/- Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Leonardo de Moura Prime numbers -/ import data.nat.fact data.nat.bquant data.nat.power logic.identities open bool namespace nat open decidable definition prime [reducible] (p : nat) := p ≥ 2 ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p definition prime_ext (p : nat) := p ≥ 2 ∧ ∀ m, m ≤ p → m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p local attribute prime_ext [reducible] lemma prime_ext_iff_prime (p : nat) : prime_ext p ↔ prime p := iff.intro begin intro h, cases h with h₁ h₂, constructor, assumption, intro m d, exact h₂ m (le_of_dvd (lt_of_succ_le (le_of_succ_le h₁)) d) d end begin intro h, cases h with h₁ h₂, constructor, assumption, intro m l d, exact h₂ m d end definition decidable_prime [instance] (p : nat) : decidable (prime p) := decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ (prime_ext_iff_prime p) lemma ge_two_of_prime {p : nat} : prime p → p ≥ 2 := assume h, obtain h₁ h₂, from h, h₁ lemma pred_prime_pos {p : nat} : prime p → pred p > 0 := assume h, have h₁ : p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime h, lt_of_succ_le (pred_le_pred h₁) lemma succ_pred_prime {p : nat} : prime p → succ (pred p) = p := assume h, succ_pred_of_pos (lt_of_succ_le (le_of_succ_le (ge_two_of_prime h))) lemma divisor_of_prime {p m : nat} : prime p → m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := assume h d, obtain h₁ h₂, from h, h₂ m d lemma gt_one_of_pos_of_prime_dvd {i p : nat} : prime p → 0 < i → i mod p = 0 → 1 < i := assume ipp pos h, have h₁ : p ∣ i, from dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h, have h₂ : p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime ipp, have h₃ : p ≤ i, from le_of_dvd pos h₁, lt_of_succ_le (le.trans h₂ h₃) theorem has_divisor_of_not_prime {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n := assume h₁ h₂, have h₃ : ¬ prime_ext n, from iff.mp' (not_iff_not_of_iff !prime_ext_iff_prime) h₂, have h₄ : ¬ n ≥ 2 ∨ ¬ (∀ m, m ≤ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from iff.mp !not_and_iff_not_or_not h₃, have h₅ : ¬ (∀ m, m ≤ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from or_resolve_right h₄ (not_not_intro h₁), have h₆ : ¬ (∀ m, m < succ n → m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from assume h, absurd (λ m hl hd, h m (lt_succ_of_le hl) hd) h₅, have h₇ : ∃ m, m < succ n ∧ ¬(m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n), from bex_not_of_not_ball h₆, obtain m hlt (h₈ : ¬(m ∣ n → m = 1 ∨ m = n)), from h₇, obtain (h₈ : m ∣ n) (h₉ : ¬ (m = 1 ∨ m = n)), from iff.mp !not_implies_iff_and_not h₈, have h₁₀ : ¬ m = 1 ∧ ¬ m = n, from iff.mp !not_or_iff_not_and_not h₉, exists.intro m (and.intro h₈ h₁₀) theorem has_divisor_of_not_prime2 {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ¬ prime n → ∃ m, m ∣ n ∧ m ≥ 2 ∧ m < n := assume h₁ h₂, have n_ne_0 : n ≠ 0, from assume h, begin subst n, exact absurd h₁ dec_trivial end, obtain m m_dvd_n m_ne_1 m_ne_n, from has_divisor_of_not_prime h₁ h₂, assert m_ne_0 : m ≠ 0, from assume h, begin subst m, exact absurd (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd m_dvd_n) n_ne_0 end, begin existsi m, split, assumption, split, {cases m with m, exact absurd rfl m_ne_0, cases m with m, exact absurd rfl m_ne_1, exact succ_le_succ (succ_le_succ (zero_le _))}, {have m_le_n : m ≤ n, from le_of_dvd (pos_of_ne_zero n_ne_0) m_dvd_n, exact lt_of_le_and_ne m_le_n m_ne_n} end theorem has_prime_divisor {n : nat} : n ≥ 2 → ∃ p, prime p ∧ p ∣ n := nat.strong_induction_on n (take n, assume ih : ∀ m, m < n → m ≥ 2 → ∃ p, prime p ∧ p ∣ m, assume n_ge_2 : n ≥ 2, by_cases (λ h : prime n, exists.intro n (and.intro h (dvd.refl n))) (λ h : ¬ prime n, obtain m m_dvd_n m_ge_2 m_lt_n, from has_divisor_of_not_prime2 n_ge_2 h, obtain p (hp : prime p) (p_dvd_m : p ∣ m), from ih m m_lt_n m_ge_2, have p_dvd_n : p ∣ n, from dvd.trans p_dvd_m m_dvd_n, exists.intro p (and.intro hp p_dvd_n))) open eq.ops theorem infinite_primes (n : nat) : ∃ p, p ≥ n ∧ prime p := let m := fact (n + 1) in have Hn1 : n + 1 ≥ 1, from succ_le_succ (zero_le _), have m_ge_1 : m ≥ 1, from le_of_lt_succ (succ_lt_succ (fact_gt_0 _)), have m1_ge_2 : m + 1 ≥ 2, from succ_le_succ m_ge_1, obtain p (prime_p : prime p) (p_dvd_m1 : p ∣ m + 1), from has_prime_divisor m1_ge_2, have p_ge_2 : p ≥ 2, from ge_two_of_prime prime_p, have p_gt_0 : p > 0, from lt_of_succ_lt (lt_of_succ_le p_ge_2), have p_ge_n : p ≥ n, from by_contradiction (assume h₁ : ¬ p ≥ n, have h₂ : p < n, from lt_of_not_ge h₁, have h₃ : p ≤ n + 1, from le_of_lt (lt.step h₂), have h₄ : p ∣ m, from dvd_fact p_gt_0 h₃, have h₅ : p ∣ 1, from dvd_of_dvd_add_right (!add.comm ▸ p_dvd_m1) h₄, have h₆ : p ≤ 1, from le_of_dvd zero_lt_one h₅, absurd (le.trans p_ge_2 h₆) dec_trivial), exists.intro p (and.intro p_ge_n prime_p) end nat