/- Copyright (c) 2015 Leonardo de Moura. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Module: data.list.set Authors: Leonardo de Moura Set-like operations on lists -/ import data.list.basic data.list.comb open nat function decidable helper_tactics eq.ops namespace list section erase variable {A : Type} variable [H : decidable_eq A] include H definition erase (a : A) : list A → list A | [] := [] | (b::l) := match H a b with | inl e := l | inr n := b :: erase l end lemma erase_nil (a : A) : erase a [] = [] := rfl lemma erase_cons_head (a : A) (l : list A) : erase a (a :: l) = l := show match H a a with | inl e := l | inr n := a :: erase a l end = l, by rewrite decidable_eq_inl_refl lemma erase_cons_tail {a b : A} (l : list A) : a ≠ b → erase a (b::l) = b :: erase a l := assume h : a ≠ b, show match H a b with | inl e := l | inr n₁ := b :: erase a l end = b :: erase a l, by rewrite (decidable_eq_inr_neg h) lemma length_erase_of_mem {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → length (erase a l) = pred (length l) | [] h := rfl | [x] h := by rewrite [mem_singleton h, erase_cons_head] | (x::y::xs) h := by_cases (λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, erase_cons_head]) (λ anex : a ≠ x, assert ainyxs : a ∈ y::xs, from or_resolve_right h anex, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ anex, *length_cons, length_erase_of_mem ainyxs]) lemma length_erase_of_not_mem {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∉ l → length (erase a l) = length l | [] h := rfl | (x::xs) h := assert anex : a ≠ x, from λ aeqx : a = x, absurd (or.inl aeqx) h, assert aninxs : a ∉ xs, from λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, absurd (or.inr ainxs) h, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ anex, length_cons, length_erase_of_not_mem aninxs] lemma erase_append_left {a : A} : ∀ {l₁} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → erase a (l₁++l₂) = erase a l₁ ++ l₂ | [] l₂ h := absurd h !not_mem_nil | (x::xs) l₂ h := by_cases (λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx, append_cons, *erase_cons_head]) (λ anex : a ≠ x, assert ainxs : a ∈ xs, from mem_of_ne_of_mem anex h, by rewrite [append_cons, *erase_cons_tail _ anex, erase_append_left l₂ ainxs]) lemma erase_append_right {a : A} : ∀ {l₁} (l₂), a ∉ l₁ → erase a (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ erase a l₂ | [] l₂ h := rfl | (x::xs) l₂ h := by_cases (λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite aeqx at h; exact (absurd !mem_cons h)) (λ anex : a ≠ x, assert nainxs : a ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_not_mem h, by rewrite [append_cons, *erase_cons_tail _ anex, erase_append_right l₂ nainxs]) lemma erase_sub (a : A) : ∀ l, erase a l ⊆ l | [] := λ x xine, xine | (x::xs) := λ y xine, by_cases (λ aeqx : a = x, by rewrite [aeqx at xine, erase_cons_head at xine]; exact (or.inr xine)) (λ anex : a ≠ x, assert yinxe : y ∈ x :: erase a xs, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ anex at xine]; exact xine, assert subxs : erase a xs ⊆ xs, from erase_sub xs, by_cases (λ yeqx : y = x, by rewrite yeqx; apply mem_cons) (λ ynex : y ≠ x, assert yine : y ∈ erase a xs, from mem_of_ne_of_mem ynex yinxe, assert yinxs : y ∈ xs, from subxs yine, or.inr yinxs)) theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem {a b : A} : ∀ {l : list A}, a ≠ b → a ∈ l → a ∈ erase b l | [] n i := absurd i !not_mem_nil | (c::l) n i := by_cases (λ beqc : b = c, assert ainl : a ∈ l, from or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i) (λ aeqc : a = c, absurd aeqc (beqc ▸ n)) (λ ainl : a ∈ l, ainl), by rewrite [beqc, erase_cons_head]; exact ainl) (λ bnec : b ≠ c, by_cases (λ aeqc : a = c, assert aux : a ∈ c :: erase b l, by rewrite [aeqc]; exact !mem_cons, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ bnec]; exact aux) (λ anec : a ≠ c, have ainl : a ∈ l, from mem_of_ne_of_mem anec i, have ainel : a ∈ erase b l, from mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem n ainl, assert aux : a ∈ c :: erase b l, from mem_cons_of_mem _ ainel, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ bnec]; exact aux)) -- theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ erase b l → a ∈ l | [] i := absurd i !not_mem_nil | (c::l) i := by_cases (λ beqc : b = c, by rewrite [beqc at i, erase_cons_head at i]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)) (λ bnec : b ≠ c, have i₁ : a ∈ c :: erase b l, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ bnec at i]; exact i, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons i₁) (λ aeqc : a = c, by rewrite [aeqc]; exact !mem_cons) (λ ainel : a ∈ erase b l, have ainl : a ∈ l, from mem_of_mem_erase ainel, mem_cons_of_mem _ ainl)) end erase /- disjoint -/ section disjoint variable {A : Type} definition disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list A) : Prop := ∀ a, (a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂) ∧ (a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁) lemma disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := λ d a, and.elim_left (d a) lemma disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → ∀ {a}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := λ d a, and.elim_right (d a) lemma disjoint.comm {l₁ l₂ : list A} : disjoint l₁ l₂ → disjoint l₂ l₁ := λ d a, and.intro (λ ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, disjoint_right d ainl₂) (λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d ainl₁) lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ := λ d x, and.intro (λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d (or.inr xinl₁)) (λ xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂, have nxinal₁ : x ∉ a::l₁, from disjoint_right d xinl₂, not_mem_of_not_mem nxinal₁) lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ := λ d, disjoint.comm (disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left (disjoint.comm d)) lemma disjoint_nil_left (l : list A) : disjoint [] l := λ a, and.intro (λ ab : a ∈ nil, absurd ab !not_mem_nil) (λ ainl : a ∈ l, !not_mem_nil) lemma disjoint_nil_right (l : list A) : disjoint l [] := disjoint.comm (disjoint_nil_left l) lemma disjoint_cons_of_not_mem_of_disjoint {a : A} {l₁ l₂} : a ∉ l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ → disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ := λ nainl₂ d x, and.intro (λ xinal₁ : x ∈ a::l₁, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinal₁) (λ xeqa : x = a, xeqa⁻¹ ▸ nainl₂) (λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, disjoint_left d xinl₁)) (λ (xinl₂ : x ∈ l₂) (xinal₁ : x ∈ a::l₁), or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xinal₁) (λ xeqa : x = a, absurd (xeqa ▸ xinl₂) nainl₂) (λ xinl₁ : x ∈ l₁, absurd xinl₁ (disjoint_right d xinl₂))) lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l : list A}, disjoint (l₁++l₂) l → disjoint l₁ l | [] l₂ l d := disjoint_nil_left l | (x::xs) l₂ l d := have nxinl : x ∉ l, from disjoint_left d !mem_cons, have d₁ : disjoint (xs++l₂) l, from disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left d, have d₂ : disjoint xs l, from disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left d₁, disjoint_cons_of_not_mem_of_disjoint nxinl d₂ lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l : list A}, disjoint (l₁++l₂) l → disjoint l₂ l | [] l₂ l d := d | (x::xs) l₂ l d := have d₁ : disjoint (xs++l₂) l, from disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left d, disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right d₁ lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l : list A}, disjoint l (l₁++l₂) → disjoint l l₁ := λ l₁ l₂ l d, disjoint.comm (disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (disjoint.comm d)) lemma disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l : list A}, disjoint l (l₁++l₂) → disjoint l l₂ := λ l₁ l₂ l d, disjoint.comm (disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (disjoint.comm d)) end disjoint /- no duplicates predicate -/ inductive nodup {A : Type} : list A → Prop := | ndnil : nodup [] | ndcons : ∀ {a l}, a ∉ l → nodup l → nodup (a::l) section nodup open nodup variables {A B : Type} theorem nodup_nil : @nodup A [] := ndnil theorem nodup_cons {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∉ l → nodup l → nodup (a::l) := λ i n, ndcons i n theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons : ∀ {a : A} {l : list A}, nodup (a::l) → nodup l | a xs (ndcons i n) := n theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons : ∀ {a : A} {l : list A}, nodup (a::l) → a ∉ l | a xs (ndcons i n) := i theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_left : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₁ | [] l₂ n := nodup_nil | (x::xs) l₂ n := have ndxs : nodup xs, from nodup_of_nodup_append_left (nodup_of_nodup_cons n), have nxinxsl₂ : x ∉ xs++l₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons n, have nxinxs : x ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left nxinxsl₂, nodup_cons nxinxs ndxs theorem nodup_of_nodup_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup (l₁++l₂) → nodup l₂ | [] l₂ n := n | (x::xs) l₂ n := nodup_of_nodup_append_right (nodup_of_nodup_cons n) theorem disjoint_of_nodup_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup (l₁++l₂) → disjoint l₁ l₂ | [] l₂ d := disjoint_nil_left l₂ | (x::xs) l₂ d := have d₁ : nodup (x::(xs++l₂)), from d, have d₂ : nodup (xs++l₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁, have nxin : x ∉ xs++l₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁, have nxinl₂ : x ∉ l₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right nxin, have dsj : disjoint xs l₂, from disjoint_of_nodup_append d₂, (λ a, and.intro (λ ainxxs : a ∈ x::xs, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainxxs) (λ aeqx : a = x, aeqx⁻¹ ▸ nxinl₂) (λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, disjoint_left dsj ainxs)) (λ ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, have nainxs : a ∉ xs, from disjoint_right dsj ainl₂, assume ain : a ∈ x::xs, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ain) (λ aeqx : a = x, absurd (aeqx ▸ ainl₂) nxinl₂) (λ ainxs : a ∈ xs, absurd ainxs nainxs))) theorem nodup_append_of_nodup_of_nodup_of_disjoint : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → disjoint l₁ l₂ → nodup (l₁++l₂) | [] l₂ d₁ d₂ dsj := by rewrite [append_nil_left]; exact d₂ | (x::xs) l₂ d₁ d₂ dsj := have dsj₁ : disjoint xs l₂, from disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left dsj, have ndxs : nodup xs, from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁, have ndxsl₂ : nodup (xs++l₂), from nodup_append_of_nodup_of_nodup_of_disjoint ndxs d₂ dsj₁, have nxinxs : x ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁, have nxinl₂ : x ∉ l₂, from disjoint_left dsj !mem_cons, have nxinxsl₂ : x ∉ xs++l₂, from not_mem_append nxinxs nxinl₂, nodup_cons nxinxsl₂ ndxsl₂ theorem nodup_app_comm {l₁ l₂ : list A} (d : nodup (l₁++l₂)) : nodup (l₂++l₁) := have d₁ : nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_append_left d, have d₂ : nodup l₂, from nodup_of_nodup_append_right d, have dsj : disjoint l₁ l₂, from disjoint_of_nodup_append d, nodup_append_of_nodup_of_nodup_of_disjoint d₂ d₁ (disjoint.comm dsj) theorem nodup_head {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} (d : nodup (l₁++(a::l₂))) : nodup (a::(l₁++l₂)) := have d₁ : nodup (a::(l₂++l₁)), from nodup_app_comm d, have d₂ : nodup (l₂++l₁), from nodup_of_nodup_cons d₁, have d₃ : nodup (l₁++l₂), from nodup_app_comm d₂, have nain : a ∉ l₂++l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d₁, have nain₂ : a ∉ l₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left nain, have nain₁ : a ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right nain, nodup_cons (not_mem_append nain₁ nain₂) d₃ theorem nodup_middle {a : A} {l₁ l₂ : list A} (d : nodup (a::(l₁++l₂))) : nodup (l₁++(a::l₂)) := have d₁ : nodup (l₁++l₂), from nodup_of_nodup_cons d, have nain : a ∉ l₁++l₂, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d, have disj : disjoint l₁ l₂, from disjoint_of_nodup_append d₁, have d₂ : nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_append_left d₁, have d₃ : nodup l₂, from nodup_of_nodup_append_right d₁, have nain₂ : a ∉ l₂, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_right nain, have nain₁ : a ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_not_mem_append_left nain, have d₄ : nodup (a::l₂), from nodup_cons nain₂ d₃, have disj₂ : disjoint l₁ (a::l₂), from disjoint.comm (disjoint_cons_of_not_mem_of_disjoint nain₁ (disjoint.comm disj)), nodup_append_of_nodup_of_nodup_of_disjoint d₂ d₄ disj₂ theorem nodup_map {f : A → B} (inj : injective f) : ∀ {l : list A}, nodup l → nodup (map f l) | [] n := begin rewrite [map_nil], apply nodup_nil end | (x::xs) n := assert nxinxs : x ∉ xs, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons n, assert ndxs : nodup xs, from nodup_of_nodup_cons n, assert ndmfxs : nodup (map f xs), from nodup_map ndxs, assert nfxinm : f x ∉ map f xs, from λ ab : f x ∈ map f xs, obtain (finv : B → A) (isinv : finv ∘ f = id), from inj, assert finvfxin : finv (f x) ∈ map finv (map f xs), from mem_map finv ab, assert xinxs : x ∈ xs, begin rewrite [map_map at finvfxin, isinv at finvfxin, left_inv_eq isinv at finvfxin], rewrite [map_id at finvfxin], exact finvfxin end, absurd xinxs nxinxs, nodup_cons nfxinm ndmfxs theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [h : decidable_eq A] (a : A) : ∀ {l}, nodup l → nodup (erase a l) | [] n := nodup_nil | (b::l) n := by_cases (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [aeqb, erase_cons_head]; exact (nodup_of_nodup_cons n)) (λ aneb : a ≠ b, have nbinl : b ∉ l, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons n, have ndl : nodup l, from nodup_of_nodup_cons n, have ndeal : nodup (erase a l), from nodup_erase_of_nodup ndl, have nbineal : b ∉ erase a l, from λ i, absurd (erase_sub _ _ i) nbinl, assert aux : nodup (b :: erase a l), from nodup_cons nbineal ndeal, by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ aneb]; exact aux) theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [h : decidable_eq A] (a : A) : ∀ {l}, nodup l → a ∉ erase a l | [] n := !not_mem_nil | (b::l) n := have ndl : nodup l, from nodup_of_nodup_cons n, have naineal : a ∉ erase a l, from mem_erase_of_nodup ndl, assert nbinl : b ∉ l, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons n, by_cases (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [aeqb, erase_cons_head]; exact nbinl) (λ aneb : a ≠ b, assert aux : a ∉ b :: erase a l, from assume ainbeal : a ∈ b :: erase a l, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainbeal) (λ aeqb : a = b, absurd aeqb aneb) (λ aineal : a ∈ erase a l, absurd aineal naineal), by rewrite [erase_cons_tail _ aneb]; exact aux) definition erase_dup [H : decidable_eq A] : list A → list A | [] := [] | (x :: xs) := if x ∈ xs then erase_dup xs else x :: erase_dup xs theorem erase_dup_nil [H : decidable_eq A] : erase_dup [] = [] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem [H : decidable_eq A] {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∈ l → erase_dup (a::l) = erase_dup l := assume ainl, calc erase_dup (a::l) = if a ∈ l then erase_dup l else a :: erase_dup l : rfl ... = erase_dup l : if_pos ainl theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem [H : decidable_eq A] {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∉ l → erase_dup (a::l) = a :: erase_dup l := assume nainl, calc erase_dup (a::l) = if a ∈ l then erase_dup l else a :: erase_dup l : rfl ... = a :: erase_dup l : if_neg nainl theorem mem_erase_dup [H : decidable_eq A] {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ l → a ∈ erase_dup l | [] h := absurd h !not_mem_nil | (b::l) h := by_cases (λ binl : b ∈ l, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem binl, -aeqb at binl]; exact (mem_erase_dup binl)) (λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem binl]; exact (mem_erase_dup ainl))) (λ nbinl : b ∉ l, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nbinl, aeqb]; exact !mem_cons) (λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nbinl]; exact (or.inr (mem_erase_dup ainl)))) theorem mem_of_mem_erase_dup [H : decidable_eq A] {a : A} : ∀ {l}, a ∈ erase_dup l → a ∈ l | [] h := by rewrite [erase_dup_nil at h]; exact h | (b::l) h := by_cases (λ binl : b ∈ l, have h₁ : a ∈ erase_dup l, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem binl at h]; exact h, or.inr (mem_of_mem_erase_dup h₁)) (λ nbinl : b ∉ l, have h₁ : a ∈ b :: erase_dup l, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nbinl at h]; exact h, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h₁) (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite aeqb; exact !mem_cons) (λ ainel : a ∈ erase_dup l, or.inr (mem_of_mem_erase_dup ainel))) theorem nodup_erase_dup [H : decidable_eq A] : ∀ l : list A, nodup (erase_dup l) | [] := by rewrite erase_dup_nil; exact nodup_nil | (a::l) := by_cases (λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_mem ainl]; exact (nodup_erase_dup l)) (λ nainl : a ∉ l, assert r : nodup (erase_dup l), from nodup_erase_dup l, assert nin : a ∉ erase_dup l, from assume ab : a ∈ erase_dup l, absurd (mem_of_mem_erase_dup ab) nainl, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nainl]; exact (nodup_cons nin r)) theorem erase_dup_eq_of_nodup [H : decidable_eq A] : ∀ {l : list A}, nodup l → erase_dup l = l | [] d := rfl | (a::l) d := assert nainl : a ∉ l, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons d, assert dl : nodup l, from nodup_of_nodup_cons d, by rewrite [erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem nainl, erase_dup_eq_of_nodup dl] end nodup /- union -/ section union variable {A : Type} variable [H : decidable_eq A] include H definition union : list A → list A → list A | [] l₂ := l₂ | (a::l₁) l₂ := if a ∈ l₂ then union l₁ l₂ else a :: union l₁ l₂ theorem union_nil (l : list A) : union [] l = l theorem union_cons_of_mem {a : A} {l₂} : ∀ (l₁), a ∈ l₂ → union (a::l₁) l₂ = union l₁ l₂ := take l₁, assume ainl₂, calc union (a::l₁) l₂ = if a ∈ l₂ then union l₁ l₂ else a :: union l₁ l₂ : rfl ... = union l₁ l₂ : if_pos ainl₂ theorem union_cons_of_not_mem {a : A} {l₂} : ∀ (l₁), a ∉ l₂ → union (a::l₁) l₂ = a :: union l₁ l₂ := take l₁, assume nainl₂, calc union (a::l₁) l₂ = if a ∈ l₂ then union l₁ l₂ else a :: union l₁ l₂ : rfl ... = a :: union l₁ l₂ : if_neg nainl₂ theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union : ∀ {l₁ l₂} {a : A}, a ∈ union l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∨ a ∈ l₂ | [] l₂ a ainl₂ := by rewrite union_nil at ainl₂; exact (or.inr (ainl₂)) | (b::l₁) l₂ a ainbl₁l₂ := by_cases (λ binl₂ : b ∈ l₂, have ainl₁l₂ : a ∈ union l₁ l₂, by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem l₁ binl₂ at ainbl₁l₂]; exact ainbl₁l₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union ainl₁l₂) (λ ainl₁, or.inl (mem_cons_of_mem _ ainl₁)) (λ ainl₂, or.inr ainl₂)) (λ nbinl₂ : b ∉ l₂, have ainb_l₁l₂ : a ∈ b :: union l₁ l₂, by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem l₁ nbinl₂ at ainbl₁l₂]; exact ainbl₁l₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons ainb_l₁l₂) (λ aeqb, by rewrite aeqb; exact (or.inl !mem_cons)) (λ ainl₁l₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union ainl₁l₂) (λ ainl₁, or.inl (mem_cons_of_mem _ ainl₁)) (λ ainl₂, or.inr ainl₂))) theorem mem_union_right {a : A} : ∀ (l₁) {l₂}, a ∈ l₂ → a ∈ union l₁ l₂ | [] l₂ h := by rewrite union_nil; exact h | (b::l₁) l₂ h := by_cases (λ binl₂ : b ∈ l₂, by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem _ binl₂]; exact (mem_union_right _ h)) (λ nbinl₂ : b ∉ l₂, by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem _ nbinl₂]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_union_right _ h))) theorem mem_union_left {a : A} : ∀ {l₁} (l₂), a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ union l₁ l₂ | [] l₂ h := absurd h !not_mem_nil | (b::l₁) l₂ h := by_cases (λ binl₂ : b ∈ l₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem l₁ binl₂, -aeqb at binl₂]; exact (mem_union_right _ binl₂)) (λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁, by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem l₁ binl₂]; exact (mem_union_left _ ainl₁))) (λ nbinl₂ : b ∉ l₂, or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (λ aeqb : a = b, by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem l₁ nbinl₂, aeqb]; exact !mem_cons) (λ ainl₁ : a ∈ l₁, by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem l₁ nbinl₂]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_union_left _ ainl₁)))) theorem nodup_union_of_nodup_of_nodup : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, nodup l₁ → nodup l₂ → nodup (union l₁ l₂) | [] l₂ n₁ nl₂ := by rewrite union_nil; exact nl₂ | (a::l₁) l₂ nal₁ nl₂ := assert nl₁ : nodup l₁, from nodup_of_nodup_cons nal₁, assert nl₁l₂ : nodup (union l₁ l₂), from nodup_union_of_nodup_of_nodup nl₁ nl₂, by_cases (λ ainl₂ : a ∈ l₂, by rewrite [union_cons_of_mem l₁ ainl₂]; exact nl₁l₂) (λ nainl₂ : a ∉ l₂, have nainl₁ : a ∉ l₁, from not_mem_of_nodup_cons nal₁, assert nainl₁l₂ : a ∉ union l₁ l₂, from assume ainl₁l₂ : a ∈ union l₁ l₂, or.elim (mem_or_mem_of_mem_union ainl₁l₂) (λ ainl₁, absurd ainl₁ nainl₁) (λ ainl₂, absurd ainl₂ nainl₂), by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem l₁ nainl₂]; exact (nodup_cons nainl₁l₂ nl₁l₂)) theorem union_eq_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list A}, disjoint l₁ l₂ → union l₁ l₂ = append l₁ l₂ | [] l₂ d := rfl | (a::l₁) l₂ d := assert nainl₂ : a ∉ l₂, from disjoint_left d !mem_cons, assert d₁ : disjoint l₁ l₂, from disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left d, by rewrite [union_cons_of_not_mem _ nainl₂, append_cons, union_eq_append d₁] variable {B : Type} theorem foldl_union_of_disjoint (f : B → A → B) (b : B) {l₁ l₂ : list A} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : foldl f b (union l₁ l₂) = foldl f (foldl f b l₁) l₂ := by rewrite [union_eq_append d, foldl_append] theorem foldr_union_of_dijoint (f : A → B → B) (b : B) {l₁ l₂ : list A} (d : disjoint l₁ l₂) : foldr f b (union l₁ l₂) = foldr f (foldr f b l₂) l₁ := by rewrite [union_eq_append d, foldr_append] end union /- insert -/ section insert variable {A : Type} variable [H : decidable_eq A] include H definition insert (a : A) (l : list A) : list A := if a ∈ l then l else a::l theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∈ l → insert a l = l := assume ainl, if_pos ainl theorem insert_eq_of_not_mem {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∉ l → insert a l = a::l := assume nainl, if_neg nainl theorem mem_insert (a : A) (l : list A) : a ∈ insert a l := by_cases (λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl]; exact ainl) (λ nainl : a ∉ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl]; exact !mem_cons) theorem mem_insert_of_mem {a : A} (b : A) {l : list A} : a ∈ l → a ∈ insert b l := assume ainl, by_cases (λ binl : b ∈ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem binl]; exact ainl) (λ nbinl : b ∉ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nbinl]; exact (mem_cons_of_mem _ ainl)) theorem nodup_insert (a : A) {l : list A} : nodup l → nodup (insert a l) := assume n, by_cases (λ ainl : a ∈ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl]; exact n) (λ nainl : a ∉ l, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl]; exact (nodup_cons nainl n)) theorem length_insert_of_mem {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∈ l → length (insert a l) = length l := assume ainl, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_mem ainl] theorem length_insert_of_not_mem {a : A} {l : list A} : a ∉ l → length (insert a l) = length l + 1 := assume nainl, by rewrite [insert_eq_of_not_mem nainl] end insert end list