michael/lean2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feat(library/data/list/*): add theorems from Haitao Zhang and clean up

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Avigad 2015-06-05 18:18:59 +10:00 committed by Leonardo de Moura
parent 4db89e16dc
commit f475408f4c
4 changed files with 139 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

44
library/data/list/basic.lean
View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Basic properties of lists.
-/
import logic tools.helper_tactics data.nat.basic algebra.function
import logic tools.helper_tactics data.nat.order algebra.function
open eq.ops helper_tactics nat prod function option
inductive list (T : Type) : Type :=
@ -313,12 +313,18 @@ list.rec_on l
theorem mem_of_ne_of_mem {x y : T} {l : list T} (H₁ : x ≠ y) (H₂ : x ∈ y :: l) : x ∈ l :=
or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons H₂) (λe, absurd e H₁) (λr, r)
theorem not_eq_of_not_mem {a b : T} {l : list T} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
theorem ne_of_not_mem_cons {a b : T} {l : list T} : a ∉ b::l → a ≠ b :=
assume nin aeqb, absurd (or.inl aeqb) nin
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem {a b : T} {l : list T} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {a b : T} {l : list T} : a ∉ b::l → a ∉ l :=
assume nin nainl, absurd (or.inr nainl) nin
lemma not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem {x y : T} {l : list T} : x ≠ y → x ∉ l → x ∉ y::l :=
assume P1 P2, not.intro (assume Pxin, absurd (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pxin) (not_or P1 P2))
lemma ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons {x y : T} {l : list T} : x ∉ y::l → x ≠ y ∧ x ∉ l :=
assume P, and.intro (ne_of_not_mem_cons P) (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons P)
definition sublist (l₁ l₂ : list T) := ∀ ⦃a : T⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂
infix `⊆` := sublist
@ -392,7 +398,7 @@ assume e, if_pos e
theorem find_cons_of_ne {x y : T} (l : list T) : x ≠ y → find x (y::l) = succ (find x l) :=
assume n, if_neg n
theorem find.not_mem {l : list T} {x : T} : ¬x ∈ l → find x l = length l :=
theorem find_of_not_mem {l : list T} {x : T} : ¬x ∈ l → find x l = length l :=
list.rec_on l
(assume P₁ : ¬x ∈ [], _)
(take y l,
@ -405,6 +411,36 @@ list.rec_on l
... = succ (find x l) : if_neg (and.elim_left P₃)
... = succ (length l) : {iH (and.elim_right P₃)}
... = length (y::l) : !length_cons⁻¹)
lemma find_le_length : ∀ {a} {l : list T}, find a l ≤ length l
| a [] := !le.refl
| a (b::l) := decidable.rec_on (H a b)
(assume Peq, by rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Peq]; exact !zero_le)
(assume Pne,
begin
rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne, length_cons],
apply succ_le_succ, apply find_le_length
end)
lemma not_mem_of_find_eq_length : ∀ {a} {l : list T}, find a l = length l → a ∉ l
| a [] := assume Peq, !not_mem_nil
| a (b::l) := decidable.rec_on (H a b)
(assume Peq, by rewrite [find_cons_of_eq l Peq, length_cons]; contradiction)
(assume Pne,
begin
rewrite [find_cons_of_ne l Pne, length_cons, mem_cons_iff],
intro Plen, apply (not_or Pne),
exact not_mem_of_find_eq_length (succ_inj Plen)
end)
lemma find_lt_length {a} {l : list T} (Pin : a ∈ l) : find a l < length l :=
begin
apply nat.lt_of_le_and_ne,
apply find_le_length,
apply not.intro, intro Peq,
exact absurd Pin (not_mem_of_find_eq_length Peq)
end
end
/- nth element -/

77
library/data/list/comb.lean
View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Leonardo de Moura. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Haitao Zhang
List combinators.
-/
@ -364,6 +364,81 @@ theorem length_product : ∀ (l₁ : list A) (l₂ : list B), length (product l
by rewrite [product_cons, length_append, length_cons,
length_map, ih, mul.right_distrib, one_mul, add.comm]
end product
-- new for list/comb dependent map theory
definition dinj₁ (p : A → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → B) := ∀ ⦃a1 a2⦄ (h1 : p a1) (h2 : p a2), a1 ≠ a2 → (f a1 h1) ≠ (f a2 h2)
definition dinj (p : A → Prop) (f : Π a, p a → B) := ∀ ⦃a1 a2⦄ (h1 : p a1) (h2 : p a2), (f a1 h1) = (f a2 h2) → a1 = a2
definition dmap (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] (f : Π a, p a → B) : list A → list B
| [] := []
| (a::l) := if P : (p a) then cons (f a P) (dmap l) else (dmap l)
-- properties of dmap
section dmap
variable {p : A → Prop}
variable [h : decidable_pred p]
include h
variable {f : Π a, p a → B}
lemma dmap_nil : dmap p f [] = [] := rfl
lemma dmap_cons_of_pos {a : A} (P : p a) : ∀ l, dmap p f (a::l) = (f a P) :: dmap p f l :=
λ l, dif_pos P
lemma dmap_cons_of_neg {a : A} (P : ¬ p a) : ∀ l, dmap p f (a::l) = dmap p f l :=
λ l, dif_neg P
lemma mem_of_dmap : ∀ {l : list A} {a} (Pa : p a), a ∈ l → (f a Pa) ∈ dmap p f l
| [] := take a Pa Pinnil, by contradiction
| (a::l) := take b Pb Pbin, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Pbin)
(assume Pbeqa, begin
rewrite [eq.symm Pbeqa, dmap_cons_of_pos Pb],
exact !mem_cons
end)
(assume Pbinl,
decidable.rec_on (h a)
(assume Pa, begin
rewrite [dmap_cons_of_pos Pa],
apply mem_cons_of_mem,
exact mem_of_dmap Pb Pbinl
end)
(assume nPa, begin
rewrite [dmap_cons_of_neg nPa],
exact mem_of_dmap Pb Pbinl
end))
lemma map_of_dmap_inv_pos {g : B → A} (Pinv : ∀ a (Pa : p a), g (f a Pa) = a) :
∀ {l : list A}, (∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l → p a) → map g (dmap p f l) = l
| [] := assume Pl, by rewrite [dmap_nil, map_nil]
| (a::l) := assume Pal,
assert Pa : p a, from Pal a !mem_cons,
assert Pl : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a,
from take x Pxin, Pal x (mem_cons_of_mem a Pxin),
by rewrite [dmap_cons_of_pos Pa, map_cons, Pinv, map_of_dmap_inv_pos Pl]
lemma dinj_mem_of_mem_of_dmap (Pdi : dinj p f) : ∀ {l : list A} {a} (Pa : p a), (f a Pa) ∈ dmap p f l → a ∈ l
| [] := take a Pa Pinnil, by contradiction
| (b::l) := take a Pa Pmap,
decidable.rec_on (h b)
(λ Pb, begin
rewrite (dmap_cons_of_pos Pb) at Pmap,
rewrite mem_cons_iff at Pmap,
rewrite mem_cons_iff,
apply (or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp Pmap),
apply Pdi,
apply dinj_mem_of_mem_of_dmap Pa
end)
(λ nPb, begin
rewrite (dmap_cons_of_neg nPb) at Pmap,
apply mem_cons_of_mem,
exact dinj_mem_of_mem_of_dmap Pa Pmap
end)
lemma dinj_not_mem_of_dmap (Pdi : dinj p f) {l : list A} {a} (Pa : p a) :
a ∉ l → (f a Pa) ∉ dmap p f l :=
not_imp_not_of_imp (dinj_mem_of_mem_of_dmap Pdi Pa)
end dmap
end list
attribute list.decidable_any [instance]

4
library/data/list/perm.lean
View file

@ -563,8 +563,8 @@ assume p, perm_induction_on p
exact skip y r
end)))
(λ nxinyt₁ : x ∉ y::t₁,
have xney : x ≠ y, from not_eq_of_not_mem nxinyt₁,
have nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem nxinyt₁,
have xney : x ≠ y, from ne_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
have nxint₁ : x ∉ t₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons nxinyt₁,
assert nxint₂ : x ∉ t₂, from
assume xint₂ : x ∈ t₂, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup (mem_perm (perm.symm r) (mem_erase_dup xint₂))) nxint₁,
by_cases

22
library/data/list/set.lean
View file

@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ lemma erase_append_right {a : A} : ∀ {l₁} (l₂), a ∉ l₁ → erase a (l
by_cases
(λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite aeqx at h; exact (absurd !mem_cons h))
(λ anex : a ≠ x,
assert nainxs : a ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_not_mem h,
assert nainxs : a ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h,
by rewrite [append_cons, *erase_cons_tail _ anex, erase_append_right l₂ nainxs])
lemma erase_sub (a : A) : ∀ l, erase a l ⊆ l
@ -425,6 +425,26 @@ theorem nodup_filter (p : A → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] : ∀ {l : list A},
by_cases
(λ pa : p a, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_pos _ pa]; exact (nodup_cons nainf ndf))
(λ npa : ¬ p a, by rewrite [filter_cons_of_neg _ npa]; exact ndf)
lemma dmap_nodup_of_dinj {p : A → Prop} [h : decidable_pred p] {f : Π a, p a → B} (Pdi : dinj p f):
∀ {l : list A}, nodup l → nodup (dmap p f l)
| [] := take P, nodup.ndnil
| (a::l) := take Pnodup,
decidable.rec_on (h a)
(λ Pa,
begin
rewrite [dmap_cons_of_pos Pa],
apply nodup_cons,
apply (dinj_not_mem_of_dmap Pdi Pa),
exact not_mem_of_nodup_cons Pnodup,
exact dmap_nodup_of_dinj (nodup_of_nodup_cons Pnodup)
end)
(λ nPa,
begin
rewrite [dmap_cons_of_neg nPa],
exact dmap_nodup_of_dinj (nodup_of_nodup_cons Pnodup)
end)
end nodup
/- upto -/