lean2/library/init/wf.lean
Floris van Doorn e14d4a4c0c feat(init/wf): port from standard library to HoTT library
After this commit we need some more advanced theorems in init/wf, notably function extenstionality.
For this reason I had to refactor the init folder a little bit.
To keep the init folders in both libraries similar, I did the same refactorization in the standard library, even though that was not required for the standard library
2016-02-09 10:03:48 -08:00

221 lines
7.4 KiB
Text
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.relation init.tactic init.nat init.prod
inductive acc {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : A → Prop :=
intro : ∀x, (∀ y, R y x → acc R y) → acc R x
namespace acc
variables {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
definition inv {x y : A} (H₁ : acc R x) (H₂ : R y x) : acc R y :=
acc.rec_on H₁ (λ x₁ ac₁ iH H₂, ac₁ y H₂) H₂
-- dependent elimination for acc
protected definition drec [recursor]
{C : Π (a : A), acc R a → Type}
(h₁ : Π (x : A) (acx : Π (y : A), R y x → acc R y),
(Π (y : A) (ryx : R y x), C y (acx y ryx)) → C x (acc.intro x acx))
{a : A} (h₂ : acc R a) : C a h₂ :=
begin
refine acc.rec _ h₂ h₂,
intro x acx ih h₂,
exact h₁ x acx (λ y ryx, ih y ryx (acx y ryx))
end
end acc
inductive well_founded [class] {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) : Prop :=
intro : (∀ a, acc R a) → well_founded R
namespace well_founded
definition apply [coercion] {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop} (wf : well_founded R) : ∀a, acc R a :=
take a, well_founded.rec_on wf (λp, p) a
section
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := R
hypothesis [Hwf : well_founded R]
theorem recursion {C : A → Type} (a : A) (H : Πx, (Πy, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
acc.rec_on (Hwf a) (λ x₁ ac₁ iH, H x₁ iH)
theorem induction {C : A → Prop} (a : A) (H : ∀x, (∀y, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
recursion a H
variable {C : A → Type}
variable F : Πx, (Πy, y ≺ x → C y) → C x
definition fix_F (x : A) (a : acc R x) : C x :=
acc.rec_on a (λ x₁ ac₁ iH, F x₁ iH)
theorem fix_F_eq (x : A) (r : acc R x) :
fix_F F x r = F x (λ (y : A) (p : y ≺ x), fix_F F y (acc.inv r p)) :=
begin
induction r using acc.drec,
reflexivity -- proof is trivial due to proof irrelevance
end
end
variables {A : Type} {C : A → Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
-- Well-founded fixpoint
definition fix [Hwf : well_founded R] (F : Πx, (Πy, R y x → C y) → C x) (x : A) : C x :=
fix_F F x (Hwf x)
-- Well-founded fixpoint satisfies fixpoint equation
theorem fix_eq [Hwf : well_founded R] (F : Πx, (Πy, R y x → C y) → C x) (x : A) :
fix F x = F x (λy h, fix F y) :=
fix_F_eq F x (Hwf x)
end well_founded
open well_founded
-- Empty relation is well-founded
definition empty.wf {A : Type} : well_founded empty_relation :=
well_founded.intro (λ (a : A),
acc.intro a (λ (b : A) (lt : false), false.rec _ lt))
-- Subrelation of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace subrelation
section
parameters {A : Type} {R Q : A → A → Prop}
parameters (H₁ : subrelation Q R)
parameters (H₂ : well_founded R)
definition accessible {a : A} (ac : acc R a) : acc Q a :=
using H₁,
begin
induction ac with x ax ih, constructor,
exact λ (y : A) (lt : Q y x), ih y (H₁ lt)
end
definition wf : well_founded Q :=
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H₂ a))
end
end subrelation
-- The inverse image of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace inv_image
section
parameters {A B : Type} {R : B → B → Prop}
parameters (f : A → B)
parameters (H : well_founded R)
private definition acc_aux {b : B} (ac : acc R b) : ∀ x, f x = b → acc (inv_image R f) x :=
