lean2/hott/init/nat.hlean

291 lines
9.7 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.wf init.tactic init.hedberg init.util init.types
open eq decidable sum lift
namespace nat
notation `` := nat
/- basic definitions on natural numbers -/
inductive le (a : ) : → Type₀ :=
| refl : le a a
| step : Π {b}, le a b → le a (succ b)
infix `≤` := le
attribute le.refl [refl]
definition lt [reducible] (n m : ) := succ n ≤ m
definition ge [reducible] (n m : ) := m ≤ n
definition gt [reducible] (n m : ) := succ m ≤ n
infix `<` := lt
infix `≥` := ge
infix `>` := gt
definition pred [unfold-c 1] (a : nat) : nat :=
nat.cases_on a zero (λ a₁, a₁)
-- add is defined in init.num
definition sub (a b : nat) : nat :=
nat.rec_on b a (λ b₁ r, pred r)
definition mul (a b : nat) : nat :=
nat.rec_on b zero (λ b₁ r, r + a)
notation a - b := sub a b
notation a * b := mul a b
/- properties of -/
protected definition is_inhabited [instance] : inhabited nat :=
inhabited.mk zero
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] : ∀ x y : nat, decidable (x = y)
| has_decidable_eq zero zero := inl rfl
| has_decidable_eq (succ x) zero := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq zero (succ y) := inr (by contradiction)
| has_decidable_eq (succ x) (succ y) :=
match has_decidable_eq x y with
| inl xeqy := inl (by rewrite xeqy)
| inr xney := inr (λ h : succ x = succ y, by injection h with xeqy; exact absurd xeqy xney)
end
/- properties of inequality -/
theorem le_of_eq {n m : } (p : n = m) : n ≤ m := p ▸ le.refl n
theorem le_succ (n : ) : n ≤ succ n := by repeat constructor
theorem pred_le (n : ) : pred n ≤ n := by cases n;all_goals (repeat constructor)
theorem le.trans [trans] {n m k : } (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ k) : n ≤ k :=
by induction H2 with n H2 IH;exact H1;exact le.step IH
theorem le_succ_of_le {n m : } (H : n ≤ m) : n ≤ succ m := le.trans H !le_succ
theorem le_of_succ_le {n m : } (H : succ n ≤ m) : n ≤ m := le.trans !le_succ H
theorem le_of_lt {n m : } (H : n < m) : n ≤ m := le_of_succ_le H
definition succ_le_succ [unfold-c 3] {n m : } (H : n ≤ m) : succ n ≤ succ m :=
by induction H;reflexivity;exact le.step v_0
definition pred_le_pred [unfold-c 3] {n m : } (H : n ≤ m) : pred n ≤ pred m :=
by induction H;reflexivity;cases b;exact v_0;exact le.step v_0
definition le_of_succ_le_succ [unfold-c 3] {n m : } (H : succ n ≤ succ m) : n ≤ m :=
pred_le_pred H
definition le_succ_of_pred_le [unfold-c 1] {n m : } (H : pred n ≤ m) : n ≤ succ m :=
by cases n;exact le.step H;exact succ_le_succ H
theorem not_succ_le_self {n : } : ¬succ n ≤ n :=
by induction n with n IH;all_goals intros;cases a;apply IH;exact le_of_succ_le_succ a
theorem zero_le (n : ) : 0 ≤ n :=
by induction n with n IH;apply le.refl;exact le.step IH
theorem lt.step {n m : } (H : n < m) : n < succ m :=
le.step H
theorem zero_lt_succ (n : ) : 0 < succ n :=
by induction n with n IH;apply le.refl;exact le.step IH
theorem lt.trans [trans] {n m k : } (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m < k) : n < k :=
le.trans (le.step H1) H2
theorem lt_of_le_of_lt [trans] {n m k : } (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m < k) : n < k :=
le.trans (succ_le_succ H1) H2
theorem lt_of_lt_of_le [trans] {n m k : } (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m ≤ k) : n < k :=
le.trans H1 H2
theorem le.antisymm {n m : } (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m ≤ n) : n = m :=
begin
cases H1 with m' H1',
{ reflexivity},
{ cases H2 with n' H2',
{ reflexivity},
{ exfalso, apply not_succ_le_self, exact lt.trans H1' H2'}},
end
theorem not_succ_le_zero (n : ) : ¬succ n ≤ zero :=
by intro H; cases H
theorem lt.irrefl (n : ) : ¬n < n := not_succ_le_self
theorem self_lt_succ (n : ) : n < succ n := !le.refl
theorem lt.base (n : ) : n < succ n := !le.refl
theorem le_lt_antisymm {n m : } (H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : m < n) : empty :=
!lt.irrefl (lt_of_le_of_lt H1 H2)
theorem lt_le_antisymm {n m : } (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m ≤ n) : empty :=
le_lt_antisymm H2 H1
theorem lt.asymm {n m : } (H1 : n < m) (H2 : m < n) : empty :=
le_lt_antisymm (le_of_lt H1) H2
definition lt.by_cases {a b : } {P : Type} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a = b → P) (H3 : b < a → P) : P :=
begin
revert b H1 H2 H3, induction a with a IH,
{ intros, cases b,
exact H2 idp,
exact H1 !zero_lt_succ},
{ intros, cases b with b,
exact H3 !zero_lt_succ,
{ apply IH,
intro H, exact H1 (succ_le_succ H),
intro H, exact H2 (ap succ H),
intro H, exact H3 (succ_le_succ H)}}
end
theorem lt.trichotomy (a b : ) : a < b ⊎ a = b ⊎ b < a :=
lt.by_cases inl (λH, inr (inl H)) (λH, inr (inr H))
definition lt_ge_by_cases {a b : } {P : Type} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a ≥ b → P) : P :=
lt.by_cases H1 (λH, H2 (le_of_eq H⁻¹)) (λH, H2 (le_of_lt H))
theorem lt_or_ge (a b : ) : (a < b) ⊎ (a ≥ b) :=
lt_ge_by_cases inl inr
theorem not_lt_zero (a : ) : ¬ a < zero :=
by intro H; cases H
-- less-than is well-founded
definition lt.wf [instance] : well_founded lt :=
begin
constructor, intro n, induction n with n IH,
{ constructor, intros n H, exfalso, exact !not_lt_zero H},
{ constructor, intros m H,
assert aux : ∀ {n₁} (hlt : m < n₁), succ n = n₁ → acc lt m,
{ intros n₁ hlt, induction hlt,
{ intro p, injection p with q, exact q ▸ IH},
{ intro p, injection p with q, exact (acc.inv (q ▸ IH) a)}},
apply aux H idp},
end
definition measure {A : Type} (f : A → ) : A → A → Type₀ :=
inv_image lt f
definition measure.wf {A : Type} (f : A → ) : well_founded (measure f) :=
inv_image.wf f lt.wf
theorem succ_lt_succ {a b : } (H : a < b) : succ a < succ b :=
succ_le_succ H
theorem lt_of_succ_lt {a b : } (H : succ a < b) : a < b :=
le_of_succ_le H
theorem lt_of_succ_lt_succ {a b : } (H : succ a < succ b) : a < b :=
le_of_succ_le_succ H
definition decidable_le [instance] : decidable_rel le :=
begin
intros n, induction n with n IH,
{ intro m, left, apply zero_le},
{ intro m, cases m with m,
{ right, apply not_succ_le_zero},
{ let H := IH m, clear IH,
cases H with H H,
left, exact succ_le_succ H,
right, intro H2, exact H (le_of_succ_le_succ H2)}}
end
definition decidable_lt [instance] : decidable_rel lt := _
definition decidable_gt [instance] : decidable_rel gt := _
definition decidable_ge [instance] : decidable_rel ge := _
theorem eq_or_lt_of_le {a b : } (H : a ≤ b) : a = b ⊎ a < b :=
by cases H with b' H; exact sum.inl rfl; exact sum.inr (succ_le_succ H)
theorem le_of_eq_or_lt {a b : } (H : a = b ⊎ a < b) : a ≤ b :=
by cases H with H H; exact le_of_eq H; exact le_of_lt H
theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : } (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b ⊎ b < a :=
sum.rec_on (lt.trichotomy a b)
(λ hlt, absurd hlt hnlt)
(λ h, h)
theorem lt_succ_of_le {a b : } (h : a ≤ b) : a < succ b :=
succ_le_succ h
theorem lt_of_succ_le {a b : } (h : succ a ≤ b) : a < b := h
theorem succ_le_of_lt {a b : } (h : a < b) : succ a ≤ b := h
definition max (a b : ) : := if a < b then b else a
definition min (a b : ) : := if a < b then a else b
theorem max_self (a : ) : max a a = a :=
eq.rec_on !if_t_t rfl
theorem max_eq_right {a b : } (H : a < b) : max a b = b :=
if_pos H
theorem max_eq_left {a b : } (H : ¬ a < b) : max a b = a :=
if_neg H
theorem eq_max_right {a b : } (H : a < b) : b = max a b :=
eq.rec_on (max_eq_right H) rfl
theorem eq_max_left {a b : } (H : ¬ a < b) : a = max a b :=
eq.rec_on (max_eq_left H) rfl
theorem le_max_left (a b : ) : a ≤ max a b :=
by_cases
(λ h : a < b, le_of_lt (eq.rec_on (eq_max_right h) h))
(λ h : ¬ a < b, eq.rec_on (eq_max_left h) !le.refl)
theorem le_max_right (a b : ) : b ≤ max a b :=
by_cases
(λ h : a < b, eq.rec_on (eq_max_right h) !le.refl)
(λ h : ¬ a < b, sum.rec_on (eq_or_lt_of_not_lt h)
(λ heq, eq.rec_on heq (eq.rec_on (inverse (max_self a)) !le.refl))
(λ h : b < a,
have aux : a = max a b, from eq_max_left (lt.asymm h),
eq.rec_on aux (le_of_lt h)))
theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (a b : ) : succ a - succ b = a - b :=
by induction b with b IH; reflexivity; apply ap pred IH
theorem sub_eq_succ_sub_succ (a b : ) : a - b = succ a - succ b :=
eq.rec_on (succ_sub_succ_eq_sub a b) rfl
theorem zero_sub_eq_zero (a : ) : zero - a = zero :=
nat.rec_on a
rfl
(λ a₁ (ih : zero - a₁ = zero), ap pred ih)
theorem zero_eq_zero_sub (a : ) : zero = zero - a :=
eq.rec_on (zero_sub_eq_zero a) rfl
theorem sub_lt {a b : } : zero < a → zero < b → a - b < a :=
have aux : Π {a}, zero < a → Π {b}, zero < b → a - b < a, from
λa h₁, le.rec_on h₁
(λb h₂, le.cases_on h₂
(lt.base zero)
(λ b₁ bpos,
eq.rec_on (sub_eq_succ_sub_succ zero b₁)
(eq.rec_on (zero_eq_zero_sub b₁) (lt.base zero))))
(λa₁ apos ih b h₂, le.cases_on h₂
(lt.base a₁)
(λ b₁ bpos,
eq.rec_on (sub_eq_succ_sub_succ a₁ b₁)
(lt.trans (@ih b₁ bpos) (lt.base a₁)))),
λ h₁ h₂, aux h₁ h₂
theorem sub_le (a b : ) : a - b ≤ a :=
nat.rec_on b
(le.refl a)
(λ b₁ ih, le.trans !pred_le ih)
lemma sub_lt_succ (a b : ) : a - b < succ a := lt_succ_of_le (sub_le a b)
end nat