Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
f1b97b18b4 refactor(frontends/lean/parser): tactic macros, and tactic Lua bindings
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-26 15:54:53 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
0c059a9917 feat(library/tactic): use _tac suffix instead of _tactic like Isabelle
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-12-05 20:06:32 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
20a36e98ec feat(library/elaborator): modify how elaborator handles constraints of the form ?M << P and P << ?M, where P is a proposition.
Before this commit, the elaborator would only assign ?M <- P, if P was normalized. This is bad since normalization may "destroy" the structure of P.

For example, consider the constraint
[a : Bool; b : Bool; c : Bool] ⊢ ?M::1 ≺ implies a (implies b (and a b))

Before this, ?M::1 will not be assigned to the "implies-term" because the "implies-term" is not normalized yet.
So, the elaborator would continue to process the constraint, and convert it into:

[a : Bool; b : Bool; c : Bool] ⊢ ?M::1 ≺ if Bool a (if Bool b (if Bool (if Bool a (if Bool b false true) true) false true) true) true

Now, ?M::1 is assigned to the term
     if Bool a (if Bool b (if Bool (if Bool a (if Bool b false true) true) false true) true) true

This is bad, since the original structure was lost.

This commit also contains an example that only works after the commit is applied.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-11-29 09:15:01 -08:00