110 lines
4.3 KiB
Text
110 lines
4.3 KiB
Text
-- Copyright (c) 2014 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
|
||
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
-- Authors: Jakob von Raumer
|
||
-- Ported from Coq HoTT
|
||
import hott.path hott.trunc hott.equiv hott.axioms.funext
|
||
|
||
open path truncation sigma function
|
||
|
||
/- In hott.axioms.funext, we defined function extensionality to be the assertion
|
||
that the map apD10 is an equivalence. We now prove that this follows
|
||
from a couple of weaker-looking forms of function extensionality. We do
|
||
require eta conversion, which Coq 8.4+ has judgmentally.
|
||
|
||
This proof is originally due to Voevodsky; it has since been simplified
|
||
by Peter Lumsdaine and Michael Shulman. -/
|
||
|
||
-- Naive funext is the simple assertion that pointwise equal functions are equal.
|
||
-- TODO think about universe levels
|
||
definition naive_funext :=
|
||
Π {A : Type} {P : A → Type} (f g : Πx, P x), (f ∼ g) → f ≈ g
|
||
|
||
-- Weak funext says that a product of contractible types is contractible.
|
||
definition weak_funext.{l k} :=
|
||
Π {A : Type.{l}} (P : A → Type.{k}) [H: Πx, is_contr (P x)], is_contr (Πx, P x)
|
||
|
||
-- The obvious implications are Funext -> NaiveFunext -> WeakFunext
|
||
-- TODO: Get class inference to work locally
|
||
definition funext_implies_naive_funext [F : funext] : naive_funext :=
|
||
(λ A P f g h,
|
||
have Fefg: IsEquiv (@apD10 A P f g),
|
||
from (@funext.ap F A P f g),
|
||
have eq1 : _, from (@IsEquiv.inv _ _ (@apD10 A P f g) Fefg h),
|
||
eq1
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
definition naive_funext_implies_weak_funext : naive_funext → weak_funext :=
|
||
(λ nf A P (Pc : Πx, is_contr (P x)),
|
||
let c := λx, center (P x) in
|
||
is_contr.mk c (λ f,
|
||
have eq' : (λx, center (P x)) ∼ f,
|
||
from (λx, contr (f x)),
|
||
have eq : (λx, center (P x)) ≈ f,
|
||
from nf A P (λx, center (P x)) f eq',
|
||
eq
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
/- The less obvious direction is that WeakFunext implies Funext
|
||
(and hence all three are logically equivalent). The point is that under weak
|
||
funext, the space of "pointwise homotopies" has the same universal property as
|
||
the space of paths. -/
|
||
|
||
context
|
||
universes l k
|
||
parameters (wf : weak_funext.{l+1 k+1}) {A : Type.{l+1}} {B : A → Type.{k+1}} (f : Π x, B x)
|
||
|
||
protected definition idhtpy : f ∼ f := (λ x, idp)
|
||
|
||
definition contr_basedhtpy [instance] : is_contr (Σ (g : Π x, B x), f ∼ g) :=
|
||
is_contr.mk (dpair f idhtpy)
|
||
(λ dp, sigma.rec_on dp
|
||
(λ (g : Π x, B x) (h : f ∼ g),
|
||
let r := λ (k : Π x, Σ y, f x ≈ y),
|
||
@dpair _ (λg, f ∼ g)
|
||
(λx, dpr1 (k x)) (λx, dpr2 (k x)) in
|
||
let s := λ g h x, @dpair _ (λy, f x ≈ y) (g x) (h x) in
|
||
have t1 : Πx, is_contr (Σ y, f x ≈ y),
|
||
from (λx, !contr_basedpaths),
|
||
have t2 : is_contr (Πx, Σ y, f x ≈ y),
|
||
from !wf,
|
||
have t3 : (λ x, @dpair _ (λ y, f x ≈ y) (f x) idp) ≈ s g h,
|
||
from @path_contr (Π x, Σ y, f x ≈ y) t2 _ _,
|
||
have t4 : r (λ x, dpair (f x) idp) ≈ r (s g h),
|
||
from ap r t3,
|
||
have endt : dpair f idhtpy ≈ dpair g h,
|
||
from t4,
|
||
endt
|
||
)
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
parameters (Q : Π g (h : f ∼ g), Type) (d : Q f idhtpy)
|
||
|
||
definition htpy_ind (g : Πx, B x) (h : f ∼ g) : Q g h :=
|
||
@transport _ (λ gh, Q (dpr1 gh) (dpr2 gh)) (dpair f idhtpy) (dpair g h)
|
||
(@path_contr _ contr_basedhtpy _ _) d
|
||
|
||
definition htpy_ind_beta : htpy_ind f idhtpy ≈ d :=
|
||
(@path2_contr _ _ _ _ !path_contr idp)⁻¹ ▹ idp
|
||
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
-- Now the proof is fairly easy; we can just use the same induction principle on both sides.
|
||
universe variables l k
|
||
|
||
theorem weak_funext_implies_funext (wf : weak_funext.{l+1 k+1}) : funext.{l+1 k+1} :=
|
||
funext.mk (λ A B f g,
|
||
let eq_to_f := (λ g' x, f ≈ g') in
|
||
let sim2path := htpy_ind _ f eq_to_f idp in
|
||
have t1 : sim2path f (idhtpy f) ≈ idp,
|
||
proof htpy_ind_beta _ f eq_to_f idp qed,
|
||
have t2 : apD10 (sim2path f (idhtpy f)) ≈ (idhtpy f),
|
||
proof ap apD10 t1 qed,
|
||
have sect : Sect (sim2path g) apD10,
|
||
proof (htpy_ind _ f (λ g' x, apD10 (sim2path g' x) ≈ x) t2) g qed,
|
||
have retr : Sect apD10 (sim2path g),
|
||
from (λ h, path.rec_on h (htpy_ind_beta _ f _ idp)),
|
||
IsEquiv.adjointify apD10 (sim2path g) sect retr)
|
||
|
||
definition naive_funext_implies_funext : naive_funext -> funext :=
|
||
compose weak_funext_implies_funext naive_funext_implies_weak_funext
|