fix(frontends/lean): check wheter the synthesized proof term has metavars or not
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
873a07d34c
commit
a1b5a8e50f
2 changed files with 61 additions and 46 deletions
|
@ -1076,7 +1076,8 @@ class parser::imp {
|
|||
diagnostic(m_frontend) << "Proof state:\n" << s << endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void backtrack(std::vector<lazy_list<proof_state>> & stack, proof_state & s) {
|
||||
typedef std::vector<proof_state_seq> proof_state_seq_stack;
|
||||
void tactic_backtrack(proof_state_seq_stack & stack, proof_state & s) {
|
||||
if (!stack.empty())
|
||||
diagnostic(m_frontend) << "Backtracking...\n";
|
||||
while (!stack.empty()) {
|
||||
|
@ -1097,9 +1098,61 @@ class parser::imp {
|
|||
throw exception("failed to synthesize proof object using tactics");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void tactic_apply(proof_state_seq_stack & stack, proof_state & s) {
|
||||
auto tac_pos = pos();
|
||||
tactic t;
|
||||
if (curr() == scanner::token::ScriptBlock) {
|
||||
parse_script_expr();
|
||||
using_script([&](lua_State * L) {
|
||||
if (is_tactic(L, -1))
|
||||
t = to_tactic(L, -1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw parser_error(sstream() << "invalid script-block, it must return a tactic", tac_pos);
|
||||
});
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
name tac_name = check_identifier_next("invalid apply command, identifier or 'script-block' expected");
|
||||
using_script([&](lua_State * L) {
|
||||
lua_getglobal(L, tac_name.to_string().c_str());
|
||||
try {
|
||||
t = to_tactic_ext(L, -1);
|
||||
} catch (...) {
|
||||
throw parser_error(sstream() << "unknown tactic '" << tac_name << "'", tac_pos);
|
||||
}
|
||||
lua_pop(L, 1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
proof_state_seq::maybe_pair r;
|
||||
code_with_callbacks([&]() {
|
||||
// t may have call-backs we should set ios in the script_state
|
||||
proof_state_seq seq = t(m_frontend, m_frontend.get_state(), s);
|
||||
r = seq.pull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (r) {
|
||||
s = r->first;
|
||||
stack.push_back(r->second);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
tactic_backtrack(stack, s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expr tactic_done(proof_state const & s) {
|
||||
if (s.is_proof_final_state()) {
|
||||
assignment a(s.get_menv());
|
||||
proof_map m;
|
||||
expr pr = s.get_proof_builder()(m, a);
|
||||
if (has_metavar(pr)) {
|
||||
throw exception("synthesized proof object has unsolved metavars");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return pr;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
display_proof_state(s);
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize proof object using tactics");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expr parse_tactic(proof_state s) {
|
||||
proof_state ini = s;
|
||||
std::vector<lazy_list<proof_state>> stack;
|
||||
proof_state_seq_stack stack;
|
||||
while (true) {
|
||||
auto p = pos();
|
||||
if (!curr_is_identifier()) {
|
||||
|
@ -1109,52 +1162,11 @@ class parser::imp {
|
|||
name id = curr_name();
|
||||
next();
|
||||
if (id == g_apply) {
|
||||
auto tac_pos = pos();
|
||||
tactic t;
|
||||
if (curr() == scanner::token::ScriptBlock) {
|
||||
parse_script_expr();
|
||||
using_script([&](lua_State * L) {
|
||||
if (is_tactic(L, -1))
|
||||
t = to_tactic(L, -1);
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw parser_error(sstream() << "invalid script-block, it must return a tactic", tac_pos);
|
||||
});
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
name tac_name = check_identifier_next("invalid apply command, identifier or 'script-block' expected");
|
||||
using_script([&](lua_State * L) {
|
||||
lua_getglobal(L, tac_name.to_string().c_str());
|
||||
try {
|
||||
t = to_tactic_ext(L, -1);
|
||||
} catch (...) {
|
||||
throw parser_error(sstream() << "unknown tactic '" << tac_name << "'", tac_pos);
|
||||
}
|
||||
lua_pop(L, 1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
proof_state_seq::maybe_pair r;
|
||||
code_with_callbacks([&]() {
|
||||
// t may have call-backs we should set ios in the script_state
|
||||
lazy_list<proof_state> seq = t(m_frontend, m_frontend.get_state(), s);
|
||||
r = seq.pull();
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (r) {
|
||||
s = r->first;
|
||||
stack.push_back(r->second);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
backtrack(stack, s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
tactic_apply(stack, s);
|
||||
} else if (id == g_back) {
|
||||
backtrack(stack, s);
|
||||
tactic_backtrack(stack, s);
|
||||
} else if (id == g_done) {
|
||||
if (s.is_proof_final_state()) {
|
||||
assignment a(s.get_menv());
|
||||
proof_map m;
|
||||
expr pr = s.get_proof_builder()(m, a);
|
||||
return pr;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
display_proof_state(s);
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize proof object using tactics");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return tactic_done(s);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
throw parser_error(sstream() << "invalid tactical proof, unknown command '" << id << "'", p);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ format proof_state::pp(formatter const & fmt, options const & opts) const {
|
|||
r += line();
|
||||
r += p.second.pp(fmt, opts);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (first) {
|
||||
r = format("no goals");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue