MessagesAndRefinement: add2_once_refines_simple_addN_once

This commit is contained in:
Adam Chlipala 2016-05-07 18:50:04 -04:00
parent d18dc3044e
commit 86516a58ec

View file

@ -3,42 +3,79 @@
* Author: Adam Chlipala
* License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *)
Require Import Frap.
Require Import Frap Eqdep FunctionalExtensionality.
Set Implicit Arguments.
Set Asymmetric Patterns.
Ltac invert H := (Frap.invert H || (inversion H; clear H));
repeat match goal with
| [ x : _ |- _ ] => subst x
| [ H : existT _ _ _ = existT _ _ _ |- _ ] => apply inj_pair2 in H; try subst
end.
Notation channel := nat.
Notation channel := nat (only parsing).
Inductive proc :=
| NewChannel (k : channel -> proc)
| NewChannel (notThese : list channel) (k : channel -> proc)
| Send (ch : channel) {A : Set} (v : A) (k : proc)
| Recv (ch : channel) {A : Set} (k : A -> proc)
| Par (pr1 pr2 : proc)
| Dup (pr : proc).
| Dup (pr : proc)
| Done
| Fail.
Notation pid := nat.
Notation pid := nat (only parsing).
Notation procs := (fmap pid proc).
Notation channels := (set channel).
Inductive step : channels * procs -> channels * procs -> Prop :=
Notation "'New' ls ( x ) ; k" := (NewChannel ls (fun x => k)) (right associativity, at level 45, ls at level 0).
Notation "!! ch ( v ) ; k" := (Send ch v k) (right associativity, at level 45, ch at level 0).
Notation "?? ch ( x : T ) ; k" := (Recv ch (fun x : T => k)) (right associativity, at level 45, ch at level 0, x at level 0).
Infix "||" := Par.
(** * Example *)
Definition simple_addN (k : nat) (input output : channel) : proc :=
Dup (??input(n : nat);
!!output(n + k);
Done).
Definition add2 (input output : channel) : proc :=
New[input;output](intermediate);
(simple_addN 1 input intermediate
|| simple_addN 1 intermediate output).
Definition tester (k n : nat) (input output : channel) : proc :=
!!input(n);
??output(n' : nat);
if n' ==n (n + k) then
Done
else
Fail.
(** * Flat semantics *)
Inductive step : procs -> procs -> Prop :=
| StepNew : forall chs ps i k ch,
ps $? i = Some (NewChannel k)
-> ~ch \in chs
-> step (chs, ps) (chs \cup {ch}, ps $+ (i, k ch))
| StepSendRecv : forall chs ps i ch {A : Set} (v : A) k1 j k2,
ps $? i = Some (NewChannel chs k)
-> ~List.In ch chs
-> step ps (ps $+ (i, k ch))
| StepSendRecv : forall ps i ch {A : Set} (v : A) k1 j k2,
ps $? i = Some (Send ch v k1)
-> ps $? j = Some (Recv ch k2)
-> step (chs, ps) (chs, ps $+ (i, k1) $+ (j, k2 v))
| StepPar : forall chs ps i pr1 pr2 j,
-> step ps (ps $+ (i, k1) $+ (j, k2 v))
| StepPar : forall ps i pr1 pr2 j,
ps $? i = Some (Par pr1 pr2)
-> ps $? j = None
-> step (chs, ps) (chs, ps $+ (i, pr1) $+ (j, pr2))
| StepDup : forall chs ps i pr j,
-> step ps (ps $+ (i, pr1) $+ (j, pr2))
| StepDup : forall ps i pr j,
ps $? i = Some (Dup pr)
-> ps $? j = None
-> step (chs, ps) (chs, ps $+ (i, Dup pr) $+ (j, pr)).
-> step ps (ps $+ (i, Dup pr) $+ (j, pr)).
(** * Labeled semantics *)
@ -70,9 +107,13 @@ Inductive lstep : proc -> label -> proc -> Prop :=
(k v)
| LStepDup : forall pr,
lstep (Dup pr) Silent (Par (Dup pr) pr)
| LStepNew : forall k l k',
(forall ch, lstep (k ch) l (k' ch))
-> lstep (NewChannel k) l (NewChannel k')
| LStepNewInside : forall chs k l k',
(forall ch, ~List.In ch chs -> lstep (k ch) l (k' ch))
-> lstep (NewChannel chs k) l (NewChannel chs k')
| LStepNewUp1 : forall chs k pr,
lstep (Par (NewChannel chs k) pr) Silent (NewChannel chs (fun ch => Par (k ch) pr))
| LStepNewUp2 : forall chs k pr,
lstep (Par pr (NewChannel chs k)) Silent (NewChannel chs (fun ch => Par pr (k ch)))
| LStepPar1 : forall pr1 pr2 l pr1',
lstep pr1 l pr1'
-> lstep (Par pr1 pr2) l (Par pr1' pr2)
@ -102,3 +143,221 @@ Inductive couldGenerate : proc -> list action -> Prop :=
Definition refines (pr1 pr2 : proc) :=
forall tr, couldGenerate pr1 tr -> couldGenerate pr2 tr.
Infix "<|" := refines (no associativity, at level 70).
(** * Simulation: a proof method *)
Definition lstepSilent (pr1 pr2 : proc) := lstep pr1 Silent pr2.
Hint Constructors couldGenerate.
Lemma lstepSilent_couldGenerate : forall pr1 pr2,
lstepSilent^* pr1 pr2
-> forall tr, couldGenerate pr2 tr
-> couldGenerate pr1 tr.
Proof.
induct 1; eauto.
Qed.
Hint Resolve lstepSilent_couldGenerate.
Lemma simulates' : forall (R : proc -> proc -> Prop),
(forall pr1 pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> forall pr1', lstepSilent pr1 pr1'
-> exists pr2', lstepSilent^* pr2 pr2'
/\ R pr1' pr2')
-> (forall pr1 pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> forall a pr1', lstep pr1 (Action a) pr1'
-> exists pr2' pr2'', lstepSilent^* pr2 pr2'
/\ lstep pr2' (Action a) pr2''
/\ R pr1' pr2'')
-> forall pr1 tr, couldGenerate pr1 tr
-> forall pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> couldGenerate pr2 tr.
Proof.
unfold refines.
induct 3; simplify; auto.
eapply H in H1; eauto.
first_order.
eauto.
eapply H0 in H1; eauto.
first_order.
eauto.
Qed.
Theorem simulates : forall (R : proc -> proc -> Prop),
(forall pr1 pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> forall pr1', lstepSilent pr1 pr1'
-> exists pr2', lstepSilent^* pr2 pr2'
/\ R pr1' pr2')
-> (forall pr1 pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> forall a pr1', lstep pr1 (Action a) pr1'
-> exists pr2' pr2'', lstepSilent^* pr2 pr2'
/\ lstep pr2' (Action a) pr2''
/\ R pr1' pr2'')
-> forall pr1 pr2, R pr1 pr2
-> pr1 <| pr2.
Proof.
unfold refines; eauto using simulates'.
Qed.
Definition simple_addN_once (k : nat) (input output : channel) : proc :=
??input(n : nat);
!!output(n + k);
Done.
Definition add2_once (input output : channel) : proc :=
New[input;output](intermediate);
(simple_addN_once 1 input intermediate
|| simple_addN_once 1 intermediate output).
Inductive R_add2 (input output : channel) : proc -> proc -> Prop :=
| Initial : forall k,
(forall ch, ~List.In ch [input; output]
-> k ch = ??input(n : nat); !!ch(n + 1); Done || simple_addN_once 1 ch output)
-> R_add2 input output
(NewChannel [input;output] k)
(simple_addN_once 2 input output)
| GotInput : forall n k,
(forall ch, ~List.In ch [input; output]
-> k ch = !!ch(n + 1); Done || simple_addN_once 1 ch output)
-> R_add2 input output
(NewChannel [input;output] k)
(!!output(n + 2); Done)
| HandedOff : forall n k,
(forall ch, ~List.In ch [input; output]
-> k ch = Done || (!!output(n + 2); Done))
-> R_add2 input output
(NewChannel [input;output] k)
(!!output(n + 2); Done)
| Finished : forall k,
(forall ch, ~List.In ch [input; output]
-> k ch = Done || Done)
-> R_add2 input output
(NewChannel [input;output] k)
Done.
Hint Constructors R_add2.
