mirror of
https://github.com/achlipala/frap.git
synced 2024-11-10 00:07:51 +00:00
Fix typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
4fdc85ae5c
commit
78e792e83d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ Specifically, when we defined $P$ inductively and want to conclude $Q$ from it,
|
|||
We transform each rule into one obligation within the induction, by replacing $P$ with $Q$ in the conclusion, in addition to taking each premise $P(e)$ and pairing it with a new premise $Q(e)$ (an \emph{induction hypothesis}\index{induction hypothesis}).
|
||||
|
||||
Our example of $\mathsf{favorites}$ is a degenerate inductive definition whose principle requires no induction hypotheses. Thus, to prove $\forall x. \; \favs{x} \Rightarrow Q(x)$, we must establish the following.
|
||||
$$\infer{Q(7)}{}
|
||||
$$\infer{Q(17)}{}
|
||||
\quad \infer{Q(23)}{}
|
||||
\quad \infer{Q(42)}{}$$
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ $$\infer{\Gamma \vdash \top}{}
|
|||
\quad \infer{\Gamma \vdash \phi_1 \lor \phi_2}{
|
||||
\Gamma \vdash \phi_1
|
||||
}
|
||||
\quad \infer{\vdash \phi_1 \lor \phi_2}{
|
||||
\quad \infer{\Gamma \vdash \phi_1 \lor \phi_2}{
|
||||
\Gamma \vdash \phi_2
|
||||
}$$
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue