/- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Module: init.trunc Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn Ported from Coq HoTT. TODO: can we replace some definitions with a hprop as codomain by theorems? -/ prelude import .logic .equiv .types.empty .types.sigma open eq nat sigma unit namespace is_trunc /- Truncation levels -/ inductive trunc_index : Type₁ := | minus_two : trunc_index | succ : trunc_index → trunc_index /- notation for trunc_index is -2, -1, 0, 1, ... from 0 and up this comes from a coercion from num to trunc_index (via nat) -/ postfix `.+1`:(max+1) := trunc_index.succ postfix `.+2`:(max+1) := λn, (n .+1 .+1) notation `-2` := trunc_index.minus_two notation `-1` := -2.+1 -- ISSUE: -1 gets printed as -2.+1 export [coercions] nat namespace trunc_index definition add (n m : trunc_index) : trunc_index := trunc_index.rec_on m n (λ k l, l .+1) definition leq (n m : trunc_index) : Type₁ := trunc_index.rec_on n (λm, unit) (λ n p m, trunc_index.rec_on m (λ p, empty) (λ m q p, p m) p) m end trunc_index infix `+2+`:65 := trunc_index.add notation x <= y := trunc_index.leq x y notation x ≤ y := trunc_index.leq x y namespace trunc_index definition succ_le_succ {n m : trunc_index} (H : n ≤ m) : n.+1 ≤ m.+1 := H definition le_of_succ_le_succ {n m : trunc_index} (H : n.+1 ≤ m.+1) : n ≤ m := H definition minus_two_le (n : trunc_index) : -2 ≤ n := star definition empty_of_succ_le_minus_two {n : trunc_index} (H : n .+1 ≤ -2) : empty := H end trunc_index definition trunc_index.of_nat [coercion] [reducible] (n : nat) : trunc_index := nat.rec_on n (-1.+1) (λ n k, k.+1) /- truncated types -/ /- Just as in Coq HoTT we define an internal version of contractibility and is_trunc, but we only use `is_trunc` and `is_contr` -/ structure contr_internal (A : Type) := (center : A) (contr : Π(a : A), center = a) definition is_trunc_internal (n : trunc_index) : Type → Type := trunc_index.rec_on n (λA, contr_internal A) (λn trunc_n A, (Π(x y : A), trunc_n (x = y))) end is_trunc open is_trunc structure is_trunc [class] (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) := (to_internal : is_trunc_internal n A) open nat num is_trunc.trunc_index namespace is_trunc abbreviation is_contr := is_trunc -2 abbreviation is_hprop := is_trunc -1 abbreviation is_hset := is_trunc 0 variables {A B : Type} definition is_trunc_succ_intro (A : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : ∀x y : A, is_trunc n (x = y)] : is_trunc n.+1 A := is_trunc.mk (λ x y, !is_trunc.to_internal) definition is_trunc_eq (n : trunc_index) [H : is_trunc (n.+1) A] (x y : A) : is_trunc n (x = y) := is_trunc.mk (!is_trunc.to_internal x y) /- contractibility -/ definition is_contr.mk (center : A) (contr : Π(a : A), center = a) : is_contr A := is_trunc.mk (contr_internal.mk center contr) definition center (A : Type) [H : is_contr A] : A := @contr_internal.center A !is_trunc.to_internal definition contr [H : is_contr A] (a : A) : !center = a := @contr_internal.contr A !is_trunc.to_internal a --TODO: rename definition center_eq [H : is_contr A] (x y : A) : x = y := (contr x)⁻¹ ⬝ (contr y) definition hprop_eq_of_is_contr {A : Type} [H : is_contr A] {x y : A} (p q : x = y) : p = q := have K : ∀ (r : x = y), center_eq x y = r, from (λ r, eq.rec_on r !con.left_inv), (K p)⁻¹ ⬝ K q definition is_contr_eq {A : Type} [H : is_contr A] (x y : A) : is_contr (x = y) := is_contr.mk !center_eq (λ p, !hprop_eq_of_is_contr) local attribute is_contr_eq [instance] /- truncation is upward close -/ -- n-types are also (n+1)-types definition is_trunc_succ [instance] [priority 100] (A : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc (n.+1) A := trunc_index.rec_on n (λ A (H : is_contr A), !is_trunc_succ_intro) (λ n IH A (H : is_trunc (n.+1) A), @is_trunc_succ_intro _ _ (λ x y, IH _ !is_trunc_eq)) A H --in the proof the type of H is given explicitly to make it available for class inference definition is_trunc_of_leq (A : Type) (n m : trunc_index) (Hnm : n ≤ m) [Hn : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc m A := have base : ∀k A, k ≤ -2 → is_trunc k A → (is_trunc -2 A), from λ k A, trunc_index.cases_on k (λh1 h2, h2) (λk h1 h2, empty.elim (is_trunc -2 A) (trunc_index.empty_of_succ_le_minus_two h1)), have step : Π (m : trunc_index) (IHm : Π (n : trunc_index) (A : Type), n ≤ m → is_trunc n A → is_trunc m A) (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) (Hnm : n ≤ m .+1) (Hn : is_trunc n A), is_trunc m .+1 A, from λm IHm n, trunc_index.rec_on n (λA Hnm Hn, @is_trunc_succ A m (IHm -2 A star Hn)) (λn IHn A Hnm (Hn : is_trunc n.+1 A), @is_trunc_succ_intro A m (λx y, IHm n (x = y) (trunc_index.le_of_succ_le_succ Hnm) !is_trunc_eq)), trunc_index.rec_on m base step n A Hnm Hn -- the following cannot be instances in their current form, because they are looping definition is_trunc_of_is_contr (A : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : is_contr A] : is_trunc n A := trunc_index.rec_on n H _ definition is_trunc_succ_of_is_hprop (A : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : is_hprop A] : is_trunc (n.+1) A := is_trunc_of_leq A -1 (n.+1) star definition is_trunc_succ_succ_of_is_hset (A : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : is_hset A] : is_trunc (n.+2) A := is_trunc_of_leq A nat.zero (n.+2) star /- hprops -/ definition is_hprop.elim [H : is_hprop A] (x y : A) : x = y := @center _ !is_trunc_eq definition is_contr_of_inhabited_hprop {A : Type} [H : is_hprop A] (x : A) : is_contr A := is_contr.mk x (λy, !is_hprop.elim) --Coq has the following as instance, but doesn't look too useful definition is_hprop_of_imp_is_contr {A : Type} (H : A → is_contr A) : is_hprop A := @is_trunc_succ_intro A -2 (λx y, have H2 [visible] : is_contr A, from H x, !is_contr_eq) definition is_hprop.mk {A : Type} (H : ∀x y : A, x = y) : is_hprop A := is_hprop_of_imp_is_contr (λ x, is_contr.mk x (H x)) /- hsets -/ definition is_hset.mk (A : Type) (H : ∀(x y : A) (p q : x = y), p = q) : is_hset A := @is_trunc_succ_intro _ _ (λ x y, is_hprop.mk (H x y)) definition is_hset.elim [H : is_hset A] ⦃x y : A⦄ (p q : x = y) : p = q := @is_hprop.elim _ !is_trunc_eq p q /- instances -/ definition is_contr_sigma_eq [instance] {A : Type} (a : A) : is_contr (Σ(x : A), a = x) := is_contr.mk (sigma.mk a idp) (λp, sigma.rec_on p (λ b q, eq.rec_on q idp)) definition is_contr_unit [instance] : is_contr unit := is_contr.mk star (λp, unit.rec_on p idp) definition is_hprop_empty [instance] : is_hprop empty := is_hprop.mk (λx, !empty.elim x) /- truncated universe -/ structure trunctype (n : trunc_index) := (carrier : Type) (struct : is_trunc n carrier) attribute trunctype.carrier [coercion] attribute trunctype.struct [instance] notation n `-Type` := trunctype n abbreviation hprop := -1-Type abbreviation hset := 0-Type protected definition hprop.mk := @trunctype.mk -1 protected definition hset.mk := @trunctype.mk (-1.+1) /- interaction with equivalences -/ section open is_equiv equiv --should we remove the following two theorems as they are special cases of --"is_trunc_is_equiv_closed" definition is_contr_is_equiv_closed (f : A → B) [Hf : is_equiv f] [HA: is_contr A] : (is_contr B) := is_contr.mk (f (center A)) (λp, eq_of_eq_inv !contr) theorem is_contr_equiv_closed (H : A ≃ B) [HA: is_contr A] : is_contr B := @is_contr_is_equiv_closed _ _ (to_fun H) (to_is_equiv H) _ definition equiv_of_is_contr_of_is_contr [HA : is_contr A] [HB : is_contr B] : A ≃ B := equiv.mk (λa, center B) (is_equiv.adjointify (λa, center B) (λb, center A) contr contr) definition is_trunc_is_equiv_closed (n : trunc_index) (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f] [HA : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc n B := trunc_index.rec_on n (λA (HA : is_contr A) B f (H : is_equiv f), !is_contr_is_equiv_closed) (λn IH A (HA : is_trunc n.+1 A) B f (H : is_equiv f), @is_trunc_succ_intro _ _ (λ x y : B, IH (f⁻¹ x = f⁻¹ y) !is_trunc_eq (x = y) (ap f⁻¹)⁻¹ !is_equiv_inv)) A HA B f H definition is_trunc_equiv_closed (n : trunc_index) (f : A ≃ B) [HA : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc n B := is_trunc_is_equiv_closed n (to_fun f) definition is_equiv_of_is_hprop [HA : is_hprop A] [HB : is_hprop B] (f : A → B) (g : B → A) : is_equiv f := is_equiv.mk g (λb, !is_hprop.elim) (λa, !is_hprop.elim) (λa, !is_hset.elim) definition equiv_of_is_hprop [HA : is_hprop A] [HB : is_hprop B] (f : A → B) (g : B → A) : A ≃ B := equiv.mk f (is_equiv_of_is_hprop f g) definition equiv_of_iff_of_is_hprop [HA : is_hprop A] [HB : is_hprop B] (H : A ↔ B) : A ≃ B := equiv_of_is_hprop (iff.elim_left H) (iff.elim_right H) end /- interaction with the Unit type -/ open equiv -- A contractible type is equivalent to [Unit]. *) definition equiv_unit_of_is_contr [H : is_contr A] : A ≃ unit := equiv.mk (λ (x : A), ⋆) (is_equiv.mk (λ (u : unit), center A) (λ (u : unit), unit.rec_on u idp) (λ (x : A), contr x) (λ (x : A), !ap_constant⁻¹)) -- TODO: port "Truncated morphisms" end is_trunc