---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. -- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. -- Author: Leonardo de Moura ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- import logic.decidable tools.tactic open decidable tactic eq.ops definition ite (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t e : A) : A := decidable.rec_on H (λ Hc, t) (λ Hnc, e) notation `if` c `then` t:45 `else` e:45 := ite c t e definition if_pos {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hc : c) {A : Type} {t e : A} : (if c then t else e) = t := decidable.rec (λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@ite c (inl Hc) A t e)) (λ Hnc : ¬c, absurd Hc Hnc) H definition if_neg {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hnc : ¬c) {A : Type} {t e : A} : (if c then t else e) = e := decidable.rec (λ Hc : c, absurd Hc Hnc) (λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@ite c (inr Hnc) A t e)) H definition if_t_t (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : A) : (if c then t else t) = t := decidable.rec (λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@ite c (inl Hc) A t t)) (λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@ite c (inr Hnc) A t t)) H definition if_true {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if true then t else e) = t := if_pos trivial definition if_false {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if false then t else e) = e := if_neg not_false_trivial theorem if_cond_congr {c₁ c₂ : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c₁] [H₂ : decidable c₂] (Heq : c₁ ↔ c₂) {A : Type} (t e : A) : (if c₁ then t else e) = (if c₂ then t else e) := decidable.rec_on H₁ (λ Hc₁ : c₁, decidable.rec_on H₂ (λ Hc₂ : c₂, if_pos Hc₁ ⬝ (if_pos Hc₂)⁻¹) (λ Hnc₂ : ¬c₂, absurd (iff.elim_left Heq Hc₁) Hnc₂)) (λ Hnc₁ : ¬c₁, decidable.rec_on H₂ (λ Hc₂ : c₂, absurd (iff.elim_right Heq Hc₂) Hnc₁) (λ Hnc₂ : ¬c₂, if_neg Hnc₁ ⬝ (if_neg Hnc₂)⁻¹)) theorem if_congr_aux {c₁ c₂ : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c₁] [H₂ : decidable c₂] {A : Type} {t₁ t₂ e₁ e₂ : A} (Hc : c₁ ↔ c₂) (Ht : t₁ = t₂) (He : e₁ = e₂) : (if c₁ then t₁ else e₁) = (if c₂ then t₂ else e₂) := Ht ▸ He ▸ (if_cond_congr Hc t₁ e₁) theorem if_congr {c₁ c₂ : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c₁] {A : Type} {t₁ t₂ e₁ e₂ : A} (Hc : c₁ ↔ c₂) (Ht : t₁ = t₂) (He : e₁ = e₂) : (if c₁ then t₁ else e₁) = (@ite c₂ (decidable_iff_equiv H₁ Hc) A t₂ e₂) := have H2 [visible] : decidable c₂, from (decidable_iff_equiv H₁ Hc), if_congr_aux Hc Ht He -- We use "dependent" if-then-else to be able to communicate the if-then-else condition -- to the branches definition dite (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : c → A) (e : ¬ c → A) : A := decidable.rec_on H (λ Hc, t Hc) (λ Hnc, e Hnc) notation `dif` c `then` t:45 `else` e:45 := dite c t e definition dif_pos {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hc : c) {A : Type} {t : c → A} {e : ¬ c → A} : (dif c then t else e) = t Hc := decidable.rec (λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@dite c (inl Hc) A t e)) (λ Hnc : ¬c, absurd Hc Hnc) H definition dif_neg {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hnc : ¬c) {A : Type} {t : c → A} {e : ¬ c → A} : (dif c then t else e) = e Hnc := decidable.rec (λ Hc : c, absurd Hc Hnc) (λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@dite c (inr Hnc) A t e)) H -- Remark: dite and ite are "definitionally equal" when we ignore the proofs. theorem dite_ite_eq (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : A) (e : A) : dite c (λh, t) (λh, e) = ite c t e := rfl