feat(kernel/simplifier): add support for Beta-reduction in the simplifier
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7a3aab60c6
commit
ed009f4c88
2 changed files with 45 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
|||
#define LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_UNFOLD false
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_CONDITIONAL
|
||||
#define LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_CONDITIONAL true
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_MAX_STEPS
|
||||
#define LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_MAX_STEPS std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -48,6 +52,7 @@ static name g_simplifier_contextual {"simplifier", "contextual"};
|
|||
static name g_simplifier_single_pass {"simplifier", "single_pass"};
|
||||
static name g_simplifier_beta {"simplifier", "beta"};
|
||||
static name g_simplifier_unfold {"simplifier", "unfold"};
|
||||
static name g_simplifier_conditional {"simplifier", "conditional"};
|
||||
static name g_simplifier_max_steps {"simplifier", "max_steps"};
|
||||
|
||||
RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_proofs, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_PROOFS, "(simplifier) generate proofs");
|
||||
|
@ -55,6 +60,7 @@ RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_contextual, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_CONTEXTUAL, "(simpli
|
|||
RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_single_pass, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_SINGLE_PASS, "(simplifier) if false then the simplifier keeps applying simplifications as long as possible");
|
||||
RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_beta, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_BETA, "(simplifier) use beta-reductions");
|
||||
RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_unfold, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_UNFOLD, "(simplifier) unfolds non-opaque definitions");
|
||||
RegisterBoolOption(g_simplifier_conditional, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_CONDITIONAL, "(simplifier) conditional rewriting");
|
||||
RegisterUnsignedOption(g_simplifier_max_steps, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_MAX_STEPS, "(simplifier) maximum number of steps");
|
||||
|
||||
bool get_simplifier_proofs(options const & opts) {
|
||||
|
@ -72,6 +78,9 @@ bool get_simplifier_beta(options const & opts) {
|
|||
bool get_simplifier_unfold(options const & opts) {
|
||||
return opts.get_bool(g_simplifier_unfold, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_UNFOLD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool get_simplifier_conditional(options const & opts) {
|
||||
return opts.get_bool(g_simplifier_conditional, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_CONDITIONAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unsigned get_simplifier_max_steps(options const & opts) {
|
||||
return opts.get_unsigned(g_simplifier_max_steps, LEAN_SIMPLIFIER_MAX_STEPS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -90,6 +99,7 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
bool m_single_pass;
|
||||
bool m_beta;
|
||||
bool m_unfold;
|
||||
bool m_conditional;
|
||||
unsigned m_max_steps;
|
||||
|
||||
struct match_fn {
|
||||
|
@ -106,8 +116,12 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
expr m_out;
|
||||
optional<expr> m_proof;
|
||||
bool m_heq_proof;
|
||||
explicit result(expr const & out, bool heq_proof = false):m_out(out), m_heq_proof(heq_proof) {}
|
||||
result(expr const & out, expr const & pr, bool heq_proof = false):m_out(out), m_proof(pr), m_heq_proof(heq_proof) {}
|
||||
explicit result(expr const & out, bool heq_proof = false):
|
||||
m_out(out), m_heq_proof(heq_proof) {}
|
||||
result(expr const & out, expr const & pr, bool heq_proof = false):
|
||||
m_out(out), m_proof(pr), m_heq_proof(heq_proof) {}
|
||||
result(expr const & out, optional<expr> const & pr, bool heq_proof = false):
|
||||
m_out(out), m_proof(pr), m_heq_proof(heq_proof) {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct set_context {
|
||||
|
@ -294,9 +308,9 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!changed) {
