refactor(kernel/converter): implement eta in whnf instead of is_def_eq.
Without cumulativity, we do not have problems with Eta at whnf anymore. When we had cumulativity, we could not not simply reduce (fun x : A, f x) ==> f This step is correct only if domain(f) was definitionally equal to f. Here is a problematic example for systems with cumulativity Given, f : Type.{2} -> Bool (fun x : Type.{1}, f x) Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c883c638d6
commit
7b15e558a2
2 changed files with 44 additions and 28 deletions
|
@ -62,16 +62,36 @@ struct default_converter : public converter {
|
|||
return m_env.norm_ext()(e, xctx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** \brief Try to apply eta-reduction to \c e. */
|
||||
expr try_eta(expr const & e) {
|
||||
lean_assert(is_lambda(e));
|
||||
expr const & b = binder_body(e);
|
||||
if (is_lambda(b)) {
|
||||
expr new_b = try_eta(b);
|
||||
if (is_eqp(b, new_b)) {
|
||||
return e;
|
||||
} else if (is_app(new_b) && is_var(app_arg(new_b), 0) && !has_free_var(app_fn(new_b), 0)) {
|
||||
return lower_free_vars(app_fn(new_b), 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return update_binder(e, binder_domain(e), new_b);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (is_app(b) && is_var(app_arg(b), 0) && !has_free_var(app_fn(b), 0)) {
|
||||
return lower_free_vars(app_fn(b), 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return e;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** \brief Weak head normal form core procedure. It does not perform delta reduction nor normalization extensions. */
|
||||
expr whnf_core(expr const & e, context & c) {
|
||||
check_system("whnf");
|
||||
|
||||
// handle easy cases
|
||||
switch (e.kind()) {
|
||||
case expr_kind::Var: case expr_kind::Sort: case expr_kind::Meta: case expr_kind::Local:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Lambda: case expr_kind::Pi: case expr_kind::Constant:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Var: case expr_kind::Sort: case expr_kind::Meta: case expr_kind::Local:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Pi: case expr_kind::Constant:
|
||||
return e;
|
||||
case expr_kind::Macro: case expr_kind::Let: case expr_kind::App:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Lambda: case expr_kind::Macro: case expr_kind::Let: case expr_kind::App:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -86,8 +106,11 @@ struct default_converter : public converter {
|
|||
expr r;
|
||||
switch (e.kind()) {
|
||||
case expr_kind::Var: case expr_kind::Sort: case expr_kind::Meta: case expr_kind::Local:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Lambda: case expr_kind::Pi: case expr_kind::Constant:
|
||||
case expr_kind::Pi: case expr_kind::Constant:
|
||||
lean_unreachable(); // LCOV_EXCL_LINE
|
||||
case expr_kind::Lambda:
|
||||
r = (m_env.eta()) ? try_eta(e) : e;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case expr_kind::Macro:
|
||||
if (auto m = expand_macro(e, c))
|
||||
r = whnf_core(*m, c);
|
||||
|
@ -261,20 +284,6 @@ struct default_converter : public converter {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** \brief Eta-expand \c s and check if it is definitionally equal to \c t. */
|
||||
bool try_eta(expr const & t, expr const & s, context & c, delayed_justification & jst) {
|
||||
lean_assert(is_lambda(t));
|
||||
lean_assert(!is_lambda(s));
|
||||
expr t_s = whnf(c.infer_type(s), c);
|
||||
if (is_pi(t_s)) {
|
||||
// new_s := lambda x : domain(t_s), s x
|
||||
expr new_s = mk_lambda(c.mk_fresh_name(), binder_domain(t_s), mk_app(lift_free_vars(s, 1), mk_var(0)));
|
||||
return is_def_eq(t, new_s, c, jst);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief Given lambda/Pi expressions \c t and \c s, return true iff \c t is def eq to \c s.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -419,16 +428,7 @@ struct default_converter : public converter {
|
|||
if (r != l_undef) return r == l_true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, t_n and s_n are in weak head normal form (modulo meta-variables)
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_env.eta()) {
|
||||
lean_assert(!is_lambda(t_n) || !is_lambda(s_n));
|
||||
// Eta-reduction support
|
||||
if ((is_lambda(t_n) && try_eta(t_n, s_n, c, jst)) ||
|
||||
(is_lambda(s_n) && try_eta(s_n, t_n, c, jst)))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point, t_n and s_n are in weak head normal form (modulo meta-variables and proof irrelevance)
|
||||
if (is_app(t_n) && is_app(s_n)) {
|
||||
expr it1 = t_n;
|
||||
expr it2 = s_n;
|
||||
|
|
16
tests/lua/eta.lua
Normal file
16
tests/lua/eta.lua
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|||
local env = empty_environment()
|
||||
env = add_decl(env, mk_var_decl("f", mk_arrow(Bool, mk_arrow(Bool, Bool))))
|
||||
local f = Const("f")
|
||||
local x = Const("x")
|
||||
local y = Const("y")
|
||||
local z = Const("z")
|
||||
local tc = type_checker(env)
|
||||
print(tc:whnf(Fun(x, Bool, f(x))))
|
||||
print(tc:whnf(Fun(x, Bool, Fun(y, Bool, f(x, y)))))
|
||||
print(tc:whnf(Fun(x, Bool, Fun(y, Bool, f(Const("a"), y)))))
|
||||
print(tc:whnf(Fun(z, Bool, Fun(x, Bool, Fun(y, Bool, f(z, y))))))
|
||||
assert(tc:is_def_eq(f, Fun(x, Bool, f(x))))
|
||||
assert(tc:is_def_eq(f, Fun(x, Bool, Fun(y, Bool, f(x, y)))))
|
||||
local a = Const("a")
|
||||
local A = Const("A")
|
||||
assert(tc:is_def_eq(Fun(a, A, a)(f), Fun(x, Bool, Fun(y, Bool, f(x, y)))))
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue