-- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Author: Leonardo de Moura
import logic cast
using eq_proofs

axiom prop_complete (a : Prop) : a = true ∨ a = false

theorem case (P : Prop → Prop) (H1 : P true) (H2 : P false) (a : Prop) : P a
:= or_elim (prop_complete a)
     (assume Ht : a = true,  Ht⁻¹ ▸ H1)
     (assume Hf : a = false, Hf⁻¹ ▸ H2)

theorem em (a : Prop) : a ∨ ¬a
:= or_elim (prop_complete a)
     (assume Ht : a = true,  or_intro_left (¬a) (eqt_elim Ht))
     (assume Hf : a = false, or_intro_right a (eqf_elim Hf))

theorem prop_complete_swapped (a : Prop) : a = false ∨ a = true
:= case (λ x, x = false ∨ x = true)
        (or_intro_right (true = false) (refl true))
        (or_intro_left  (false = true) (refl false))
        a

theorem not_true : (¬true) = false
:= have aux : (¬true) ≠ true, from
     assume H : (¬true) = true,
       absurd_not_true (H⁻¹ ▸ trivial),
   resolve_right (prop_complete (¬true)) aux

theorem not_false : (¬false) = true
:= have aux : (¬false) ≠ false, from
     assume H : (¬false) = false,
        H ▸ not_false_trivial,
   resolve_right (prop_complete_swapped (¬false)) aux

theorem not_not_eq (a : Prop) : (¬¬a) = a
:= case (λ x, (¬¬x) = x)
        (calc (¬¬true)  = (¬false) : {not_true}
                  ...   = true     : not_false)
        (calc (¬¬false) = (¬true)  : {not_false}
                  ...   = false    : not_true)
        a

theorem not_not_elim {a : Prop} (H : ¬¬a) : a
:= (not_not_eq a) ◂ H

theorem propext {a b : Prop} (Hab : a → b) (Hba : b → a) : a = b
:= or_elim (prop_complete a)
    (assume Hat,  or_elim (prop_complete b)
      (assume Hbt,  Hat ⬝ Hbt⁻¹)
      (assume Hbf, false_elim (a = b) (Hbf ▸ (Hab (eqt_elim Hat)))))
    (assume Haf, or_elim (prop_complete b)
      (assume Hbt,  false_elim (a = b) (Haf ▸ (Hba (eqt_elim Hbt))))
      (assume Hbf, Haf ⬝ Hbf⁻¹))

theorem iff_to_eq {a b : Prop} (H : a ↔ b) : a = b
:= iff_elim (assume H1 H2, propext H1 H2) H

theorem iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b)
:= propext
     (assume H, iff_to_eq H)
     (assume H, eq_to_iff H)

theorem eqt_intro {a : Prop} (H : a) : a = true
:= propext (assume H1 : a,    trivial)
           (assume H2 : true, H)

theorem eqf_intro {a : Prop} (H : ¬a) : a = false
:= propext (assume H1 : a,     absurd H1 H)
           (assume H2 : false, false_elim a H2)

theorem by_contradiction {a : Prop} (H : ¬a → false) : a
:= or_elim (em a) (assume H1 : a, H1) (assume H1 : ¬a, false_elim a (H H1))

theorem a_neq_a {A : Type} (a : A) : (a ≠ a) = false
:= propext (assume H, a_neq_a_elim H)
           (assume H, false_elim (a ≠ a) H)

theorem eq_id {A : Type} (a : A) : (a = a) = true
:= eqt_intro (refl a)

theorem heq_id {A : Type} (a : A) : (a == a) = true
:= eqt_intro (hrefl a)

theorem not_or (a b : Prop) : (¬(a ∨ b)) = (¬a ∧ ¬b)
:= propext
     (assume H, or_elim (em a)
       (assume Ha, absurd_elim (¬a ∧ ¬b) (or_intro_left b Ha) H)
       (assume Hna, or_elim (em b)
         (assume Hb, absurd_elim (¬a ∧ ¬b) (or_intro_right a Hb) H)
         (assume Hnb, and_intro Hna Hnb)))
     (assume (H : ¬a ∧ ¬b) (N : a ∨ b),
       or_elim N
         (assume Ha, absurd Ha (and_elim_left H))
         (assume Hb, absurd Hb (and_elim_right H)))

theorem not_and (a b : Prop) : (¬(a ∧ b)) = (¬a ∨ ¬b)
:= propext
     (assume H, or_elim (em a)
       (assume Ha, or_elim (em b)
       (assume Hb, absurd_elim (¬a ∨ ¬b) (and_intro Ha Hb) H)
         (assume Hnb, or_intro_right (¬a) Hnb))
         (assume Hna, or_intro_left (¬b) Hna))
     (assume (H : ¬a ∨ ¬b) (N : a ∧ b),
       or_elim H
         (assume Hna, absurd (and_elim_left N) Hna)
         (assume Hnb, absurd (and_elim_right N) Hnb))

theorem imp_or (a b : Prop) : (a → b) = (¬a ∨ b)
:= propext
     (assume H : a → b, (or_elim (em a)
       (assume Ha  : a,   or_intro_right (¬a) (H Ha))
       (assume Hna : ¬a, or_intro_left b Hna)))
     (assume (H : ¬a ∨ b) (Ha : a),
       resolve_right H ((not_not_eq a)⁻¹ ◂ Ha))

theorem not_implies (a b : Prop) : (¬(a → b)) = (a ∧ ¬b)
:= calc (¬(a → b)) = (¬(¬a ∨ b)) : {imp_or a b}
                 ... = (¬¬a ∧ ¬b)  : not_or (¬a) b
                 ... = (a ∧ ¬b)    : {not_not_eq a}

theorem a_eq_not_a (a : Prop) : (a = ¬a) = false
:= propext
     (assume H, or_elim (em a)
       (assume Ha, absurd Ha (H ▸ Ha))
       (assume Hna, absurd (H⁻¹ ▸ Hna) Hna))
     (assume H, false_elim (a = ¬a) H)

theorem true_eq_false : (true = false) = false
:= not_true ▸ (a_eq_not_a true)

theorem false_eq_true : (false = true) = false
:= not_false ▸ (a_eq_not_a false)

theorem a_eq_true (a : Prop) : (a = true) = a
:= propext (assume H, eqt_elim H) (assume H, eqt_intro H)

theorem a_eq_false (a : Prop) : (a = false) = ¬a
:= propext (assume H, eqf_elim H) (assume H, eqf_intro H)

theorem not_exists_forall {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (H : ¬∃x, P x) : ∀x, ¬P x
:= take x, or_elim (em (P x))
     (assume Hp : P x,   absurd_elim (¬P x) (exists_intro x Hp) H)
     (assume Hn : ¬P x, Hn)

theorem not_forall_exists {A : Type} {P : A → Prop} (H : ¬∀x, P x) : ∃x, ¬P x
:= by_contradiction (assume H1 : ¬∃ x, ¬P x,
     have H2 : ∀x, ¬¬P x, from not_exists_forall H1,
     have H3 : ∀x, P x, from take x, not_not_elim (H2 x),
     absurd H3 H)

theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a
:= assume H, by_contradiction (assume Hna : ¬a,
     have Hnna : ¬¬a, from not_implies_left (mt H Hna),
     absurd (not_not_elim Hnna) Hna)