lean2/hott/types/fin.hlean
2018-09-11 19:25:32 +02:00

628 lines
22 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Haitao Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Haitao Zhang, Leonardo de Moura, Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Finite ordinal types.
-/
import types.list algebra.bundled function logic types.prod types.sum types.nat.div
open eq function list equiv is_trunc algebra sigma sum nat
structure fin (n : nat) := (val : nat) (is_lt : val < n)
definition less_than [reducible] := fin
namespace fin
attribute fin.val [coercion]
section def_equal
variable {n : nat}
protected definition sigma_char : fin n ≃ Σ (val : nat), val < n :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
intro i, cases i with i ilt, apply dpair i ilt,
intro s, cases s with i ilt, apply fin.mk i ilt,
intro s, cases s with i ilt, reflexivity,
intro i, cases i with i ilt, reflexivity
end
definition is_set_fin [instance] : is_set (fin n) :=
begin
assert H : Πa, is_set (a < n), exact _,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev 0 !fin.sigma_char _,
end
definition eq_of_veq : Π {i j : fin n}, (val i) = j → i = j :=
begin
intro i j, cases i with i ilt, cases j with j jlt, esimp,
intro p, induction p, apply ap (mk i), apply !is_prop.elim
end
definition fin_eq := @eq_of_veq
definition eq_of_veq_refl (i : fin n) : eq_of_veq (refl (val i)) = idp :=
!is_prop.elim
definition veq_of_eq : Π {i j : fin n}, i = j → (val i) = j :=
by intro i j P; apply ap val; exact P
definition eq_iff_veq {i j : fin n} : (val i) = j ↔ i = j :=
pair eq_of_veq veq_of_eq
definition val_inj := @eq_of_veq n
end def_equal
section decidable
open decidable
protected definition has_decidable_eq [instance] (n : nat) :
Π (i j : fin n), decidable (i = j) :=
begin
intros i j, apply decidable_of_decidable_of_iff,
apply nat.has_decidable_eq i j, apply eq_iff_veq,
end
end decidable
/-lemma dinj_lt (n : nat) : dinj (λ i, i < n) fin.mk :=
take a1 a2 Pa1 Pa2 Pmkeq, fin.no_confusion Pmkeq (λ Pe Pqe, Pe)
lemma val_mk (n i : nat) (Plt : i < n) : fin.val (fin.mk i Plt) = i := rfl
definition upto [reducible] (n : nat) : list (fin n) :=
dmap (λ i, i < n) fin.mk (list.upto n)
lemma nodup_upto (n : nat) : nodup (upto n) :=
dmap_nodup_of_dinj (dinj_lt n) (list.nodup_upto n)
lemma mem_upto (n : nat) : Π (i : fin n), i ∈ upto n :=
take i, fin.destruct i
(take ival Piltn,
have ival ∈ list.upto n, from mem_upto_of_lt Piltn,
mem_dmap Piltn this)
lemma upto_zero : upto 0 = [] :=
by rewrite [↑upto, list.upto_nil, dmap_nil]
lemma map_val_upto (n : nat) : map fin.val (upto n) = list.upto n :=
map_dmap_of_inv_of_pos (val_mk n) (@lt_of_mem_upto n)
lemma length_upto (n : nat) : length (upto n) = n :=
calc
length (upto n) = length (list.upto n) : (map_val_upto n ▸ length_map fin.val (upto n))⁻¹
... = n : list.length_upto n
definition is_fintype [instance] (n : nat) : fintype (fin n) :=
fintype.mk (upto n) (nodup_upto n) (mem_upto n)
section pigeonhole
open fintype
lemma card_fin (n : nat) : card (fin n) = n := length_upto n
theorem pigeonhole {n m : nat} (Pmltn : m < n) : ¬Σ f : fin n → fin m, injective f :=
assume Pex, absurd Pmltn (not_lt_of_ge
(calc
n = card (fin n) : card_fin
... ≤ card (fin m) : card_le_of_inj (fin n) (fin m) Pex
... = m : card_fin))
end pigeonhole-/
protected definition zero [constructor] (n : nat) : fin (succ n) :=
mk 0 !zero_lt_succ
definition fin_has_zero [instance] (n : nat) : has_zero (fin (succ n)) :=
has_zero.mk (fin.zero n)
definition val_zero (n : nat) : val (0 : fin (succ n)) = 0 := rfl
definition mk_mod [reducible] (n i : nat) : fin (succ n) :=
mk (i % (succ n)) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
theorem mk_mod_zero_eq (n : nat) : mk_mod n 0 = 0 :=
apd011 fin.mk rfl !is_prop.elimo
variable {n : nat}
theorem val_lt : Π i : fin n, val i < n
| (mk v h) := h
lemma max_lt (i j : fin n) : max i j < n :=
max_lt (is_lt i) (is_lt j)
definition lift [constructor] (x : fin n) (m : ) : fin (n + m) :=
fin.mk x (lt_add_of_lt_right (is_lt x) m)
definition lift_succ [constructor] ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (x : fin n) : fin (nat.succ n) :=
fin.mk x (le.step (is_lt x))
definition maxi [reducible] : fin (succ n) :=
mk n !lt_succ_self
definition val_lift : Π (i : fin n) (m : nat), val i = val (lift i m)
| (mk v h) m := rfl
lemma mk_succ_ne_zero {i : nat} : Π {P}, mk (succ i) P ≠ (0 : fin (succ n)) :=
assume P Pe, absurd (veq_of_eq Pe) !succ_ne_zero
lemma mk_mod_eq {i : fin (succ n)} : i = mk_mod n i :=
eq_of_veq begin rewrite [↑mk_mod, mod_eq_of_lt !is_lt] end
lemma mk_mod_of_lt {i : nat} (Plt : i < succ n) : mk_mod n i = mk i Plt :=
begin esimp [mk_mod], congruence, exact mod_eq_of_lt Plt end
section lift_lower
lemma lift_zero : lift_succ (0 : fin (succ n)) = (0 : fin (succ (succ n))) :=
by apply eq_of_veq; reflexivity
lemma ne_max_of_lt_max {i : fin (succ n)} : i < n → i ≠ maxi :=
begin
intro hlt he,
have he' : maxi = i, by apply he⁻¹,
induction he', apply nat.lt_irrefl n hlt,
end
lemma lt_max_of_ne_max {i : fin (succ n)} : i ≠ maxi → i < n :=
assume hne : i ≠ maxi,
have vne : val i ≠ n, from
assume he,
have val (@maxi n) = n, from rfl,
have val i = val (@maxi n), from he ⬝ this⁻¹,
absurd (eq_of_veq this) hne,
have val i < nat.succ n, from val_lt i,
lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_lt_succ this) vne
lemma lift_succ_ne_max {i : fin n} : lift_succ i ≠ maxi :=
begin
cases i with v hlt, esimp [lift_succ, lift, max], intro he,
injection he, substvars,
exact absurd hlt (lt.irrefl v)
end
lemma lift_succ_inj [instance] : is_embedding (@lift_succ n) :=
begin
apply is_embedding_of_is_injective, intro i j,
induction i with iv ilt, induction j with jv jlt, intro Pmkeq,
apply eq_of_veq, apply veq_of_eq Pmkeq
end
definition lt_of_inj_of_max (f : fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) :
is_embedding f → (f maxi = maxi) → Π i : fin (succ n), i < n → f i < n :=
assume Pinj Peq, take i, assume Pilt,
have P1 : f i = f maxi → i = maxi, from assume Peq, is_injective_of_is_embedding Peq,
have f i ≠ maxi, from
begin rewrite -Peq, intro P2, apply absurd (P1 P2) (ne_max_of_lt_max Pilt) end,
lt_max_of_ne_max this
definition lift_fun : (fin n → fin n) → (fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) :=
λ f i, dite (i = maxi) (λ Pe, maxi) (λ Pne, lift_succ (f (mk i (lt_max_of_ne_max Pne))))
definition lower_inj (f : fin (succ n) → fin (succ n)) (inj : is_embedding f) :
f maxi = maxi → fin n → fin n :=
assume Peq, take i, mk (f (lift_succ i)) (lt_of_inj_of_max f inj Peq (lift_succ i) (lt_max_of_ne_max lift_succ_ne_max))
lemma lift_fun_max {f : fin n → fin n} : lift_fun f maxi = maxi :=
begin rewrite [↑lift_fun, dif_pos rfl] end
lemma lift_fun_of_ne_max {f : fin n → fin n} {i} (Pne : i ≠ maxi) :
lift_fun f i = lift_succ (f (mk i (lt_max_of_ne_max Pne))) :=
begin rewrite [↑lift_fun, dif_neg Pne] end
lemma lift_fun_eq {f : fin n → fin n} {i : fin n} :
lift_fun f (lift_succ i) = lift_succ (f i) :=
begin
rewrite [lift_fun_of_ne_max lift_succ_ne_max], do 2 congruence,
apply eq_of_veq, reflexivity
end
lemma lift_fun_of_inj {f : fin n → fin n} : is_embedding f → is_embedding (lift_fun f) :=
begin
intro Pemb, apply is_embedding_of_is_injective, intro i j,
have Pdi : decidable (i = maxi), by apply _,
have Pdj : decidable (j = maxi), by apply _,
cases Pdi with Pimax Pinmax,
cases Pdj with Pjmax Pjnmax,
substvars, intros, reflexivity,
substvars, rewrite [lift_fun_max, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pjnmax],
intro Plmax, apply absurd Plmax⁻¹ lift_succ_ne_max,
cases Pdj with Pjmax Pjnmax,
substvars, rewrite [lift_fun_max, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pinmax],
intro Plmax, apply absurd Plmax lift_succ_ne_max,
rewrite [lift_fun_of_ne_max Pinmax, lift_fun_of_ne_max Pjnmax],
intro Peq, apply eq_of_veq,
cases i with i ilt, cases j with j jlt, esimp at *,
fapply veq_of_eq, apply @is_injective_of_is_embedding _ _ f,
apply @is_injective_of_is_embedding _ _ (@lift_succ _) _ _ _ Peq,
end
lemma lift_fun_inj : is_embedding (@lift_fun n) :=
begin
apply is_embedding_of_is_injective, intro f f' Peq, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro i,
have H : lift_fun f (lift_succ i) = lift_fun f' (lift_succ i), by apply congr_fun Peq _,
revert H, rewrite [*lift_fun_eq], apply is_injective_of_is_embedding,
end
lemma lower_inj_apply {f Pinj Pmax} (i : fin n) :
val (lower_inj f Pinj Pmax i) = val (f (lift_succ i)) :=
by rewrite [↑lower_inj]
end lift_lower
section madd
definition madd (i j : fin (succ n)) : fin (succ n) :=
mk ((i + j) % (succ n)) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
definition minv : Π i : fin (succ n), fin (succ n)
| (mk iv ilt) := mk ((succ n - iv) % succ n) (mod_lt _ !zero_lt_succ)
lemma val_madd : Π i j : fin (succ n), val (madd i j) = (i + j) % (succ n)
| (mk iv ilt) (mk jv jlt) := by esimp
lemma madd_inj : Π {i : fin (succ n)}, is_embedding (madd i)
| (mk iv ilt) := is_embedding_of_is_injective
(take j₁ j₂, fin.destruct j₁ (fin.destruct j₂ (λ jv₁ jlt₁ jv₂ jlt₂, begin
rewrite [↑madd],
intro Peq', note Peq := ap val Peq', congruence,
rewrite [-(mod_eq_of_lt jlt₁), -(mod_eq_of_lt jlt₂)],
apply mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_left Peq
end)))
lemma madd_mk_mod {i j : nat} : madd (mk_mod n i) (mk_mod n j) = mk_mod n (i+j) :=
eq_of_veq begin esimp [madd, mk_mod], rewrite [ mod_add_mod, add_mod_mod ] end
lemma val_mod : Π i : fin (succ n), (val i) % (succ n) = val i
| (mk iv ilt) := by esimp; rewrite [(mod_eq_of_lt ilt)]
lemma madd_comm (i j : fin (succ n)) : madd i j = madd j i :=
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [*val_madd, add.comm (val i)]
lemma zero_madd (i : fin (succ n)) : madd 0 i = i :=
have H : madd (fin.zero n) i = i,
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [val_madd, ↑fin.zero, nat.zero_add, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt i)],
H
lemma madd_zero (i : fin (succ n)) : madd i (fin.zero n) = i :=
!madd_comm ▸ zero_madd i
lemma madd_assoc (i j k : fin (succ n)) : madd (madd i j) k = madd i (madd j k) :=
by apply eq_of_veq; rewrite [*val_madd, mod_add_mod, add_mod_mod, add.assoc (val i)]
lemma madd_left_inv : Π i : fin (succ n), madd (minv i) i = fin.zero n
| (mk iv ilt) := eq_of_veq (by
rewrite [val_madd, ↑minv, mod_add_mod, nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt ilt), mod_self])
definition madd_is_ab_group [instance] : add_ab_group (fin (succ n)) :=
ab_group.mk _ madd madd_assoc (fin.zero n) zero_madd madd_zero minv madd_left_inv madd_comm
definition gfin (n : ) [H : is_succ n] : AddAbGroup.{0} :=
by induction H with n; exact AddAbGroup.mk (fin (succ n)) _
end madd
definition pred [constructor] : fin n → fin n
| (mk v h) := mk (nat.pred v) (pre_lt_of_lt h)
lemma val_pred : Π (i : fin n), val (pred i) = nat.pred (val i)
| (mk v h) := rfl
lemma pred_zero : pred (fin.zero n) = fin.zero n :=
begin
induction n, reflexivity, apply eq_of_veq, reflexivity,
end
definition mk_pred (i : nat) (h : succ i < succ n) : fin n :=
mk i (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
definition succ : fin n → fin (succ n)
| (mk v h) := mk (nat.succ v) (succ_lt_succ h)
lemma val_succ : Π (i : fin n), val (succ i) = nat.succ (val i)
| (mk v h) := rfl
lemma succ_max : fin.succ maxi = (@maxi (nat.succ n)) := rfl
lemma lift_succ.comm : @lift_succ _ ∘ (@succ n) = succ ∘ @lift_succ _ :=
eq_of_homotopy take i,
eq_of_veq (begin rewrite [↑lift_succ, *val_succ] end)
definition elim0 {C : fin 0 → Type} : Π i : fin 0, C i
| (mk v h) := absurd h !not_lt_zero
definition zero_succ_cases {C : fin (nat.succ n) → Type} :
C (fin.zero n) → (Π j : fin n, C (succ j)) → (Π k : fin (nat.succ n), C k) :=
begin
intros CO CS k,
induction k with [vk, pk],
induction (nat.decidable_lt 0 vk) with [HT, HF],
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
let vj := nat.pred vk in
have vk = nat.succ vj, from
inverse (succ_pred_of_pos HT),
have vj < n, from
lt_of_succ_lt_succ (eq.subst `vk = nat.succ vj` pk),
have succ (mk vj `vj < n`) = mk vk pk, by apply val_inj; apply (succ_pred_of_pos HT),
eq.rec_on this (CS (mk vj `vj < n`)) },
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
have vk = 0, from
eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_not_gt HF),
have fin.zero n = mk vk pk, from
val_inj (inverse this),
eq.rec_on this CO }
end
definition succ_maxi_cases {C : fin (nat.succ n) → Type} :
(Π j : fin n, C (lift_succ j)) → C maxi → (Π k : fin (nat.succ n), C k) :=
begin
intros CL CM k,
induction k with [vk, pk],
induction (nat.decidable_lt vk n) with [HT, HF],
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
have HL : lift_succ (mk vk HT) = mk vk pk, from
val_inj rfl,
eq.rec_on HL (CL (mk vk HT)) },
{ show C (mk vk pk), from
have HMv : vk = n, from
le.antisymm (le_of_lt_succ pk) (le_of_not_gt HF),
have HM : maxi = mk vk pk, from
val_inj (inverse HMv),
eq.rec_on HM CM }
end
open decidable
-- TODO there has to be a less painful way to do this
definition elim_succ_maxi_cases_lift_succ {C : fin (nat.succ n) → Type}
{Cls : Π j : fin n, C (lift_succ j)} {Cm : C maxi} (i : fin n) :
succ_maxi_cases Cls Cm (lift_succ i) = Cls i :=
begin
esimp[succ_maxi_cases], cases i with i ilt, esimp,
apply decidable.rec,
{ intro ilt', esimp[val_inj], apply concat,
apply ap (λ x, eq.rec_on x _), esimp[eq_of_veq, rfl], reflexivity,
have H : ilt = ilt', by apply is_prop.elim, cases H,
apply ap (λx, eq.rec_on x _), apply ap02, apply is_prop_elim_self },
{ intro a, exact absurd ilt a },
end
definition elim_succ_maxi_cases_maxi {C : fin (nat.succ n) → Type}
{Cls : Π j : fin n, C (lift_succ j)} {Cm : C maxi} :
succ_maxi_cases Cls Cm maxi = Cm :=
begin
esimp[succ_maxi_cases, maxi],
apply decidable.rec,
{ intro a, apply absurd a !nat.lt_irrefl },
{ intro a, esimp[val_inj], apply concat,
have H : (le.antisymm (le_of_lt_succ (lt_succ_self n)) (le_of_not_gt a))⁻¹ = idp,
by apply is_prop.elim,
apply ap _ H, krewrite eq_of_veq_refl },
end
definition foldr {A B : Type} (m : A → B → B) (b : B) : Π {n : nat}, (fin n → A) → B :=
nat.rec (λ f, b) (λ n IH f, m (f (fin.zero n)) (IH (λ i : fin n, f (succ i))))
definition foldl {A B : Type} (m : B → A → B) (b : B) : Π {n : nat}, (fin n → A) → B :=
nat.rec (λ f, b) (λ n IH f, m (IH (λ i : fin n, f (lift_succ i))) (f maxi))
theorem choice {C : fin n → Type} :
(Π i : fin n, nonempty (C i)) → nonempty (Π i : fin n, C i) :=
begin
revert C,
induction n with [n, IH],
{ intros C H,
apply nonempty.intro,
exact elim0 },
{ intros C H,
fapply nonempty.elim (H (fin.zero n)),
intro CO,
fapply nonempty.elim (IH (λ i, C (succ i)) (λ i, H (succ i))),
intro CS,
apply nonempty.intro,
exact zero_succ_cases CO CS }
end
/-section
open list
local postfix `+1`:100 := nat.succ
lemma dmap_map_lift {n : nat} : Π l : list nat, (Π i, i ∈ l → i < n) → dmap (λ i, i < n +1) mk l = map lift_succ (dmap (λ i, i < n) mk l)
| [] := assume Plt, rfl
| (i::l) := assume Plt, begin
rewrite [@dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n +1) _ _ _ (lt_succ_of_lt (Plt i !mem_cons)), @dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n) _ _ _ (Plt i !mem_cons), map_cons],
congruence,
apply dmap_map_lift,
intro j Pjinl, apply Plt, apply mem_cons_of_mem, assumption end
lemma upto_succ (n : nat) : upto (n +1) = maxi :: map lift_succ (upto n) :=
begin
rewrite [↑fin.upto, list.upto_succ, @dmap_cons_of_pos _ _ (λ i, i < n +1) _ _ _ (nat.self_lt_succ n)],
congruence,
apply dmap_map_lift, apply @list.lt_of_mem_upto
end
definition upto_step : Π {n : nat}, fin.upto (n +1) = (map succ (upto n))++[0]
| 0 := rfl
| (i +1) := begin rewrite [upto_succ i, map_cons, append_cons, succ_max, upto_succ, -lift_zero],
congruence, rewrite [map_map, -lift_succ.comm, -map_map, -(map_singleton _ 0), -map_append, -upto_step] end
end-/
open sum equiv decidable
definition fin_zero_equiv_empty : fin 0 ≃ empty :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK, rotate 1, do 2 (intro x; contradiction),
rotate 1, do 2 (intro x; apply elim0 x)
end
definition is_contr_fin_one [instance] : is_contr (fin 1) :=
begin
fapply is_contr.mk, exact 0,
intro x, induction x with v vlt,
apply eq_of_veq, rewrite val_zero,
apply inverse, apply eq_zero_of_le_zero, apply le_of_succ_le_succ, exact vlt,
end
definition fin_sum_equiv (n m : nat) : (fin n + fin m) ≃ fin (n+m) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro s, induction s with l r,
induction l with v vlt, apply mk v, apply lt_add_of_lt_right, exact vlt,
induction r with v vlt, apply mk (v + n), rewrite {n + m}add.comm,
apply add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le vlt, apply nat.le_refl },
{ intro f, induction f with v vlt,
exact if h : v < n
then sum.inl (mk v h)
else sum.inr (mk (v-n) (nat.sub_lt_of_lt_add vlt (le_of_not_gt h))) },
{ intro f, cases f with v vlt, esimp, apply @by_cases (v < n),
intro vltn, rewrite [dif_pos vltn], apply eq_of_veq, reflexivity,
intro nvltn, rewrite [dif_neg nvltn], apply eq_of_veq, esimp,
apply nat.sub_add_cancel, apply le_of_not_gt, apply nvltn },
{ intro s, cases s with f g,
cases f with v vlt, rewrite [dif_pos vlt],
cases g with v vlt, esimp, have ¬ v + n < n, from
suppose v + n < n,
have v < n - n, from nat.lt_sub_of_add_lt this !le.refl,
have v < 0, by rewrite [nat.sub_self at this]; exact this,
absurd this !not_lt_zero,
apply concat, apply dif_neg this, apply ap inr, apply eq_of_veq, esimp,
apply nat.add_sub_cancel },
end
definition fin_succ_equiv (n : nat) : fin (n + 1) ≃ fin n + unit :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ apply succ_maxi_cases, esimp, apply inl, apply inr unit.star },
{ intro d, cases d, apply lift_succ a, apply maxi },
{ intro d, cases d,
cases a with a alt, esimp, apply elim_succ_maxi_cases_lift_succ,
cases a, apply elim_succ_maxi_cases_maxi },
{ intro a, apply succ_maxi_cases, esimp,
intro j, krewrite elim_succ_maxi_cases_lift_succ,
krewrite elim_succ_maxi_cases_maxi },
end
open prod
definition fin_prod_equiv (n m : nat) : (fin n × fin m) ≃ fin (n*m) :=
begin
induction n,
{ krewrite nat.zero_mul,
calc fin 0 × fin m ≃ empty × fin m : fin_zero_equiv_empty
... ≃ fin m × empty : prod_comm_equiv
... ≃ empty : prod_empty_equiv
... ≃ fin 0 : fin_zero_equiv_empty },
{ have H : (a + 1) * m = a * m + m, by rewrite [nat.right_distrib, one_mul],
calc fin (a + 1) × fin m
≃ (fin a + unit) × fin m : prod_equiv_prod_left !fin_succ_equiv
... ≃ (fin a × fin m) + (unit × fin m) : sum_prod_right_distrib
... ≃ (fin a × fin m) + (fin m × unit) : prod_comm_equiv
... ≃ fin (a * m) + (fin m × unit) : v_0
... ≃ fin (a * m) + fin m : prod_unit_equiv
... ≃ fin (a * m + m) : fin_sum_equiv
... ≃ fin ((a + 1) * m) : equiv_of_eq (ap fin H⁻¹) },
end
definition fin_two_equiv_bool : fin 2 ≃ bool :=
let H := equiv_unit_of_is_contr (fin 1) _ in
calc
fin 2 ≃ fin (1 + 1) : equiv.refl
... ≃ fin 1 + fin 1 : fin_sum_equiv
... ≃ unit + unit : H
... ≃ bool : bool_equiv_unit_sum_unit
definition fin_sum_unit_equiv (n : nat) : fin n + unit ≃ fin (nat.succ n) :=
let H := equiv_unit_of_is_contr (fin 1) _ in
calc
fin n + unit ≃ fin n + fin 1 : H
... ≃ fin (nat.succ n) : fin_sum_equiv
definition fin_sum_equiv_cancel {n : nat} {A B : Type} (H : (fin n) + A ≃ (fin n) + B) :
A ≃ B :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ calc A ≃ A + empty : sum_empty_equiv
... ≃ empty + A : sum_comm_equiv
... ≃ fin 0 + A : fin_zero_equiv_empty
... ≃ fin 0 + B : H
... ≃ empty + B : fin_zero_equiv_empty
... ≃ B + empty : sum_comm_equiv
... ≃ B : sum_empty_equiv },
{ apply IH, apply unit_sum_equiv_cancel,
calc unit + (fin n + A) ≃ (unit + fin n) + A : sum_assoc_equiv
... ≃ (fin n + unit) + A : sum_comm_equiv
... ≃ fin (nat.succ n) + A : fin_sum_unit_equiv
... ≃ fin (nat.succ n) + B : H
... ≃ (fin n + unit) + B : fin_sum_unit_equiv
... ≃ (unit + fin n) + B : sum_comm_equiv
... ≃ unit + (fin n + B) : sum_assoc_equiv },
end
definition eq_of_fin_equiv {m n : nat} (H :fin m ≃ fin n) : m = n :=
begin
revert n H, induction m with m IH IH,
{ intro n H, cases n, reflexivity, exfalso,
apply to_fun fin_zero_equiv_empty, apply to_inv H, apply fin.zero },
{ intro n H, cases n with n, exfalso,
apply to_fun fin_zero_equiv_empty, apply to_fun H, apply fin.zero,
have unit + fin m ≃ unit + fin n, from
calc unit + fin m ≃ fin m + unit : sum_comm_equiv
... ≃ fin (nat.succ m) : fin_succ_equiv
... ≃ fin (nat.succ n) : H
... ≃ fin n + unit : fin_succ_equiv
... ≃ unit + fin n : sum_comm_equiv,
have fin m ≃ fin n, from unit_sum_equiv_cancel this,
apply ap nat.succ, apply IH _ this },
end
definition cyclic_succ {n : } (x : fin n) : fin n :=
begin
cases n with n,
{ exfalso, apply not_lt_zero _ (is_lt x)},
{ exact
if H : val x = n
then fin.mk 0 !zero_lt_succ
else fin.mk (nat.succ (val x))
(succ_lt_succ (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_lt_succ (is_lt x)) H))}
end
definition cyclic_pred {n : } (x : fin n) : fin n :=
begin
cases n with n,
{ exfalso, apply not_lt_zero _ (is_lt x)},
{ cases x with m H, cases m with m,
{ exact fin.mk n (self_lt_succ n) },
{ exact fin.mk m (lt.trans (self_lt_succ m) H) }}
end
/-
We want to say that fin (succ n) always has a 0 and 1. However, we want a bit more, because
sometimes we want a zero of (fin a) where a is either
- equal to a successor, but not definitionally a successor (e.g. (0 : fin (3 + n)))
- definitionally equal to a successor, but not in a way that type class inference can infer.
(e.g. (0 : fin 4). Note that 4 is bit0 (bit0 one), but (bit0 x) (defined as x + x),
is not always a successor)
To solve this we use an auxillary class `is_succ` which can solve whether a number is a
successor.
-/
/- this is a version of `madd` which might compute better -/
protected definition add {n : } (x y : fin n) : fin n :=
iterate cyclic_succ (val y) x
definition has_zero_fin [instance] (n : ) [H : is_succ n] : has_zero (fin n) :=
by induction H with n; exact has_zero.mk (fin.zero n)
definition has_one_fin [instance] (n : ) [H : is_succ n] : has_one (fin n) :=
by induction H with n; exact has_one.mk (cyclic_succ (fin.zero n))
definition has_add_fin [instance] (n : ) : has_add (fin n) :=
has_add.mk fin.add
end fin