lean2/library/data/real/complete.lean

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Robert Y. Lewis
The real numbers, constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rationals.
This construction follows Bishop and Bridges (1985).

At this point, we no longer proceed constructively: this file makes heavy use of decidability,
 excluded middle, and Hilbert choice.

Here, we show that ℝ is complete.
-/
 
import data.real.basic data.real.order data.real.division data.rat data.nat logic.axioms.classical
open -[coercions] rat 
open -[coercions] nat
open algebra
open eq.ops


local notation 2 := pnat.pos (nat.of_num 2) dec_trivial
local notation 3 := pnat.pos (nat.of_num 3) dec_trivial

namespace s

theorem nonneg_of_ge_neg_invs (a : ℚ) (H : ∀ n : ℕ+, -n⁻¹ ≤ a) : 0 ≤ a := sorry

theorem ineq_helper (a b c : ℚ) : c ≤ a + b → -a ≤ b - c := sorry

definition const (a : ℚ) : seq := λ n, a

theorem const_reg (a : ℚ) : regular (const a) :=
  begin
    intros,
    rewrite [↑const, sub_self, abs_zero],
    apply add_invs_nonneg
  end

definition r_const (a : ℚ) : reg_seq := reg_seq.mk (const a) (const_reg a)

theorem rat_approx_l1 {s : seq} (H : regular s) : 
        ∀ n : ℕ+, ∃ q : ℚ, ∃ N : ℕ+, ∀ m : ℕ+, m ≥ N → abs (s m - q) ≤ n⁻¹ :=
  begin
    intro n,
    existsi (s (2 * n)),
    existsi 2 * n,
    intro m Hm,
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply H,
    rewrite -(padd_halves n),
    apply rat.add_le_add_right,
    apply inv_ge_of_le Hm
  end

theorem rat_approx {s : seq} (H : regular s) : 
        ∀ n : ℕ+, ∃ q : ℚ, s_le (s_abs (sadd s (sneg (const q)))) (const n⁻¹) := 
  begin
    intro m,
    rewrite ↑s_le,
    apply exists.elim (rat_approx_l1 H m),
    intro q Hq,
    apply exists.elim Hq,
    intro N HN,
    existsi q,
    apply nonneg_of_bdd_within,
    repeat (apply reg_add_reg | apply reg_neg_reg | apply abs_reg_of_reg | apply const_reg
             | assumption),
    intro n,
    existsi N,
    intro p Hp,
    rewrite ↑[sadd, sneg, s_abs, const],
    apply rat.le.trans,
    rotate 1,
    apply rat.sub_le_sub_left,
    apply HN,
    apply ple.trans,
    apply Hp,
    rewrite -*pnat_mul_assoc,
    apply pnat.mul_le_mul_left,
    rewrite [sub_self, -neg_zero],
    apply neg_le_neg,
    apply rat.le_of_lt,
    apply inv_pos
  end

definition r_abs (s : reg_seq) : reg_seq := 
  reg_seq.mk (s_abs (reg_seq.sq s)) (abs_reg_of_reg (reg_seq.is_reg s))

theorem abs_well_defined {s t : seq} (Hs : regular s) (Ht : regular t) (Heq : s ≡ t) :
        s_abs s ≡ s_abs t := 
  begin
    rewrite [↑equiv at *],
    intro n,
    rewrite ↑s_abs,
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply abs_abs_sub_abs_le_abs_sub,
    apply Heq
  end

theorem r_abs_well_defined {s t : reg_seq} (H : requiv s t) : requiv (r_abs s) (r_abs t) := 
  abs_well_defined (reg_seq.is_reg s) (reg_seq.is_reg t) H

theorem r_rat_approx (s : reg_seq) :
        ∀ n : ℕ+, ∃ q : ℚ, r_le (r_abs (radd s (rneg (r_const q)))) (r_const n⁻¹) := 
  rat_approx (reg_seq.is_reg s)

theorem const_bound {s : seq} (Hs : regular s) (n : ℕ+) : s_le (s_abs (sadd s (sneg (const (s n))))) (const n⁻¹) :=
  begin
    rewrite ↑[s_le, nonneg, s_abs, sadd, sneg, const],
    intro m,
    apply ineq_helper,
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply Hs,
    apply rat.add_le_add_right,
    rewrite -*pnat_mul_assoc,
    apply inv_ge_of_le,
    apply pnat.mul_le_mul_left
  end

theorem abs_const (a : ℚ) : const (abs a) ≡ s_abs (const a) :=
  begin
    rewrite [↑s_abs, ↑const],
    apply equiv.refl
  end

theorem r_abs_const (a : ℚ) : requiv (r_const (abs a) ) (r_abs (r_const a)) := abs_const a

theorem add_consts (a b : ℚ) : sadd (const a) (const b) ≡ const (a + b) := 
  begin
    rewrite [↑sadd, ↑const],
    apply equiv.refl
  end

theorem r_add_consts (a b : ℚ) : requiv (r_const a + r_const b) (r_const (a + b)) := add_consts a b

theorem const_le_const_of_le {a b : ℚ} (H : a ≤ b) : s_le (const a) (const b) :=
  begin
    rewrite [↑s_le, ↑nonneg],
    intro n,
    rewrite [↑sadd, ↑sneg, ↑const],
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply rat.neg_nonpos_of_nonneg,
    apply rat.le_of_lt,
    apply inv_pos,
    apply iff.mp' !rat.sub_nonneg_iff_le,
    apply H
  end

theorem le_of_const_le_const {a b : ℚ} (H : s_le (const a) (const b)) : a ≤ b :=
  begin
    rewrite [↑s_le at H, ↑nonneg at H, ↑sadd at H, ↑sneg at H, ↑const at H],
    apply iff.mp !rat.sub_nonneg_iff_le,
    apply nonneg_of_ge_neg_invs _ H
  end

theorem r_const_le_const_of_le {a b : ℚ} (H : a ≤ b) : r_le (r_const a) (r_const b) :=
  const_le_const_of_le H

theorem r_le_of_const_le_const {a b : ℚ} (H : r_le (r_const a) (r_const b)) : a ≤ b :=
  le_of_const_le_const H

theorem equiv_abs_of_ge_zero {s : seq} (Hs : regular s) (Hz : s_le zero s) : s_abs s ≡ s :=
  begin 
    apply eq_of_bdd,
    apply abs_reg_of_reg Hs,
    apply Hs,
    intro j,
    rewrite ↑s_abs,
    let Hz' := s_nonneg_of_ge_zero Hs Hz,
    existsi 2 * j,
    intro n Hn,
    apply or.elim (decidable.em (s n ≥ 0)),
    intro Hpos,
    rewrite [rat.abs_of_nonneg Hpos, sub_self, abs_zero],
    apply rat.le_of_lt,
    apply inv_pos,
    intro Hneg,
    let Hneg' := lt_of_not_ge Hneg,
    have Hsn : -s n - s n > 0, from add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg Hneg') (neg_pos_of_neg Hneg'), 
    rewrite [rat.abs_of_neg Hneg', rat.abs_of_pos Hsn],
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply rat.add_le_add,
    repeat (apply rat.neg_le_neg; apply Hz'),
    rewrite *rat.neg_neg,
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply rat.add_le_add,
    repeat (apply inv_ge_of_le; apply Hn),
    rewrite padd_halves,
    apply rat.le.refl
  end

theorem equiv_neg_abs_of_le_zero {s : seq} (Hs : regular s) (Hz : s_le s zero) : s_abs s ≡ sneg s :=
  begin
    apply eq_of_bdd,
    apply abs_reg_of_reg Hs,
    apply reg_neg_reg Hs,
    intro j,
    rewrite [↑s_abs, ↑s_le at Hz],
    have Hz' : nonneg (sneg s), begin
      apply nonneg_of_nonneg_equiv,
      rotate 3,
      apply Hz,
      rotate 2,
      apply s_zero_add,
      repeat (apply Hs | apply zero_is_reg | apply reg_neg_reg | apply reg_add_reg)
    end,
    existsi 2 * j,
    intro n Hn,
    apply or.elim (decidable.em (s n ≥ 0)),
    intro Hpos,
    have Hsn : s n + s n ≥ 0, from add_nonneg Hpos Hpos,
    rewrite [rat.abs_of_nonneg Hpos, ↑sneg, rat.sub_neg_eq_add, rat.abs_of_nonneg Hsn],
    rewrite [↑nonneg at Hz', ↑sneg at Hz'],
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply rat.add_le_add,
    repeat apply (rat.le_of_neg_le_neg !Hz'),
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply rat.add_le_add,
    repeat (apply inv_ge_of_le; apply Hn),
    rewrite padd_halves,
    apply rat.le.refl,
    intro Hneg,
    let Hneg' := lt_of_not_ge Hneg,
    rewrite [rat.abs_of_neg Hneg', ↑sneg, rat.sub_neg_eq_add, rat.neg_add_eq_sub, rat.sub_self,
                abs_zero], 
    apply rat.le_of_lt,
    apply inv_pos
  end

theorem r_equiv_abs_of_ge_zero {s : reg_seq} (Hz : r_le r_zero s) : requiv (r_abs s) s :=
  equiv_abs_of_ge_zero (reg_seq.is_reg s) Hz 

theorem r_equiv_neg_abs_of_le_zero {s : reg_seq} (Hz : r_le s r_zero) : requiv (r_abs s) (-s) :=
  equiv_neg_abs_of_le_zero (reg_seq.is_reg s) Hz

end s

namespace real

theorem rewrite_helper9 (a b c : ℝ) : b - c = (b - a) - (c - a) := sorry

theorem rewrite_helper10 (a b c d : ℝ) : c - d = (c - a) + (a - b) + (b - d) := sorry

theorem r_abs_add_three (a b c : ℝ) : abs (a + b + c) ≤ abs a + abs b + abs c := 
  begin
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply algebra.abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply algebra.add_le_add_right,
    apply algebra.abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
    apply algebra.le.refl
  end

theorem r_add_le_add_three (a b c d e f : ℝ) (H1 : a ≤ d) (H2 : b ≤ e) (H3 : c ≤ f) :
        a + b + c ≤ d + e + f := 
  begin
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply algebra.add_le_add,
    apply algebra.add_le_add,
    repeat assumption,
    apply algebra.le.refl
  end

theorem re_add_comm_3 (a b c : ℝ) : a + b + c = c + b + a := sorry

definition rep (x : ℝ) : reg_seq := some (quot.exists_rep x)

definition const (a : ℚ) : ℝ := quot.mk (s.r_const a) 

theorem add_consts (a b : ℚ) : const a + const b = const (a + b) := 
  quot.sound (s.r_add_consts a b)

theorem sub_consts (a b : ℚ) : const a - const b = const (a - b) := !add_consts

theorem add_half_const (n : ℕ+) : const (2 * n)⁻¹ + const (2 * n)⁻¹ = const (n⁻¹) := 
  by rewrite [add_consts, padd_halves]

theorem const_le_const_of_le (a b : ℚ) : a ≤ b → const a ≤ const b := 
  s.r_const_le_const_of_le

theorem le_of_const_le_const (a b : ℚ) : const a ≤ const b → a ≤ b := 
  s.r_le_of_const_le_const

definition re_abs (x : ℝ) : ℝ := 
  quot.lift_on x (λ a, quot.mk (s.r_abs a)) (take a b Hab, quot.sound (s.r_abs_well_defined Hab))

theorem r_abs_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ x → re_abs x = x :=
  quot.induction_on x (λ a Ha, quot.sound  (s.r_equiv_abs_of_ge_zero Ha))

theorem r_abs_nonpos {x : ℝ} : x ≤ 0 → re_abs x = -x :=
  quot.induction_on x (λ a Ha, quot.sound (s.r_equiv_neg_abs_of_le_zero Ha))

theorem abs_const' (a : ℚ) : const (rat.abs a) = re_abs (const a) := quot.sound (s.r_abs_const a)

theorem re_abs_is_abs : re_abs = algebra.abs := funext
  (begin
    intro x,
    rewrite ↑abs,
    apply eq.symm,
    let Hor := decidable.em (0 ≤ x),
    apply or.elim Hor,
    intro Hor1,
    rewrite [(if_pos Hor1), r_abs_nonneg Hor1],
    intro Hor2,
    let Hor2' := algebra.le_of_lt (algebra.lt_of_not_ge Hor2),
    rewrite [(if_neg Hor2), r_abs_nonpos Hor2']
  end)

theorem abs_const (a : ℚ) : const (rat.abs a) = abs (const a) :=
  by rewrite -re_abs_is_abs -- ????

theorem rat_approx' (x : ℝ) : ∀ n : ℕ+, ∃ q : ℚ, re_abs (x - const q) ≤ const n⁻¹ :=
  quot.induction_on x (λ s n, s.r_rat_approx s n)

theorem rat_approx (x : ℝ) : ∀ n : ℕ+, ∃ q : ℚ, abs (x - const q) ≤ const n⁻¹ :=
  by rewrite -re_abs_is_abs; apply rat_approx'

definition approx (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ+) := some (rat_approx x n)

theorem approx_spec (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ+) : abs (x - (const (approx x n))) ≤ const n⁻¹ := 
  some_spec (rat_approx x n)

theorem approx_spec' (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ+) : abs ((const (approx x n)) - x) ≤ const n⁻¹ :=
  by rewrite algebra.abs_sub; apply approx_spec

notation `r_seq` := ℕ+ → ℝ

definition converges_to (X : r_seq) (a : ℝ) (N : ℕ+ → ℕ+) :=
  ∀ k : ℕ+, ∀ n : ℕ+, n ≥ N k → abs (X n - a) ≤ const k⁻¹

definition cauchy (X : r_seq) (M : ℕ+ → ℕ+) :=
  ∀ k : ℕ+, ∀ m n : ℕ+, m ≥ M k → n ≥ M k → abs (X m - X n) ≤ const k⁻¹

theorem cauchy_of_converges_to {X : r_seq} {a : ℝ} {N : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : converges_to X a N) :
        cauchy X (λ k, N (2 * k)) :=
  begin
    intro k m n Hm Hn, 
    rewrite (rewrite_helper9 a),
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply algebra.abs_add_le_abs_add_abs,
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply algebra.add_le_add,
    apply Hc,
    apply Hm,
    rewrite algebra.abs_neg,
    apply Hc,
    apply Hn,
    rewrite add_half_const,
    apply !algebra.le.refl
  end

definition Nb (M : ℕ+ → ℕ+) := λ k, max (3 * k) (M (2 * k))

theorem Nb_spec_right (M : ℕ+ → ℕ+) (k : ℕ+) : M (2 * k) ≤ Nb M k := !max_right

theorem Nb_spec_left (M : ℕ+ → ℕ+) (k : ℕ+) : 3 * k ≤ Nb M k := !max_left

definition lim_seq {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) : seq :=
  λ k, approx (X (Nb M k)) (2 * k)

theorem lim_seq_reg_helper {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) {m n : ℕ+} 
        (Hmn : M (2 * n) ≤M (2 * m)) :
           abs (const (lim_seq Hc m) - X (Nb M m)) + abs (X (Nb M m) - X (Nb M n)) + abs
            (X (Nb M n) - const (lim_seq Hc n)) ≤ const (m⁻¹ + n⁻¹) :=
  begin
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply r_add_le_add_three,
    apply approx_spec',
    rotate 1,
    apply approx_spec,
    rotate 1,
    apply Hc,
    rotate 1,
    apply Nb_spec_right,
    rotate 1,
    apply ple.trans,
    apply Hmn,
    apply Nb_spec_right,
    rewrite [*add_consts, rat.add.assoc, padd_halves],
    apply const_le_const_of_le,
    apply rat.add_le_add_right,
    apply inv_ge_of_le,
    apply pnat.mul_le_mul_left
  end

theorem lim_seq_reg {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) : regular (lim_seq Hc) := 
  begin
    rewrite ↑regular,
    intro m n,
    apply le_of_const_le_const,
    rewrite [abs_const, -sub_consts, (rewrite_helper10 (X (Nb M m)) (X (Nb M n)))],
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply r_abs_add_three,
    let Hor := decidable.em (M (2 * m) ≥ M (2 * n)),
    apply or.elim Hor,
    intro Hor1,
    apply lim_seq_reg_helper Hc Hor1,
    intro Hor2,
    let Hor2' := pnat.le_of_lt (pnat.lt_of_not_le Hor2),
    rewrite [algebra.abs_sub (X (Nb M n)), algebra.abs_sub (X (Nb M m)), algebra.abs_sub, -- ???
             rat.add.comm, re_add_comm_3],
    apply lim_seq_reg_helper Hc Hor2'
  end

theorem lim_seq_spec {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) (k : ℕ+) : 
        s.s_le (s.s_abs (sadd (lim_seq Hc) (sneg (s.const (lim_seq Hc k))) )) (s.const k⁻¹) :=
  begin
    apply s.const_bound,
    apply lim_seq_reg
  end

definition r_lim_seq {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) : reg_seq :=
  reg_seq.mk (lim_seq Hc) (lim_seq_reg Hc)

theorem r_lim_seq_spec {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) (k : ℕ+) :
        s.r_le (s.r_abs (((r_lim_seq Hc) + -s.r_const ((reg_seq.sq (r_lim_seq Hc)) k)))) (s.r_const (k)⁻¹) := 
  lim_seq_spec Hc k

definition lim {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) : ℝ :=
  quot.mk (r_lim_seq Hc)

theorem re_lim_spec {x : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy x M) (k : ℕ+) : 
        re_abs ((lim Hc) - (const ((lim_seq Hc) k))) ≤ const k⁻¹ :=
  r_lim_seq_spec Hc k 

theorem lim_spec' {x : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy x M) (k : ℕ+) : 
        abs ((lim Hc) - (const ((lim_seq Hc) k))) ≤ const k⁻¹ :=
  by rewrite -re_abs_is_abs; apply re_lim_spec

theorem lim_spec {x : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy x M) (k : ℕ+) : 
        abs ((const ((lim_seq Hc) k)) - (lim Hc)) ≤ const (k)⁻¹ :=
  by rewrite algebra.abs_sub; apply lim_spec'

theorem converges_of_cauchy {X : r_seq} {M : ℕ+ → ℕ+} (Hc : cauchy X M) : 
        converges_to X (lim Hc) (Nb M) := 
  begin
    intro k n Hn,
    rewrite (rewrite_helper10 (X (Nb M n)) (const (lim_seq Hc n))),
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply r_abs_add_three,
    apply algebra.le.trans,
    apply r_add_le_add_three,
    apply Hc,
    apply ple.trans,
    rotate 1,
    apply Hn,
    rotate_right 1,
    apply Nb_spec_right,
    have HMk : M (2 * k) ≤ Nb M n, begin
      apply ple.trans,
      apply Nb_spec_right,
      apply ple.trans,
      apply Hn,
      apply ple.trans,
      apply pnat.mul_le_mul_left 3,
      apply Nb_spec_left
    end,
    apply HMk,
    rewrite ↑lim_seq,
    apply approx_spec,
    apply lim_spec,
    rewrite 2 add_consts,
    apply const_le_const_of_le,
    apply rat.le.trans,
    apply add_le_add_three,
    apply rat.le.refl,
    apply inv_ge_of_le,
    apply pnat_mul_le_mul_left',
    apply ple.trans,
    rotate 1,
    apply Hn,
    rotate_right 1,
    apply Nb_spec_left,
    apply inv_ge_of_le,
    apply ple.trans,
    rotate 1,
    apply Hn,
    rotate_right 1,
    apply Nb_spec_left,
    rewrite [-*pnat_mul_assoc, p_add_fractions],
    apply rat.le.refl
  end

end real