lean2/hott/algebra/category/limits/colimits.hlean
2016-02-22 11:15:38 -08:00

332 lines
13 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
Colimits in a category
-/
import .limits ..constructions.opposite
open is_trunc functor nat_trans eq
-- we define colimits to be the dual of a limit
namespace category
variables {ob : Type} [C : precategory ob] {c c' : ob} (D I : Precategory)
include C
definition is_initial [reducible] (c : ob) := @is_terminal _ (opposite C) c
definition is_contr_of_is_initial (c d : ob) [H : is_initial d]
: is_contr (d ⟶ c) :=
H c
local attribute is_contr_of_is_initial [instance]
definition initial_morphism (c c' : ob) [H : is_initial c'] : c' ⟶ c :=
!center
definition hom_initial_eq [H : is_initial c'] (f f' : c' ⟶ c) : f = f' :=
!is_prop.elim
definition eq_initial_morphism [H : is_initial c'] (f : c' ⟶ c) : f = initial_morphism c c' :=
!is_prop.elim
definition initial_iso_initial {c c' : ob} (H : is_initial c) (K : is_initial c') : c ≅ c' :=
iso_of_opposite_iso (@terminal_iso_terminal _ (opposite C) _ _ H K)
theorem is_prop_is_initial [instance] : is_prop (is_initial c) := _
omit C
definition has_initial_object [reducible] : Type := has_terminal_object Dᵒᵖ
definition initial_object [unfold 2] [reducible] [H : has_initial_object D] : D :=
has_terminal_object.d Dᵒᵖ
definition has_initial_object.is_initial [H : has_initial_object D]
: is_initial (initial_object D) :=
@has_terminal_object.is_terminal (Opposite D) H
variable {D}
definition initial_object_iso_initial_object (H₁ H₂ : has_initial_object D)
: @initial_object D H₁ ≅ @initial_object D H₂ :=
initial_iso_initial (@has_initial_object.is_initial D H₁) (@has_initial_object.is_initial D H₂)
set_option pp.coercions true
theorem is_prop_has_initial_object [instance] (D : Category)
: is_prop (has_initial_object D) :=
is_prop_has_terminal_object (Category_opposite D)
variable (D)
abbreviation has_colimits_of_shape := has_limits_of_shape Dᵒᵖ Iᵒᵖ
/-
The next definitions states that a category is cocomplete with respect to diagrams
in a certain universe. "is_cocomplete.{o₁ h₁ o₂ h₂}" means that D is cocomplete
with respect to diagrams of type Precategory.{o₂ h₂}
-/
abbreviation is_cocomplete (D : Precategory) := is_complete Dᵒᵖ
definition has_colimits_of_shape_of_is_cocomplete [instance] [H : is_cocomplete D]
(I : Precategory) : has_colimits_of_shape D I := H Iᵒᵖ
section
open pi
theorem is_prop_has_colimits_of_shape [instance] (D : Category) (I : Precategory)
: is_prop (has_colimits_of_shape D I) :=
is_prop_has_limits_of_shape (Category_opposite D) _
theorem is_prop_is_cocomplete [instance] (D : Category) : is_prop (is_cocomplete D) :=
is_prop_is_complete (Category_opposite D)
end
variables {D I} (F : I ⇒ D) [H : has_colimits_of_shape D I] {i j : I}
include H
abbreviation cocone := (cone Fᵒᵖᶠ)ᵒᵖ
definition has_initial_object_cocone [H : has_colimits_of_shape D I]
(F : I ⇒ D) : has_initial_object (cocone F) :=
begin
unfold [has_colimits_of_shape,has_limits_of_shape] at H,
exact H Fᵒᵖᶠ
end
local attribute has_initial_object_cocone [instance]
definition colimit_cocone : cocone F := limit_cone Fᵒᵖᶠ
definition is_initial_colimit_cocone [instance] : is_initial (colimit_cocone F) :=
is_terminal_limit_cone Fᵒᵖᶠ
definition colimit_object : D :=
limit_object Fᵒᵖᶠ
definition colimit_nat_trans : constant_functor Iᵒᵖ (colimit_object F) ⟹ Fᵒᵖᶠ :=
limit_nat_trans Fᵒᵖᶠ
definition colimit_morphism (i : I) : F i ⟶ colimit_object F :=
limit_morphism Fᵒᵖᶠ i
variable {H}
theorem colimit_commute {i j : I} (f : i ⟶ j)
: colimit_morphism F j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = colimit_morphism F i :=
by rexact limit_commute Fᵒᵖᶠ f
variable [H]
definition colimit_cone_obj [constructor] {d : D} {η : Πi, F i ⟶ d}
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i) : cone_obj Fᵒᵖᶠ :=
limit_cone_obj Fᵒᵖᶠ proof p qed
variable {H}
definition colimit_hom {d : D} (η : Πi, F i ⟶ d)
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i) : colimit_object F ⟶ d :=
hom_limit Fᵒᵖᶠ η proof p qed
theorem colimit_hom_commute {d : D} (η : Πi, F i ⟶ d)
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i) (i : I)
: colimit_hom F η p ∘ colimit_morphism F i = η i :=
by rexact hom_limit_commute Fᵒᵖᶠ η proof p qed i
definition colimit_cone_hom [constructor] {d : D} {η : Πi, F i ⟶ d}
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i) {h : colimit_object F ⟶ d}
(q : Πi, h ∘ colimit_morphism F i = η i)
: cone_hom (colimit_cone_obj F p) (colimit_cocone F) :=
by rexact limit_cone_hom Fᵒᵖᶠ proof p qed proof q qed
variable {F}
theorem eq_colimit_hom {d : D} {η : Πi, F i ⟶ d}
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i) {h : colimit_object F ⟶ d}
(q : Πi, h ∘ colimit_morphism F i = η i) : h = colimit_hom F η p :=
by rexact @eq_hom_limit _ _ Fᵒᵖᶠ _ _ _ proof p qed _ proof q qed
theorem colimit_cocone_unique {d : D} {η : Πi, F i ⟶ d}
(p : Π⦃j i : I⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), η j ∘ to_fun_hom F f = η i)
{h₁ : colimit_object F ⟶ d} (q₁ : Πi, h₁ ∘ colimit_morphism F i = η i)
{h₂ : colimit_object F ⟶ d} (q₂ : Πi, h₂ ∘ colimit_morphism F i = η i) : h₁ = h₂ :=
@limit_cone_unique _ _ Fᵒᵖᶠ _ _ _ proof p qed _ proof q₁ qed _ proof q₂ qed
definition colimit_hom_colimit [reducible] {F G : I ⇒ D} (η : F ⟹ G)
: colimit_object F ⟶ colimit_object G :=
colimit_hom _ (λi, colimit_morphism G i ∘ η i)
abstract by intro i j f; rewrite [-assoc,-naturality,assoc,colimit_commute] end
omit H
variable (F)
definition colimit_object_iso_colimit_object [constructor] (H₁ H₂ : has_colimits_of_shape D I) :
@(colimit_object F) H₁ ≅ @(colimit_object F) H₂ :=
iso_of_opposite_iso (limit_object_iso_limit_object Fᵒᵖᶠ H₁ H₂)
definition colimit_functor [constructor] (D I : Precategory) [H : has_colimits_of_shape D I]
: D ^c I ⇒ D :=
(limit_functor Dᵒᵖ Iᵒᵖ ∘f opposite_functor_opposite_left D I)ᵒᵖ'
section bin_coproducts
open bool prod.ops
definition has_binary_coproducts [reducible] (D : Precategory) := has_colimits_of_shape D c2
variables [K : has_binary_coproducts D] (d d' : D)
include K
definition coproduct_object : D :=
colimit_object (c2_functor D d d')
infixr `+l`:27 := coproduct_object
local infixr + := coproduct_object
definition inl : d ⟶ d + d' :=
colimit_morphism (c2_functor D d d') ff
definition inr : d' ⟶ d + d' :=
colimit_morphism (c2_functor D d d') tt
variables {d d'}
definition coproduct_hom {x : D} (f : d ⟶ x) (g : d' ⟶ x) : d + d' ⟶ x :=
colimit_hom (c2_functor D d d') (bool.rec f g)
(by intro b₁ b₂ f; induction b₁: induction b₂: esimp at *; try contradiction: apply id_right)
theorem coproduct_hom_inl {x : D} (f : d ⟶ x) (g : d' ⟶ x) : coproduct_hom f g ∘ !inl = f :=
colimit_hom_commute (c2_functor D d d') (bool.rec f g) _ ff
theorem coproduct_hom_inr {x : D} (f : d ⟶ x) (g : d' ⟶ x) : coproduct_hom f g ∘ !inr = g :=
colimit_hom_commute (c2_functor D d d') (bool.rec f g) _ tt
theorem eq_coproduct_hom {x : D} {f : d ⟶ x} {g : d' ⟶ x} {h : d + d' ⟶ x}
(p : h ∘ !inl = f) (q : h ∘ !inr = g) : h = coproduct_hom f g :=
eq_colimit_hom _ (bool.rec p q)
theorem coproduct_cocone_unique {x : D} {f : d ⟶ x} {g : d' ⟶ x}
{h₁ : d + d' ⟶ x} (p₁ : h₁ ∘ !inl = f) (q₁ : h₁ ∘ !inr = g)
{h₂ : d + d' ⟶ x} (p₂ : h₂ ∘ !inl = f) (q₂ : h₂ ∘ !inr = g) : h₁ = h₂ :=
eq_coproduct_hom p₁ q₁ ⬝ (eq_coproduct_hom p₂ q₂)⁻¹
variable (D)
-- TODO: define this in terms of colimit_functor and functor_two_left (in exponential_laws)
definition coproduct_functor [constructor] : D ×c D ⇒ D :=
functor.mk
(λx, coproduct_object x.1 x.2)
(λx y f, coproduct_hom (!inl ∘ f.1) (!inr ∘ f.2))
abstract begin intro x, symmetry, apply eq_coproduct_hom: apply id_comp_eq_comp_id end end
abstract begin intro x y z g f, symmetry, apply eq_coproduct_hom,
rewrite [-assoc,coproduct_hom_inl,assoc,coproduct_hom_inl,-assoc],
rewrite [-assoc,coproduct_hom_inr,assoc,coproduct_hom_inr,-assoc] end end
omit K
variables {D} (d d')
definition coproduct_object_iso_coproduct_object [constructor] (H₁ H₂ : has_binary_coproducts D) :
@coproduct_object D H₁ d d' ≅ @coproduct_object D H₂ d d' :=
colimit_object_iso_colimit_object _ H₁ H₂
end bin_coproducts
/-
intentionally we define coproducts in terms of colimits,
but coequalizers in terms of equalizers, to see which characterization is more useful
-/
section coequalizers
open bool prod.ops sum equalizer_category_hom
definition has_coequalizers [reducible] (D : Precategory) := has_equalizers Dᵒᵖ
variables [K : has_coequalizers D]
include K
variables {d d' x : D} (f g : d ⟶ d')
definition coequalizer_object : D :=
!(@equalizer_object Dᵒᵖ) f g
definition coequalizer : d' ⟶ coequalizer_object f g :=
!(@equalizer Dᵒᵖ)
theorem coequalizes : coequalizer f g ∘ f = coequalizer f g ∘ g :=
by rexact !(@equalizes Dᵒᵖ)
variables {f g}
definition coequalizer_hom (h : d' ⟶ x) (p : h ∘ f = h ∘ g) : coequalizer_object f g ⟶ x :=
!(@hom_equalizer Dᵒᵖ) proof p qed
theorem coequalizer_hom_coequalizer (h : d' ⟶ x) (p : h ∘ f = h ∘ g)
: coequalizer_hom h p ∘ coequalizer f g = h :=
by rexact !(@equalizer_hom_equalizer Dᵒᵖ)
theorem eq_coequalizer_hom {h : d' ⟶ x} (p : h ∘ f = h ∘ g) {i : coequalizer_object f g ⟶ x}
(q : i ∘ coequalizer f g = h) : i = coequalizer_hom h p :=
by rexact !(@eq_hom_equalizer Dᵒᵖ) proof q qed
theorem coequalizer_cocone_unique {h : d' ⟶ x} (p : h ∘ f = h ∘ g)
{i₁ : coequalizer_object f g ⟶ x} (q₁ : i₁ ∘ coequalizer f g = h)
{i₂ : coequalizer_object f g ⟶ x} (q₂ : i₂ ∘ coequalizer f g = h) : i₁ = i₂ :=
!(@equalizer_cone_unique Dᵒᵖ) proof p qed proof q₁ qed proof q₂ qed
omit K
variables (f g)
definition coequalizer_object_iso_coequalizer_object [constructor] (H₁ H₂ : has_coequalizers D) :
@coequalizer_object D H₁ _ _ f g ≅ @coequalizer_object D H₂ _ _ f g :=
iso_of_opposite_iso !(@equalizer_object_iso_equalizer_object Dᵒᵖ)
end coequalizers
section pushouts
open bool prod.ops sum pullback_category_hom
definition has_pushouts [reducible] (D : Precategory) := has_pullbacks Dᵒᵖ
variables [K : has_pushouts D]
include K
variables {d₁ d₂ d₃ x : D} (f : d₁ ⟶ d₂) (g : d₁ ⟶ d₃)
definition pushout_object : D :=
!(@pullback_object Dᵒᵖ) f g
definition pushout : d₃ ⟶ pushout_object f g :=
!(@pullback Dᵒᵖ)
definition pushout_rev : d₂ ⟶ pushout_object f g :=
!(@pullback_rev Dᵒᵖ)
theorem pushout_commutes : pushout_rev f g ∘ f = pushout f g ∘ g :=
by rexact !(@pullback_commutes Dᵒᵖ)
variables {f g}
definition pushout_hom (h₁ : d₂ ⟶ x) (h₂ : d₃ ⟶ x) (p : h₁ ∘ f = h₂ ∘ g)
: pushout_object f g ⟶ x :=
!(@hom_pullback Dᵒᵖ) proof p qed
theorem pushout_hom_pushout (h₁ : d₂ ⟶ x) (h₂ : d₃ ⟶ x) (p : h₁ ∘ f = h₂ ∘ g)
: pushout_hom h₁ h₂ p ∘ pushout f g = h₂ :=
by rexact !(@pullback_hom_pullback Dᵒᵖ)
theorem pushout_hom_pushout_rev (h₁ : d₂ ⟶ x) (h₂ : d₃ ⟶ x) (p : h₁ ∘ f = h₂ ∘ g)
: pushout_hom h₁ h₂ p ∘ pushout_rev f g = h₁ :=
by rexact !(@pullback_rev_hom_pullback Dᵒᵖ)
theorem eq_pushout_hom {h₁ : d₂ ⟶ x} {h₂ : d₃ ⟶ x} (p : h₁ ∘ f = h₂ ∘ g)
{i : pushout_object f g ⟶ x} (q : i ∘ pushout f g = h₂) (r : i ∘ pushout_rev f g = h₁)
: i = pushout_hom h₁ h₂ p :=
by rexact !(@eq_hom_pullback Dᵒᵖ) proof q qed proof r qed
theorem pushout_cocone_unique {h₁ : d₂ ⟶ x} {h₂ : d₃ ⟶ x} (p : h₁ ∘ f = h₂ ∘ g)
{i₁ : pushout_object f g ⟶ x} (q₁ : i₁ ∘ pushout f g = h₂) (r₁ : i₁ ∘ pushout_rev f g = h₁)
{i₂ : pushout_object f g ⟶ x} (q₂ : i₂ ∘ pushout f g = h₂) (r₂ : i₂ ∘ pushout_rev f g = h₁)
: i₁ = i₂ :=
!(@pullback_cone_unique Dᵒᵖ) proof p qed proof q₁ qed proof r₁ qed proof q₂ qed proof r₂ qed
omit K
variables (f g)
definition pushout_object_iso_pushout_object [constructor] (H₁ H₂ : has_pushouts D) :
@pushout_object D H₁ _ _ _ f g ≅ @pushout_object D H₂ _ _ _ f g :=
iso_of_opposite_iso !(@pullback_object_iso_pullback_object (Opposite D))
end pushouts
definition has_limits_of_shape_op_op [H : has_limits_of_shape D Iᵒᵖᵒᵖ]
: has_limits_of_shape D I :=
by induction I with I Is; induction Is; exact H
namespace ops
infixr + := coproduct_object
end ops
end category