refactor(library/data/subtype): define subtype using 'structure' command
This commit is contained in:
parent
b5404cd979
commit
bf5f48730c
4 changed files with 13 additions and 26 deletions
|
@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ theorem fun_image_def {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (a : A) :
|
|||
fun_image f a = tag (f a) (exists_intro a rfl) := rfl
|
||||
|
||||
theorem elt_of_fun_image {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (a : A) : elt_of (fun_image f a) = f a :=
|
||||
elt_of_tag _ _
|
||||
elt_of.tag _ _
|
||||
|
||||
theorem image_elt_of {A B : Type} {f : A → B} (u : image f) : ∃a, f a = elt_of u :=
|
||||
has_property u
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,41 +6,28 @@ import logic.inhabited logic.eq logic.decidable
|
|||
|
||||
open decidable
|
||||
|
||||
inductive subtype {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) : Type :=
|
||||
tag : Πx : A, P x → subtype P
|
||||
structure subtype {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) :=
|
||||
tag :: (elt_of : A) (has_property : P elt_of)
|
||||
|
||||
notation `{` binders `,` r:(scoped P, subtype P) `}` := r
|
||||
notation `{` binders `|` r:(scoped 1 P, subtype P) `}` := r
|
||||
|
||||
namespace subtype
|
||||
variables {A : Type} {P : A → Prop}
|
||||
|
||||
-- TODO: make this a coercion?
|
||||
definition elt_of (a : {x, P x}) : A := rec (λ x y, x) a
|
||||
theorem has_property (a : {x, P x}) : P (elt_of a) := rec (λ x y, y) a
|
||||
|
||||
theorem elt_of_tag (a : A) (H : P a) : elt_of (tag a H) = a := rfl
|
||||
|
||||
protected theorem destruct {Q : {x, P x} → Prop} (a : {x, P x})
|
||||
(H : ∀(x : A) (H1 : P x), Q (tag x H1)) : Q a :=
|
||||
rec H a
|
||||
|
||||
theorem tag_irrelevant {a : A} (H1 H2 : P a) : tag a H1 = tag a H2 :=
|
||||
rfl
|
||||
|
||||
theorem tag_elt_of (a : subtype P) : ∀(H : P (elt_of a)), tag (elt_of a) H = a :=
|
||||
destruct a (take (x : A) (H1 : P x) (H2 : P x), rfl)
|
||||
|
||||
theorem tag_eq {a1 a2 : A} {H1 : P a1} {H2 : P a2} (H3 : a1 = a2) : tag a1 H1 = tag a2 H2 :=
|
||||
eq.subst H3 (take H2, tag_irrelevant H1 H2) H2
|
||||
|
||||
protected theorem equal {a1 a2 : {x, P x}} : ∀(H : elt_of a1 = elt_of a2), a1 = a2 :=
|
||||
protected theorem equal {a1 a2 : {x | P x}} : ∀(H : elt_of a1 = elt_of a2), a1 = a2 :=
|
||||
destruct a1 (take x1 H1, destruct a2 (take x2 H2 H, tag_eq H))
|
||||
|
||||
protected definition is_inhabited [instance] {a : A} (H : P a) : inhabited {x, P x} :=
|
||||
protected definition is_inhabited [instance] {a : A} (H : P a) : inhabited {x | P x} :=
|
||||
inhabited.mk (tag a H)
|
||||
|
||||
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] (H : decidable_eq A) : decidable_eq {x, P x} :=
|
||||
take a1 a2 : {x, P x},
|
||||
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] (H : decidable_eq A) : decidable_eq {x | P x} :=
|
||||
take a1 a2 : {x | P x},
|
||||
have H1 : (a1 = a2) ↔ (elt_of a1 = elt_of a2), from
|
||||
iff.intro (assume H, eq.subst H rfl) (assume H, equal H),
|
||||
decidable_iff_equiv _ (iff.symm H1)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ open subtype inhabited nonempty
|
|||
-- ---------
|
||||
|
||||
axiom strong_indefinite_description {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) (H : nonempty A) :
|
||||
{x : A, (∃x : A, P x) → P x}
|
||||
{ x | (∃y : A, P y) → P x}
|
||||
|
||||
-- In the presence of classical logic, we could prove this from the weaker
|
||||
-- axiom indefinite_description {A : Type} {P : A->Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : {x : A, P x}
|
||||
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ theorem nonempty_imp_exists_true {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : ∃x : A, true :=
|
|||
nonempty.elim H (take x, exists_intro x trivial)
|
||||
|
||||
theorem nonempty_imp_inhabited {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) : inhabited A :=
|
||||
let u : {x : A, (∃x : A, true) → true} := strong_indefinite_description (λa, true) H in
|
||||
let u : {x | (∃y : A, true) → true} := strong_indefinite_description (λa, true) H in
|
||||
inhabited.mk (elt_of u)
|
||||
|
||||
theorem exists_imp_inhabited {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (H : ∃x, P x) : inhabited A :=
|
||||
|
@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ nonempty_imp_inhabited (obtain w Hw, from H, nonempty.intro w)
|
|||
-- ----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
opaque definition epsilon {A : Type} [H : nonempty A] (P : A → Prop) : A :=
|
||||
let u : {x : A, (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
|
||||
let u : {x | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
|
||||
strong_indefinite_description P H in
|
||||
elt_of u
|
||||
|
||||
theorem epsilon_spec_aux {A : Type} (H : nonempty A) (P : A → Prop) (Hex : ∃y, P y) :
|
||||
P (@epsilon A H P) :=
|
||||
let u : {x : A, (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
|
||||
let u : {x | (∃y, P y) → P x} :=
|
||||
strong_indefinite_description P H in
|
||||
has_property u Hex
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
|
|||
funext : ∀ {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {f g : Π (a : A), B a}, (∀ (a : A), f a = g a) → f = g
|
||||
strong_indefinite_description : Π {A : Type} (P : A → Prop), nonempty A → { (x : A), (∃ (x : A), P x) → P x }
|
||||
strong_indefinite_description : Π {A : Type} (P : A → Prop), nonempty A → { (x : A) | (∃ (x : A), P x) → P x }
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue