368f9d347e
The previous approach was too fragile TODO: we should add separate parsing tables for tactics
67 lines
2.2 KiB
Text
67 lines
2.2 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
|
||
Module: logic.axioms.classical
|
||
Author: Leonardo de Moura
|
||
-/
|
||
import logic.connectives logic.quantifiers logic.cast algebra.relation
|
||
open eq.ops
|
||
|
||
axiom prop_complete (a : Prop) : a = true ∨ a = false
|
||
|
||
definition eq_true_or_eq_false := prop_complete
|
||
|
||
theorem cases_true_false (P : Prop → Prop) (H1 : P true) (H2 : P false) (a : Prop) : P a :=
|
||
or.elim (prop_complete a)
|
||
(assume Ht : a = true, Ht⁻¹ ▸ H1)
|
||
(assume Hf : a = false, Hf⁻¹ ▸ H2)
|
||
|
||
theorem cases_on (a : Prop) {P : Prop → Prop} (H1 : P true) (H2 : P false) : P a :=
|
||
cases_true_false P H1 H2 a
|
||
|
||
-- this supercedes the em in decidable
|
||
theorem em (a : Prop) : a ∨ ¬a :=
|
||
or.elim (prop_complete a)
|
||
(assume Ht : a = true, or.inl (of_eq_true Ht))
|
||
(assume Hf : a = false, or.inr (not_of_eq_false Hf))
|
||
|
||
-- this supercedes by_cases in decidable
|
||
definition by_cases {p q : Prop} (Hpq : p → q) (Hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
|
||
or.elim (em p) (assume Hp, Hpq Hp) (assume Hnp, Hnpq Hnp)
|
||
|
||
-- this supercedes by_contradiction in decidable
|
||
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} (H : ¬p → false) : p :=
|
||
by_cases
|
||
(assume H1 : p, H1)
|
||
(assume H1 : ¬p, false.rec _ (H H1))
|
||
|
||
theorem eq_false_or_eq_true (a : Prop) : a = false ∨ a = true :=
|
||
cases_true_false (λ x, x = false ∨ x = true)
|
||
(or.inr rfl)
|
||
(or.inl rfl)
|
||
a
|
||
|
||
theorem propext {a b : Prop} (Hab : a → b) (Hba : b → a) : a = b :=
|
||
or.elim (prop_complete a)
|
||
(assume Hat, or.elim (prop_complete b)
|
||
(assume Hbt, Hat ⬝ Hbt⁻¹)
|
||
(assume Hbf, false.elim (Hbf ▸ (Hab (of_eq_true Hat)))))
|
||
(assume Haf, or.elim (prop_complete b)
|
||
(assume Hbt, false.elim (Haf ▸ (Hba (of_eq_true Hbt))))
|
||
(assume Hbf, Haf ⬝ Hbf⁻¹))
|
||
|
||
theorem eq.of_iff {a b : Prop} (H : a ↔ b) : a = b :=
|
||
iff.elim (assume H1 H2, propext H1 H2) H
|
||
|
||
theorem iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) :=
|
||
propext
|
||
(assume H, eq.of_iff H)
|
||
(assume H, iff.of_eq H)
|
||
|
||
open relation
|
||
theorem iff_congruence [instance] (P : Prop → Prop) : is_congruence iff iff P :=
|
||
is_congruence.mk
|
||
(take (a b : Prop),
|
||
assume H : a ↔ b,
|
||
show P a ↔ P b, from iff.of_eq (eq.of_iff H ▸ eq.refl (P a)))
|