4a36f843f7
I changed the definition of pow so that a^(succ n) reduces to a * a^n rather than a^n * a. This has the nice effect that on nat and int, where multiplication is defined by recursion on the right, a^1 reduces to a, and a^2 reduces to a * a. The change was a pain in the neck, and in retrospect maybe not worth it, but oh, well.
106 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
106 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
|
||
|
||
The power function on the natural numbers.
|
||
-/
|
||
import data.nat.basic data.nat.order data.nat.div data.nat.gcd algebra.ring_power
|
||
|
||
namespace nat
|
||
|
||
section migrate_algebra
|
||
open [classes] algebra
|
||
local attribute nat.comm_semiring [instance]
|
||
local attribute nat.decidable_linear_ordered_semiring [instance]
|
||
|
||
definition pow (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := algebra.pow a n
|
||
infix ^ := pow
|
||
|
||
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le {x y : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : x ≤ y) : x^i ≤ y^i :=
|
||
algebra.pow_le_pow_of_le i !zero_le H
|
||
|
||
migrate from algebra with nat
|
||
replacing dvd → dvd, has_le.ge → ge, has_lt.gt → gt, pow → pow
|
||
hiding add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos,
|
||
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_and_eq_zero_of_nonneg_of_nonneg, le_add_of_nonneg_of_le,
|
||
le_add_of_le_of_nonneg, lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt, lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg,
|
||
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left, lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right, pos_of_mul_pos_left, pos_of_mul_pos_right,
|
||
pow_nonneg_of_nonneg
|
||
end migrate_algebra
|
||
|
||
-- generalize to semirings?
|
||
theorem le_pow_self {x : ℕ} (H : x > 1) : ∀ i, i ≤ x^i
|
||
| 0 := !zero_le
|
||
| (succ j) := have x > 0, from lt.trans zero_lt_one H,
|
||
have x^j ≥ 1, from succ_le_of_lt (pow_pos_of_pos _ this),
|
||
have x ≥ 2, from succ_le_of_lt H,
|
||
calc
|
||
succ j = j + 1 : rfl
|
||
... ≤ x^j + 1 : add_le_add_right (le_pow_self j)
|
||
... ≤ x^j + x^j : add_le_add_left `x^j ≥ 1`
|
||
... = x^j * (1 + 1) : by rewrite [mul.left_distrib, *mul_one]
|
||
... = x^j * 2 : rfl
|
||
... ≤ x^j * x : mul_le_mul_left _ `x ≥ 2`
|
||
... = x^(succ j) : pow_succ'
|
||
|
||
-- TODO: eventually this will be subsumed under the algebraic theorems
|
||
|
||
theorem mul_self_eq_pow_2 (a : nat) : a * a = pow a 2 :=
|
||
show a * a = pow a (succ (succ zero)), from
|
||
by rewrite [*pow_succ, *pow_zero, mul_one]
|
||
|
||
theorem pow_cancel_left : ∀ {a b c : nat}, a > 1 → pow a b = pow a c → b = c
|
||
| a 0 0 h₁ h₂ := rfl
|
||
| a (succ b) 0 h₁ h₂ :=
|
||
assert a = 1, by rewrite [pow_succ at h₂, pow_zero at h₂]; exact (eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right h₂),
|
||
assert 1 < 1, by rewrite [this at h₁]; exact h₁,
|
||
absurd `1 < 1` !lt.irrefl
|
||
| a 0 (succ c) h₁ h₂ :=
|
||
assert a = 1, by rewrite [pow_succ at h₂, pow_zero at h₂]; exact (eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_right (eq.symm h₂)),
|
||
assert 1 < 1, by rewrite [this at h₁]; exact h₁,
|
||
absurd `1 < 1` !lt.irrefl
|
||
| a (succ b) (succ c) h₁ h₂ :=
|
||
assert a ≠ 0, from assume aeq0, by rewrite [aeq0 at h₁]; exact (absurd h₁ dec_trivial),
|
||
assert pow a b = pow a c, by rewrite [*pow_succ at h₂]; exact (eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (pos_of_ne_zero this) h₂),
|
||
by rewrite [pow_cancel_left h₁ this]
|
||
|
||
theorem pow_div_cancel : ∀ {a b : nat}, a ≠ 0 → pow a (succ b) div a = pow a b
|
||
| a 0 h := by rewrite [pow_succ, pow_zero, mul_one, div_self (pos_of_ne_zero h)]
|
||
| a (succ b) h := by rewrite [pow_succ, mul_div_cancel_left _ (pos_of_ne_zero h)]
|
||
|
||
lemma dvd_pow : ∀ (i : nat) {n : nat}, n > 0 → i ∣ i^n
|
||
| i 0 h := absurd h !lt.irrefl
|
||
| i (succ n) h := by rewrite [pow_succ']; apply dvd_mul_left
|
||
|
||
lemma dvd_pow_of_dvd_of_pos : ∀ {i j n : nat}, i ∣ j → n > 0 → i ∣ j^n
|
||
| i j 0 h₁ h₂ := absurd h₂ !lt.irrefl
|
||
| i j (succ n) h₁ h₂ := by rewrite [pow_succ']; apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h₁
|
||
|
||
lemma pow_mod_eq_zero (i : nat) {n : nat} (h : n > 0) : (i^n) mod i = 0 :=
|
||
iff.mp !dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero (dvd_pow i h)
|
||
|
||
lemma pow_dvd_of_pow_succ_dvd {p i n : nat} : p^(succ i) ∣ n → p^i ∣ n :=
|
||
suppose p^(succ i) ∣ n,
|
||
assert p^i ∣ p^(succ i), from by rewrite [pow_succ']; apply dvd_of_eq_mul; apply rfl,
|
||
dvd.trans `p^i ∣ p^(succ i)` `p^(succ i) ∣ n`
|
||
|
||
lemma dvd_of_pow_succ_dvd_mul_pow {p i n : nat} (Ppos : p > 0) :
|
||
p^(succ i) ∣ (n * p^i) → p ∣ n :=
|
||
by rewrite [pow_succ]; apply dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right; apply pow_pos_of_pos _ Ppos
|
||
|
||
lemma coprime_pow_right {a b} : ∀ n, coprime b a → coprime b (a^n)
|
||
| 0 h := !comprime_one_right
|
||
| (succ n) h :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rewrite [pow_succ'],
|
||
apply coprime_mul_right,
|
||
exact coprime_pow_right n h,
|
||
exact h
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
lemma coprime_pow_left {a b} : ∀ n, coprime b a → coprime (b^n) a :=
|
||
take n, suppose coprime b a,
|
||
coprime_swap (coprime_pow_right n (coprime_swap this))
|
||
|
||
end nat
|