refactor(frontends/lean/parser): cleanup method apply_tactics
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ff6013594
commit
e4dff52d7a
1 changed files with 33 additions and 52 deletions
|
@ -1521,71 +1521,52 @@ class parser::imp {
|
|||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
\brief Try to fill the 'holes' in \c val using tactics.
|
||||
The expression \c expected_type is the type of \c val.
|
||||
The metavar_env \c menv contains the definition of the metavariables occurring in \c val.
|
||||
|
||||
If a 'hole' is associated with a "hint tactic" ('show-by' and 'by' constructs),
|
||||
then this will be the tactic used to "fill" the hole. Otherwise,
|
||||
a tactic command sequence is expected in the input stream being parsed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
expr apply_tactics(expr const & expected_type, expr const & val, metavar_env & menv) {
|
||||
if (is_metavar(val)) {
|
||||
// simple case
|
||||
if (!m_type_inferer.is_proposition(expected_type))
|
||||
expr apply_tactics(expr const & val, metavar_env & menv) {
|
||||
buffer<expr> mvars;
|
||||
for_each(val, [&](expr const & e, unsigned) {
|
||||
if (is_metavar(e)) {
|
||||
mvars.push_back(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
std::sort(mvars.begin(), mvars.end(), [](expr const & e1, expr const & e2) { return is_lt(e1, e2, false); });
|
||||
for (auto mvar : mvars) {
|
||||
expr mvar_type = instantiate_metavars(menv.get_type(mvar), menv);
|
||||
if (has_metavar(mvar_type))
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize metavar, its type contains metavariables");
|
||||
buffer<context_entry> new_entries;
|
||||
for (auto e : menv.get_context(mvar)) {
|
||||
new_entries.emplace_back(e.get_name(),
|
||||
instantiate_metavars(e.get_domain(), menv),
|
||||
instantiate_metavars(e.get_body(), menv));
|
||||
}
|
||||
context mvar_ctx(to_list(new_entries.begin(), new_entries.end()));
|
||||
if (!m_type_inferer.is_proposition(mvar_type, mvar_ctx))
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize metavar, its type is not a proposition");
|
||||
proof_state s = to_proof_state(m_frontend, context(), expected_type);
|
||||
std::pair<tactic, pos_info> hint_and_pos = get_tactic_tactic_for(val);
|
||||
proof_state s = to_proof_state(m_frontend, mvar_ctx, mvar_type);
|
||||
std::pair<tactic, pos_info> hint_and_pos = get_tactic_tactic_for(mvar);
|
||||
if (hint_and_pos.first) {
|
||||
// metavariable has an associated tactic hint
|
||||
s = apply_tactic(s, hint_and_pos.first, hint_and_pos.second).first;
|
||||
return mk_proof_for(s, hint_and_pos.second, context(), expected_type);
|
||||
menv.assign(mvar, mk_proof_for(s, hint_and_pos.second, mvar_ctx, mvar_type));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
display_proof_state_if_interactive(s);
|
||||
show_tactic_prompt();
|
||||
check_period_next("invalid theorem, '.' expected before tactical proof");
|
||||
return parse_tactic_cmds(s, context(), expected_type);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
buffer<expr> mvars;
|
||||
for_each(val, [&](expr const & e, unsigned) {
|
||||
if (is_metavar(e)) {
|
||||
mvars.push_back(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
std::sort(mvars.begin(), mvars.end(), [](expr const & e1, expr const & e2) { return is_lt(e1, e2, false); });
|
||||
for (auto mvar : mvars) {
|
||||
expr mvar_type = instantiate_metavars(menv.get_type(mvar), menv);
|
||||
if (has_metavar(mvar_type))
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize metavar, its type contains metavariables");
|
||||
buffer<context_entry> new_entries;
|
||||
for (auto e : menv.get_context(mvar)) {
|
||||
new_entries.emplace_back(e.get_name(),
|
||||
instantiate_metavars(e.get_domain(), menv),
|
||||
instantiate_metavars(e.get_body(), menv));
|
||||
}
|
||||
context mvar_ctx(to_list(new_entries.begin(), new_entries.end()));
|
||||
if (!m_type_inferer.is_proposition(mvar_type, mvar_ctx))
|
||||
throw exception("failed to synthesize metavar, its type is not a proposition");
|
||||
proof_state s = to_proof_state(m_frontend, mvar_ctx, mvar_type);
|
||||
std::pair<tactic, pos_info> hint_and_pos = get_tactic_tactic_for(mvar);
|
||||
if (hint_and_pos.first) {
|
||||
// metavariable has an associated tactic hint
|
||||
s = apply_tactic(s, hint_and_pos.first, hint_and_pos.second).first;
|
||||
menv.assign(mvar, mk_proof_for(s, hint_and_pos.second, mvar_ctx, mvar_type));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (curr_is_period()) {
|
||||
display_proof_state_if_interactive(s);
|
||||
show_tactic_prompt();
|
||||
next();
|
||||
}
|
||||
expr mvar_val = parse_tactic_cmds(s, mvar_ctx, mvar_type);
|
||||
if (mvar_val)
|
||||
menv.assign(mvar, mvar_val);
|
||||
if (curr_is_period()) {
|
||||
display_proof_state_if_interactive(s);
|
||||
show_tactic_prompt();
|
||||
next();
|
||||
}
|
||||
expr mvar_val = parse_tactic_cmds(s, mvar_ctx, mvar_type);
|
||||
if (mvar_val)
|
||||
menv.assign(mvar, mvar_val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return instantiate_metavars(val, menv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return instantiate_metavars(val, menv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** \brief Auxiliary method used for parsing definitions and theorems. */
|
||||
|
@ -1629,7 +1610,7 @@ class parser::imp {
|
|||
if (has_metavar(type))
|
||||
throw exception("invalid definition, type still contains metavariables after elaboration");
|
||||
if (!is_definition && has_metavar(val)) {
|
||||
val = apply_tactics(type, val, menv);
|
||||
val = apply_tactics(val, menv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (has_metavar(val))
|
||||
throw exception("invalid definition, value still contains metavariables after elaboration");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue