s₂, a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂), from mem_split this,
|
||||
obtain (s₁ s₂ : list A) (t₂_eq : a₂::t₂ = s₁++(a₁::s₂)), from this,
|
||||
have dt₂' : nodup (a₁::(s₁++s₂)), from nodup_head (by rewrite [t₂_eq at d₂]; exact d₂),
|
||||
have na₁s₁s₂ : a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
|
||||
have na₁s₁ : a₁ ∉ s₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left na₁s₁s₂,
|
||||
have na₁s₂ : a₁ ∉ s₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right na₁s₁s₂,
|
||||
have ds₁s₂ : nodup (s₁++s₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
|
||||
have eqv : ∀a, a ∈ t₁ ↔ a ∈ s₁++s₂, from
|
||||
take a, iff.intro
|
||||
(λ aint₁ : a ∈ t₁,
|
||||
assert aina₂t₂ : a ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a) (mem_cons_of_mem _ aint₁),
|
||||
have ains₁a₁s₂ : a ∈ s₁++(a₁::s₂), by rewrite [t₂_eq at aina₂t₂]; exact aina₂t₂,
|
||||
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append ains₁a₁s₂)
|
||||
(λ ains₁ : a ∈ s₁, mem_append_left s₂ ains₁)
|
||||
(λ aina₁s₂ : a ∈ a₁::s₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons aina₁s₂)
|
||||
(λ aeqa₁ : a = a₁,
|
||||
have a₁ ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁,
|
||||
absurd (aeqa₁ ▸ aint₁) this)
|
||||
(λ ains₂ : a ∈ s₂, mem_append_right s₁ ains₂)))
|
||||
(λ ains₁s₂ : a ∈ s₁ ++ s₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append ains₁s₂)
|
||||
(λ ains₁ : a ∈ s₁,
|
||||
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_left _ ains₁),
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ t₁,
|
||||
assert a ∈ a₂::t₂, from iff.mp (e a) (mem_cons_of_mem _ this),
|
||||
have a ∈ s₁++(a₁::s₂), by rewrite [t₂_eq at this]; exact this,
|
||||
or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ s₁, mem_append_left s₂ this)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ a₁::s₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
|
||||
(suppose a = a₁,
|
||||
assert a₁ ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁,
|
||||
by subst a; contradiction)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ s₂, mem_append_right s₁ this)))
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ s₁ ++ s₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_append this)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ s₁,
|
||||
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_left _ this),
|
||||
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
|
||||
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
|
||||
(λ aeqa₁ : a = a₁, absurd (aeqa₁ ▸ ains₁) na₁s₁)
|
||||
(λ aint₁ : a ∈ t₁, aint₁))
|
||||
(λ ains₂ : a ∈ s₂,
|
||||
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_right _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ ains₂)),
|
||||
(suppose a = a₁,
|
||||
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
|
||||
assert a₁ ∉ s₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left this,
|
||||
by subst a; contradiction)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ s₂,
|
||||
have a ∈ a₂::t₂, from by rewrite [t₂_eq]; exact (mem_append_right _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ this)),
|
||||
have a ∈ a₁::t₁, from iff.mpr (e a) this,
|
||||
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons this)
|
||||
(λ aeqa₁ : a = a₁, absurd (aeqa₁ ▸ ains₂) na₁s₂)
|
||||
(λ aint₁ : a ∈ t₁, aint₁))),
|
||||
(suppose a = a₁,
|
||||
have a₁ ∉ s₁++s₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
|
||||
assert a₁ ∉ s₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right this,
|
||||
by subst a; contradiction)
|
||||
(suppose a ∈ t₁, this))),
|
||||
have ds₁s₂ : nodup (s₁++s₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons dt₂',
|
||||
have nodup t₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁,
|
||||
calc a₁::t₁ ~ a₁::(s₁++s₂) : skip a₁ (perm_ext this ds₁s₂ eqv)
|
||||
... ~ s₁++(a₁::s₂) : !perm_middle
|
||||
|
@ -761,8 +764,8 @@ assume u, perm.induction_on u
|
|||
assume u' : l₁' ~ l₂',
|
||||
assume u'' : filter p l₁' ~ filter p l₂',
|
||||
decidable.by_cases
|
||||
(assume H : p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_pos _ H]; apply perm.skip; apply u'')
|
||||
(assume H : ¬ p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_neg _ H]; apply u''))
|
||||
(suppose p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_pos _ this]; apply perm.skip; apply u'')
|
||||
(suppose ¬ p x, by rewrite [*filter_cons_of_neg _ this]; apply u''))
|
||||
(take x y l,
|
||||
decidable.by_cases
|
||||
(assume H1 : p x,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue