feat(library/blast/congruence_closure): add proved/disproved aux methods
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f6b79227f
commit
d833410f0d
2 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -320,6 +320,40 @@ optional<expr> congruence_closure::get_inconsistency_proof() const {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
bool congruence_closure::prove(expr const & e) const {
|
||||||
|
return is_eqv(get_iff_name(), e, mk_true());
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
optional<expr> congruence_closure::get_proof(expr const & e) const {
|
||||||
|
try {
|
||||||
|
app_builder & b = get_app_builder();
|
||||||
|
if (auto p = get_eqv_proof(get_iff_name(), e, mk_true())) {
|
||||||
|
return some_expr(b.mk_of_iff_true(*p));
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
return none_expr();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
} catch (app_builder_exception &) {
|
||||||
|
return none_expr();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
bool congruence_closure::disproved(expr const & e) const {
|
||||||
|
return is_eqv(get_iff_name(), e, mk_false());
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
optional<expr> congruence_closure::get_disproof(expr const & e) const {
|
||||||
|
try {
|
||||||
|
app_builder & b = get_app_builder();
|
||||||
|
if (auto p = get_eqv_proof(get_iff_name(), e, mk_false())) {
|
||||||
|
return some_expr(b.mk_not_of_iff_false(*p));
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
return none_expr();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
} catch (app_builder_exception &) {
|
||||||
|
return none_expr();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bool congruence_closure::is_congr_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const {
|
bool congruence_closure::is_congr_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const {
|
||||||
if (auto n = m_entries.find(eqc_key(R, e))) {
|
if (auto n = m_entries.find(eqc_key(R, e))) {
|
||||||
return n->m_cg_root;
|
return n->m_cg_root;
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ public:
|
||||||
bool is_uneqv(name const & R, expr const & e1, expr const & e2) const;
|
bool is_uneqv(name const & R, expr const & e1, expr const & e2) const;
|
||||||
optional<expr> get_uneqv_proof(name const & R, expr const & e1, expr const & e2) const;
|
optional<expr> get_uneqv_proof(name const & R, expr const & e1, expr const & e2) const;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/** \brief Return true iff \c e has been proved by this module. That is, the proposition \c e is inhabited */
|
||||||
|
bool prove(expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
|
optional<expr> get_proof(expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/** \brief Return true iff \c (not e) has been proved by this module. That is, the proposition \c (not e) is inhabited */
|
||||||
|
bool disproved(expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
|
optional<expr> get_disproof(expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bool is_congr_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const;
|
bool is_congr_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
bool is_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const { return get_root(R, e) == e; }
|
bool is_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const { return get_root(R, e) == e; }
|
||||||
expr get_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const;
|
expr get_root(name const & R, expr const & e) const;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue