lean2/hott/homotopy/susp.hlean

/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Ulrik Buchholtz

Declaration of suspension
-/

import hit.pushout types.pointed cubical.square .connectedness

open pushout unit eq equiv

definition susp (A : Type) : Type := pushout (λ(a : A), star) (λ(a : A), star)

namespace susp
  variable {A : Type}

  definition north {A : Type} : susp A :=
  inl star

  definition south {A : Type} : susp A :=
  inr star

  definition merid (a : A) : @north A = @south A :=
  glue a

  protected definition rec {P : susp A → Type} (PN : P north) (PS : P south)
    (Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) (x : susp A) : P x :=
  begin
    induction x with u u,
    { cases u, exact PN},
    { cases u, exact PS},
    { apply Pm},
  end

  protected definition rec_on [reducible] {P : susp A → Type} (y : susp A)
    (PN : P north) (PS : P south) (Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) : P y :=
  susp.rec PN PS Pm y

  theorem rec_merid {P : susp A → Type} (PN : P north) (PS : P south)
    (Pm : Π(a : A), PN =[merid a] PS) (a : A)
      : apd (susp.rec PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
  !rec_glue

  protected definition elim {P : Type} (PN : P) (PS : P) (Pm : A → PN = PS)
    (x : susp A) : P :=
  susp.rec PN PS (λa, pathover_of_eq _ (Pm a)) x

  protected definition elim_on [reducible] {P : Type} (x : susp A)
    (PN : P) (PS : P)  (Pm : A → PN = PS) : P :=
  susp.elim PN PS Pm x

  theorem elim_merid {P : Type} {PN PS : P} (Pm : A → PN = PS) (a : A)
    : ap (susp.elim PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
  begin
    apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn_inv !(pathover_constant (merid a)),
    rewrite [▸*,-apd_eq_pathover_of_eq_ap,↑susp.elim,rec_merid],
  end

  protected definition elim_type (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
    (x : susp A) : Type :=
  pushout.elim_type (λx, PN) (λx, PS) Pm x

  protected definition elim_type_on [reducible] (x : susp A)
    (PN : Type) (PS : Type)  (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS) : Type :=
  susp.elim_type PN PS Pm x

  theorem elim_type_merid (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
    (a : A) : transport (susp.elim_type PN PS Pm) (merid a) = Pm a :=
  !elim_type_glue

  theorem elim_type_merid_inv {A : Type} (PN : Type) (PS : Type) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
    (a : A) : transport (susp.elim_type PN PS Pm) (merid a)⁻¹ = to_inv (Pm a) :=
  !elim_type_glue_inv

  protected definition merid_square {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
    : square (merid a) (merid a') idp idp :=
  by cases p; apply vrefl

end susp

attribute susp.north susp.south [constructor]
attribute susp.rec susp.elim [unfold 6] [recursor 6]
attribute susp.elim_type [unfold 5]
attribute susp.rec_on susp.elim_on [unfold 3]
attribute susp.elim_type_on [unfold 2]

namespace susp

  open is_trunc is_conn trunc

  -- Theorem 8.2.1
  definition is_conn_susp [instance] (n : trunc_index) (A : Type)
    [H : is_conn n A] : is_conn (n .+1) (susp A) :=
  is_contr.mk (tr north)
  begin
    apply trunc.rec,
    fapply susp.rec,
    { reflexivity },
    { exact (trunc.rec (λa, ap tr (merid a)) (center (trunc n A))) },
    { intro a,
      generalize (center (trunc n A)),
      apply trunc.rec,
      intro a',
      apply pathover_of_tr_eq,
      rewrite [transport_eq_Fr,idp_con],
      revert H, induction n with [n, IH],
      { intro H, apply is_prop.elim },
      { intros H,
        change ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid a'),
        generalize a',
        apply is_conn_fun.elim n
              (is_conn_fun_from_unit n A a)
              (λx : A, trunctype.mk' n (ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid x))),
        intros,
        change ap (@tr n .+2 (susp A)) (merid a) = ap tr (merid a),
        reflexivity
      }
    }
  end

end susp

/- Flattening lemma -/
namespace susp

  open prod prod.ops
  section
    universe variable u
    parameters (A : Type) (PN PS : Type.{u}) (Pm : A → PN ≃ PS)
    include Pm

    local abbreviation P [unfold 5] := susp.elim_type PN PS Pm

    local abbreviation F : A × PN → PN := λz, z.2

    local abbreviation G : A × PN → PS := λz, Pm z.1 z.2

    protected definition flattening : sigma P ≃ pushout F G :=
    begin
      apply equiv.trans !pushout.flattening,
      fapply pushout.equiv,
      { exact sigma.equiv_prod A PN },
      { apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
      { apply sigma.sigma_unit_left },
      { reflexivity },
      { reflexivity }
    end
  end

end susp

/- Functoriality and equivalence -/
namespace susp
  variables {A B : Type} (f : A → B)
  include f

  protected definition functor [unfold 4] : susp A → susp B :=
  begin
    intro x, induction x with a,
    { exact north },
    { exact south },
    { exact merid (f a) }
  end

  variable [Hf : is_equiv f]
  include Hf

  open is_equiv
  protected definition is_equiv_functor [instance] [constructor] : is_equiv (susp.functor f) :=
  adjointify (susp.functor f) (susp.functor f⁻¹)
  abstract begin
    intro sb, induction sb with b, do 2 reflexivity,
    apply eq_pathover,
    rewrite [ap_id,ap_compose' (susp.functor f) (susp.functor f⁻¹)],
    krewrite [susp.elim_merid,susp.elim_merid], apply transpose,
    apply susp.merid_square (right_inv f b)
  end end
  abstract begin
    intro sa, induction sa with a, do 2 reflexivity,
    apply eq_pathover,
    rewrite [ap_id,ap_compose' (susp.functor f⁻¹) (susp.functor f)],
    krewrite [susp.elim_merid,susp.elim_merid], apply transpose,
    apply susp.merid_square (left_inv f a)
  end end


end susp

namespace susp
  variables {A B : Type} (f : A ≃ B)

  protected definition equiv : susp A ≃ susp B :=
  equiv.mk (susp.functor f) _
end susp

namespace susp
  open pointed
  definition pointed_susp [instance] [constructor] (X : Type)
    : pointed (susp X) :=
  pointed.mk north
end susp

open susp
definition psusp [constructor] (X : Type) : Type* :=
pointed.mk' (susp X)

namespace susp
  open pointed
  variables {X Y Z : Type*}

  definition psusp_functor [constructor] (f : X →* Y) : psusp X →* psusp Y :=
  begin
    fconstructor,
    { exact susp.functor f },
    { reflexivity }
  end

  definition is_equiv_psusp_functor [constructor] (f : X →* Y) [Hf : is_equiv f]
    : is_equiv (psusp_functor f) :=
  susp.is_equiv_functor f

  definition psusp_equiv [constructor] (f : X ≃* Y) : psusp X ≃* psusp Y :=
  pequiv_of_equiv (susp.equiv f) idp

  definition psusp_functor_compose (g : Y →* Z) (f : X →* Y)
    : psusp_functor (g ∘* f) ~* psusp_functor g ∘* psusp_functor f :=
  begin
    fconstructor,
    { intro a, induction a,
      { reflexivity },
      { reflexivity },
      { apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
        rewrite [▸*,ap_compose' _ (psusp_functor f)],
        krewrite +susp.elim_merid } },
    { reflexivity }
  end

  -- adjunction from Coq-HoTT

  definition loop_susp_unit [constructor] (X : Type*) : X →* Ω(psusp X) :=
  begin
    fconstructor,
    { intro x, exact merid x ⬝ (merid pt)⁻¹},
    { apply con.right_inv},
  end

  definition loop_susp_unit_natural (f : X →* Y)
    : loop_susp_unit Y ∘* f ~* ap1 (psusp_functor f) ∘* loop_susp_unit X :=
  begin
    induction X with X x, induction Y with Y y, induction f with f pf, esimp at *, induction pf,
    fconstructor,
    { intro x', esimp [psusp_functor], symmetry,
      exact
        !idp_con ⬝
        (!ap_con ⬝
        whisker_left _ !ap_inv) ⬝
        (!elim_merid ◾ (inverse2 !elim_merid))
        },
    { rewrite [▸*,idp_con (con.right_inv _)],
      apply inv_con_eq_of_eq_con,
      refine _ ⬝ !con.assoc',
      rewrite inverse2_right_inv,
      refine _ ⬝ !con.assoc',
      rewrite [ap_con_right_inv],
      xrewrite [idp_con_idp, -ap_compose (concat idp)]},
  end

  definition loop_susp_counit [constructor] (X : Type*) : psusp (Ω X) →* X :=
  begin
    fconstructor,
    { intro x, induction x, exact pt, exact pt, exact a},
    { reflexivity},
  end

  definition loop_susp_counit_natural (f : X →* Y)
    : f ∘* loop_susp_counit X ~* loop_susp_counit Y ∘* (psusp_functor (ap1 f)) :=
  begin
    induction X with X x, induction Y with Y y, induction f with f pf, esimp at *, induction pf,
    fconstructor,
    { intro x', induction x' with p,
      { reflexivity},
      { reflexivity},
      { esimp, apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
        xrewrite [ap_compose' f, ap_compose' (susp.elim (f x) (f x) (λ (a : f x = f x), a)),▸*],
        xrewrite [+elim_merid,▸*,idp_con]}},
    { reflexivity}
  end

  definition loop_susp_counit_unit (X : Type*)
    : ap1 (loop_susp_counit X) ∘* loop_susp_unit (Ω X) ~* pid (Ω X) :=
  begin
    induction X with X x, fconstructor,
    { intro p, esimp,
      refine !idp_con ⬝
             (!ap_con ⬝
             whisker_left _ !ap_inv) ⬝
             (!elim_merid ◾ inverse2 !elim_merid)},
    { rewrite [▸*,inverse2_right_inv (elim_merid id idp)],
      refine !con.assoc ⬝ _,
      xrewrite [ap_con_right_inv (susp.elim x x (λa, a)) (merid idp),idp_con_idp,-ap_compose]}
  end

  definition loop_susp_unit_counit (X : Type*)
    : loop_susp_counit (psusp X) ∘* psusp_functor (loop_susp_unit X) ~* pid (psusp X) :=
  begin
    induction X with X x, fconstructor,
    { intro x', induction x',
      { reflexivity},
      { exact merid pt},
      { apply eq_pathover,
        xrewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose' (susp.elim north north (λa, a)), +elim_merid,▸*],
        apply square_of_eq, exact !idp_con ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_right⁻¹}},
    { reflexivity}
  end

  definition susp_adjoint_loop [constructor] (X Y : Type*) : psusp X →* Y ≃ X →* Ω Y :=
  begin
    fapply equiv.MK,
    { intro f, exact ap1 f ∘* loop_susp_unit X},
    { intro g, exact loop_susp_counit Y ∘* psusp_functor g},
    { intro g, apply eq_of_phomotopy, esimp,
      refine !pwhisker_right !ap1_compose ⬝* _,
      refine !passoc ⬝* _,
      refine !pwhisker_left !loop_susp_unit_natural⁻¹* ⬝* _,
      refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _,
      refine !pwhisker_right !loop_susp_counit_unit ⬝* _,
      apply pid_comp},
    { intro f, apply eq_of_phomotopy, esimp,
      refine !pwhisker_left !psusp_functor_compose ⬝* _,
      refine !passoc⁻¹* ⬝* _,
      refine !pwhisker_right !loop_susp_counit_natural⁻¹* ⬝* _,
      refine !passoc ⬝* _,
      refine !pwhisker_left !loop_susp_unit_counit ⬝* _,
      apply comp_pid},
  end

  definition susp_adjoint_loop_nat_right (f : psusp X →* Y) (g : Y →* Z)
    : susp_adjoint_loop X Z (g ∘* f) ~* ap1 g ∘* susp_adjoint_loop X Y f :=
  begin
    esimp [susp_adjoint_loop],
    refine _ ⬝* !passoc,
    apply pwhisker_right,
    apply ap1_compose
  end

  definition susp_adjoint_loop_nat_left (f : Y →* Ω Z) (g : X →* Y)
    : (susp_adjoint_loop X Z)⁻¹ᵉ (f ∘* g) ~* (susp_adjoint_loop Y Z)⁻¹ᵉ f ∘* psusp_functor g :=
  begin
    esimp [susp_adjoint_loop],
    refine _ ⬝* !passoc⁻¹*,
    apply pwhisker_left,
    apply psusp_functor_compose
  end

  definition iterate_susp (n : ℕ) (A : Type) : Type := iterate susp n A
  definition iterate_psusp (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) : Type* := iterate (λX, psusp X) n A

  open is_conn trunc_index nat
  definition iterate_susp_succ (n : ℕ) (A : Type) :
    iterate_susp (succ n) A = susp (iterate_susp n A) :=
  idp

  definition is_conn_iterate_susp [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) (m : ℕ) (A : Type)
    [H : is_conn n A] : is_conn (n + m) (iterate_susp m A) :=
  begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end

  definition is_conn_iterate_psusp [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) (m : ℕ) (A : Type*)
    [H : is_conn n A] : is_conn (n + m) (iterate_psusp m A) :=
  begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end

  -- Separate cases for n = 0, which comes up often
  definition is_conn_iterate_susp_zero [instance] (m : ℕ) (A : Type)
    [H : is_conn 0 A] : is_conn m (iterate_susp m A) :=
  begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end

  definition is_conn_iterate_psusp_zero [instance] (m : ℕ) (A : Type*)
    [H : is_conn 0 A] : is_conn m (iterate_psusp m A) :=
  begin induction m with m IH, exact H, exact @is_conn_susp _ _ IH end

end susp