fix(library/elaborator): bug in process_meta_app
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b887a2b900
commit
84bfe2a222
2 changed files with 12 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ bool metavar_env_cell::assign(name const & m, expr const & t, justification cons
|
|||
failed = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
it2->m_context = it2->m_context.remove(e_ctx_size - extra, extra);
|
||||
lean_assert(free_var_range(e, metavar_env(this)) == ctx_size + offset);
|
||||
lean_assert_le(free_var_range(e, metavar_env(this)), ctx_size + offset);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -474,9 +474,9 @@ class elaborator::imp {
|
|||
swap(new_a, new_b);
|
||||
push_new_constraint(is_eq(c), new_ctx, new_a, new_b, new_jst);
|
||||
return Processed;
|
||||
} else if (is_var(b)) {
|
||||
} else if (!has_metavar(b)) {
|
||||
// Failure, there is no way to unify
|
||||
// ?m[lift:s:n, ...] with a variable in [s, s+n]
|
||||
// ?m[lift:s:n, ...] with a term that contains variables in [s, s+n]
|
||||
m_conflict = justification(new unification_failure_justification(c));
|
||||
return Failed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -795,14 +795,9 @@ class elaborator::imp {
|
|||
unsigned num_a = num_args(a);
|
||||
buffer<expr> arg_types;
|
||||
buffer<unification_constraint> ucs;
|
||||
// h_ctx is the context for new fresh metavariables used in the imitation step
|
||||
// Since the imitation is going to be assigned to f_a, its context must
|
||||
// be the context of f_a + the imitation arguments
|
||||
context h_ctx = menv->get_context(metavar_name(f_a));
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_a; i++) {
|
||||
arg_types.push_back(m_type_inferer(arg(a, i), ctx, menv, ucs));
|
||||
push_active(ucs);
|
||||
h_ctx = extend(h_ctx, name(g_x_name, i), arg_types.back());
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Add projections
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_a; i++) {
|
||||
|
@ -832,9 +827,8 @@ class elaborator::imp {
|
|||
buffer<expr> imitation_args; // arguments for the imitation
|
||||
imitation_args.push_back(lift_free_vars(f_b, 0, num_a - 1, new_state.m_menv));
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 1; i < num_b; i++) {
|
||||
// Remark: h_ctx is "ctx, (x_{num_a} : T_{num_a}) ... (x_1 : T_1)" because h_i is inside of the lambda
|
||||
expr h_i = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(h_ctx);
|
||||
imitation_args.push_back(mk_app_vars(h_i, num_a - 1));
|
||||
expr h_i = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(ctx);
|
||||
imitation_args.push_back(mk_app_vars(add_lift(h_i, 0, num_a - 1), num_a - 1));
|
||||
push_new_eq_constraint(new_state.m_active_cnstrs, ctx, update_app(a, 0, h_i), arg(b, i), new_assumption);
|
||||
}
|
||||
imitation = mk_lambda(arg_types, mk_app(imitation_args));
|
||||
|
@ -843,24 +837,24 @@ class elaborator::imp {
|
|||
// Assign f_a <- fun (x_1 : T_1) ... (x_{num_a} : T_{num_a}), (h_1 x_1 ... x_{num_a}) = (h_2 x_1 ... x_{num_a})
|
||||
// New constraints (h_1 a_1 ... a_{num_a}) == eq_lhs(b)
|
||||
// (h_2 a_1 ... a_{num_a}) == eq_rhs(b)
|
||||
expr h_1 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(h_ctx);
|
||||
expr h_2 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(h_ctx);
|
||||
expr h_1 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(ctx);
|
||||
expr h_2 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(ctx);
|
||||
push_new_eq_constraint(new_state.m_active_cnstrs, ctx, update_app(a, 0, h_1), eq_lhs(b), new_assumption);
|
||||
push_new_eq_constraint(new_state.m_active_cnstrs, ctx, update_app(a, 0, h_2), eq_rhs(b), new_assumption);
|
||||
imitation = mk_lambda(arg_types, mk_eq(mk_app_vars(h_1, num_a - 1), mk_app_vars(h_2, num_a - 1)));
|
||||
imitation = mk_lambda(arg_types, mk_eq(mk_app_vars(add_lift(h_1, 0, num_a - 1), num_a - 1), mk_app_vars(add_lift(h_2, 0, num_a - 1), num_a - 1)));
|
||||
} else if (is_abstraction(b)) {
|
||||
// Imitation for lambdas and Pis
|
||||
// Assign f_a <- fun (x_1 : T_1) ... (x_{num_a} : T_{num_a}),
|
||||
// fun (x_b : (?h_1 x_1 ... x_{num_a})), (?h_2 x_1 ... x_{num_a} x_b)
|
||||
// New constraints (h_1 a_1 ... a_{num_a}) == abst_domain(b)
|
||||
// (h_2 a_1 ... a_{num_a} x_b) == abst_body(b)
|
||||
expr h_1 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(h_ctx);
|
||||
expr h_1 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(ctx);
|
||||
context new_ctx = extend(ctx, abst_name(b), abst_domain(b));
|
||||
expr h_2 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(extend(h_ctx, abst_name(b), abst_domain(b)));
|
||||
expr h_2 = new_state.m_menv->mk_metavar(extend(ctx, abst_name(b), abst_domain(b)));
|
||||
push_new_eq_constraint(new_state.m_active_cnstrs, ctx, update_app(a, 0, h_1), abst_domain(b), new_assumption);
|
||||
push_new_eq_constraint(new_state.m_active_cnstrs, new_ctx,
|
||||
mk_app(update_app(a, 0, h_2), mk_var(0)), abst_body(b), new_assumption);
|
||||
imitation = mk_lambda(arg_types, update_abstraction(b, mk_app_vars(h_1, num_a - 1), mk_app_vars(h_2, num_a)));
|
||||
mk_app(update_app(lift_free_vars(a, 1), 0, h_2), mk_var(0)), abst_body(b), new_assumption);
|
||||
imitation = mk_lambda(arg_types, update_abstraction(b, mk_app_vars(add_lift(h_1, 0, num_a - 1), num_a - 1), mk_app_vars(add_lift(h_2, 1, num_a - 1), num_a)));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// "Dumb imitation" aka the constant function
|
||||
// Assign f_a <- fun (x_1 : T_1) ... (x_{num_a} : T_{num_a}), b
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue