/- Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Floris van Doorn Adjoint functors -/ import .attributes .examples open functor nat_trans is_trunc eq iso prod namespace category structure adjoint [class] {C D : Precategory} (F : C ⇒ D) (G : D ⇒ C) := (η : 1 ⟹ G ∘f F) (ε : F ∘f G ⟹ 1) (H : Π(c : C), ε (F c) ∘ F (η c) = ID (F c)) (K : Π(d : D), G (ε d) ∘ η (G d) = ID (G d)) -- TODO(?): define is_left_adjoint in terms of adjoint -- structure is_left_adjoint (F : C ⇒ D) := -- (G : D ⇒ C) -- G -- (is_adjoint : adjoint F G) infix ` ⊣ `:55 := adjoint structure is_left_adjoint [class] {C D : Precategory} (F : C ⇒ D) := (G : D ⇒ C) (η : 1 ⟹ G ∘f F) (ε : F ∘f G ⟹ 1) (H : Π(c : C), ε (F c) ∘ F (η c) = ID (F c)) (K : Π(d : D), G (ε d) ∘ η (G d) = ID (G d)) abbreviation right_adjoint [unfold 4] := @is_left_adjoint.G abbreviation unit [unfold 4] := @is_left_adjoint.η abbreviation counit [unfold 4] := @is_left_adjoint.ε abbreviation counit_unit_eq [unfold 4] := @is_left_adjoint.H abbreviation unit_counit_eq [unfold 4] := @is_left_adjoint.K theorem is_hprop_is_left_adjoint [instance] {C : Category} {D : Precategory} (F : C ⇒ D) : is_hprop (is_left_adjoint F) := begin apply is_hprop.mk, intro G G', cases G with G η ε H K, cases G' with G' η' ε' H' K', assert lem₁ : Π(p : G = G'), p ▸ η = η' → p ▸ ε = ε' → is_left_adjoint.mk G η ε H K = is_left_adjoint.mk G' η' ε' H' K', { intros p q r, induction p, induction q, induction r, esimp, apply apd011 (is_left_adjoint.mk G η ε) !is_hprop.elim !is_hprop.elim}, assert lem₂ : Π (d : carrier D), (to_fun_hom G (natural_map ε' d) ∘ natural_map η (to_fun_ob G' d)) ∘ to_fun_hom G' (natural_map ε d) ∘ natural_map η' (to_fun_ob G d) = id, { intro d, esimp, rewrite [assoc], rewrite [-assoc (G (ε' d))], esimp, rewrite [nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt' G' ε η d], esimp, rewrite [assoc], esimp, rewrite [-assoc], rewrite [↑functor.compose, -respect_comp G], rewrite [nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt ε ε' d,nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt η' η (G d),▸*], rewrite [respect_comp G], rewrite [assoc,▸*,-assoc (G (ε d))], rewrite [↑functor.compose, -respect_comp G], rewrite [H' (G d)], rewrite [respect_id,▸*,id_right], apply K}, assert lem₃ : Π (d : carrier D), (to_fun_hom G' (natural_map ε d) ∘ natural_map η' (to_fun_ob G d)) ∘ to_fun_hom G (natural_map ε' d) ∘ natural_map η (to_fun_ob G' d) = id, { intro d, esimp, rewrite [assoc, -assoc (G' (ε d))], esimp, rewrite [nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt' G ε' η' d], esimp, rewrite [assoc], esimp, rewrite [-assoc], rewrite [↑functor.compose, -respect_comp G'], rewrite [nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt ε' ε d,nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt η η' (G' d)], esimp, rewrite [respect_comp G'], rewrite [assoc,▸*,-assoc (G' (ε' d))], rewrite [↑functor.compose, -respect_comp G'], rewrite [H (G' d)], rewrite [respect_id,▸*,id_right], apply K'}, fapply lem₁, { fapply functor.eq_of_pointwise_iso, { fapply change_natural_map, { exact (G' ∘fn1 ε) ∘n !assoc_natural_rev ∘n (η' ∘1nf G)}, { intro d, exact (G' (ε d) ∘ η' (G d))}, { intro d, exact ap (λx, _ ∘ x) !id_left}}, { intro d, fconstructor, { exact (G (ε' d) ∘ η (G' d))}, { exact lem₂ d }, { exact lem₃ d }}}, { clear lem₁, refine transport_hom_of_eq_right _ η ⬝ _, krewrite hom_of_eq_compose_right, rewrite functor.hom_of_eq_eq_of_pointwise_iso, apply nat_trans_eq, intro c, esimp, refine !assoc⁻¹ ⬝ ap (λx, _ ∘ x) (nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt η η' c) ⬝ !assoc ⬝ _, esimp, rewrite [-respect_comp G',H c,respect_id G',▸*,id_left]}, { clear lem₁, refine transport_hom_of_eq_left _ ε ⬝ _, krewrite inv_of_eq_compose_left, rewrite functor.inv_of_eq_eq_of_pointwise_iso, apply nat_trans_eq, intro d, esimp, krewrite [respect_comp], rewrite [assoc,nf_fn_eq_fn_nf_pt ε' ε d,-assoc,▸*,H (G' d),id_right]} end section universe variables u v parameters {C D : Precategory.{u v}} {F : C ⇒ D} {G : D ⇒ C} (θ : hom_functor D ∘f prod_functor_prod Fᵒᵖᶠ 1 ≅ hom_functor C ∘f prod_functor_prod 1 G) include θ /- θ : _ ⟹[Cᵒᵖ × D ⇒ set] _-/ definition adj_unit [constructor] : 1 ⟹ G ∘f F := begin fapply nat_trans.mk: esimp, { intro c, exact natural_map (to_hom θ) (c, F c) id}, { intro c c' f, let H := naturality (to_hom θ) (ID c, F f), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, id_right at K, ▸*, K, respect_id, +id_right], clear H K, let H := naturality (to_hom θ) (f, ID (F c')), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, respect_id at K,+id_left at K, K]} end definition adj_counit [constructor] : F ∘f G ⟹ 1 := begin fapply nat_trans.mk: esimp, { intro d, exact natural_map (to_inv θ) (G d, d) id, }, { intro d d' g, let H := naturality (to_inv θ) (Gᵒᵖᶠ g, ID d'), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, id_left at K, ▸*, K, respect_id, +id_left], clear H K, let H := naturality (to_inv θ) (ID (G d), g), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, respect_id at K,+id_right at K, K]} end theorem adj_eq_unit (c : C) (d : D) (f : F c ⟶ d) : natural_map (to_hom θ) (c, d) f = G f ∘ adj_unit c := begin esimp, let H := naturality (to_hom θ) (ID c, f), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, id_right at K, K, respect_id, +id_right], end theorem adj_eq_counit (c : C) (d : D) (g : c ⟶ G d) : natural_map (to_inv θ) (c, d) g = adj_counit d ∘ F g := begin esimp, let H := naturality (to_inv θ) (g, ID d), let K := ap10 H id, rewrite [▸* at K, id_left at K, K, respect_id, +id_left], end definition adjoint.mk' [constructor] : F ⊣ G := begin fapply adjoint.mk, { exact adj_unit}, { exact adj_counit}, { intro c, esimp, refine (adj_eq_counit c (F c) (adj_unit c))⁻¹ ⬝ _, apply ap10 (to_left_inverse (componentwise_iso θ (c, F c)))}, { intro d, esimp, refine (adj_eq_unit (G d) d (adj_counit d))⁻¹ ⬝ _, apply ap10 (to_right_inverse (componentwise_iso θ (G d, d)))}, end end end category