-- Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. -- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. -- Author: Leonardo de Moura inductive path {A : Type} (a : A) : A → Type := | refl : path a a infix `=`:50 := path definition transport {A : Type} {a b : A} {P : A → Type} (H1 : a = b) (H2 : P a) : P b := path_rec H2 H1 notation p `*(`:75 u `)` := transport p u definition symm {A : Type} {a b : A} (p : a = b) : b = a := p*(refl a) definition trans {A : Type} {a b c : A} (p1 : a = b) (p2 : b = c) : a = c := p2*(p1) namespace path_notation postfix `⁻¹`:100 := symm infixr `⬝`:75 := trans end using path_notation theorem trans_refl_right {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p = p ⬝ (refl y) := refl p theorem trans_refl_left {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p = (refl x) ⬝ p := path_rec (trans_refl_right (refl x)) p theorem refl_symm {A : Type} (x : A) : (refl x)⁻¹ = (refl x) := refl (refl x) theorem refl_trans {A : Type} (x : A) : (refl x) ⬝ (refl x) = (refl x) := refl (refl x) theorem trans_symm {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p ⬝ p⁻¹ = refl x := have q : (refl x) ⬝ (refl x)⁻¹ = refl x, from ((refl_symm x)⁻¹)*(refl_trans x), path_rec q p theorem symm_trans {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : p⁻¹ ⬝ p = refl y := have q : (refl x)⁻¹ ⬝ (refl x) = refl x, from ((refl_symm x)⁻¹)*(refl_trans x), path_rec q p theorem symm_symm {A : Type} {x y : A} (p : x = y) : (p⁻¹)⁻¹ = p := have q : ((refl x)⁻¹)⁻¹ = refl x, from refl (refl x), path_rec q p theorem trans_assoc {A : Type} {x y z w : A} (p : x = y) (q : y = z) (r : z = w) : p ⬝ (q ⬝ r) = (p ⬝ q) ⬝ r := have e1 : (p ⬝ q) ⬝ (refl z) = p ⬝ q, from (trans_refl_right (p ⬝ q))⁻¹, have e2 : q ⬝ (refl z) = q, from (trans_refl_right q)⁻¹, have e3 : p ⬝ (q ⬝ (refl z)) = p ⬝ q, from e2*(refl (p ⬝ (q ⬝ (refl z)))), path_rec (e3 ⬝ e1⁻¹) r theorem ap {A : Type} {B : Type} (f : A → B) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : f a = f b := p*(refl (f a)) section parameter {A : Type} parameter {B : A → Type} parameter f : Π x, B x definition D [private] (x y : A) (p : x = y) := p*(f x) = f y definition d [private] (x : A) : D x x (refl x) := refl (f x) theorem apd {a b : A} (p : a = b) : p*(f a) = f b := path_rec (d a) p end definition homotopy {A : Type} {P : A → Type} (f g : Π x, P x) := Π x, f x = g x infix `∼`:50 := homotopy notation `assume` binders `,` r:(scoped f, f) := r notation `take` binders `,` r:(scoped f, f) := r section parameter {A : Type} parameter {B : Type} theorem hom_refl (f : A → B) : f ∼ f := take x, refl (f x) theorem hom_symm {f g : A → B} : f ∼ g → g ∼ f := assume h, take x, (h x)⁻¹ theorem hom_trans {f g h : A → B} : f ∼ g → g ∼ h → f ∼ h := assume h1 h2, take x, (h1 x) ⬝ (h2 x) end inductive empty : Type := -- empty theorem empty_elim (c : Type) (H : empty) : c := empty_rec (λ e, c) H definition not (A : Type) := A → empty prefix `¬`:40 := not theorem not_intro {a : Type} (H : a → empty) : ¬ a := H theorem not_elim {a : Type} (H1 : ¬ a) (H2 : a) : empty := H1 H2 theorem absurd {a : Type} (H1 : a) (H2 : ¬ a) : empty := H2 H1 theorem mt {a b : Type} (H1 : a → b) (H2 : ¬ b) : ¬ a := assume Ha : a, absurd (H1 Ha) H2 theorem contrapos {a b : Type} (H : a → b) : ¬ b → ¬ a := assume Hnb : ¬ b, mt H Hnb theorem absurd_elim {a : Type} (b : Type) (H1 : a) (H2 : ¬ a) : b := empty_elim b (absurd H1 H2) inductive unit : Type := | star : unit notation `⋆`:max := star theorem absurd_not_unit (H : ¬ unit) : empty := absurd star H theorem not_empty_trivial : ¬ empty := assume H : empty, H theorem upun (x : unit) : x = ⋆ := unit_rec (refl ⋆) x inductive product (A : Type) (B : Type) : Type := | pair : A → B → product A B infixr `∧`:30 := product notation `(` h `,` t:(foldl `,` (e r, pair r e) h) `)` := t definition pr1 {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A ∧ B) : A := product_rec (λ a b, a) p definition pr2 {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A ∧ B) : B := product_rec (λ a b, b) p theorem uppt {A : Type} {B : Type} (p : A ∧ B) : (pr1 p, pr2 p) = p := product_rec (λ x y, refl (x, y)) p inductive sum (A : Type) (B : Type) : Type := | inl : A → sum A B | inr : B → sum A B infixr `∨`:25 := sum theorem sum_elim {a : Type} {b : Type} {c : Type} (H1 : a ∨ b) (H2 : a → c) (H3 : b → c) : c := sum_rec H2 H3 H1 theorem resolve_right {a : Type} {b : Type} (H1 : a ∨ b) (H2 : ¬ a) : b := sum_elim H1 (assume Ha, absurd_elim b Ha H2) (assume Hb, Hb) theorem resolve_left {a : Type} {b : Type} (H1 : a ∨ b) (H2 : ¬ b) : a := sum_elim H1 (assume Ha, Ha) (assume Hb, absurd_elim a Hb H2) theorem or_flip {a : Type} {b : Type} (H : a ∨ b) : b ∨ a := sum_elim H (assume Ha, inr b Ha) (assume Hb, inl a Hb) inductive bool : Type := | true : bool | false : bool theorem bool_cases (p : bool) : p = true ∨ p = false := bool_rec (inl _ (refl true)) (inr _ (refl false)) p inductive Sigma {A : Type} (B : A → Type) : Type := | sigma : Π a, B a → Sigma B notation `Σ` binders `,` r:(scoped P, Sigma P) := r