1d23d93e60
Add 'have' notation suggested by Jeremy Avigad. Add his example to the test suite. Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
33 lines
1.2 KiB
Text
33 lines
1.2 KiB
Text
import macros
|
||
import tactic
|
||
using Nat
|
||
|
||
definition dvd (a b : Nat) : Bool := ∃ c, a * c = b
|
||
|
||
infix 50 | : dvd
|
||
|
||
theorem dvd_trans {a b c} (H1 : a | b) (H2 : b | c) : a | c
|
||
:= obtain (w1 : Nat) (Hw1 : a * w1 = b), from H1,
|
||
obtain (w2 : Nat) (Hw2 : b * w2 = c), from H2,
|
||
exists_intro (w1 * w2)
|
||
(calc a * (w1 * w2) = a * w1 * w2 : symm (mul_assoc a w1 w2)
|
||
... = b * w2 : { Hw1 }
|
||
... = c : Hw2)
|
||
|
||
definition prime p := p ≥ 2 ∧ forall m, m | p → m = 1 ∨ m = p
|
||
|
||
theorem not_prime_eq (n : Nat) (H1 : n ≥ 2) (H2 : ¬ prime n) : ∃ m, m | n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n
|
||
:= have H3 : ¬ n ≥ 2 ∨ ¬ (∀ m : Nat, m | n → m = 1 ∨ m = n),
|
||
from (not_and _ _ ◂ H2),
|
||
have H4 : ¬ ¬ n ≥ 2,
|
||
from ((symm (not_not_eq _)) ◂ H1),
|
||
obtain (m : Nat) (H5 : ¬ (m | n → m = 1 ∨ m = n)),
|
||
from (not_forall_elim (resolve1 H3 H4)),
|
||
have H6 : m | n ∧ ¬ (m = 1 ∨ m = n),
|
||
from ((not_implies _ _) ◂ H5),
|
||
have H7 : ¬ (m = 1 ∨ m = n) ↔ (m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n),
|
||
from (not_or (m = 1) (m = n)),
|
||
have H8 : m | n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n,
|
||
from subst H6 H7,
|
||
show ∃ m, m | n ∧ m ≠ 1 ∧ m ≠ n,
|
||
from exists_intro m H8
|