(** Formal Reasoning About Programs * Chapter 7: Abstract Interpretation and Dataflow Analysis * Author: Adam Chlipala * License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *) Require Import Frap Imp. Set Implicit Arguments. Module SimpleAbstractInterpreter. Record absint := { Typeof :> Set; (* This [:>] notation lets us treat any [absint] as its [Typeof], * automatically. *) Top : Typeof; (* A lattice element that describes all concrete values *) Constant : nat -> Typeof; (* Most accurate representation of a constant *) Add : Typeof -> Typeof -> Typeof; Subtract : Typeof -> Typeof -> Typeof; Multiply : Typeof -> Typeof -> Typeof; (* Abstract versions of arithmetic operators *) Join : Typeof -> Typeof -> Typeof; (* Least upper bound of two elements *) Represents : nat -> Typeof -> Prop (* Which lattice elements represent which numbers? *) }. Record absint_sound (a : absint) : Prop := { TopSound : forall n, a.(Represents) n a.(Top); ConstSound : forall n, a.(Represents) n (a.(Constant) n); AddSound : forall n na m ma, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) m ma -> a.(Represents) (n + m) (a.(Add) na ma); SubtractSound: forall n na m ma, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) m ma -> a.(Represents) (n - m) (a.(Subtract) na ma); MultiplySound : forall n na m ma, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) m ma -> a.(Represents) (n * m) (a.(Multiply) na ma); AddMonotone : forall na na' ma ma', (forall n, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) n na') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n ma -> a.(Represents) n ma') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n (a.(Add) na ma) -> a.(Represents) n (a.(Add) na' ma')); SubtractMonotone : forall na na' ma ma', (forall n, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) n na') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n ma -> a.(Represents) n ma') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n (a.(Subtract) na ma) -> a.(Represents) n (a.(Subtract) na' ma')); MultiplyMonotone : forall na na' ma ma', (forall n, a.(Represents) n na -> a.(Represents) n na') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n ma -> a.(Represents) n ma') -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n (a.(Multiply) na ma) -> a.(Represents) n (a.(Multiply) na' ma')); JoinSoundLeft : forall x y n, a.(Represents) n x -> a.(Represents) n (a.(Join) x y); JoinSoundRight : forall x y n, a.(Represents) n y -> a.(Represents) n (a.(Join) x y) }. Hint Resolve TopSound ConstSound AddSound SubtractSound MultiplySound AddMonotone SubtractMonotone MultiplyMonotone JoinSoundLeft JoinSoundRight. Definition astate (a : absint) := fmap var a. Definition astates (a : absint) := fmap cmd (astate a). Fixpoint absint_interp (e : arith) a (s : astate a) : a := match e with | Const n => a.(Constant) n | Var x => match s $? x with | None => a.(Top) | Some xa => xa end | Plus e1 e2 => a.(Add) (absint_interp e1 s) (absint_interp e2 s) | Minus e1 e2 => a.(Subtract) (absint_interp e1 s) (absint_interp e2 s) | Times e1 e2 => a.(Multiply) (absint_interp e1 s) (absint_interp e2 s) end. Fixpoint absint_step a (s : astate a) (c : cmd) (wrap : cmd -> cmd) : option (astates a) := match c with | Skip => None | Assign x e => Some ($0 $+ (wrap Skip, s $+ (x, absint_interp e s))) | Sequence c1 c2 => match absint_step s c1 (fun c => wrap (Sequence c c2)) with | None => Some ($0 $+ (wrap c2, s)) | v => v end | If e then_ else_ => Some ($0 $+ (wrap then_, s) $+ (wrap else_, s)) | While e body => Some ($0 $+ (wrap Skip, s) $+ (wrap (Sequence body (While e body)), s)) end. Definition compatible1 a (s : astate a) (v : valuation) : Prop := forall x xa, s $? x = Some xa -> exists n, v $? x = Some n /\ a.(Represents) n xa. Theorem absint_interp_ok : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s : astate a) v e, compatible1 s v -> a.(Represents) (interp e v) (absint_interp e s). Proof. induct e; simplify; eauto. cases (s $? x); auto. unfold compatible1 in H0. apply H0 in Heq. invert Heq. propositional. rewrite H2. assumption. Qed. Lemma compatible1_add : forall a (s : astate a) v x na n, compatible1 s v -> a.(Represents) n na -> compatible1 (s $+ (x, na)) (v $+ (x, n)). Proof. unfold compatible1; simplify. cases (x ==v x0); simplify; eauto. invert H1; eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve compatible1_add absint_interp_ok. Lemma command_equal : forall c1 c2 : cmd, sumbool (c1 = c2) (c1 <> c2). Proof. repeat decide equality. Qed. Theorem absint_step_ok : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s : astate a) v, compatible1 s v -> forall c v' c', step (v, c) (v', c') -> forall wrap, exists ss s', absint_step s c wrap = Some ss /\ ss $? wrap c' = Some s' /\ compatible1 s' v'. Proof. induct 2; simplify. do 2 eexists; propositional. simplify; equality. eauto. eapply IHstep in H0; auto. invert H0. invert H2. propositional. rewrite H2. eauto. do 2 eexists; propositional. simplify; equality. assumption. do 2 eexists; propositional. cases (command_equal (wrap c') (wrap else_)). simplify; equality. simplify; equality. assumption. do 2 eexists; propositional. simplify; equality. assumption. do 2 eexists; propositional. simplify; equality. assumption. do 2 eexists; propositional. cases (command_equal (wrap Skip) (wrap (body;; while e loop body done))). simplify; equality. simplify; equality. assumption. Qed. Inductive abs_step a : astate a * cmd -> astate a * cmd -> Prop := | AbsStep : forall s c ss s' c', absint_step s c (fun x => x) = Some ss -> ss $? c' = Some s' -> abs_step (s, c) (s', c'). Hint Constructors abs_step. Definition absint_trsys a (c : cmd) := {| Initial := {($0, c)}; Step := abs_step (a := a) |}. Inductive Rabsint a : valuation * cmd -> astate a * cmd -> Prop := | RAbsint : forall v s c, compatible1 s v -> Rabsint (v, c) (s, c). Hint Constructors abs_step Rabsint. Theorem absint_simulates : forall a v c, absint_sound a -> simulates (Rabsint (a := a)) (trsys_of v c) (absint_trsys a c). Proof. simplify. constructor; simplify. exists ($0, c); propositional. subst. constructor. unfold compatible1. simplify. equality. invert H0. cases st1'. eapply absint_step_ok in H1; eauto. invert H1. invert H0. propositional. eauto. Qed. Definition merge_astate a : astate a -> astate a -> astate a := merge (fun x y => match x with | None => None | Some x' => match y with | None => None | Some y' => Some (a.(Join) x' y') end end). Definition merge_astates a : astates a -> astates a -> astates a := merge (fun x y => match x with | None => y | Some x' => match y with | None => Some x' | Some y' => Some (merge_astate x' y') end end). Inductive oneStepClosure a : astates a -> astates a -> Prop := | OscNil : oneStepClosure $0 $0 | OscCons : forall ss c s ss', oneStepClosure ss ss' -> oneStepClosure (ss $+ (c, s)) (match absint_step s c (fun x => x) with | None => ss' | Some ss'' => merge_astates ss'' ss' end). Definition subsumed a (s1 s2 : astate a) := forall x, match s1 $? x with | None => s2 $? x = None | Some xa1 => forall xa2, s2 $? x = Some xa2 -> forall n, a.(Represents) n xa1 -> a.(Represents) n xa2 end. Theorem subsumed_refl : forall a (s : astate a), subsumed s s. Proof. unfold subsumed; simplify. cases (s $? x); equality. Qed. Hint Resolve subsumed_refl. Definition subsumeds a (ss1 ss2 : astates a) := forall c s1, ss1 $? c = Some s1 -> exists s2, ss2 $? c = Some s2 /\ subsumed s1 s2. Theorem subsumeds_refl : forall a (ss : astates a), subsumeds ss ss. Proof. unfold subsumeds; simplify; eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve subsumeds_refl. Inductive interpret a : astates a -> astates a -> astates a -> Prop := | InterpretDone : forall ss1 any ss2, oneStepClosure ss1 ss2 -> subsumeds ss2 ss1 -> interpret ss1 any ss1 | InterpretStep : forall ss worklist ss' ss'', oneStepClosure worklist ss' -> interpret (merge_astates ss ss') ss' ss'' -> interpret ss worklist ss''. Lemma oneStepClosure_sound : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall ss ss' : astates a, oneStepClosure ss ss' -> forall c s s' c', ss $? c = Some s -> abs_step (s, c) (s', c') -> exists s'', ss' $? c' = Some s'' /\ subsumed s' s''. Proof. induct 2; simplify. equality. cases (command_equal c c0); subst; simplify. invert H1. invert H2. rewrite H5. unfold merge_astates; simplify. rewrite H7. cases (ss' $? c'). eexists; propositional. unfold subsumed; simplify. unfold merge_astate; simplify. cases (s' $? x); try equality. cases (a0 $? x); simplify; try equality. invert H1; eauto. eauto. apply IHoneStepClosure in H2; auto. invert H2; propositional. cases (absint_step s c (fun x => x)); eauto. unfold merge_astates; simplify. rewrite H2. cases (a0 $? c'); eauto. eexists; propositional. unfold subsumed; simplify. unfold merge_astate; simplify. specialize (H4 x0). cases (s' $? x0). cases (a1 $? x0); try equality. cases (x $? x0); try equality. invert 1. eauto. rewrite H4. cases (a1 $? x0); equality. Qed. Lemma subsumed_add : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s1 s2 : astate a) x v1 v2, subsumed s1 s2 -> (forall n, a.(Represents) n v1 -> a.(Represents) n v2) -> subsumed (s1 $+ (x, v1)) (s2 $+ (x, v2)). Proof. unfold subsumed; simplify. cases (x ==v x0); subst; simplify; eauto. invert H2; eauto. specialize (H0 x0); eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve subsumed_add. Lemma subsumeds_add : forall a (ss1 ss2 : astates a) c s1 s2, subsumeds ss1 ss2 -> subsumed s1 s2 -> subsumeds (ss1 $+ (c, s1)) (ss2 $+ (c, s2)). Proof. unfold subsumeds; simplify. cases (command_equal c c0); subst; simplify; eauto. invert H1; eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve subsumeds_add. Lemma subsumed_use : forall a (s s' : astate a) x n t0 t, s $? x = Some t0 -> subsumed s s' -> s' $? x = Some t -> Represents a n t0 -> Represents a n t. Proof. unfold subsumed; simplify. specialize (H0 x). rewrite H in H0. eauto. Qed. Lemma subsumed_use_empty : forall a (s s' : astate a) x n t0 t, s $? x = None -> subsumed s s' -> s' $? x = Some t -> Represents a n t0 -> Represents a n t. Proof. unfold subsumed; simplify. specialize (H0 x). rewrite H in H0. equality. Qed. Hint Resolve subsumed_use subsumed_use_empty. Lemma absint_interp_monotone : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s : astate a) e s' n, a.(Represents) n (absint_interp e s) -> subsumed s s' -> a.(Represents) n (absint_interp e s'). Proof. induct e; simplify; eauto. cases (s' $? x); eauto. cases (s $? x); eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve absint_interp_monotone. Lemma absint_step_monotone_None : forall a (s : astate a) c wrap, absint_step s c wrap = None -> forall s' : astate a, absint_step s' c wrap = None. Proof. induct c; simplify; try equality. cases (absint_step s c1 (fun c => wrap (c;; c2))); equality. Qed. Lemma absint_step_monotone : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s : astate a) c wrap ss, absint_step s c wrap = Some ss -> forall s', subsumed s s' -> exists ss', absint_step s' c wrap = Some ss' /\ subsumeds ss ss'. Proof. induct c; simplify. equality. invert H0. eexists; propositional. eauto. apply subsumeds_add; eauto. cases (absint_step s c1 (fun c => wrap (c;; c2))). invert H0. eapply IHc1 in Heq; eauto. invert Heq; propositional. rewrite H2; eauto. invert H0. eapply absint_step_monotone_None in Heq; eauto. rewrite Heq; eauto. invert H0; eauto. invert H0; eauto. Qed. Lemma abs_step_monotone : forall a, absint_sound a -> forall (s : astate a) c s' c', abs_step (s, c) (s', c') -> forall s1, subsumed s s1 -> exists s1', abs_step (s1, c) (s1', c') /\ subsumed s' s1'. Proof. invert 2; simplify. eapply absint_step_monotone in H4; eauto. invert H4; propositional. apply H3 in H6. invert H6; propositional; eauto. Qed. Lemma subsumed_trans : forall a (s1 s2 s3 : astate a), subsumed s1 s2 -> subsumed s2 s3 -> subsumed s1 s3. Proof. unfold subsumed; simplify. specialize (H x); specialize (H0 x). cases (s1 $? x); simplify. cases (s2 $? x); eauto. cases (s2 $? x); eauto. equality. Qed. Lemma interpret_sound' : forall c a, absint_sound a -> forall ss worklist ss' : astates a, interpret ss worklist ss' -> ss $? c = Some $0 -> invariantFor (absint_trsys a c) (fun p => exists s, ss' $? snd p = Some s /\ subsumed (fst p) s). Proof. induct 2; simplify; subst. apply invariant_induction; simplify; propositional; subst; simplify; eauto. invert H3; propositional. cases s. cases s'. simplify. eapply abs_step_monotone in H4; eauto. invert H4; propositional. eapply oneStepClosure_sound in H4; eauto. invert H4; propositional. eapply H1 in H4. invert H4; propositional. eauto using subsumed_trans. apply IHinterpret. unfold merge_astates; simplify. rewrite H2. cases (ss' $? c); trivial. unfold merge_astate; simplify. f_equal. maps_equal. Qed. Theorem interpret_sound : forall c a (ss : astates a), absint_sound a -> interpret ($0 $+ (c, $0)) ($0 $+ (c, $0)) ss -> invariantFor (absint_trsys a c) (fun p => exists s, ss $? snd p = Some s /\ subsumed (fst p) s). Proof. simplify. eapply interpret_sound'; eauto. simplify; equality. Qed. (** * Example: even-odd analysis *) Inductive parity := Even | Odd | Either. Definition isEven (n : nat) := exists k, n = k * 2. Definition isOdd (n : nat) := exists k, n = k * 2 + 1. Theorem decide_parity : forall n, isEven n \/ isOdd n. Proof. induct n; simplify; propositional. left; exists 0; linear_arithmetic. invert H. right. exists x; linear_arithmetic. invert H. left. exists (x + 1); linear_arithmetic. Qed. Theorem notEven_odd : forall n, ~isEven n -> isOdd n. Proof. simplify. assert (isEven n \/ isOdd n). apply decide_parity. propositional. Qed. Theorem odd_notEven : forall n, isOdd n -> ~isEven n. Proof. propositional. invert H. invert H0. linear_arithmetic. Qed. Theorem isEven_0 : isEven 0. Proof. exists 0; linear_arithmetic. Qed. Theorem isEven_1 : ~isEven 1. Proof. propositional; invert H; linear_arithmetic. Qed. Theorem isEven_S_Even : forall n, isEven n -> ~isEven (S n). Proof. propositional; invert H; invert H0; linear_arithmetic. Qed. Theorem isEven_S_Odd : forall n, ~isEven n -> isEven (S n). Proof. propositional. apply notEven_odd in H. invert H. exists (x + 1); linear_arithmetic. Qed. Hint Resolve isEven_0 isEven_1 isEven_S_Even isEven_S_Odd. Definition parity_flip (p : parity) := match p with | Even => Odd | Odd => Even | Either => Either end. Fixpoint parity_const (n : nat) := match n with | O => Even | S n' => parity_flip (parity_const n') end. Definition parity_add (x y : parity) := match x, y with | Even, Even => Even | Odd, Odd => Even | Even, Odd => Odd | Odd, Even => Odd | _, _ => Either end. Definition parity_subtract (x y : parity) := match x, y with | Even, Even => Even | _, _ => Either end. (* Note subtleties with [Either]s above, to deal with underflow at zero! *) Definition parity_multiply (x y : parity) := match x, y with | Even, Even => Even | Odd, Odd => Odd | Even, Odd => Even | Odd, Even => Even | _, _ => Either end. Definition parity_join (x y : parity) := match x, y with | Even, Even => Even | Odd, Odd => Odd | _, _ => Either end. Inductive parity_rep : nat -> parity -> Prop := | PrEven : forall n, isEven n -> parity_rep n Even | PrOdd : forall n, ~isEven n -> parity_rep n Odd | PrEither : forall n, parity_rep n Either. Hint Constructors parity_rep. Definition parity_absint := {| Top := Either; Constant := parity_const; Add := parity_add; Subtract := parity_subtract; Multiply := parity_multiply; Join := parity_join; Represents := parity_rep |}. Lemma parity_const_sound : forall n, parity_rep n (parity_const n). Proof. induct n; simplify; eauto. cases (parity_const n); simplify; eauto. invert IHn; eauto. invert IHn; eauto. Qed. Hint Resolve parity_const_sound. Lemma even_not_odd : (forall n, parity_rep n Even -> parity_rep n Odd) -> False. Proof. simplify. specialize (H 0). assert (parity_rep 0 Even) by eauto. apply H in H0. invert H0. apply H1. auto. Qed. Lemma odd_not_even : (forall n, parity_rep n Odd -> parity_rep n Even) -> False. Proof. simplify. specialize (H 1). assert (parity_rep 1 Odd) by eauto. apply H in H0. invert H0. invert H1. linear_arithmetic. Qed. Hint Resolve even_not_odd odd_not_even. Theorem parity_sound : absint_sound parity_absint. Proof. constructor; simplify; eauto; repeat match goal with | [ H : parity_rep _ _ |- _ ] => invert H | [ H : ~isEven _ |- _ ] => apply notEven_odd in H; invert H | [ H : isEven _ |- _ ] => invert H | [ p : parity |- _ ] => cases p; simplify; try equality end; try solve [ exfalso; eauto ]; try (constructor; try apply odd_notEven). exists (x0 + x); ring. exists (x0 + x); ring. exists (x0 + x); ring. exists (x0 + x + 1); ring. exists (x - x0); linear_arithmetic. exists (x * x0 * 2); ring. exists ((x * 2 + 1) * x0); ring. exists ((x * 2 + 1) * x0); ring. exists (2 * x * x0 + x + x0); ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x; ring. exists x0; ring. exists x0; ring. Qed. Definition loopy := "n" <- 100;; "a" <- 0;; while "n" loop "a" <- "a" + "n";; "n" <- "n" - 2 done. Hint Rewrite merge_empty1 merge_empty2 using solve [ eauto 1 ]. Hint Rewrite merge_empty1_alt merge_empty2_alt using congruence. Lemma merge_astates_fok : forall x : option (astate parity_absint), match x with Some x' => Some x' | None => None end = x. Proof. simplify; cases x; equality. Qed. Lemma merge_astates_fok2 : forall x (y : option (astate parity_absint)), match y with | Some y' => Some (merge_astate x y') | None => Some x end = None -> False. Proof. simplify; cases y; equality. Qed. Hint Resolve merge_astates_fok merge_astates_fok2. Hint Rewrite merge_add1 using solve [ eauto | unfold Sets.In; simplify; equality ]. Hint Rewrite merge_add1_alt using solve [ congruence | unfold Sets.In; simplify; equality ]. Ltac inList x xs := match xs with | (x, _) => constr:true | (_, ?xs') => inList x xs' | _ => constr:false end. Ltac maybe_simplify_map m found kont := match m with | @empty ?A ?B => kont (@empty A B) | ?m' $+ (?k, ?v) => let iL := inList k found in match iL with | true => maybe_simplify_map m' found kont | false => maybe_simplify_map m' (k, found) ltac:(fun m' => kont (m' $+ (k, v))) end end. Ltac simplify_map' m found kont := match m with | ?m' $+ (?k, ?v) => let iL := inList k found in match iL with | true => maybe_simplify_map m' found kont | false => simplify_map' m' (k, found) ltac:(fun m' => kont (m' $+ (k, v))) end end. Ltac simplify_map := match goal with | [ |- context[@add ?A ?B ?m ?k ?v] ] => simplify_map' (m $+ (k, v)) tt ltac:(fun m' => replace (@add A B m k v) with m' by maps_equal) end. Definition easy := "n" <- 10;; while "n" loop "n" <- "n" - 2 done. Ltac interpret1 := eapply InterpretStep; [ repeat (apply OscNil || apply OscCons) | unfold merge_astates, merge_astate; simplify; repeat simplify_map ]. Lemma subsumeds_empty : forall a (ss : astates a), subsumeds $0 ss. Proof. unfold subsumeds; simplify. equality. Qed. Lemma subsumeds_add_left : forall a (ss1 ss2 : astates a) c s, ss2 $? c = Some s -> subsumeds ss1 ss2 -> subsumeds (ss1 $+ (c, s)) ss2. Proof. unfold subsumeds; simplify. cases (command_equal c c0); subst; simplify; eauto. invert H1; eauto. Qed. Ltac interpret_done := eapply InterpretDone; [ repeat (apply OscNil || apply OscCons) | unfold merge_astates, merge_astate; simplify; repeat simplify_map; repeat (apply subsumeds_add_left || apply subsumeds_empty); (simplify; equality) ]. Lemma final_even : forall (s s' : astate parity_absint) v x, compatible1 s v -> subsumed s s' -> s' $? x = Some Even -> exists n, v $? x = Some n /\ isEven n. Proof. unfold compatible1, subsumed; simplify. specialize (H x); specialize (H0 x). cases (s $? x); simplify. rewrite Heq in *. assert (Some t = Some t) by equality. apply H in H2. first_order. eapply H0 in H1. invert H1. eauto. assumption. rewrite Heq in *. equality. Qed. Theorem easy_even : forall v n, isEven n -> invariantFor (trsys_of v easy) (fun p => snd p = Skip -> exists n, fst p $? "n" = Some n /\ isEven n). Proof. simplify. eapply invariant_weaken. unfold easy. eapply invariant_simulates. apply absint_simulates with (a := parity_absint). apply parity_sound. apply interpret_sound. apply parity_sound. interpret1. interpret1. interpret1. interpret1. interpret1. interpret_done. invert 1. first_order. invert H1; simplify. invert H2. eapply final_even; eauto; simplify; equality. Qed. End SimpleAbstractInterpreter.