b45ab9dc30
Convertability constraints are harder to solve than equality constraints, and it seems they don't buy us anything definitions. They are just increasing the search space for the elaborator. Signed-off-by: Leonardo de Moura <leonardo@microsoft.com>
58 lines
1.6 KiB
Text
58 lines
1.6 KiB
Text
Set: pp::colors
|
||
Set: pp::unicode
|
||
Assumed: f
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
⊢ Bool ≺ ℕ
|
||
elab1.lean:2:6: Type of argument 3 must be convertible to the expected type in the application of
|
||
@f
|
||
with arguments:
|
||
ℕ
|
||
10
|
||
⊤
|
||
Assumed: g
|
||
elab1.lean:5:0: error: invalid expression, it still contains metavariables after elaboration
|
||
@g ℕ ?M::1 10
|
||
elab1.lean:5:8: error: unsolved metavar M::1
|
||
Assumed: h
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
x : ?M::0, A : Type ⊢ ?M::0 ≺ A
|
||
elab1.lean:9:27: Type of argument 2 must be convertible to the expected type in the application of
|
||
h
|
||
with arguments:
|
||
A
|
||
x
|
||
Assumed: my_eq
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
A : Type, B : Type, a : ?M::0, b : ?M::1, C : Type ⊢ ?M::0[lift:0:3] ≺ C
|
||
elab1.lean:13:51: Type of argument 2 must be convertible to the expected type in the application of
|
||
my_eq
|
||
with arguments:
|
||
C
|
||
a
|
||
b
|
||
Assumed: a
|
||
Assumed: b
|
||
Assumed: H
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
⊢ ∀ H1 : ?M::0, ?M::1 ∧ a ≈ b
|
||
elab1.lean:18:18: Type of definition 't1' must be convertible to expected type.
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
⊢ @eq ?M::6 b b ≺ @eq ?M::1 a b
|
||
elab1.lean:20:22: Type of argument 6 must be convertible to the expected type in the application of
|
||
@trans
|
||
with arguments:
|
||
?M::1
|
||
a
|
||
a
|
||
b
|
||
@refl ?M::1 a
|
||
@refl ?M::6 b
|
||
Failed to solve
|
||
⊢ ?M::1 ≺ Type
|
||
elab1.lean:22:6: Type of argument 1 must be convertible to the expected type in the application of
|
||
@f
|
||
with arguments:
|
||
?M::0
|
||
Bool
|
||
Bool
|
||
elab1.lean:25:18: error: unknown identifier 'EM'
|