Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
4564bfa1d3 feat(library/elaborator): improve simple_ho_match
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-27 11:17:03 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
dbefc91151 fix(kernel/metavar): add normalize assignment justification
We need that when we normalize the assignment in a metavariable environment.
That is, we replace metavariable in a substitution with other assignments.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-27 11:02:34 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
92f5a31976 feat(kernel/expr): add new mk_app template for creating applications using a collection
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-27 08:53:58 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
e3efe39eeb fix(elaborator): fix bug in higher-order matching/unification
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 17:53:37 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
d1a2a4ea7e feat(frontends/lean/elaborator): add support for coercions in let declarations
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 17:01:06 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
872b698bc3 feat(elaborator): add option m_assume_injectivity for getting more concise solutions
We may miss solutions, but the solutions found are much more readable.
For example, without this option, for elaboration problem

Theorem Example4 (a b c d e : N) (H: (a = b ∧ b = e ∧ b = c) ∨ (a = d ∧ d = c)) : (h a c) = (h c a) :=
    DisjCases H
              (fun H1 : _,
                   let AeqC := Trans (Conjunct1 H1) (Conjunct2 (Conjunct2 H1))
                   in CongrH AeqC (Symm AeqC))
              (fun H1 : _,
                   let AeqC := Trans (Conjunct1 H1) (Conjunct2 H1)
                   in CongrH AeqC (Symm AeqC))

the elaborator generates

Theorem Example4 (a b c d e : N) (H : a = b ∧ b = e ∧ b = c ∨ a = d ∧ d = c) : (h a c) = (h c a) :=
    DisjCases
        H
        (λ H1 : if
               Bool
               (if Bool (a = b) (if Bool (if Bool (if Bool (b = e) (if Bool (b = c) ⊥ ⊤) ⊤) ⊥ ⊤) ⊥ ⊤) ⊤)
               ⊥
               ⊤,
           let AeqC := Trans (Conjunct1 H1) (Conjunct2 (Conjunct2 H1)) in CongrH AeqC (Symm AeqC))
        (λ H1 : if Bool (if Bool (a = d) (if Bool (d = c) ⊥ ⊤) ⊤) ⊥ ⊤,
           let AeqC := Trans (Conjunct1 H1) (Conjunct2 H1) in CongrH AeqC (Symm AeqC))

The solution is correct, but it is not very readable. The problem is that the elaborator expands the definitions of \/ and /\.

Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 16:47:50 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
a7f94b55db fix(frontends/lean/elaborator): fix bugs and adjust tests
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 15:29:56 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
bbc265ded4 feat(frontends/lean): hook new elaborator in the default frontend
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 15:14:29 -07:00
Leonardo de Moura
71ccec5b9e refactor(frontends/lean/elaborator): delete old_elaborator, and create frontend_elaborator class that will be based on library/elaborator/elaborator
Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
2013-10-24 10:45:59 -07:00