begin
induction ac with x acx ih,
intro z e, constructor,
intro y lt, subst x,
exact ih (f y) lt y rfl
end
definition accessible {a : A} (ac : acc R (f a)) : acc (inv_image R f) a :=
acc_aux ac a rfl
definition wf : well_founded (inv_image R f) :=
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H (f a)))
end
end inv_image
-- The transitive closure of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace tc
section
parameters {A : Type} {R : A → A → Prop}
local notation `R⁺` := tc R
definition accessible {z} (ac: acc R z) : acc R⁺ z :=
begin
induction ac with x acx ih,
constructor, intro y rel,
induction rel with a b rab a b c rab rbc ih₁ ih₂,
{exact ih a rab},
{exact acc.inv (ih₂ acx ih) rab}
end
definition wf (H : well_founded R) : well_founded R⁺ :=
well_founded.intro (λ a, accessible (H a))
end
end tc
namespace nat
-- less-than is well-founded
definition lt.wf [instance] : well_founded lt :=
well_founded.intro (nat.rec
(!acc.intro (λn H, absurd H (not_lt_zero n)))
(λn IH, !acc.intro (λm H,
or.elim (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (le_of_succ_le_succ H))
(λe, eq.substr e IH) (acc.inv IH))))
definition measure {A : Type} : (A → ) → A → A → Prop :=
inv_image lt
definition measure.wf {A : Type} (f : A → ) : well_founded (measure f) :=
inv_image.wf f lt.wf
end nat
namespace prod
open well_founded
section
variables {A B : Type}
variable (Ra : A → A → Prop)
variable (Rb : B → B → Prop)
-- Lexicographical order based on Ra and Rb
inductive lex : A × B → A × B → Prop :=
| left : ∀{a₁ b₁} a₂ b₂, Ra a₁ a₂ → lex (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
| right : ∀a {b₁ b₂}, Rb b₁ b₂ → lex (a, b₁) (a, b₂)
-- Relational product based on Ra and Rb
inductive rprod : A × B → A × B → Prop :=
intro : ∀{a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ra a₁ a₂ → Rb b₁ b₂ → rprod (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
end
section
parameters {A B : Type}
parameters {Ra : A → A → Prop} {Rb : B → B → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := lex Ra Rb
definition lex.accessible {a} (aca : acc Ra a) (acb : ∀b, acc Rb b): ∀b, acc (lex Ra Rb) (a, b) :=
acc.rec_on aca
(λxa aca (iHa : ∀y, Ra y xa → ∀b, acc (lex Ra Rb) (y, b)),
λb, acc.rec_on (acb b)
(λxb acb
(iHb : ∀y, Rb y xb → acc (lex Ra Rb) (xa, y)),
acc.intro (xa, xb) (λp (lt : p ≺ (xa, xb)),
have aux : xa = xa → xb = xb → acc (lex Ra Rb) p, from
@prod.lex.rec_on A B Ra Rb (λp₁ p₂, pr₁ p₂ = xa → pr₂ p₂ = xb → acc (lex Ra Rb) p₁)
p (xa, xb) lt
(λa₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ (H : Ra a₁ a₂) (eq₂ : a₂ = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ = xb),
show acc (lex Ra Rb) (a₁, b₁), from
have Ra₁ : Ra a₁ xa, from eq.rec_on eq₂ H,
iHa a₁ Ra₁ b₁)
(λa b₁ b₂ (H : Rb b₁ b₂) (eq₂ : a = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ = xb),
show acc (lex Ra Rb) (a, b₁), from
have Rb₁ : Rb b₁ xb, from eq.rec_on eq₃ H,
have eq₂' : xa = a, from eq.rec_on eq₂ rfl,
eq.rec_on eq₂' (iHb b₁ Rb₁)),
aux rfl rfl)))
-- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded
definition lex.wf (Ha : well_founded Ra) (Hb : well_founded Rb) : well_founded (lex Ra Rb) :=
well_founded.intro (λp, destruct p (λa b, lex.accessible (Ha a) (well_founded.apply Hb) b))
-- Relational product is a subrelation of the lex
definition rprod.sub_lex : ∀ a b, rprod Ra Rb a b → lex Ra Rb a b :=
λa b H, prod.rprod.rec_on H (λ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ H₁ H₂, lex.left Rb a₂ b₂ H₁)
-- The relational product of well founded relations is well-founded
definition rprod.wf (Ha : well_founded Ra) (Hb : well_founded Rb) : well_founded (rprod Ra Rb) :=
subrelation.wf (rprod.sub_lex) (lex.wf Ha Hb)
end
end prod