Lemma invert_Recv : forall ch (A : Set) (k : A -> proc) (x : A) pr,
lstep (Recv ch k) (Input {| Channel := ch; Value := x |}) pr
-> pr = k x.
Proof.
invert 1; auto.
Qed.
Ltac inverter :=
repeat match goal with
| [ H : lstep _ _ _ |- _ ] => (apply invert_Recv in H; try subst) || invert H
| [ H : lstepSilent _ _ |- _ ] => invert H
(*| [ H : forall ch : channel, lstep _ _ _ |- _ ] =>
eapply anystep_somestep with (1 := 0); [ apply H | clear H; simplify ]*)
end.
Hint Constructors lstep.
Definition In' := In.
Theorem In'_eq : In' = In.
Proof.
auto.
Qed.
Opaque In.
Ltac instWith n :=
match goal with
| [ H0 : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> _, H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ _ _ |- _ ] =>
let Hni := fresh "Hni" in let Hni' := fresh "Hni'" in
assert (Hni : ~In n ls) by (rewrite <- In'_eq in *; simplify; propositional; linear_arithmetic);
assert (Hni' : ~In (S n) ls) by (rewrite <- In'_eq in *; simplify; propositional; linear_arithmetic);
generalize (H0 _ Hni), (H _ Hni), (H0 _ Hni'), (H _ Hni'); simplify;
repeat match goal with
| [ H : ?k _ = _, H' : lstep (?k _) _ _ |- _ ] => rewrite H in H'
end; inverter; try linear_arithmetic
| [ H0 : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> _, H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ _ _ |- _ ] =>
let Hni := fresh "Hni" in
assert (Hni : ~In n ls) by (rewrite <- In'_eq in *; simplify; propositional; linear_arithmetic);
generalize (H0 _ Hni), (H _ Hni); simplify;
repeat match goal with
| [ H : ?k _ = _, H' : lstep (?k _) _ _ |- _ ] => rewrite H in H'
end; inverter
| [ H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ _ _ |- _ ] =>
let Hni := fresh "Hni" in
assert (Hni : ~In n ls) by (rewrite <- In'_eq in *; simplify; propositional; linear_arithmetic);
generalize (H _ Hni); simplify; inverter
end.
Ltac impossible :=
match goal with
| [ H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> _ |- _ ] =>
instWith (S (fold_left max ls 0))
end.
Ltac inferAction :=
match goal with
| [ H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ (Action ?a) _ |- _ ] =>
let av := fresh "av" in
evar (av : action);
let av' := eval unfold av in av in
clear av;
assert (a = av'); [ instWith (S (fold_left max ls 0));
match goal with
| [ |- ?X = _ ] => instantiate (1 := X)
end; reflexivity | subst ]
end.
Ltac inferProc :=
match goal with
| [ H : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ _ (?k' ch) |- _ ] =>
let k'' := fresh "k''" in
evar (k'' : channel -> proc);
let k''' := eval unfold k'' in k'' in
clear k'';
assert (forall ch, ~In ch ls
-> k' ch = k''' ch);
[ intro ch; simplify; instWith ch; simplify; inverter;
(reflexivity || rewrite <- In'_eq in *; simplify; propositional) | subst; simplify ]
end.
Ltac inferRead :=
match goal with
| [ _ : forall ch, ~In ch ?ls -> lstep _ (Action ?a) _ |- _ ] =>
let ch0 := fresh "ch0" in
evar (ch0 : channel);
let ch0' := eval unfold ch0 in ch0 in
clear ch0;
assert (exists v : nat, a = Input {| Channel := ch0'; Value := v |})
by (instWith (S (fold_left max ls 0)); eauto);
first_order; subst
end.
Theorem add2_once_refines_simple_addN_once : forall input output,
add2_once input output <| simple_addN_once 2 input output.
Proof.
simplify.
apply simulates with (R := R_add2 input output).
invert 1; simplify; inverter.
impossible.
inferProc.
replace (n + 1 + 1) with (n + 2) in * by linear_arithmetic.
eauto.
impossible.
impossible.
invert 1; simplify; inverter.
inferRead.
inferProc.
unfold simple_addN_once; eauto 10.
impossible.
inferAction.
inferProc.
eauto 10.
impossible.
unfold add2_once; eauto.
Qed.