f177082c3b
@avigad and @fpvandoorn, I changed the metaclasses names. They were not uniform: - The plural was used in some cases (e.g., [coercions]). - In other cases a cryptic name was used (e.g., [brs]). Now, I tried to use the attribute name as the metaclass name whenever possible. For example, we write definition foo [coercion] ... definition bla [forward] ... and open [coercion] nat open [forward] nat It is easier to remember and is uniform.
40 lines
851 B
Text
40 lines
851 B
Text
prelude
|
|
precedence `+`:65
|
|
|
|
namespace nat
|
|
constant nat : Type.{1}
|
|
constant add : nat → nat → nat
|
|
infixl + := add
|
|
end nat
|
|
|
|
namespace int
|
|
open nat (nat)
|
|
constant int : Type.{1}
|
|
constant add : int → int → int
|
|
infixl + := add
|
|
constant of_nat : nat → int
|
|
attribute of_nat [coercion]
|
|
end int
|
|
|
|
-- Open "only" the notation and declarations from the namespaces nat and int
|
|
open [notation] nat
|
|
open [notation] int
|
|
open [decl] nat
|
|
open [decl] int
|
|
|
|
constants n m : nat
|
|
constants i j : int
|
|
check n + m
|
|
check i + j
|
|
|
|
-- The following check does not work, since we are not open the coercions
|
|
-- check n + i
|
|
|
|
-- Here is a possible trick for this kind of configuration
|
|
definition add_ni (a : nat) (b : int) := (of_nat a) + b
|
|
definition add_in (a : int) (b : nat) := a + (of_nat b)
|
|
infixl + := add_ni
|
|
infixl + := add_in
|
|
|
|
check i + n
|
|
check n + i
|