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(e));
|
||||
return rewrite_app(e, result(e));
|
||||
} else if (!m_proofs_enabled) {
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(mk_app(new_args)));
|
||||
return rewrite_app(e, result(mk_app(new_args)));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
expr out = mk_app(new_args);
|
||||
unsigned i = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -310,7 +324,7 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
bool heq_proof = false;
|
||||
if (i == 0) {
|
||||
pr = *(proofs[0]);
|
||||
heq_proof = heq_proofs[0];
|
||||
heq_proof = m_has_heq && heq_proofs[0];
|
||||
} else if (m_has_heq && heq_proofs[i]) {
|
||||
expr f = mk_app_prefix(i, new_args);
|
||||
pr = mk_hcongr_th(f_types[i-1], f_types[i-1], f, f, arg(e, i), new_args[i],
|
||||
|
@ -341,10 +355,17 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
pr = mk_congr1_th(f_types[i-1], f, new_f, arg(e, i), pr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(out, pr, heq_proof));
|
||||
return rewrite_app(e, result(out, pr, heq_proof));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result rewrite_app(expr const & e, result const & r) {
|
||||
if (m_beta && is_lambda(arg(r.m_out, 0)))
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(head_beta_reduce(r.m_out), r.m_proof, r.m_heq_proof));
|
||||
else
|
||||
return rewrite(e, r);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
expr m_target; // temp field
|
||||
buffer<optional<expr>> m_subst; // temp field
|
||||
buffer<expr> m_new_args; // temp field
|
||||
|
@ -439,6 +460,11 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
return rewrite(e, result(e));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result rewrite_lambda(expr const & e, result const & r) {
|
||||
|
||||
rewrite(e, r);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
result simplify_lambda(expr const & e) {
|
||||
lean_assert(is_lambda(e));
|
||||
if (m_has_heq) {
|
||||
|
@ -450,14 +476,14 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
lean_assert(!res_body.m_heq_proof);
|
||||
expr new_body = res_body.m_out;
|
||||
if (is_eqp(new_body, abst_body(e)))
|
||||
return result(e);
|
||||
return rewrite_lambda(e, result(e));
|
||||
expr out = mk_lambda(e, new_body);
|
||||
if (!m_proofs_enabled || !res_body.m_proof)
|
||||
return result(out);
|
||||
return rewrite_lambda(e, result(out));
|
||||
expr body_type = infer_type(abst_body(e));
|
||||
expr pr = mk_funext_th(abst_domain(e), mk_lambda(e, body_type), e, out,
|
||||
mk_lambda(e, *res_body.m_proof));
|
||||
return result(out, pr);
|
||||
return rewrite_lambda(e, result(out, pr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -472,15 +498,15 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
lean_assert(!res_body.m_heq_proof);
|
||||
expr new_body = res_body.m_out;
|
||||
if (is_eqp(new_body, abst_body(e)))
|
||||
return result(e);
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(e));
|
||||
expr out = mk_pi(abst_name(e), abst_domain(e), new_body);
|
||||
if (!m_proofs_enabled || !res_body.m_proof)
|
||||
return result(out);
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(out));
|
||||
expr pr = mk_allext_th(abst_domain(e),
|
||||
mk_lambda(e, abst_body(e)),
|
||||
mk_lambda(e, abst_body(out)),
|
||||
mk_lambda(e, *res_body.m_proof));
|
||||
return result(out, pr);
|
||||
return rewrite(e, result(out, pr));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// if the environment does not contain heq axioms, then we don't simplify Pi's that are not forall's
|
||||
return result(e);
|
||||
|
@ -509,6 +535,7 @@ class simplifier_fn {
|
|||
m_single_pass = get_simplifier_single_pass(o);
|
||||
m_beta = get_simplifier_beta(o);
|
||||
m_unfold = get_simplifier_unfold(o);
|
||||
m_conditional = get_simplifier_conditional(o);
|
||||
m_max_steps = get_simplifier_max_steps(o);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -28,3 +28,9 @@ print(e)
|
|||
print(pr)
|
||||
local env = get_environment()
|
||||
print(env:type_check(pr))
|
||||
|
||||
e, pr = simplify(parse_lean('(fun x, f (f x (0 + a)) (g (b + 0))) b'))
|
||||
print(e)
|
||||
print(pr)
|
||||
local env = get_environment()
|
||||
print(env:type_check(pr))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue